Re: [EVGRAY] Taking gravity from strength to strength

Why not throw a liter or more on the lit fuel   see if it just spreads diluting with flame or puts it out or increases it !
 That would be showing the working percentage! !!



Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.


-------- Original message --------
From: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
Date: 2019-03-26 2:01 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] a new direction for free energy or not.



This is a multi faceted answer.

On this forum, one is spinning magnets to generate more 'electrical" output than electrical input with the Multi-meter being the proof generally.
But spinning magnets generate magnetic Fields and Man doesn't utilize Magnetic Fields. He's always looking for a greater amount of electrons. So the majority of Field Energy is used in heat and most loss is in eddy currents. You guys need our propriety Magnetic Shielding Technology and so to does NASA to get anywhere beyond near earth orbit. My Adams Pulsed Motor used both sides of each magnet and spin at 1000 rpm. with a 2 foot diameter wheel.Some where I have it on sony cassette video as it was shown at a Nexus conference in the 90's. I've moved on. Joecells are an upgrade to using Spinning Magnetic Energy at distance WITH WIRES to using Fields in situ.

Outside our personal experimental labs, Spinning magnets Is the 'generator' of Tesla. and we know lots of ways to utilize it.

One has 6 senses working in varying degrees of effectiveness. You can sense the Field by eyeing the results, you can Hear and Feel the Global Field Vibrating. Some sense or see the "fire" of the Field. Instruments will pick up the Field of the wiring in your house. Smell is usually ozone as the Magnetic Field energizes the oxygen frequencies and this we call O3

Plug into the wall an old school wall wart. The heavy kind Not switching or voltage detecting. Gather all your permanent magnets up. Hold each one close to the Wall Wart and Feel the difference in each Vibration of each magnet makes to the same source.DO NOT TOUCH the Wall Wart you WILL get electrocuted.Which is not a good way to utilized this energy. And is totally UN-explainable with 'electrons'. To prove this make sure your partner knows Resuscitation science.

If one could use a sensitive vibration meter, one could detect the Different Field Frequency of each magnet as no two magnets will have the same vibration. So spinning magnets in an overunity motor will have the most unusual eddy currents with all them different frequencies being generated. Unless you have magnetic shielding.

This Experiment could be repeated for each "source" of Mains Power. like countries with 50 or 60 cycles. Or solar or wind from 48VDC to 120 VAC for example..

Field Science has totally made spinning magnets obsolete in areas of Water Purification, Desalination, Plant Fertilizers, Oil Production

The Aqua Chi uses Spinning Magnet Energy, Its FIELD Generated is best Utilized in anti Ageing and Longevity.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lzb0AXmAE
And if you are sick or have STD Warts or cancer or vaccine autism or PMT or Eczema or Golden Staph , you pretty much SENSE it real Quick.

Some can feel the Field pulsing from 10 feet away. It Pulses at 50 or 60 cycles per sec and if we made it 113VAC, its effectiveness in this area would greatly increase.

The short answer is... everything is a Magnetic Field and by generating Magnetic Fields one can interact with all matter any way one wishes. Tesla brought us the Coil and the millions of coil variations allow us to use it millions of ways.  Sticking it in water for healing or OIL production or Desalination he never thought of. Your senses will detect this.

The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so easily makes with minimal input.

When Tesla showed his 3 phase generator and motor to Westinghouse, It was hand cranked... Westinghouse "got it" right away.

 

 Why do you need more proof? Better percentage proof or whatever?  

 

 Ive seen it done with a car battery that was so flat it barely sparked when crossing the terminals, On the vid link I gave, Joe uses a 48V AC to DC power source. 

 

 Having seen it done a dozen times in front of dozens of people. I have yet to met one of the witnesses that doesnt go and smell the cap. NO eyewitness yet will acknowledge what they saw.  And you can learn how to do it.  It could be considered one the practical application of Spoon bending abilities.
 

 One time we had this gold mine owner make a proposal for Joe Tech. He was a particularly abrasive type of guy. No matter how Joe tried to make the water burn, it would not burn until the guy went outside the shed. Bio Field Science. He was clearly not the kinda guy we are looking for. (or gal)

 

 Those who see Desalination or water into oil, even the Victorian Govt Director Of Earth Resources  (who took back 16 samples for Monash University) REFUSE to discuss what they saw within minutes of seeing.
 Charlie Speers, who was also Director of Mines in Vic just shook his head for 2 hours saying I cant get my mind around where the Solids went.   Rocks, shit, acids, salt, all are restructured into pure water where the HEALING effects of the water (if drank) kinda restructure the mercuries and leads and glyphosphates contaminating the body into well The Nothingness..... 

 

 As stated earlier, no pdf, no report, no Mr Wonderful post, no video evidence can get over human programming and Dissociative Cognizance. Their Insanity is INGRAINED. Is this the best dissociative cognizance you can come up with? Ive seen better.
 

---In [email protected], <okbart@...> wrote :

 Why not throw a liter or more on the lit fuel   see if it just spreads diluting with flame or puts it out or increases it !
  That would be showing the working percentage! !!
 

 

 

 Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.

 
 
 -------- Original message --------
 From: "eagleseeone@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]> 
 Date: 2019-03-26 2:01 AM (GMT-05:00) 
 To: [email protected] 
 Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] a new direction for free energy or not. 
 
   
 This is a multi faceted answer.
 

 On this forum, one is spinning magnets to generate more 'electrical" output than electrical input with the Multi-meter being the proof generally.

 But spinning magnets generate magnetic Fields and Man doesn't utilize Magnetic Fields. He's always looking for a greater amount of electrons. So the majority of Field Energy is used in heat and most loss is in eddy currents. You guys need our propriety Magnetic Shielding Technology and so to does NASA to get anywhere beyond near earth orbit. My Adams Pulsed Motor used both sides of each magnet and spin at 1000 rpm. with a 2 foot diameter wheel.Some where I have it on sony cassette video as it was shown at a Nexus conference in the 90's. I've moved on. Joecells are an upgrade to using Spinning Magnetic Energy at distance WITH WIRES to using Fields in situ.

 

 Outside our personal experimental labs, Spinning magnets Is the 'generator' of Tesla. and we know lots of ways to utilize it. 

