Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: 	28 2019 <>
X-Account-Key: 	account1
X-UIDL: 	AJJxDhcGY+lvXVrhWgJ06O4PLwY
X-Mozilla-Status: 	0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 	00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys: 	
X-Apparently-To: 	[email protected]; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:50:17 +0000
Return-Path: 	<[email protected]>
Authentication-Results: 	mta4099.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com; dkim=pass (ok) 
[email protected] header.s=s1024; spf=none [email protected]; 
dmarc=NULL(p=NULL sp=NULL dis=NULL) header.from=att.net;
Received-SPF: 	none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted 
sender hosts)
X-YMailISG: 	39pbfosWLDsB28lSQafvUEwGnET8M0sAEvDApmsup74AlEPC 
ws5lvc6W8WbLCPdfHdLHZ6230Anqgpyz1iUVdK4qyuH07Z5lN3jMILdPhLO7 
KTTmEFfp1tEaiQZtwrOrEckVGyfkDmEb1izodJCeZ.oPfC4gWQwOY5hDx7GC 
42WaJPUqFIkYLz388RFKKmL_1eHNEaI2E5ZTYAw07ZUhwfqoV8ZST1.YqdwE 
iRIXE2cmsG8iZhKmQp197YIVmz7YqY5JBWDvoPqR8gz8j2mk5MR0l1cpbwca 
9C18nXKy0ZlfO9QPUUN4C1ZmJVNGY09dzIhsTQddqdyarDZrmcE2rjStpo5g 
EjxdbKmU8c0B3TVNJtks43Z3Pfb.EbVZGtGlKv.f0Yfg7f_F66wcJnwu7Fpj 
qd.k5NBcYZ4RUNfMpLzPKBrU9HXu13mqTpOBjThV9LpRonLA5Ps2BFCSV2fi 
iksPO_sqhBa.L76bjUa49N1huKbqNHhl1ImuUYC0UV0l3V6kkziCyvK1Kkrb 
7y9yR3TPLTLfiQQ2i2ttVzZ07E3UeaGwNzDlSGryLDSLBQXNiX0hegrmCoXo 
0um6F8Chvho6hjSoNqpHn_wK7kOl9utQQH.txkDYdf4BUwp1EstpCHpkT33q 
16UaFtlhUdZhkpgyo6Wi0Q1kzK3qLd01OQMbQxiiYEXCCISw9Wouysp9FUYh 
AoV5_ETwtBBJ.rUOCR06QQBxPj8qo_3OSckjWxFISXPeTOcUdifEM7_ISpPS 
9BGmOLR3GsJye8w8J74qAzRJAvbDCgIfiXdj7Hd0CDeTo_JdYtpC5XPsqpH3 
rPYzVu6TymVM3opeBwiympr8ss7d8Fwmeu4r.o10ZRSPxapWGyZz7Gp0zQdu 
fjPU9A2zVQeVV.oBLe.CKwIGxh4RtwYMlii0cxpshazzFg39j.GhwGE.qIB6 
hg8TEskGZGVnDJMeksqte26ZTauLO0M2gqw0DOe0stVAXthV312JOrCfizoc 
Y1b8.giUBCnyikZIpYmw2AlrW8sCk_9gl4Ij8PzvTZqV_o3AzI8zB0tlMlW1 
iymBeN.TJRbSwEWXwhatWxDIYchjWBWmPTOnIB0fmQLv5C6.IGPritBaEUDX 
SuoLRg1DiA4fM74nJHhnssIbD_VLGX5dHqflDPxzhK1CTXeSK3VwiBlv6QYR 
nKFmTbA7WSdtauZehrnp.26v79X_mz7iE0MSxawz7Y4Qlo5SNpEm_bDkN4MH 
0oyqSqV_vdS.dlCTp6sDxjHGooFdCC8xi7MN72KBaAV9w5kvpq12PVXoq9DP 
yX1Pp8V5VQ6unbNsSFK8y8nlAUd.W1FLNSafsN45syS6rfTuk69accYPIztP 
V6JBd7uOj0nT6_ujIjo2lrFYooqMnnxhAOOzfjFOenrnxmLVG8ICWG0iiHfX 
fHb.SAt3ZvDC_THlFfPmVKwVpsrgJsjKn6unZIZvm31WvQ7MmE12ZNI-
X-Originating-IP: 	[98.137.68.151]
Received: 	from 144.160.244.105 (EHLO alph731.prodigy.net) 
(144.160.244.105) by mta4099.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 19 
Aug 2019 17:50:17 +0000
X-Originating-IP: 	[98.137.68.151]
Received: 	from sonic302-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com 
(sonic302-25.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.151]) by 
alph731.prodigy.net (Inbound 8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 
x7JHoEk4107754 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 
verify=NO) for <[email protected]>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:50:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: 	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; 
s=s1024; t=1566237014; bh=viW5i4ftkfq1d2VBpM6hTlOTDgJJlsWiRp323Z9n/MU=; 
h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; 
b=dYIby6bbfx8anX4K8N7P5c704GYjJt9swpIGLybr261rEBLnNXk9EenLP7Qt3pa7iMJhTq2ORth8SByJVsl7zz0ax0soVAuHWogaKhRAmK7DTIOibWq+ssj5UK9ERMpEjUn46Oc6z+RzJv2FpX3K67wfn49PRROs4KhSmdRu+gI= 

