Body
Hi Mick,
It's not necessary to get too bogged down in mathematics mate; the answer to free energy is not complicated, in fact it is very simple. You don't need a tutor LOL.
Tesla was going to raise the earth's potential to the potential that existed at the top of his tower. Then by driving an earth stake into the ground in the local area near the tower the earth stake's potential was much higher than the surrounding air above ground level. Electrical circuits could be used by this potential difference, and the energy was free.
The 50 ton of iron at the top of the tower was attracting the aether at that height and transferring the potential down through the water pipe deep into the earth. Aether prefers to run in ferrous metal rather than air or non ferrous metal. The water pipe did not come into contact with the earth until it reached it desired depth where it was earthed.
Not much maths needed to know and understand this; it's so simple and these towers were to be all over the earth allowing people to get free energy everywhere.
George
On Wednesday, 9 May 2018, 4:05:31 am AEST, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ole,
I think your right, even if the math theory was all right there practice and theory are different. At resonance many factors change dramatically. The flyback pulse is also different as this would be another frame of reference and at a certain nodal points may temporarily invert things like the controls of an aircraft inverting at mach speeds. Smith said we need 12 dimensional math to explain this reality, 8 more dimensions than the Kaluza & Klein manifolds which is already insanely complex math. I am not sure where Smith came up with the 12 dimensions as proving much of the KK 5 dimensional theory has taken modern computing hardware. Haha I think I need a tutor, but really getting too much into theoretical math can create infinite series thought holes.
As far as cohering the odd energies such as the return strike or neutral spike if one looks to nature one finds a plasma channel. It seems many of the so called free energy devices rely on spark gaps, therefore if we copy nature we can sum these energies.
I know Wilbur Smith was very interested in producing spinning fields from stationary circuits. I find this pathway of particular interest if you have additional information.
Have you built much of the hardware Smith described and experimented with it?
Thanks again for your wonderful detail!
On 5/7/2018 4:25 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
Hi Mick,
"Can you elaborate onthe E field and H0 Hd based on the capacitor to inductor size in a resonant circuit."
For high voltage keep the capacitance low and inductance high. For high current it is the opposite way around. At resonance the energy is oscillating between the capacitor and the inductor. By knowing the peak current of the inductor and its inductance the peak voltage of the capacitor can be calculated when also knowing its capacitance. That's because the same amount of energy oscillates between those two components.
Magnetic energy stored in an inductor of inductance L and current I:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_energy
Electric energy stored in a capacitor:
here C is the capacitance and V is the voltage. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor
Knowing the inductance L and the capacitance C makes it possible to calculate the current if knowing the voltage or vice versa. The voltage and current are the peak values which determine the total energy oscillating between the inductor and the capacitor. The two formulas use different letters (E and W) for energy. The terms after the last equal sign of both formulas are just put equal to each other to solve for the voltage or the current when knowing the rest of the parameters.
Resonance happens at the frequency where the impedance of the capacitor equals the impedance of the inductor if the resistance (damping) of the circuit isn't too big: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit. This link applies for an ideal circuit. For a more realistic circuit look up RLC circuit.
You may have to study this area yourself. Conventional theory doesn't give much clue as to how to get free energy though. For that purpose different disciplines will have to be studied. Some such areas would be nonlinear physics and wave theory. Those two disciplines allow mixing non-coherent waves into coherent waves. That's a clue to harvesting free energy.
Regards
Ole
---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
Ole,
Can you elaborate on the E field and H0 Hd based on the capacitor to inductor size in a resonant circuit.
In the case of a resonant field of an equal microhenries to microfarads and then a resonant circuit biased towards a larger capacitance or a larger inductor ratio?