 

 One has 6 senses working in varying degrees of effectiveness. You can sense the Field by eyeing the results, you can Hear and Feel the Global Field Vibrating. Some sense or see the "fire" of the Field. Instruments will pick up the Field of the wiring in your house. Smell is usually ozone as the Magnetic Field energizes the oxygen frequencies and this we call O3 

 

 Plug into the wall an old school wall wart. The heavy kind Not switching or voltage detecting. Gather all your permanent magnets up. Hold each one close to the Wall Wart and Feel the difference in each Vibration of each magnet makes to the same source.DO NOT TOUCH the Wall Wart you WILL get electrocuted.Which is not a good way to utilized this energy. And is totally UN-explainable with 'electrons'. To prove this make sure your partner knows Resuscitation science.

 

 If one could use a sensitive vibration meter, one could detect the Different Field Frequency of each magnet as no two magnets will have the same vibration. So spinning magnets in an overunity motor will have the most unusual eddy currents with all them different frequencies being generated. Unless you have magnetic shielding.

 

 This Experiment could be repeated for each "source" of Mains Power. like countries with 50 or 60 cycles. Or solar or wind from 48VDC to 120 VAC for example.. 

 

 Field Science has totally made spinning magnets obsolete in areas of Water Purification, Desalination, Plant Fertilizers, Oil Production 

 

 The Aqua Chi uses Spinning Magnet Energy, Its FIELD Generated is best Utilized in anti Ageing and Longevity.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lzb0AXmAE

 And if you are sick or have STD Warts or cancer or vaccine autism or PMT or Eczema or Golden Staph , you pretty much SENSE it real Quick.
 

 Some can feel the Field pulsing from 10 feet away. It Pulses at 50 or 60 cycles per sec and if we made it 113VAC, its effectiveness in this area would greatly increase.
 

 The short answer is... everything is a Magnetic Field and by generating Magnetic Fields one can interact with all matter any way one wishes. Tesla brought us the Coil and the millions of coil variations allow us to use it millions of ways.  Sticking it in water for healing or OIL production or Desalination he never thought of. Your senses will detect this.

 

 The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so easily makes with minimal input.

Jean,

Very interesting.

Yeah I am not sure why someone wants to come here and be rude to people
and as you say try to take over.  Thank you for clarifying a few things.

Your English is perfect.



On 3/26/2019 6:57 AM, Jean Bourg [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
> Lynn,
> I respect your knowledge, but did you kicked out James Robert Clark
> (Coilpack4you) from joecellenergiticforum because he was selling his
> product.
> Do you sell Aqua Chi? and make millions out of it?
> So why you had been so hard on Jim?
> You even changed the name of the forum group to
> JoeCellGenerationField, because, it was not what you wanted to teach.
>
> What is your intention here?
> Please teach us something but do not change this forum (EVGRAY) to
> your needs.
>
> English is not my native language, sorry if the tone sound bad, i mean
> no harm to you.
>
> Respectfully
>
> Jean
>
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 2:03:55 a.m. EDT, [email protected]
> [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> This is a multi faceted answer.
>
> On this forum, one is spinning magnets to generate more 'electrical"
> output than electrical input with the Multi-meter being the proof
> generally.
> But spinning magnets generate magnetic Fields and Man doesn't utilize
> Magnetic Fields. He's always looking for a greater amount of
> electrons. So the majority of Field Energy is used in heat and most
> loss is in eddy currents. You guys need our propriety Magnetic
> Shielding Technology and so to does NASA to get anywhere beyond near
> earth orbit. My Adams Pulsed Motor used both sides of each magnet and
> spin at 1000 rpm. with a 2 foot diameter wheel.Some where I have it on
> sony cassette video as it was shown at a Nexus conference in the 90's.
> I've moved on. Joecells are an upgrade to using Spinning Magnetic
> Energy at distance WITH WIRES to using Fields in situ.
>
> Outside our personal experimental labs, Spinning magnets Is the
> 'generator' of Tesla. and we know lots of ways to utilize it.
>
> One has 6 senses working in varying degrees of effectiveness. You can
> sense the Field by eyeing the results, you can Hear and Feel the
> Global Field Vibrating. Some sense or see the "fire" of the Field.
> Instruments will pick up the Field of the wiring in your house. Smell
> is usually ozone as the Magnetic Field energizes the oxygen
> frequencies and this we call O3
>
> Plug into the wall an old school wall wart. The heavy kind Not
> switching or voltage detecting. Gather all your permanent magnets up.
> Hold each one close to the Wall Wart and Feel the difference in each
> Vibration of each magnet makes to the same source.DO NOT TOUCH the
> Wall Wart you WILL get electrocuted.Which is not a good way to
> utilized this energy. And is totally UN-explainable with 'electrons'.
> To prove this make sure your partner knows Resuscitation science.
>
> If one could use a sensitive vibration meter, one could detect the
> Different Field Frequency of each magnet as no two magnets will have
> the same vibration. So spinning magnets in an overunity motor will
> have the most unusual eddy currents with all them different
> frequencies being generated. Unless you have magnetic shielding.
>
> This Experiment could be repeated for each "source" of Mains Power.
> like countries with 50 or 60 cycles. Or solar or wind from 48VDC to
> 120 VAC for example..
>
> Field Science has totally made spinning magnets obsolete in areas of
> Water Purification, Desalination, Plant Fertilizers, Oil Production
>
> The Aqua Chi uses Spinning Magnet Energy, Its FIELD Generated is best
> Utilized in anti Ageing and Longevity. 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lzb0AXmAE
> And if you are sick or have STD Warts or cancer or vaccine autism or
> PMT or Eczema or Golden Staph , you pretty much SENSE it real Quick.
>
> Some can feel the Field pulsing from 10 feet away. It Pulses at 50 or
> 60 cycles per sec and if we made it 113VAC, its effectiveness in this
> area would greatly increase.
>
> The short answer is... everything is a Magnetic Field and by
> generating Magnetic Fields one can interact with all matter any way
> one wishes. Tesla brought us the Coil and the millions of coil
> variations allow us to use it millions of ways.  Sticking it in water
> for healing or OIL production or Desalination he never thought of.
> Your senses will detect this.
>
> The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so
> easily makes with minimal input.
>
>
>
>

Thanks Warren for some common sense! 

What circuit are you building, something was mentioned about Arduino but
I must have missed the post?

