Body
The universe doesn't hate up .or over Lords cable service stopped due to
lack of payment .and they created us for entertainment .no they love us
.constantly putting us in some kind of trouble .laughing at us .were like a
sitcom better than TV. And no cable bill .😁😨👍😶
On Apr 12, 2018 1:08 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Lutz,
>
> I don't know about it being possible to cancel Lenz's law. The equivalent
> of Lenz's law in mechanical systems known as Newton's third law (i.e. for
> every action there is an equal opposite reaction) can change direction by
> using negative mass (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAJlg8MDAlU).
> Something similar could be the solution to negating Lenz's law. This could
> be what is done in the Genesis Project: http://freenrg.info/Misc/Genesis/.
> <http://freenrg.info/Misc/Genesis/> Here a negative electric field is
> used as background field.
>
> The only thing I see in your transformer is that the two fields from each
> end are made separate. Then if the fields are mixed into a single coherent
> field there will be an increase in energy. But the field has to pass
> through the winding of the secondary coil. When the loops formed by the
> secondary winding has the magnetic flux pass sideways across the loops
> equal but opposite currents tries to run in the loops. Thus they just
> cancel out leaving only a small electric field on opposite sides of the
> loops instead of along the wire forming the loops. This would be like two
> half loops having half the voltage as a single loop with the same flux
> passing through it. A no circuit is formed around the magnetic flux then no
> current will flow.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <lutzliebers@...> wrote :
>
> Hi Ole,
> thanks for affirming my keen corrections.
>
> If you are an expert on the law of induction, please leave a comment. I
> have an "evil plan" in mind how to
> lure away the Lenzian demon (not trying to kill it).
>
> O.K., many a brave fellows may have done that in vain. But I do not think
> the universe hates us, instead it
> is supposed to love us https://youtu.be/nXKIS8St5rY since we all
> are its own creation.
> Nature should give us whatever is needed to make a living, OU included.
>
> link: http://schiefs.com/mystuff/a_novel_transformer.pdf
> However I have objections concerning my own idea:
> - is the induction law applicable on this situation at all?
> - if so, the Lenz counter flux under load will vibrate in the secondary
> core without being able to hold up
> against anything. So it has to be considered as stray flux and the
> impedance of the secondary winding
> might be very high resulting in quite a low output power rate.
> Strange as it may sound but the cure for this might be to put some
> copper rings around the secondary
> core (short circuit one turn windings of low resistance) creating a
> secondary Lenz counter flux that
> pushes against the original Lenz flux. Thus the impedance of the output
> winding would be reduced
> and the extractable output current would raise.
> However these rings should be aligned fully radial, in order not to
> "see" any inducing primary flux.
>
> If the strange thing will work, it should be called
> "Lohengrin-transformer" https://youtu.be/hNRHw9a9IqI
>
> Regards
> Lutz
>
>
>
>
> Am 10.04.2018 um 02:21 schrieb onielsen@... [EVGRAY]:
>
>
>
> Hi Lutz,
>
> You're right. I totally agree. This was a mistake on that page.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <lutzliebers@...> <lutzliebers@...> wrote :
>
>
> http://www.sharetechnote.com/html/Electronics_Diode_KickBack.html
>
> Something is wrong with the explanations in figure (upper C): it's not the
> current that reverses its
> direction in the moment of opening the switch but the created EMK is
> reversed in respect to the polarity
> of the battery.
> In other words:
> - when you power the inductor from the battery, the current will lag due
> to the inductors' self inductance
> creating a counter EMK until the current reaches its stationary rate
> defined by the Ohmic share of the
> inductors' impedance.
> - when you open the switch, the current is hindered from flowing through
> the inductor, so its rate over
> time dI/dt is decreasing rapidly. According to the law of self
> inductance this negative dI/dt will create
> a reversed EMK called kick back spike. As a consequence, an arc is
> created between the contacts and
> the current will continue to flow through the arc in the *same
> direction* but at a decreasing rate
> until the energy of the magnetic flux is fully consumed.
>
> If there is a free wheeling diode hooked parallel to the inductor (figure
> middle C), the current will flow from
> the plus side of the battery through the closed switch downwards through
> the inductor to the minus side of
> the battery while the diode is sleeping.
> In the moment of opening the switch, the decreasing current flow, still
> going in the same direction makes
> the polarity at the inductor reverse and instead of forming an arc the
> diode wakes up and overtakes the
> decreasing current flow.
> Thus the negative kick back spike gets limited to the forward voltage of
> the diode which means to protect
> the contacts of the switch. So the situation has changed to far extend,
> almost as if a resistor or filament
> was switched.
>
>
> ....
>
>
>
>