X-YMail-OSG: 
cqwT9V8VM1nSM.JEIBcRz9x56gq3hEH5nVEnrSW8JBJxQq3hI6ZBCbmnhr0GKQt 
ekrey1FHEp8h2fNmLb_hmGRu5jqkTWca.DB4w3VPX_tNN0tUqGfgqnWP789BzCpTXh.MLQAbncKS 
e8SarSBhtXIFUbdfOqbh.LRxoX57R2m0NDRvxw7T93WGCtC4wVq30gGBomqlCpdh.qIAWYzHa9rb 
tEmtNt5AJPaMAX_sXkzpgnMMHLqVhX.nOQ0I2We9n0WhGiMzLoik1nCGSMdBvoBzgN6uxgmXkDlw 
3YhWfZ1DpJczM1V4wGn.D4lMNhZkXOuWH7v9ZujBLULTkjA2yLK0rXab.Dlvq5nytlqPxLg0k_RV 
P2twHZMR0NRk6RaFWVKjkM2gmdqAKySaPyCJcbNXBUh4Uhi52vWK70NfoRJ9v8H0.v_Leiqre8Fh 
HpOSofKSHEIGouUdBoQOMDScAS7JhXJem2PqUILacKpyHJJJH53HhWybu9OEyG4Z_9F3qHoxR20I 
M_SXhi.WJ3JFzkjHCX1MjI1XWqjbhp.moACjkQVpylhXDXTYJqVbVXPr30eshB6KlOCdRapWit0G 
QcNtEms5xrr3nouf97LBOi84g9sa1S1ra_dRQwQ3hWhZ8_ZYRU4T1jg7rO1LdWCsxviIYxI0dUiz 
J3nbUJDjbORN4CwGZwCBIwpJ3NAm6phUA8cNm4K1wBAhrWIESBHlcFexk_tBI4PIwghJFoxHKCkL 
.AHiAX80uwUpRok5I8p3v.82bfAWnpmROTNp2qgkZf8mLsNO_Vmri2yQnLL3uq2t3Fzrt2jf23EF 
VGcG4yUq7CUjW7_3l9ERKfmdTdaUjitwbsjLPGxEXXXRA9wYJVo1GS501dNgAKmYBhpRvPmAMsyD 
uscy.8ALbi1nIrqTt8IjruheD9HpdF0QgCPthMIk3Fmhm5S9nn5CTwr4D1dvfzjP..KILBvaWrGL 
Jf7_q750.kBuHLdq.lsxWjU2PhEtJjS91kIKUJcg40pZa93aZd5jAWm5dGwrx_dGDD3Z5oPRWTaa 
wxIuxtBibbBTN8OMAuM6qN2W1bZQo7dViahZmX8S5DLdDXmWsU4V1Z5_RU5rxdEXKcGv58__lQrD 
RWMhmJT_HCTSfpglNrzlVS8b3InCpB146w7PizGcGVZfmujgeTz46nW091k44qyzE2RLAbsXGWNQ 
aSTaR5coOE3aL5Nbwexrg8ErOdzOYtGrreQas6VECaGLbLetLLmib6YBPRSx7KRB7GT1tAme.N_y 
jqaaPT7k_NZUYpxXBamgpFSlRpwhIE0zcxJWVDEDO8PmtYijp
Received: 	from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by 
sonic302.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:50:14 
+0000
Received: 	by smtp414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with 
ESMTPA ID 5c1505bacad81b9c675b230542a0784e; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:50:11 
+0000 (UTC)
Subject: 	Fwd: Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux 
annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP
References: 	<[email protected]>
To: 	[email protected], nwootan <[email protected]>
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: 	<[email protected]>
Message-ID: 	<[email protected]>
Date: 	Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:50:09 -0500
User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 	1.0
In-Reply-To: 	<[email protected]>
Content-Type: 	multipart/alternative; 
boundary="------------C15DD3B97BE6FD1E19BD7355"
Content-Language: 	en-US
Content-Length: 	106096






