Body
Hi Ole,
I think your right, even if the math theory was all right there practice
and theory are different. At resonance many factors change
dramatically. The flyback pulse is also different as this would be
another frame of reference and at a certain nodal points may temporarily
invert things like the controls of an aircraft inverting at mach
speeds. Smith said we need 12 dimensional math to explain this reality,
8 more dimensions than the Kaluza & Klein manifolds which is already
insanely complex math. I am not sure where Smith came up with the 12
dimensions as proving much of the KK 5 dimensional theory has taken
modern computing hardware. Haha I think I need a tutor, but really
getting too much into theoretical math can create infinite series
thought holes.
As far as cohering the odd energies such as the return strike or neutral
spike if one looks to nature one finds a plasma channel. It seems many
of the so called free energy devices rely on spark gaps, therefore if we
copy nature we can sum these energies.
I know Wilbur Smith was very interested in producing spinning fields
from stationary circuits. I find this pathway of particular interest if
you have additional information.
Have you built much of the hardware Smith described and experimented
with it?
Thanks again for your wonderful detail!
On 5/7/2018 4:25 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mick,
>
> "Can you elaborate onthe E field and H0 Hd based on the capacitor to
> inductor size in a resonant circuit."
> For high voltage keep the capacitance low and inductance high. For
> high current it is the opposite way around. At resonance the energy is
> oscillating between the capacitor and the inductor. By knowing the
> peak current of the inductor and its inductance the peak voltage of
> the capacitor can be calculated when also knowing its capacitance.
> That's because the same amount of energy oscillates between those two
> components.
> Magnetic energy stored in an inductor of inductance L and current
> I:{\displaystyle E_{\rm {p,m}}={1 \over 2}LI^{2}}
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_energy
>
> Electric energy stored in a capacitor: {\displaystyle W=\int
> _{0}^{Q}V(q)\mathrm {d} q=\int _{0}^{Q}{\frac {q}{C}}\mathrm {d} q={1
> \over 2}{Q^{2} \over C}={1 \over 2}VQ={1 \over 2}CV^{2}}
> here C is the capacitance and V is the voltage. Source:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor
>
> Knowing the inductance L and the capacitance C makes it possible to
> calculate the current if knowing the voltage or vice versa. The
> voltage and current are the peak values which determine the total
> energy oscillating between the inductor and the capacitor. The two
> formulas use different letters (E and W) for energy. The terms after
> the last equal sign of both formulas are just put equal to each other
> to solve for the voltage or the current when knowing the rest of the
> parameters.
>
> Resonance happens at the frequency where the impedance of the
> capacitor equals the impedance of the inductor if the resistance
> (damping) of the circuit isn't too big:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit. This link applies for an
> ideal circuit. For a more realistic circuit look up RLC circuit.
>
> You may have to study this area yourself. Conventional theory doesn't
> give much clue as to how to get free energy though. For that purpose
> different disciplines will have to be studied. Some such areas would
> be nonlinear physics and wave theory. Those two disciplines allow
> mixing non-coherent waves into coherent waves. That's a clue to
> harvesting free energy.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Ole,
>
> Can you elaborate on the E field and H0 Hd based on the capacitor to
> inductor size in a resonant circuit.
>
> In the case of a resonant field of an equal microhenries to
> microfarads and then a resonant circuit biased towards a larger
> capacitance or a larger inductor ratio?
>