Body
Hi Lutz,
I don't know about it being possible to cancel Lenz's law. The equivalent of Lenz's law in mechanical systems known as Newton's third law (i.e. for every action there is an equal opposite reaction) can change direction by using negative mass (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAJlg8MDAlU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAJlg8MDAlU). Something similar could be the solution to negating Lenz's law. This could be what is done in the Genesis Project: http://freenrg.info/Misc/Genesis/. http://freenrg.info/Misc/Genesis/ Here a negative electric field is used as background field.
The only thing I see in your transformer is that the two fields from each end are made separate. Then if the fields are mixed into a single coherent field there will be an increase in energy. But the field has to pass through the winding of the secondary coil. When the loops formed by the secondary winding has the magnetic flux pass sideways across the loops equal but opposite currents tries to run in the loops. Thus they just cancel out leaving only a small electric field on opposite sides of the loops instead of along the wire forming the loops. This would be like two half loops having half the voltage as a single loop with the same flux passing through it. A no circuit is formed around the magnetic flux then no current will flow.
Regards
Ole
---In [email protected], <lutzliebers@...> wrote :
Hi Ole,
thanks for affirming my keen corrections.
If you are an expert on the law of induction, please leave a comment. I have an "evil plan" in mind how to
lure away the Lenzian demon (not trying to kill it).
O.K., many a brave fellows may have done that in vain. But I do not think the universe hates us, instead it
is supposed to love us https://youtu.be/nXKIS8St5rY https://youtu.be/nXKIS8St5rY since we all are its own creation.
Nature should give us whatever is needed to make a living, OU included.
link: http://schiefs.com/mystuff/a_novel_transformer.pdf http://schiefs.com/mystuff/a_novel_transformer.pdf
However I have objections concerning my own idea:
- is the induction law applicable on this situation at all?
- if so, the Lenz counter flux under load will vibrate in the secondary core without being able to hold up
against anything. So it has to be considered as stray flux and the impedance of the secondary winding
might be very high resulting in quite a low output power rate.
Strange as it may sound but the cure for this might be to put some copper rings around the secondary
core (short circuit one turn windings of low resistance) creating a secondary Lenz counter flux that
pushes against the original Lenz flux. Thus the impedance of the output winding would be reduced
and the extractable output current would raise.
However these rings should be aligned fully radial, in order not to "see" any inducing primary flux.
If the strange thing will work, it should be called "Lohengrin-transformer" https://youtu.be/hNRHw9a9IqI https://youtu.be/hNRHw9a9IqI
Regards
Lutz
Am 10.04.2018 um 02:21 schrieb onielsen@... mailto:onielsen@... [EVGRAY]:
Hi Lutz,
You're right. I totally agree. This was a mistake on that page.
Regards
Ole
---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected], <lutzliebers@...> mailto:lutzliebers@... wrote :
http://www.sharetechnote.com/html/Electronics_Diode_KickBack.html http://www.sharetechnote.com/html/Electronics_Diode_KickBack.html
Something is wrong with the explanations in figure (upper C): it's not the current that reverses its
direction in the moment of opening the switch but the created EMK is reversed in respect to the polarity
of the battery.
In other words:
- when you power the inductor from the battery, the current will lag due to the inductors' self inductance
creating a counter EMK until the current reaches its stationary rate defined by the Ohmic share of the
inductors' impedance.
- when you open the switch, the current is hindered from flowing through the inductor, so its rate over
time dI/dt is decreasing rapidly. According to the law of self inductance this negative dI/dt will create
a reversed EMK called kick back spike. As a consequence, an arc is created between the contacts and
the current will continue to flow through the arc in the same direction but at a decreasing rate
until the energy of the magnetic flux is fully consumed.
If there is a free wheeling diode hooked parallel to the inductor (figure middle C), the current will flow from
the plus side of the battery through the closed switch downwards through the inductor to the minus side of
the battery while the diode is sleeping.
In the moment of opening the switch, the decreasing current flow, still going in the same direction makes
the polarity at the inductor reverse and instead of forming an arc the diode wakes up and overtakes the
decreasing current flow.
Thus the negative kick back spike gets limited to the forward voltage of the diode which means to protect
the contacts of the switch. So the situation has changed to far extend, almost as if a resistor or filament
was switched.
...