-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: 	58 2018 <>
X-Mozilla-Status: 	0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 	00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys: 	
Subject: 	Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux 
annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP
References: 	<[email protected]>
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
To: 	[email protected]
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: 	<[email protected]>
Message-ID: 	<[email protected]>
Date: 	Mon, 17 Dec 2018 07:30:57 -0600
User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 	1.0
In-Reply-To: 	<[email protected]>
Content-Type: 	multipart/alternative; 
boundary="------------4D6B28C7C79A5091177B8EB5"
Content-Language: 	en-US



Mick.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm?? Table 
top laser/ Plasma studies make it possible to study the phenomenon of 
the magnetic flux re-connect.? My Neutral Spike phenomenon occurred at 
the point of a plasma development at the contactor opening event.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux 
annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP
Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 07:46:40 -0600
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
To: 	Jon Gentry <[email protected]>



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/


Jon, remember our discussion as to where John Mileweski and others 
originated the SUPER LIGHT theory?? Based on the latest out of SLAC, the 
Hotson Vortex-Anti vortex flows and magnetic flux annihilation-Reconnect 
(BEC) is correct.? In the counter vortex (anti-parallel) flux 
interaction, the Alfvin waves (transverse) provide the compression of 
the current sheets (Z pinch effect) which causes the collision (at 
precise crossing angles) of the anti-parallel flux flows, annihilation, 
cross, then re-connection with the burst of the magnetic flux 
constituent particles.? Who would have thought that magnetic flux flow 
was actually sub-atomic particle flow (Aether ???).? Now the question 
arises as to just what are these particles and characteristics of same.? 
You have to admit that this is all CURRENT EVENTS. See date of SLAC report.


On 11/22/2018 9:11 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:

Please read the attached Dirac Equation!

On 11/22/2018 9:05 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:

http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Superlight.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Tiller

https://www.scribd.com/document/240940332/Subtle-Energies

https://fmbr.org/the-new-physics/

http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

https://www.blue-science.org/articles/suggested-articles/


On 11/22/2018 12:15 PM, Jon Gentry wrote:
Norm,
All the while we're talking about capturing light, I'm looking at 
Mileweski's quote, which I presume is from his website; and I have to 
admit I really do not "know" Maxwell's Equation to be THE universal 
"famous" wave equation.? I thought it had more to do with "fields".? I'm 
probably wrong, and the link in the email does not go anywhere when I 
click on it for me to clarify my error.? But one equation I DO know 
solved for a universal wave equation AND had a negative numbers solution 
within it was Dirac's Equation . . . that Heisenberg objected to, 
bifurcated (maimed) and re-cast as having to do with the electron.? So, 
Bless Milewski, he's up in years and I'm getting there as well.? Maybe 
someone can clarify if perhaps John is talking about Dirac's Equation.? 
Because if he's not, there is that secondary equation which ALSO 
describes very well the existence of Super Light.? If you doubt me--and 
I hope I'm not being tiresome here constantly referring back to 
this--check out Don Hotson's 2-part exposition here . . . . and now I 
find I can't search up the pdf; which I've been warning people to save 
it.? Here's a discussion BASED on it, while I continue looking:

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

Sometimes, yes, things just drop out of sight on the internet.? But 
Hotson's work, from my perspective, was groundbreaking; not something to 
lose down the memory hole.? Okay, I found the pdf for Part II.? For the 
purposes of discussion here, the first page of the pdf engaged in a 
debate and defense of Dirac's Equation.? Even with the missing Part I, 
which I will continue to look for, this might be a good place to start:

https://ethw.org/w/images/7/72/PVB_Dirac%27s-sea-of-negative-energy-%28part_2%29.pdf

Okay, my search engine is not bringing up a link to Part I the way I'm 
searching.? But if you examine the "panel" on the first page of Part II 
that does a summary of the missing Part I that I'm looking for; which 
should be sufficient to answer my question for this discussion here.? I 
think I actually recall that Colonel Sanders billboard.? But today it's 
the other bird; and that would make Sanders a turkey.? So we can all 
posthumously? give the Colonel "the bird".?

So, just to focus back, my question is: Did Milewski inadvertently 
reference the wrong equation (Maxwell); or does that mean there are two 
equations solving for "everything that waves"??
The telling detail I conjecture: Did Maxwell's Equation employ a 
negative number solve?? ????

Regards,

JG



On 12/14/2018 4:01 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASJ...62..993K
>
> https://wsx.lanl.gov/RSX/RSX_publications/intrator_3Drcxn_onset_pileup_NatPhys2009.pdf
>
> http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/062/meta
>
> https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/article/div-classtitlerole-of-z-pinches-in-magnetic-reconnection-in-space-plasmasdiv/2292C53A41E958AB27B9BF299899F45B
>
> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ASSL..427..521G
>
>
> The two helix magnetic fields are anti-parallel flows and bases on Z 
> pinch effect of Alfvin waves cause an annihilation event and 
> reconnection at crossing. Compression of current sheet at critical angle.
>
>
> http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/175820
>
> Reconnection of antiparallel magnetic flux tubes
>
> Many examples of solar activity, such as large two-ribbon flares and 
> prominence eruptions, are widely believed to involve the fast 
> reconnection of magnetic flux tubes. Because of the difficulties 
> associated with calculating the evolution of three-dimensional (3-D) 
> flux tubes, however, the details of the energy-release process are 
> poorly understood. In this paper we describe our first attempts to 
> shed light on this important process. We describe the results of 3-D 
> numerical simulations of initially distinct magnetic flux tubes 
> interacting via magnetic reconnection. As a typical case, we consider 
> an initial magnetic field given by a compact support function 
> distribution so that the initial topology consists of two antiparallel 
> flux tubes. We then impose an initial velocity field on this system 
> which causes the flux tubes to move toward each other. As a result of 
> this initial velocity, the tubes first flatten against each other and 
> an electric current sheet begins to develop at the interface between 
> them. After approximately 10 Alfven times we observe a burst of 
> reconnection. The turbulent kinetic energy rises dramatically as two 
> reconnection jets form, which are aligned parallel to the initial 
> field. The reconnection phase lasts for approximately 20 Alfven times, 
> by which time the central region of the initial tubes has been 
> completely dissipated so that the system now consists of four tubes 
> that are relatively widely separated and hence stop interacting. We 
> find that the excitation of small-scale spatial structure in the flow 
> field depends critically on the value of the Lundquist numbers. 
> Compressible effects are insignificant for this particular case of 
> flux tube reconnection. The numerical simulations are carried out 
> using a three-dimensional explicit Fourier collocation algorithm for 
> solving the viscoresistive equations of compressible 
> magnetohydrodynamics. We also report on the performance of a new 
> parallelized version of the code. 15 refs., 5 figs._??less 
> <http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/175820>_
>
> ?
>
> https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrTcdglugNXT38App4nnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByNWU4cGh1BGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Antiparallel+Flux+Lines+of+a+Magnet&fr=ytff1-tyc-sc&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-006
>
> ?
>
> http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf
>
> ?
>
> Merging plasma!???? "Deep do-do"!?? 
> _http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf_
>
> For? parallel? flux? tubes? (field? lines)? this? force? is? repulsive
> keeping the parallel field lines at the largest possible mutual