On 3/22/2019 8:15 PM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> It is somewhat boastful to assume people have not achieved your
> measure of education, while at the same time, berate a group of
> dedicated experimenters for not being, in your eyes, successful.
>
> Why on earth do you wish to simply pester us, for doing things that
> you have not a clue about?
> You are not curious. You are simply preaching, and lecturing, playing
> messiah among the heathen.
> I am getting back to making a device, with solder, and circuit board.
> After hundreds of failures, maybe this will be the one?
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 10:31 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>      
>
>     But you dont know what causes the Two Dimensional Frequencies. Or
>     have a grasp at the Spiral of 3D a frequencies.
>     Or the structure of Light Plasma emitted by the Sun thats the
>     source of emitted Frequencies.
>     And thats just for starters.
>
>     I am pretty sure all you got are photon releases from electrons
>     colliding other electrons. So last millenium theories.
>
>     There are none so wise as they who seek Upwising.
>
>

Have you ever built a rotoverter ? made hydroxil from resonance ? 

used sonofusion ? 

just curious ? 

(H) 

---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :

 The Art of Winning Wars by Sun Tzu aka MerLynn
  
 Know your opposition.
 Well humans are pretty much predictable. Their past will be repeated, mistakes and all, as the future is based on cyclic History.
  
 For the Third time ….  So youse all get it.
  
 First the new idea is ridiculed by any and all means possible (source outside opinions from experts of course)
 Then its Violently rejected (belittle the presenter anyway one can all the way through to Spiritual burning at the stake or banning)
 Finally its accepted as self evident... (by following procedure)
  
 It was foretold, twice, the behaviour of Idea rejection would be evident even here.
  
 Whats the best Defense? Why Offense of course. So I jumped in with “that tone” hoping to get past stage one and stage 2 very quickly and save time and writing. It was only ever going to be violent opposition eventually anyway. The idea is not only just too new, Its revolutionary with History. Nothing like you’ve ever heard before but an explanation for every anomaly you can think of including devices just for Transmutation. That legendary of all chemical impossibilities including the Silver Joecell and the Gold Joecell with the Aqua Chi coming in at 3rd and Ocean White a distant 4th.
 No one wants to taste transmuted Sea water with just a car battery? Afraid are ya?
  
 If die hard Theorists want to continue violently objecting by seeking outside experts, You cant blame the Art of War for making you do so because of being butt hurt on the Internet in this day and age by predicting your actions in advance.
  
 Defend your theories. Is the double slit the best you got? I see no has one really tried. You have no Defence in this battle. Its been shot so full of holes by others and forms the very reason you are here.  There has to be an Alternate way.
  
 When it comes along, even God is told “all the best”. Because you cant have it the way you want it in pdf form.
  
 Please, I see my tone mirrored in most every post. Will we ever get past stage 2 of violent rejection?
  
 The learning can begin in earnest then, giving students the option to opt out with the send to the spam button.  Not all free Energies are Equal, could be the next lesson.
  
 Now this lesson thing of Pai Mei or the preaching and shoving down the throats as its translated here apparently.…
  
 ALL of Life is Lessons in Karma or Energy. So the word Lesson is the only choice.
 Am open to Intelligent Questions for those who want to know Field Science.

Lynn,I respect your knowledge, but did you kicked out James Robert Clark (Coilpack4you) from joecellenergiticforum because he was selling his product.Do you sell Aqua Chi? and make millions out of it?So why you had been so hard on Jim?
You even changed the name of the forum group to JoeCellGenerationField, because, it was not what you wanted to teach.
What is your intention here?Please teach us something but do not change this forum (EVGRAY) to your needs.
English is not my native language, sorry if the tone sound bad, i mean no harm to you.
Respectfully

Jean

    On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 2:03:55 a.m. EDT, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 

This is a multi faceted answer.
On this forum, one is spinning magnets to generate more 'electrical" output than electrical input with the Multi-meter being the proof generally.
But spinning magnets generate magnetic Fields and Man doesn't utilize Magnetic Fields. He's always looking for a greater amount of electrons. So the majority of Field Energy is used in heat and most loss is in eddy currents. You guys need our propriety Magnetic Shielding Technology and so to does NASA to get anywhere beyond near earth orbit. My Adams Pulsed Motor used both sides of each magnet and spin at 1000 rpm. with a 2 foot diameter wheel.Some where I have it on sony cassette video as it was shown at a Nexus conference in the 90's. I've moved on. Joecells are an upgrade to using Spinning Magnetic Energy at distance WITH WIRES to using Fields in situ.

Outside our personal experimental labs, Spinning magnets Is the 'generator' of Tesla. and we know lots of ways to utilize it. 

One has 6 senses working in varying degrees of effectiveness. You can sense the Field by eyeing the results, you can Hear and Feel the Global Field Vibrating. Some sense or see the "fire" of the Field. Instruments will pick up the Field of the wiring in your house. Smell is usually ozone as the Magnetic Field energizes the oxygen frequencies and this we call O3 

Plug into the wall an old school wall wart. The heavy kind Not switching or voltage detecting. Gather all your permanent magnets up. Hold each one close to the Wall Wart and Feel the difference in each Vibration of each magnet makes to the same source.DO NOT TOUCH the Wall Wart you WILL get electrocuted.Which is not a good way to utilized this energy. And is totally UN-explainable with 'electrons'. To prove this make sure your partner knows Resuscitation science.

If one could use a sensitive vibration meter, one could detect the Different Field Frequency of each magnet as no two magnets will have the same vibration. So spinning magnets in an overunity motor will have the most unusual eddy currents with all them different frequencies being generated. Unless you have magnetic shielding.

This Experiment could be repeated for each "source" of Mains Power. like countries with 50 or 60 cycles. Or solar or wind from 48VDC to 120 VAC for example.. 

Field Science has totally made spinning magnets obsolete in areas of Water Purification, Desalination, Plant Fertilizers, Oil Production 

The Aqua Chi uses Spinning Magnet Energy, Its FIELD Generated is best Utilized in anti Ageing and Longevity.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lzb0AXmAE
And if you are sick or have STD Warts or cancer or vaccine autism or PMT or Eczema or Golden Staph , you pretty much SENSE it real Quick.
Some can feel the Field pulsing from 10 feet away. It Pulses at 50 or 60 cycles per sec and if we made it 113VAC, its effectiveness in this area would greatly increase.
The short answer is... everything is a Magnetic Field and by generating Magnetic Fields one can interact with all matter any way one wishes. Tesla brought us the Coil and the millions of coil variations allow us to use it millions of ways.  Sticking it in water for healing or OIL production or Desalination he never thought of. Your senses will detect this.

