Re: [EVGRAY] charging a coil like a cap

Database ID: 108119
2018-05-27T11:52:28-07:00
onielsen2000 <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Hi Karl,

At 73V across the coil added to the 5V supply voltage minus the diode forward conduction drop of around .7V the transistor CE probably breaks down if NE-3055 is the same as 2N3055. This transistor has a CE breakdown voltage with no base current of 60V according to the datasheet: http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/2N3055-D.PDF http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/2N3055-D.PDF.

This simple inverter (flyback converter) is basically a constant current generator. The output voltage is limited by the breakdown voltage of the transistor and the parasitic capacitance of the coil. There is nothing preventing the circuit from overcharging the battery.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <kwagnert@...> wrote :

 

 This is the way the circuit should be for pure back "EMF only" charging. This is what I use to charge all my AA, AAA and 9 volt batteries. No forward DC pulse with current, as in Rene's circuit. I need a large Toroidal Ferrite core to try this on large 6 or 12 VDC flooded batteries. Haven't tried that yet. But for small batteries, this has worked perfectly, batteries remain cold, and brings back almost all dead alcalines, Ni-Mh and NiCads. It's basically a joule thief but instead of taking the output from collector and emitter, as it's usually done to light LEDs, I take the output from the high spike collapsing coil.


 The input power supply is a 5VDC wall power supply. The measured output voltage  across the coil is around  73 VDC, measured without charging  battery and from collector to anode of diode and a temporary cap so it can be measured correctly due to high frequency. Frequency varies from 15 Khz to around 150 Khz  or more, depending on the bias. Transistor is a standard NE-3055


 On May 27, 2018, at 10:00 AM, "konehead@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:   
 Hi Mick
 I think I can help since I made quite a few rene chargers....
 The circuit first sends an 18VDC to 22VDC charge through the battery...call this a forward-charge....it does this via a self-oscillating transistor pulsing in the DC charge, this charge is not from a cap-discharge , but simply a rectified to DC charge from the power-supply such as a transformer 120VAC to 20VAC, then rectified (what I did)
 So think of this primary charge to 12V battery simply a transformer 120VAC to 20VAC, rectify it, and pulse it into battery....This is the "first stage" of a rene charger....
 Now AFTER this pulsing happens, and after each pulse, there is a backemf spike that gets recovered and also shoves itself into the battery that Rene calls a "RE-backemf charge" so for every pulse that happens there are two that charge the battery, one "forward" then one the backspike coming off  of the pulsing too...
 

 To ne I think the Bedini wheel charge is superior, since it is a PURE backemf/recoil/flyback charge going into lead acid batteries...no "forward" conventional pulse through the battery first as in a rene charger...
 

 Perhaps with a rene charger you can find a very particular charging cycle for particular batteries in how far to deplete until charge cycle, and how high to charge during charge cycle where a rene charger will work overunity via comparison of watts to charge over time  vs watts to run load over time...
 

 So, I would say  Bedini wheel is superior especially from the very believable reports Warren did of charging every battery from just about everyone in his marina one winter....he ran his bedini wheel on a small 7AH 12V battery (4AH?) that he only needed to charge back up once a week and this took only a couple hours,  and during that week, he managed to charge up many big marine batteries (that all do serious work in people's boats)...it seems to be way overunity, and very practical for of overunity too.
 Warren also reported that his marina-friends would keep bringing the batteries back after running them down and they charged up better than they had ever seen before....
 ciao
 Kone