> distance,? an? effect? well-known? from? the? tendency? of? mag-
> netic fields to expand into field-free space, while anti-parallel
> flux tubes attract each other.
> The implication is that,? in elementary field-line merging
> events in which two anti-parallel sections of field lines at-
> tract and touch each other, the amount of 2
> 8
> 0
> of magnetic
> flux will be annihilated.? The annihilated amount of flux is
> exactly 2
> 8
> 0
> because each field line carries just one flux quan-
> tum, and because flux quanta cannot be divided into half or
> any fraction such that there is no half flux quantum available
> which could be added to another half in order to annihilate
> 1
> 8
> 0
> .? Conversely, since field lines are composed of one flux
> quantum only they contribute 1
> 8
> 0
> to annihilation in merging,? not more and not less.? This annihilation 
> happens in a
> certain time
> 1t
> .? Thus the elementary flux annihilation cor-
> responds to the generation of an induced electromotive force
> (emf
>
> ?
>
> Hi! Ole, been doing a lot of "leg work" trying to figure out "where 
> and how" we get such a huge manifestation of the very unusual "spike 
> energy"!? The occurrence of anti-parallel magnetic flux lines 
> annihilating with a yield of "EMF" may give us a clue.? Take a look at 
> this:?? 
> _http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf_??? 
> The creation of anti-parallel flux annihilation may be the answer!? 
> "Opinion please"!
>
> On 3/23/2016 7:04 AM, [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>_ [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> '/"Now carefully think this out, for a cap discharge back into a 
> saturated iron decaying flux is a unidirectional "DC" event, not AC" 
> because AC line is no longer connected. ?? (contactor is open)./'
> As both inductance and capacitance are at play it will make 
> oscillations until the energy is dissipated so no guarantee for a true 
> unidirectional pulse. The circuit forms an LC-tank circuit. Also as 
> the inductance is decreasing because of the saturation the current is 
> increasing. An increasing current gives a squared increase in stored 
> energy while the decrease in inductance only dampens the stored energy 
> in a linear way making the total energy increase very fast. When 
> breaking the circuit the magnetic energy can't be stored any longer 
> and has to go somewhere like an EMP or melting something. The voltage 
> will take whatever value it needs to keep the current flowing at the 
> value it had at the breaking point as the current through an inductor 
> can't be discontinuous. Think of the mechanical analog of instantly 
> stopping a flywheel. The spin (current) will make the stopping force 
> (voltage) approach infinity. In real systems something breaks down 
> before reaching infinity by melting or exploding. In electrical 
> systems the air may ionize and form an arc burning away the metal. The 
> arc is conducting thus closes the circuit while dissipating a lot of 
> heat until the energy of the inductor and capacitor is dissipated.
>
> The peak current of the circuit at the moment the over current relay 
> (contactor) opens should be measured. It would be hard to protect the 
> contactor with a spark gap or something without any damping as the 
> contact points have to move away from zero distance to open the 
> circuit. As soon as this happens the high voltage ionizes the air and 
> an electric arc is formed across the breaking points. Perhaps an 
> electronic interrupter with an external spark gap could be used for 
> the experiment. The electronic circuit breaker would have to be able 
> to work at a voltage above the firing voltage of the spark gap. The 
> spark gap has to be placed close to the electronic circuit breaker to 
> be able to protect it from over voltage. I.e. inductance of the wires 
> must be small or the circuit breaker will be fried.
>
> Normally capacitors are placed across the contact points to absorb the 
> energy for preventing arc over which eats the metal of the contacts 
> (or welds them together). This is also done for preventing the EMP 
> from disturbing sensitive equipment in the vicinity. Capacitors 
> absorbing the pulse may prevent the destructive effect of the 
> experiment if they can take the excess energy. This is much higher 
> than in an ordinary circuit as just double voltage and double current 
> (changing from full forward to full reverse) gives four times the 
> normal power. The decrease of the inductance by saturation even adds 
> to this meaning many times the normal power.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
> http://reu.physics.ucla.edu/common/papers/2012/sarah_smolenski.pdf
>
> http://www.skif.biz/download/pub/4/0/Magnetic%20Technology.pdf
>
> http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/ns545_fall2009_notes02/NS545_session02_reading.pdf
>
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/antiparticle