The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so easily makes with minimal input.

Your English fine.



Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Jean Bourg [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
Date: 2019-03-26 9:59 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] a new direction for free energy or not.



Lynn,
I respect your knowledge, but did you kicked out James Robert Clark (Coilpack4you) from joecellenergiticforum because he was selling his product.
Do you sell Aqua Chi? and make millions out of it?
So why you had been so hard on Jim?
You even changed the name of the forum group to JoeCellGenerationField, because, it was not what you wanted to teach.

What is your intention here?
Please teach us something but do not change this forum (EVGRAY) to your needs.

English is not my native language, sorry if the tone sound bad, i mean no harm to you.

Respectfully

Jean

On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 2:03:55 a.m. EDT, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:




This is a multi faceted answer.

On this forum, one is spinning magnets to generate more 'electrical" output than electrical input with the Multi-meter being the proof generally.
But spinning magnets generate magnetic Fields and Man doesn't utilize Magnetic Fields. He's always looking for a greater amount of electrons. So the majority of Field Energy is used in heat and most loss is in eddy currents. You guys need our propriety Magnetic Shielding Technology and so to does NASA to get anywhere beyond near earth orbit. My Adams Pulsed Motor used both sides of each magnet and spin at 1000 rpm. with a 2 foot diameter wheel.Some where I have it on sony cassette video as it was shown at a Nexus conference in the 90's. I've moved on. Joecells are an upgrade to using Spinning Magnetic Energy at distance WITH WIRES to using Fields in situ.

Outside our personal experimental labs, Spinning magnets Is the 'generator' of Tesla. and we know lots of ways to utilize it.

One has 6 senses working in varying degrees of effectiveness. You can sense the Field by eyeing the results, you can Hear and Feel the Global Field Vibrating. Some sense or see the "fire" of the Field. Instruments will pick up the Field of the wiring in your house. Smell is usually ozone as the Magnetic Field energizes the oxygen frequencies and this we call O3

Plug into the wall an old school wall wart. The heavy kind Not switching or voltage detecting. Gather all your permanent magnets up. Hold each one close to the Wall Wart and Feel the difference in each Vibration of each magnet makes to the same source.DO NOT TOUCH the Wall Wart you WILL get electrocuted.Which is not a good way to utilized this energy. And is totally UN-explainable with 'electrons'. To prove this make sure your partner knows Resuscitation science.

If one could use a sensitive vibration meter, one could detect the Different Field Frequency of each magnet as no two magnets will have the same vibration. So spinning magnets in an overunity motor will have the most unusual eddy currents with all them different frequencies being generated. Unless you have magnetic shielding.

This Experiment could be repeated for each "source" of Mains Power. like countries with 50 or 60 cycles. Or solar or wind from 48VDC to 120 VAC for example..

Field Science has totally made spinning magnets obsolete in areas of Water Purification, Desalination, Plant Fertilizers, Oil Production

The Aqua Chi uses Spinning Magnet Energy, Its FIELD Generated is best Utilized in anti Ageing and Longevity.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5lzb0AXmAE
And if you are sick or have STD Warts or cancer or vaccine autism or PMT or Eczema or Golden Staph , you pretty much SENSE it real Quick.

Some can feel the Field pulsing from 10 feet away. It Pulses at 50 or 60 cycles per sec and if we made it 113VAC, its effectiveness in this area would greatly increase.

The short answer is... everything is a Magnetic Field and by generating Magnetic Fields one can interact with all matter any way one wishes. Tesla brought us the Coil and the millions of coil variations allow us to use it millions of ways.  Sticking it in water for healing or OIL production or Desalination he never thought of. Your senses will detect this.

The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so easily makes with minimal input.

Yes the product (TC5000) is $1595. Where are the directions to make one? 

 Ron
 

---In [email protected], <tijean1961@...> wrote :

 
 Lynn,
 I respect your knowledge, but did you kicked out James Robert Clark (Coilpack4you) from joecellenergiticforum because he was selling his product.
 Do you sell Aqua Chi? and make millions out of it?
 So why you had been so hard on Jim?

 You even changed the name of the forum group to JoeCellGenerationField, because, it was not what you wanted to teach.
 

 What is your intention here?
 Please teach us something but do not change this forum (EVGRAY) to your needs.
 

 English is not my native language, sorry if the tone sound bad, i mean no harm to you.
 

 Respectfully

 

 Jean

The Fisher and Paykel washing machine motor is a Low Drag motor so easily makes with minimal input.
 

 Thanks, do you have a schematic for a control circuit?
 

 Ron

Thanks Hector, solid.

On 3/26/2019 10:38 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Have you ever built a rotoverter ? made hydroxil from resonance ?
>
> used sonofusion ?
>
> just curious ?
>
> (H)
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :
>
> The Art of Winning Wars by Sun Tzu aka MerLynn
>
>  
>
> Know your opposition.
>
> Well humans are pretty much predictable. Their past will be repeated,
> mistakes and all, as the future is based on cyclic History.
>
>  
>
> For the Third time ….  So youse all get it.
>
>  
>
> First the new idea is ridiculed by any and all means possible (source
> outside opinions from experts of course)
>
> Then its Violently rejected (belittle the presenter anyway one can all
> the way through to Spiritual burning at the stake or banning)
>
> Finally its accepted as self evident... (by following procedure)
>
>  
>
> It was foretold, twice, the behaviour of Idea rejection would be
> evident even here.
>
>  
>
> Whats the best Defense? Why Offense of course. So I jumped in with
> “that tone” hoping to get past stage one and stage 2 very quickly and
> save time and writing. It was only ever going to be violent opposition
> eventually anyway. The idea is not only just too new, Its
> revolutionary with History. Nothing like you’ve ever heard before but
> an explanation for every anomaly you can think of including devices
> just for Transmutation. That legendary of all chemical impossibilities
> including the Silver Joecell and the Gold Joecell with the Aqua Chi
> coming in at 3^rd and Ocean White a distant 4^th .
>
> No one wants to taste transmuted Sea water with just a car battery?
> Afraid are ya?
>
>  
>
> If die hard Theorists want to continue violently objecting by seeking
> outside experts, You cant blame the Art of War for making you do so
> because of being butt hurt on the Internet in this day and age by
> predicting your actions in advance.
>
>  
>
> Defend your theories. Is the double slit the best you got? I see no
> has one really tried. You have no Defence in this battle. Its been
> shot so full of holes by others and forms the very reason you are
> here.  There has to be an Alternate way.
>
>  
>
> When it comes along, even God is told “all the best”. Because you cant
> have it the way you want it in pdf form.
>
>  
>
> Please, I see my tone mirrored in most every post. Will we ever get
> past stage 2 of violent rejection?
>
>  
>
> The learning can begin in earnest then, giving students the option to
> opt out with the send to the spam button.  Not all free Energies are
> Equal, could be the next lesson.
>
>  
>
> Now this lesson thing of Pai Mei or the preaching and shoving down the
> throats as its translated here apparently.…
>
>  
>
> ALL of Life is Lessons in Karma or Energy. So the word Lesson is the
> only choice.
>
> Am open to Intelligent Questions for those who want to know Field Science.
>
>

