Body
"Yes"! (H) that is a well kept secret from the "Telegraphy days"!
When I built my first Tesla aerial charge collector array and put it up
about 50 ft. and hooked up a 2 mfd, 30kv capacitor as a collector
storage. , I was confused at first with the (+) collected charge????
Later figured it out! Lol
On 3/19/2018 6:45 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> think of a Tesla receiver as a series linear class c amplifier in
> relation to earth capacity gravity potential tensor . i know that is
> far beyond your heads but need to understand that the atmospheric
> capacitor tends to charge earth isolated elements into the negative in
> respect to earth POSITIVE charge
>
> that was why telegraph lines were charged into the negative also
> telephone lines, the air capacity potential kept the battery (zinc
> carbon) charged so its a fact they used free energy wile maintaining
> the public totally ignorant on the subject ,,,
>
>
> (H)
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Norm,
>
> Moving on with the exercise 1899 yeah right and we had to give the
> aether a new name now as dark matter/dark energy too because we had
> our heads up our collective asses for over 100 years.
>
Tesla was really "pissed" when Einstein published his theory and
"torpedoed" the Aether theory! Yep! The Quantum boys nave it as "Dark
Matter/ Dark Energy"!
> A three pole magneto, sounds interesting like |_|_| would this be push
> pull or why the three pole design?
>
Precisely! "Push/ pull" by design!
>
> When you make the distinction between magneto electric and
> electromagnetic, can you quantify this more?
>
*WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
*By:Dr. John Mileweski***
*SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
*Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**.
There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and
opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and
left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not
light? *
*Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things
except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity in light as well ! *
*I will now explain and give you more detail. *
*SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by
science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of
years. It has been given different names by different cultures for
thousands of years. *
*A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy,
Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum
Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception
know it is real. *
*SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James
Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his
famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by
Nikola Tesla <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and
theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain
radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this
explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation
such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation
also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the
solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second
solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught
algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root
of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have
changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's
equation and it is SuperLight. *
*In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University
took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this
second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
*To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first
or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio
waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source
(the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity
traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large
electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the
electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
*The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite
structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point
source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation is
composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component,
thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked
at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of
light squared !** 10^20 meters per second, or 10 billion times faster
than light <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
*It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding,
shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher energy density. *
*The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come
we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?" Well,
the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8
nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes
through everything as though the substance was nearly completely
transparent (like glass). *
*We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays,
but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be
given later. *
*WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
*It comes out of black holes !***
*First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the
analogy for SuperLight. *
*Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric
monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an
electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or
absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is
converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the
opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
*So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an
electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its energy
in the form of light. *
*Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot
matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain
magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small,
extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their
orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So black
holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of
course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of the black
holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it
therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
*The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy
in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of
galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are
literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an
"Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
> I assume the magnetoelectric is always inductor based, either
> collapsing field from an energized coil or via a magnet moving over
> the inductor and having the same effect. Is there more to this
> definition and is the definition always referring to the flyback pulse?
>
> Is the mechanical device with a permanent magnet passing by an
> inductor (magneto) or always the highest and best form of magneto
> electric?
> Is there something important missing from something non mechanical
> solid state or tube really fast like a nand gate pulsing a (thyratron)
> hard switched inductor for the flyback pulse?
>
> The Tesla device is run by what looks like air batteries, I don't
> really understand how many are needed or if my air battery assumption is
>
The unit depicted by Tesla on page 25 was operated at 200VDC from am
series of those small batteries!
The specs for that circuit with 1,000 ohms of coil resistance (fine wire
solenoid) with permanent magnet core (Ala MRA) could have easily
operated his smalll plasma tube "quench" circuit giving him his .020A
(20 milliamp" "Unidirectional DC pulse" into earth ground.
>
> correct.
>
> Perhaps for storing the harvested earth pulse we go backwards again
> and look to water capacitors Leyden jars, or have you found something
> better?
>
I had numerous "Holtz and Whimshurst" electrostatic generators and can
say that I would prefer the old Leyden style jars to capture and store
this type of "charge"! With modern dielectrics available, some "kick
ass" charge accumulators can easily be built. Old days used crown glass
and foil.
