Body
Hector you said simple .a carbon rod and a coil a round it making four
times the energy put to it ? With out consuming anything ?⚡
On Mar 1, 2018 9:20 PM, "James Glinski" <[email protected]> wrote:
> To who it might concern a translation from the French found in a PDF on pf
> Vallee on scinergenic generator .something from nothing .
>
> So it's carbon that's been retained forthe first synergistic generator due
> to BelgianE. Hoker. How to produce boron 12 atcarbon shooting? By a simple
> reaction plannedby theory and confirmed by the tests of fu-controlled
> nuclear power; we have already treatedthe subject (January 1975). Normally
> electricityfree trons within matter are attracted bypositive nuclei and
> tend tocock around; in classical physics, it istheir only possible
> behavior.On the other hand, synergisticthat we can achieve something
> muchmore interesting: to drop the electron onthe nucleus through magnetic
> fieldsintense, parallel and contrary toelectric fields. This fallout of
> electricitytrons on the core of carbon 12 transforms itin boron 12,
> radioactive, which returns to the state ofcarbon 12 by releasing some of
> the energydiffuse collected from the environment by thedioactivity β. Still
> to be drawn in a formpractice this energy β. We know, since theLee and
> Yang, that the β emission isin a preferential direction, that of
> themagnetic field. The extra currentthus created can be used by Joule
> effect, oreven better by braking the electrons in asecondary winding that
> will provide directlyan alternating current.The experiment in Belgium was
> aimed atto check this diagram; an electric capacitorthat was charged by a
> battery thendischarged through a short carbon stick- in the form of
> graphite. This first circuitconstituting the primary of a conventional
> transformerwhose secondary school was connected to a galvaballistic name.
> In addition, graphite wasge in a winding intended to create the
> fieldmagnetic in the same direction as the fieldelectric. In the absence of
> power in thisturnover was recovered in high school energycarbon, with the
> usual pertespecific to any transformer. On the other hand,by sending the
> current in the windingsurrounding the carbon, so by creating the
> fieldmagnetic required according to the theory, wechanges the received
> power at the secondary of afactor 4. So we receive 4 times more energyBy
> realizing this montage, the Belgian Eric d'Hoker has proved that it is
> possible to draw energy fromthis unlimited reservoir that constitute the
> electromagnetic wave of the universe. It opened the way toSynergistic
> generators, true inexhaustible piles of high power. In the schematic
> devicehere, the current of a battery charges a capacitor, which is then
> discharged throughphite sealed in the glass between 2 iron electrodes. In
> the absence of current in the coil windingIn secondary school, only the
> energy sent to primary school is collected, less the usual losses,about 1/2
> CV². If we raise the current in the winding with the rheostat, we note from
> a certaina threshold that the current collected by the galvanometer is 4
> times stronger, or 2 CV². This extrapower comes from the diffuse medium on
> which the energy was taken by means of the carbon,as predicted by
> synergistic theory. The counter-experiment made by replacing carbon withThe
> conductive element no longer shows the least power multiplication at the
> secondary level.IMPORTANT: the assembly presented here has never been
> approved by RLValley. We can refer to the experiments of JL Naudin realized
> inFebruary 2005 cf. http://www.jlnlabs.org
> On Mar 1, 2018 9:09 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hector,
>>
>>
>> I'll bite, I want to try the genset experiment. First is aquiring the
>> gen head. The place you mentioned Central Georgia Generator seems to be
>> units made in China. Have to save up a bit first but should be able to
>> find a decent feild coil head without too much trouble.
>>
>>
>> The four pole design with two sets of brushes, do you think this version
>> is the easier to turn into something serious >1PF vs the same 4 pole 7.5k
>> in brushless?
>>
>>
>> Notwithstanding the higher cost of brushless are the brushed easier to
>> mod?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>