I have never been a moderator with kicking out ability. The posting records are there for all to read. 

 A group mindset cant have a member who actively ridicules the groups topic in an unmoderated forum. 

 I contacted Bernie Here and he made Tomas Moderator and after MONTHS of warnings, Tomas did the right thing,. I gave Bernie a fully working Aqua Chi footbath unit to make Tomas a Mod. Bernie didnt care about the group again and I did want to resurrect it. The world needs to know about Field Science and I cleaned house.
 

 I  see the problem here with some members, The lack of english comprehension skills, In my second post on this form #111461 I stated clearly the following;
 "I have NO pecuniary interest in the following. I refer to it only as a device I helped invent to prove the above science. I am not here to sell anything other than another point of view. The only thing of value in the universe is knowledge".  Then followed ;what the Aqua Chi is. 

 So NO I do not sell these, and I never made a penny from the million it took to equip a R&D Lab to made a number of prototypes with the 7 Ringed array unit being the only one commercialized. Due to Life's Lessons, I havent been involved for 15 years. Never made a penny. But when one considers I would be dead now if it wasnt for the invention, I suppose you could say it made me a fortune as health is priceless. I am spending my good fortune passing it on. 
 

 The expense of my education in Field Science leaves any Degree from any Uni for dead. 

 

 Gross income from that Device marketed as the Aqua Chi in the USA and the BEFE in China and Q2 Orb in Australia  exceeds 100 million. With PhD Marcy's new model un-named yet.  You have to admit that to bring forth an Idea that does what no one else on the planet can do, and have some one pick up the idea and earn a PhD from it, is worthy of a Merit Star in the school of Life.
 

 I did not change the name of the joecell group and have the emails to prove it. I said to Tomas the new Mod, its your group and you chose the name and words to the new introduction. I had NO say in either. Your English comprehension is NOT GOOD Jean. Your water memory is not good either.

 

 What is my intention here?
 

 I have put my intention here IN WRITING in an email to Kone. If he feels the need to divulge it, he will. I would rather let it unfold all by itself.

 It is always advisable to be upfront when one is a guest in anothers house.

 

 "Please teach us something but do not change this forum (EVGRAY) to your needs."
 US = Group Description   EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT FREE ENERGY SYSTEMS
 

 The absolutely huge amount of data I have already given about free energy systems it appears has largely been ignored and I fear its due to lack of english comprehension skills by dam near everyone. 

 

 I can teach you, but most dont want to learn. The Buzzzing is ridiculed as the heart might stop with a couple milliamps of Pure Water. (Electricity is Water as is everything else in the universe) When Charging a Field, one surly does need to know the Electrode Placement as in any healing modality there can be SIDE effects particularly if done wrong by unskilled quacks.

 Some here are seeking outside opinions to STOP me teaching anything here. Go Figure !!!!

Patent number
 US 6,555,071 B2
 

 But unfortunately it is wrong. the patent office goofed and besides you cant patent something thats been commercially available for 7 years. 

 

 If you want one I can assist with finding the cheapest setup anywhere.

My answer....  Why would I need to? 

 

 The rotoverter is best done with many fisher n paykel motors stacked upon each other for 1000's of horses power. present electron producing theories need a generator attached to it. but it is already a low drag generator, Is not there a bunch of coils spinning? Could not one place the magnets as stationary? Giving a sort of opposite and equal to spinning magnet energy?  

 

 What is hydroxil used for? Perhaps I know of it by another name?
 

 What is the purpose of sonofusion? Perhaps I know it by another name.

http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf
 I made their list....
 but they just cant get their mind around the fact that it transmutes the water into silver.
 

 

 Why I write the way I do....
 

 http://milesmathis.com/anger.html http://milesmathis.com/anger.html

 

I often get emails, from fans and opponents alike, asking why I seem to be so angry and confrontational. Can't I just present the facts in a scientific manner without all the emotion? No, I can't. It isn't my style, for one thing. And I have no desire to change my style. Many will think this is just caprice or ego, but it isn't. I keep my style, and even play it up, not from ego but from a firm belief that it is both called for and necessary. If you are one of the ones bothered by my anger, my reply to you is, “Why aren't you angry? You should be. Given all the lies you have been told, all the misdirection you have been hit with, all the dodging and fudging and faking you have been presented with as science, you should be furious. You should be just as mad at the current scientists as you are at the current politicians, and for the same reason. You have been sold a bill of goods, taught a bunch of fake and false equations in high school and college, heard decades of loud and obnoxious promotion for novel theories that turn out to have been created from nothing, been presented with new heroes who are nothing more than conmen, and been taxed to support all these careerists and their bloated projects. What you are told is true is not, and what you are told is false is often full of promise. While bad new ideas from entrenched phonies are shoved down your throat in all the magazines and other media, good new ideas are slandered, belittled, and buried, to protect these same phonies. If you aren't mad, you either aren't paying attention, or you are taking too many sedatives. 