>
> On 3/19/2018 11:03 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...>
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>> Thank You, Mick for being very "astute" and grasping the very
>> essence of this whole exercise! "Yes"! a "milliamp" fly-back
>> pulse can "provoke" an earth response, just as Tesla himself
>> tried to convey way back in 1899 on the page 25, Colorado Springs
>> Notes! I built a lot of "unidirectional" DC pulse devices and
>> consistently got the earth response from the "neutral". I along
>> with Hector posted all of our experiments with the "Door bell"
>> buzzers (Hectors Coil banger) which, with a 6 volt driver voltage
>> gave over 1kv of earth pulse from the ground frame (iron) of the
>> buzzer. Your question about magnetos! I worked for 7 years in
>> Marine repair shop and found that the Outboard Marine (Evinrude)
>> back in the early days (before the new single pole CD solid state
>> commuted mags) had a three pole stator design with the flywheel
>> mounted N-S pole moving magnets. "Perfect design which provoked
>> the "Neutral Spike" from the iron core! I could turn a mag by
>> hand (very low speed) and get a 1/2 inch bright blue spark.
>> Most folks did not exactly understand the inductor/capacitor
>> relationship. By "design" the capacitor value was very precise
>> because it perfectly matched the impedance of the inductor iron
>> core coil so that final result was a total cancellation of X-L/
>> X-C which precisely was at the "peak" of the Universal Resonance
>> Curve. (Lossless region), Ultra high "Q". Hector told you guys
>> about striving to achieve this Ultra high "Q" when dealing with a
>> resonant tuned circuit. The old outboard mags did precisely
>> this! I head so many technicians tell me that the "Condenser"
>> (capacitor) was there to prevent arcing at the breaker points!
>> "True" for battery driven ignition circuits but totally wrong for
>> magnetos. The "condenser" in the old magnetos discharged back
>> through the inductor coil just as the flux reversal was
>> occurring and due to the fact that the Lenz effect does not exist
>> during magnetic field collaspe, there is a series assist and
>> acceleration of the flux decay. "Scope shows" a straight down
>> line which is Tesla's "Compression of energy in time"! It
>> would be very difficult to calculate the "multiplication
>> factor"! In ferroresonce phenomenon, a 10X current and voltage
>> has been documented. "But"! was there a "perfect match" of X/C"
>> at the random resonance event! I dare say "not". If you design
>> your device following the old time Outboard Marine Magneto theory
>> then you will get "off the chart" power multiplication in the
>> earth Neutral spike, just as Tesla pointed out! I agree with the
>> use of a "plasma" tube "quenched by magnet" to do your
>> commutation of circuit! This would comply with Tesla's original
>> theory from "Gee"! 1899. Who would have thought that we re-visit
>> the "Master"! Hope this will help explain Ideal "Neutral
>> Spike" development! All of this is "Magneto-electric" and "NOT"
>> "Electro-magnetic". Please think in the "inverse"! "High
>> power" manifest in very small conductors with no heating and all
>> the other weird off shoot phenomenon! "have seen them all" and
>> posted here to be "shot down" by "conventional experimenters" who
>> write it off as fully explained by conventional electrical
>> theory! "NOT"! Believe me! I have watched Hector explain all
>> of this and somehow "the lights don't come on"! Norm
>>
>>
>> On 3/19/2018 11:38 AM, Mick mkjekyll@... <mailto:mkjekyll@...>
>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> What you are saying with the MRA blowing bulbs is HUGE. Milliamp
>>> devices earthing a flyback pulse and then... POOF
>>> Pg 25 the Tesla receiver where some tiny microamp air battery is
>>> creating enough energy for an electromagnet to snuff a plasma tube.
>>>
>>> This is much higher than the x10 energy increase so the negatricity
>>> spike is likely acting as a positron radar pulse pinging back a
>>> shitload
>>> of electrons from the earth cavity resonator.
>>>
>>> That old magneto is very complex. Is there a single polepiece
>>> coil in
>>> those or a horseshoe core coil like most modern magnetos?
>>> Can you elucidate the build of a proper magneto for this effect?
>>>
>>> On 3/19/2018 8:33 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>> > Fairbanks Morse
>>>
>>
>
>