Body
The old timers liked radium because it was very powerful like in the horse
power range. and with a half life of 1600 years you could pass it on to
your decedent's. But it did have gamma radiation . put in a vacuum was one
of the the first uses call a cold cathode worked like a hot cathode
.cascading three together and you got some power but the vacuum would break
down due to the release of radon that came from the radium .so you needed
to reastablish it every three days .but its lighter than air and go up to
be with all the other radon in the sky.then there was the work of Paul
Brown a paint can size unit putting out 50,000 Watts .same vacuum problems
.but much more energy .that x-ray gamma ray problem could be shielded with
lead glass with a coating of zinc sulfate that would glow from the energy
.real time see the energy .at work .
On Jun 16, 2018 12:39 PM, "Darrell Evans [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Werner my friend, you said;p "My power bill is around $50, $32 of it is
> for the meters only."
>
> This is what I had to pay a month, more, but never less... and I was
> living in a 50' foot trailer myself and no one else, using an electric
> stove and central air electric heating./..
>
> Makes a man want to pull his hair... All Idaho Power is, is a big rip off
> corporation ..
> On Saturday, June 16, 2018, 6:55:45 AM PDT, werner held
> [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> OK WARREN the setup I have now is a little over 1kw solar panels&8
> batterys . My power bill is around $50 $32 of it is for the meters only
> no use at all !!! Right now I am working on a SELF RUNNING GENERATOR all
> that's left to do is make the BRUSH HOLDER ,been working on it for 5years I
> hav'nt said anything about it because it is VERY SIMPLE NO ELECTRONICS &IT
> is not done when I get the results & some numbers THEN I WILL GIVE THE INFO
> .
>
>
> On Saturday, June 16, 2018 2:52 AM, "Warren Keillor
> [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Werner
> Don't despair. Think of your individual energy problems, and solve those.
> By being successful on a small scale, it can show others how it can be
> done.
> Thorium is available in small quantities.
> A back yard nuclear generator may not be desireable if your nut case
> neighbour is building one, considering the mess he made building his garden
> shed.
> Cutting down on simply wasting the energy one consumes, makes the job
> easier.
> The end solution may be very simple, and small.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:07 PM, werner held [email protected]
> [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> EXCELLENT INFORMATION now the problem is what can be done ???As far as I
> can see there is little to nothing can be done they have us by our ?!?!?!?!
> . There are too many reactors & high end people to do anything except
> waste time complaining to politicians WHO WON'T DO A THING EXCEPT PROMISE
> HOT AIR &DO 00000 !
>
>
> On Friday, June 15, 2018 7:19 AM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nuclear generators are used for generating weapons grade plutonium 239,
> nothing more, we have been led down the proverbial Garden Path my
> friends...
>
> Virtually any combination of plutonium isotopes -- the different forms of
> an element having different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei -- can be
> used to make a nuclear weapon. Not all combinations, however, are equally
> convenient or efficient.
>
> The most common isotope, *plutonium-239*, is produced when the most
> common isotope of uranium, *uranium-238*, absorbs a neutron and then
> quickly decays to plutonium. It is this plutonium isotope that is most
> useful in making nuclear weapons, and it is produced in varying quantities
> in virtually all operating nuclear reactors. As fuel in a reactor is
> exposed to longer and longer periods of neutron irradiation, higher
> isotopes of plutonium build up as some of the plutonium absorbs additional
> neutrons, creating *plutonium-240*, *plutonium-241*, and so on.
> *Plutonium-238* also builds up from a chain of neutron absorptions and
> radioactive decays starting from *uranium-235*.
>
> Source:http://www.ccnr.org/plute.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>