 Still, I often hear that “anger is not productive.” Scientifically, that is false. Anger is one of the most productive things. It is one of the primary engines of human action. Anger and sex are the two biggest motives of human action, and anger may have even more potential than sex, especially in extraordinary situations. The modern or contemporary belief that anger is unproductive is actually just one more lie you have been fed, to keep you quiet. Along with all this fake and false science, you are taught to be embarrassed by your own emotions. This keeps you from channeling your anger into positive action. Instead, you sit on it and try to squelch it, as something low and unscientific. This is just what your teachers and handlers want. They want you to spend all your time reacting against your own natural emotions, and no time reacting against their theories and projects. They need you to be docile, so they teach you there is something wrong with anger. This insures you do nothing. Instead, you rationalize your inaction as some sort of emotional purity. You are “above all that.” You are not a coward, you are a yogi or a Zen master, enlightened and above the fray. While you are doing that, they sell you an upside-down world as some advance. While you are admiring the purity of your navel, they steal the food from your lips, the socks from your feet, the very air from your lungs. That's not hyperbole, either. They are stealing the air from your lungs and the lungs of your children, whether or not you have the gumption to be angry about it. 

 But the only thing wrong with anger is bottling it up. Instead, you should use it. That is what it is there for. We don't need any more yogis or Zen masters or other purists. We need some people with some fight left in them, people who can't placidly watch the world crumble while they coddle themselves and talk of objectivity. 

 “All right,” you will say, “maybe so, but it doesn't have to make its way into the actual research. Be angry if you want, but give us a paper that is calm and objective.” Again, that tends to sound good, because it is what we are taught. We are taught to separate ideas from emotion. Reason is good, emotion is bad. But I don't buy it, because it is false. Emotion is not bad; and besides there is no possible way to separate reason and emotion. In reality, they are always informing one another. Therefore, a writing style that tries to excise the emotions must be a falsification. It is a sort of lying to the audience, trying to convince it that you are emotionless when you can't be. In that sense, any “objectivity” is fake. A writer cannot be objective, because a writer is a single person, a subject, who has opinions and emotions. Any objectivity is a pretense. It is better to just say what you intend to say, with the emotion in it, and let the reader see the two together. 

 It is actually easier to judge “facts” when they are couched in the emotions they cause. That is to say, it is much easier to spot a lie when a writer is not trying to be objective than when he is. We are taught that scientific writing was chosen as a style historically because it is the most transparent. But again, that is false. Not only false, but a lie. Scientific writing was chosen and kept because it has proven to be a great way to hide. When all emotion is excised from writing, it becomes very difficult to judge the veracity and character of the writer. The writer becomes invisible. The invisibility of the writer would seem to be a good thing, but it actually isn't. The invisibility of the writer is like the invisibility of the magician's hand: it allows for all sorts of things to be passed off in the dark. 

 To see what I mean, compare what you know about me from my style to what you know about famous physicists from their style. You may or may not like my style, or the personality it exhibits, but you have to admit it tells you who I am. It informs you about my veracity. Many readers will doubt my humility, but few will doubt my veracity. I don't seem to be hiding anything. It's all right there, good or bad. Can you say that about other physicists? I can't. I feel pretty sure, even before I check their facts, that they are hiding something. Their style is a dead giveaway. From the first sentence, they are trying to divert me. They are diverting me not only from the fundamental questions, by taking me immediately into side alleys and unsupported maths, but also from learning anything about their character or veracity. They purposely avoid telling me anything I might be able to use in judging them or their theories. This is because the sentences don't say anything. Most often, they are sentences with form but little or no content. They have no emotional content, of course, because that is forbidden in science. But they also have very little content of any other kind. We don't get science, we get science-speak. We get a lot of lingo, math, and claims of relevance, but no real ideas or opinions. 

 Readers will tell me, “We don't want ideas or opinions, we want facts. We want data.” Really? Is that really what physics is? Facts and data? No. That is what we have been taught, but it is false. Physics isn't facts and data. We have lots of facts and data now, and almost no physics, since no one can read that data. We don't need more facts and data, although they are always nice to have. We need a coherent reading of centuries of data, going back to Galileo. We don't have it, therefore we don't have physics. We have data, we have facts, and we have math, but we have very little physics, because we have very little in the way of good ideas or opinions about how to explain that data. 

 Math is not an explanation of data, although many modern physicists seem to think that it is. Any monkey can force-fit data into equations. But if the equations don't naturally represent some comprehensible mechanics, we don't have physics. All we have is the pretense of physics. We have a bunch of big equations that overpaid people can fill blackboards with, but we have no real physics. Physics means mechanics. Look up the definition of the word. We have been sold a non-mechanical physics, but that is about as logical as non-aesthetic art or non-constructive architecture or non-aqueous water. If you will accept a non-mechanical physics, you will accept anything. Basically, the modern world has accepted anything, in all fields. It has accepted everyday, untouched objects as art; it has accepted thuggery and looting as government; it has accepted mobsters as politicians; and it has accepted magic and mysticism as physics. 

 If this doesn't make you angry, I don't know what to say. You must be under the influence of some strong sedative, and all sedatives aren't pharmacological. Your sedative may be wealth or career or position or prestige. I can't say. All I can say is that I will continue to tone it UP, to sharpen my theories as well as my tongue and my wit and my sense of humor. If that isn't to your taste, you will have to do your science reading elsewhere, I suppose. Good luck with that, since you are unlikely to find healthy opinions or ideas from those who are sitting on their emotions.

Hi Ron,

Here is his home page: http://www.free-energy-info.com/ http://www.free-energy-info.com/

The first book doesn't have that many chapters. But the second one does (Simple FE book): http://www.free-energy-info.com/SimpleFE.pdf http://www.free-energy-info.com/SimpleFE.pdf

Your message hasn't made to the group yet which is why the answer is here.

Regards
Ole


"Hi Warren, 

 Do you have a link to Patrick Kelly, chapter 32?
 

 Here is my Fisher Paykel:
 

 [url=https://postimages.org/][img]https://i.postimg.cc/BQ43WqKv/IMG-7414e.jpg[/img][/url]

 

Ron"

Thanks Ole, 

 I was fighting with Yahoo, trying to provide a link to a photo but Yahoo won so I deleted my posts.
 

 Ron
 

---In [email protected], <onielsen@...> wrote :

 Hi Ron,

Here is his home page: http://www.free-energy-info.com/ http://www.free-energy-info.com/

The first book doesn't have that many chapters. But the second one does (Simple FE book): http://www.free-energy-info.com/SimpleFE.pdf http://www.free-energy-info.com/SimpleFE.pdf

Your message hasn't made to the group yet which is why the answer is here.

