Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] buzzer OU

Body

Correction --"current flow" only appears between differentials otherwise
current is a scalar and we are back to the bird on the wire.


On 4/12/2018 6:05 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Hi Mick
>
> You are right!
> The ground makes a huge difference.
> The Smith device concept is correct on this point, according to Kurt's
> latest experimental results.
> I need to figure out how to make a good ground here, where I am located.
> I had just put down a nice 10' long steel rebar at my home/workshop,
> before we moved here, where there is sedimentary rock only a few
> inches under the sod.
> If you were to see a cross section, it looks like layers apon layers
> of limestone blocks, along with even harder sandstone layers.
> Can this be a ground?
> I do have a pair of water wells, one that is over120 feet deep. Can I
> ground to the well casing?
> I used to communicate with a ham operator located somewhere near this
> area who had a beam antenna giving him an extraordinary signal even to
> me to my boat in Venezuela.
> Sadly, he has since passed away.
> He had purchased his property based on the radio propagation
> capability. He used to connect telephone patches to my parents, so we
> could chat before cell phones came in.
> I have hopes, I too, can get a ground connections, for Smith experiments.
> Another ground source might be the result of our fence contractor who
> will be putting in page wire perimeter fences, using steel t bar posts
> driven into the rock, using pnuematic jack hammer post drivers.
> I should be able to get a ground off this fence, as well, I hope.
> Zilano manages to run her farm on 160 kw of 250 volt 50 hz table top unit.
> Man! I can certainly use that around here, after this last winter's
> heating bills came home.
> Toronto is in Ontario's banana belt, by comparison to here, in Eastern
> Ontario.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>      
>
>     Warren,
>
>     If one takes what Norm says to heart, which I don't know why one
>     wouldn't as he has a hand up on most of us, the issue on your
>     Smith device needs to be tuned to make a neutral spike and receive
>     the ping back.  Look up "lightening return strike"  Start with
>     getting the spike then tune for the proper phase to suck it back in.
>
>     First you have to be able to send the proper width and amplitude
>     pulse and then receive the echo from a well grounded rod.  Part
>     one use a battery to undertake this experiment as many bench
>     supplies and such I think cause problems with their grounding
>     scheme interfering with this.  Part Zero- don't forget the ground,
>     even Don Smith said it would not operate without a ground.  You
>     can't get something for nothing plain resonating is just that
>     until it is taken to the point of such high Q that it pumps a core
>     like a laser then there are some nuclear resonant points one can
>     derive energy from.  On the other hand the neutral spike sounds
>     like a much easier way to source extra power.
>
>
>     On 4/11/2018 12:26 PM, Warren Keillor
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>      
>>
>>     James
>>
>>     You are correct about the high voltage pulses.
>>     I'm not sure what the mechanism is, but I have read it is better.
>>     Zilano seems to have written that it is possible to do a lower
>>     voltage version, that is less efficient.
>>     Of course, the real magic was done with a kv.system.
>>     I have yet to replicate Zilano's devices, with success.
>>     They seem to be easy to make, but a little short on hands on,
>>     idiot proof instructions, with ample feedback.
>>     We have to keeo trying
>>     Cheers Warren
>>     Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>     <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>         On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:42 PM, James Glinski
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>          
>>
>>         Warren don't leave out the hi voltage power  needle pluses.
>>         That's important .
>>
>>         On Apr 11, 2018 11:22 AM, "Warren Keillor
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]"
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>              
>>
>>
>>             Sven
>>
>>             You are going too fast for me.
>>             Give some context to what you are referring to transformers.
>>             You mentioned the Earth.
>>             Transformers as I understand them, are able to capture
>>             hertzian waves that can circulate through them as current.
>>             I have been led to believe that two coils can resonate in
>>             magnetic proximaty to each other avoiding Lenz's law,
>>             providing the frequency is compatible to the wire length
>>             of each other.
>>             The coil length is very important, but can be very low
>>             impedence fat wire, or even copper tubing making the
>>             helix, as long as it is a harmonic of the other coil(s)
>>             sharing that magnetic field so they resonate together.
>>             Capacitors can be used to adjust the tuning, as can
>>             changing the helix lengths so resonance can be achieved.
>>             Losing lenz's law, yet transfering energy, is difficult,
>>             as we all know, and each workable method is a treasure of
>>             a tool to work with.
>>             The trick, if it is a trick, is to have a nice big tool
>>             kit, to design with.
>>             Cheers Warren
>>             Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>             <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>                 On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:00 AM,
>>                 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>                 [EVGRAY]
>>                 <[email protected]
>>                 <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>                  
>>
>>                 Hello Ole,
>>
>>                 ok the capacity of the transformer is the keyword it
>>                 flows in over the earth?!? That would be free energy
>>                 over ground potential ????
>>
>>                 That would have to work with every other transformer,
>>                 too, or is the extreme high impedance important,
>>                 since the number of windings appears to add capacitively.
>>
>>                 What and how should we proceed to get positive
>>                 results. For me, everything speaks for the electric
>>                 field that should be strengthened or based on it.
>>
>>                 A ferroresonant transformer could also be used with
>>                 low impedance winding and larger capacitors, but it
>>                 is not made. The windings all have a very high
>>                 inductance.
>>
>>                 The Genesis Project is also based on sucking energy
>>                 from the electric field with a negative inductor.
>>
>>                 I did not really understand Ivor Catt. Only so much
>>                 that we do not move electrons when current is
>>                 flowing, as evidence that a capacitor discharges so
>>                 fast almost at the speed of light and so-called free
>>                 electrons can not move so fast in an electrical
>>                 conductor. I've read a few links from Ivor Catt and
>>                 scientists he relies on.
>>                 It's almost as if a capacitor is already a product
>>                 for free energy in the broadest sense.
>>
>>                 regards
>>
>>                 Sven
>>
>
>