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_reconnection
>
>
> SUM of all the above.?????
>
>
> On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Jon Gentry wrote:
>> Norm,
>>
>> Okay, maybe just bats in the belfry swooping around; but when they're 
>> talking about non-parallel I'm thinking the older term that I do not
>> know what area it came from called Reverse Particle Flow; which does 
>> not need to be at right angles, necessarily; but it helps.? I've already
>> gotten lost in all the talk of magnetic fields and plasma; lost 
>> figuring how this all is ordered together.? But here is what I'm 
>> visualizing as
>> a potential experiment.? We know there are now "tasers" that carry an 
>> electrical charge on low intensity UV spectrum dual laser beams;
>> that can carry a lot of volts, up in the hundreds of thousands.? The 
>> target's body or articles of clothing complete the circuit when hit 
>> by the
>> dual beams, and provide resistance against a "dead short" while 
>> target "cooks".? So that particular UV band does carry electrons with a
>> certain amount of humidity in the air as a conductive medium.? You 
>> might have a bit of difficulty in Tucson or Mojave Desert.? But above
>> 15% humidity minimum, the tasers will carry a hefty charge to put 
>> someone into a non-attack mode.?
>>
>> What you would need.? Two of these tasers.? A strong magnetic field 
>> with emphasis on projection past the physical end of the magnet . . .
>> don't know what shape would be ideal, maybe a large horseshoe magnet; 
>> or several bar magnets in a bucking configuration to each other.?
>> Some kind of lab equipment to secure each laser at a precise angle of 
>> height and direction.? I have no conclusion as to what setup should
>> sub for the attackers' bodies at each end of the now dual-dual 
>> beams.? Because I do not know how or where one would harvest energy from
>> this process.? If you expect an immense bump up of electrical energy 
>> or discharge of some kind, then whatever body substitute should be
>> able to provide either the resistance needed to keep from blowing the 
>> whole assembly or the ability to tap off the energy.? The lasers are
>> positioned so that they pass very close, but do not "physically" 
>> interact on the particle level.? The beams do not intersect, in other 
>> words.?
>> Then you have the beams passing through your "strong" magnetic 
>> field.? I'm presuming permanent magnets.? But for experimental purposes
>> such as positioning an electromagnet might be practical.?
>>
>> And if we are able to fire both tasers simultaneously--or have them 
>> firing then switch on the electromagnet--we are then expecting what?
>> A plasma effect at that point?? Ball lightning??
>>
>> Taking into account critical measurements such as the distance 
>> between the non-intersecting beams, what are we looking at happening??
>> In Pantone's Geet experiments the "reverse particle flow" is causing 
>> charge interaction from the flows in opposing directions.? In Adair's
>> rocket, employing some neat things like Deuterium in the figure 8 
>> "raceway" particle accelerator you--according to Adair--get a small
>> hydrogen explosion stream at right angles to the raceway driven by a 
>> similar charge interaction.? Personally I would like to draw the line
>> at Pantone's mono-molecular phenomenon, or at the most a ball 
>> lightning event, rather than doing something nuclear as Adair claimed.?
>>
>> I'm posing this experimental model to get feedback as to what is 
>> meant to happen here?? Would we have the two dual laser beams
>> bending together in some magnetic flux annihilation event?? What 
>> would it even mean to have a magnetic flux annihilation if you have
>> a permanent magnet?? Are we looking at some continuous flow of 
>> electrons over input showing up in this process.? IF so, WHERE in the
>> process.?
>>
>> Hopefully this is clear enough you can use this as a starting point 
>> to answer questions.?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> JG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 7, 2018 5:47 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; Mbking42; Lane 
>> Wootan; Toby Grotz; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric 
>> Fletcher; Jeane Manning; joel mcclain; Jon Gentry
>> *Subject:* Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>> ?
>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>
>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> >
>> > This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect
>> > theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>> >
>> > 
>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>> >
>> > On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> >> See: attached doc.? Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of
>> >> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in
>> >> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!