Regards
Ole

Have you ever built & tested a Rotoverter ? Normans MRA ?  a Kone motor?  , a Newman motor ? a coil banger ? ....

still curious ? 

 (H)  




 

---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :

 http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf
 I made their list....
 but they just cant get their mind around the fact that it transmutes the water into silver.
 

 

 Why I write the way I do....
 

 http://milesmathis.com/anger.html http://milesmathis.com/anger.html

 

I often get emails, from fans and opponents alike, asking why I seem to be so angry and confrontational. Can't I just present the facts in a scientific manner without all the emotion? No, I can't. It isn't my style, for one thing. And I have no desire to change my style. Many will think this is just caprice or ego, but it isn't. I keep my style, and even play it up, not from ego but from a firm belief that it is both called for and necessary. If you are one of the ones bothered by my anger, my reply to you is, “Why aren't you angry? You should be. Given all the lies you have been told, all the misdirection you have been hit with, all the dodging and fudging and faking you have been presented with as science, you should be furious. You should be just as mad at the current scientists as you are at the current politicians, and for the same reason. You have been sold a bill of goods, taught a bunch of fake and false equations in high school and college, heard decades of loud and obnoxious promotion for novel theories that turn out to have been created from nothing, been presented with new heroes who are nothing more than conmen, and been taxed to support all these careerists and their bloated projects. What you are told is true is not, and what you are told is false is often full of promise. While bad new ideas from entrenched phonies are shoved down your throat in all the magazines and other media, good new ideas are slandered, belittled, and buried, to protect these same phonies. If you aren't mad, you either aren't paying attention, or you are taking too many sedatives. 

 Still, I often hear that “anger is not productive.” Scientifically, that is false. Anger is one of the most productive things. It is one of the primary engines of human action. Anger and sex are the two biggest motives of human action, and anger may have even more potential than sex, especially in extraordinary situations. The modern or contemporary belief that anger is unproductive is actually just one more lie you have been fed, to keep you quiet. Along with all this fake and false science, you are taught to be embarrassed by your own emotions. This keeps you from channeling your anger into positive action. Instead, you sit on it and try to squelch it, as something low and unscientific. This is just what your teachers and handlers want. They want you to spend all your time reacting against your own natural emotions, and no time reacting against their theories and projects. They need you to be docile, so they teach you there is something wrong with anger. This insures you do nothing. Instead, you rationalize your inaction as some sort of emotional purity. You are “above all that.” You are not a coward, you are a yogi or a Zen master, enlightened and above the fray. While you are doing that, they sell you an upside-down world as some advance. While you are admiring the purity of your navel, they steal the food from your lips, the socks from your feet, the very air from your lungs. That's not hyperbole, either. They are stealing the air from your lungs and the lungs of your children, whether or not you have the gumption to be angry about it. 

 But the only thing wrong with anger is bottling it up. Instead, you should use it. That is what it is there for. We don't need any more yogis or Zen masters or other purists. We need some people with some fight left in them, people who can't placidly watch the world crumble while they coddle themselves and talk of objectivity. 

 “All right,” you will say, “maybe so, but it doesn't have to make its way into the actual research. Be angry if you want, but give us a paper that is calm and objective.” Again, that tends to sound good, because it is what we are taught. We are taught to separate ideas from emotion. Reason is good, emotion is bad. But I don't buy it, because it is false. Emotion is not bad; and besides there is no possible way to separate reason and emotion. In reality, they are always informing one another. Therefore, a writing style that tries to excise the emotions must be a falsification. It is a sort of lying to the audience, trying to convince it that you are emotionless when you can't be. In that sense, any “objectivity” is fake. A writer cannot be objective, because a writer is a single person, a subject, who has opinions and emotions. Any objectivity is a pretense. It is better to just say what you intend to say, with the emotion in it, and let the reader see the two together. 

 It is actually easier to judge “facts” when they are couched in the emotions they cause. That is to say, it is much easier to spot a lie when a writer is not trying to be objective than when he is. We are taught that scientific writing was chosen as a style historically because it is the most transparent. But again, that is false. Not only false, but a lie. Scientific writing was chosen and kept because it has proven to be a great way to hide. When all emotion is excised from writing, it becomes very difficult to judge the veracity and character of the writer. The writer becomes invisible. The invisibility of the writer would seem to be a good thing, but it actually isn't. The invisibility of the writer is like the invisibility of the magician's hand: it allows for all sorts of things to be passed off in the dark. 

 To see what I mean, compare what you know about me from my style to what you know about famous physicists from their style. You may or may not like my style, or the personality it exhibits, but you have to admit it tells you who I am. It informs you about my veracity. Many readers will doubt my humility, but few will doubt my veracity. I don't seem to be hiding anything. It's all right there, good or bad. Can you say that about other physicists? I can't. I feel pretty sure, even before I check their facts, that they are hiding something. Their style is a dead giveaway. From the first sentence, they are trying to divert me. They are diverting me not only from the fundamental questions, by taking me immediately into side alleys and unsupported maths, but also from learning anything about their character or veracity. They purposely avoid telling me anything I might be able to use in judging them or their theories. This is because the sentences don't say anything. Most often, they are sentences with form but little or no content. They have no emotional content, of course, because that is forbidden in science. But they also have very little content of any other kind. We don't get science, we get science-speak. We get a lot of lingo, math, and claims of relevance, but no real ideas or opinions. 

 Readers will tell me, “We don't want ideas or opinions, we want facts. We want data.” Really? Is that really what physics is? Facts and data? No. That is what we have been taught, but it is false. Physics isn't facts and data. We have lots of facts and data now, and almost no physics, since no one can read that data. We don't need more facts and data, although they are always nice to have. We need a coherent reading of centuries of data, going back to Galileo. We don't have it, therefore we don't have physics. We have data, we have facts, and we have math, but we have very little physics, because we have very little in the way of good ideas or opinions about how to explain that data. 