References

<[email protected]>
<CA+uJ=ncRxLmHuHzC-s=_FWP7gGmF7xkq7PJSwVssCO0ydapBig@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 63648 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2018 18:52:32 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.198.29.79) by m13.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2018 18:52:32 -0000
X-Received (qmail 10818 invoked from network); 27 May 2018 18:52:32 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.100.120) by mtaq6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2018 18:52:32 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of yahoogroups.com designates 98.137.71.158 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG NQlXNXwWLDsrjqVPYf0qmrz0_RvAVKE3xm7FQQ7Xait0Ub6t 1tWD67SU61fScthqZ4yjE2dn7vYMXwcCG.9hDFNKSrVvLAj35i_gh7h6qAyA QrBiZbZUv0rSzqeCSpAZ1n9Hmk32BBIF0MRnSjR_UE51OWr_eHQJNKjJbBam ObVMruAvE6TY8nxP87yRI1Aj8X9B9uh3GDwD.S9QHJH_273MbWC5y8d4oTEC F3UCUzmc3VuOR8SOcRGaUAZ9nve9s_Kq.WGlSupOK0sS6poSA1pysF4ubbC_ JAaXHVOP2cvtnf78j1hqt5gFwBuxvU6kq_jjIIJoStTZ99n_z6qS4vPdWUVe 2VfJ8efIkxFTx4f5QXXIIxkKcSUdiFJF2GkX7hzUGgyplyWoJShsCLP3meVU QR2irYfpxQWK_XwKOVTStq8JqlC2khQKnpBeAQl2wAvpWMhLcqdDGNgmjofv Pj.7EOKKO9q.bLHufpyEpuqchgrp70jBxPwIwZEzKeSS_MRUezjILODFR1x7 8JuJ1IwoRuAzAV47jktms9kiKh0zjdzxAme9bFdh5CUmKYPWIFrbfA5uveVN LJq2LtyZMgOuxR3Pu7_Jo7erG0tNTy2CDCE4GbYK5EpKgX5iFEAK.wrJjrYd MK2PbiA1DoR84NakefKgOoJM0BEsMXptzpzcIpYka.mNdmVbqTTlaJqCe1db WVzIUxRpSKF9o1._yd.s0OUlaTIGaCYNRDzMdSWruCpBnmxGeL5FirTFOKY0 bSY38qSO8gmXj7wDR4f4tn8hgDNnz_1twTj5SkRX7amepDFnpGUzS1cdW57o aORpO5WMeK8ucTFWq3Qj8UGIZ4eMWlzBCwYh5kIN8jBDKQeGqxAlYyKdEefq YSyMlE3X0ibQqu5erKk2tGYUIyq4cdapvwin_26Ef2MFyhBuuxX4KLcU5pa1 N6MCGw1Vv42FAr1JtqMk4IUpPBy5ghPyqJLtZM1YYWbRXmTwVJfnTsjyJoHb 3Sp82KlIGi5Dk_AMWE2kYy7Bk1yjp_HCX1IT6SN2x2fh_707ZOWZH2m_iJ5b x5xEE_CBJZtXcUr5unpKp9UHMJUSok8a85H4FwKrQhiz1f5G2La1WdpUXiNf d8d46XtpCisjZdrIaTkpIQRMKTNoN0jkhMNRSBOFrOYhcfvpBZ02iPQrk598 O8w-
Authentication-Results mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=permerror (bad sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic326-32.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.71.158) by mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Sun, 27 May 2018 18:52:32 +0000
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic326.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 May 2018 18:52:29 +0000
Date Sun, 27 May 2018 11:52:28 -0700
X-Received from [127.0.0.1] by gapi17.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2018 18:52:27 -0000
To [email protected]
X-Original-Return-Path [email protected]
X-Original-From [email protected]
X-Mailer Yahoo Groups Message Poster
References <[email protected]> <CA+uJ=ncRxLmHuHzC-s=_FWP7gGmF7xkq7PJSwVssCO0ydapBig@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property groups-compose
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="9nlWnTS9ocNmxdhsK3FKVLWiM6a5jwOaA8HvrLV"
X-Originating-IP 85.81.4.255
X-Yahoo-Post-IP 85.81.4.255
Reply-To [email protected]
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] charging a coil like a cap
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=115023864; y=dxqSbjMyqZLZzA5hLiuVn24yzN9Mj-MRak0AQGQRGzprATqNWtuH
X-Yahoo-Profile onielsen2000
From [email protected]