 Math is not an explanation of data, although many modern physicists seem to think that it is. Any monkey can force-fit data into equations. But if the equations don't naturally represent some comprehensible mechanics, we don't have physics. All we have is the pretense of physics. We have a bunch of big equations that overpaid people can fill blackboards with, but we have no real physics. Physics means mechanics. Look up the definition of the word. We have been sold a non-mechanical physics, but that is about as logical as non-aesthetic art or non-constructive architecture or non-aqueous water. If you will accept a non-mechanical physics, you will accept anything. Basically, the modern world has accepted anything, in all fields. It has accepted everyday, untouched objects as art; it has accepted thuggery and looting as government; it has accepted mobsters as politicians; and it has accepted magic and mysticism as physics. 

 If this doesn't make you angry, I don't know what to say. You must be under the influence of some strong sedative, and all sedatives aren't pharmacological. Your sedative may be wealth or career or position or prestige. I can't say. All I can say is that I will continue to tone it UP, to sharpen my theories as well as my tongue and my wit and my sense of humor. If that isn't to your taste, you will have to do your science reading elsewhere, I suppose. Good luck with that, since you are unlikely to find healthy opinions or ideas from those who are sitting on their emotions.

HectorStart putting your feelers out for a used Samsung or LG front loading washing machine motor in Puerto Rico cheap. We need your brains here.I posted a picture of what it should look like.A plus, and bummer, of the design is that you need a shaft and bearing for it.I attached mine to the end of a 2.6 kw generator, using it's bearing, and shaft. (See picture), separate post to Doug Cheers Warren

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 9:33 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY]<[email protected]> wrote:       
Have you ever built & tested a Rotoverter ? Normans MRA ?  a Kone motor?  , a Newman motor ? a coil banger ? ....

still curious ? 

 (H)  







---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :

http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdfI made their list....but they just cant get their mind around the fact that it transmutes the water into silver.

Why I write the way I do....
http://milesmathis.com/anger.html

I often get emails, fromfans and opponents alike, asking why I seem to be so angry andconfrontational. Can't I just present the facts in a scientific mannerwithout all the emotion? No, I can't. It isn't my style, for onething. And I have no desire to change my style. Many will think thisis just caprice or ego, but it isn't. I keep my style, and even play itup, not from ego but from a firm belief that it is both called for andnecessary. If you are one of the ones bothered by my anger, my reply toyou is, “Why aren't you angry? You should be. Given all thelies you have been told, all the misdirection you have been hit with,all the dodging and fudging and faking you have been presented with asscience, you should be furious. You should be just as mad at thecurrent scientists as you are at the current politicians, and for thesame reason. You have been sold a bill of goods, taught a bunch of fakeand false equations in high school and college, heard decades of loudand obnoxious promotion for novel theories that turn out to have beencreated from nothing, been presented with new heroes who are nothingmore than conmen, and been taxed to support all these careerists andtheir bloated projects. What you are told is true is not, and what youare told is false is often full of promise. While bad new ideas fromentrenched phonies are shoved down your throat in all the magazines andother media, good new ideas are slandered, belittled, and buried, toprotect these same phonies. If you aren't mad, you either aren't payingattention, or you are taking too many sedatives.

Still, I often hear that “anger is not productive.” Scientifically,that is false. Anger is one of the most productive things. It is oneof the primary engines of human action. Anger and sex are the twobiggest motives of human action, and anger may have even more potentialthan sex, especially in extraordinary situations. The modern orcontemporary belief that anger is unproductive is actually just one morelie you have been fed, to keep you quiet. Along with all this fake andfalse science, you are taught to be embarrassed by your own emotions.This keeps you from channeling your anger into positive action.Instead, you sit on it and try to squelch it, as something low andunscientific. This is just what your teachers and handlers want. Theywant you to spend all your time reacting against your own naturalemotions, and no time reacting against their theories and projects.They need you to be docile, so they teach you there is something wrongwith anger. This insures you do nothing. Instead, you rationalize yourinaction as some sort of emotional purity. You are “above all that.”You are not a coward, you are a yogi or a Zen master, enlightened andabove the fray. While you are doing that, they sell you an upside-downworld as some advance. While you are admiring the purity of your navel,they steal the food from your lips, the socks from your feet, the veryair from your lungs. That's not hyperbole, either. They are stealing the air from your lungs and the lungs of your children, whether or not you have the gumption to be angry about it.

But the only thing wrong with anger is bottling it up. Instead, youshould use it. That is what it is there for. We don't need any moreyogis or Zen masters or other purists. We need some people with somefight left in them, people who can't placidly watch the world crumblewhile they coddle themselves and talk of objectivity.

“All right,” you will say, “maybe so, but it doesn't have to make itsway into the actual research. Be angry if you want, but give us a paperthat is calm and objective.” Again, that tends to sound good, becauseit is what we are taught. We are taught to separate ideas from emotion.Reason is good, emotion is bad. But I don't buy it, because it isfalse. Emotion is not bad; and besides there is no possible wayto separate reason and emotion. In reality, they are always informingone another. Therefore, a writing style that tries to excise theemotions must be a falsification. It is a sort of lying to theaudience, trying to convince it that you are emotionless when you can'tbe. In that sense, any “objectivity” is fake. A writer cannot beobjective, because a writer is a single person, a subject, who hasopinions and emotions. Any objectivity is a pretense. It is better tojust say what you intend to say, with the emotion in it, and let thereader see the two together.

It is actually easier to judge “facts” when they are couched in theemotions they cause. That is to say, it is much easier to spot a liewhen a writer is not trying to be objective than when he is. We aretaught that scientific writing was chosen as a style historicallybecause it is the most transparent. But again, that is false. Not onlyfalse, but a lie. Scientific writing was chosen and kept because ithas proven to be a great way to hide. When all emotion is excised fromwriting, it becomes very difficult to judge the veracity and characterof the writer. The writer becomes invisible. The invisibility of thewriter would seem to be a good thing, but it actually isn't. Theinvisibility of the writer is like the invisibility of the magician'shand: it allows for all sorts of things to be passed off in the dark.

To see what I mean, compare what you know about me from my style to whatyou know about famous physicists from their style. You may or may notlike my style, or the personality it exhibits, but you have to admit ittells you who I am. It informs you about my veracity. Many readerswill doubt my humility, but few will doubt my veracity. I don't seem tobe hiding anything. It's all right there, good or bad. Can you saythat about other physicists? I can't. I feel pretty sure, even before Icheck their facts, that they are hiding something. Their style is adead giveaway. From the first sentence, they are trying to divert me.They are diverting me not only from the fundamental questions, by takingme immediately into side alleys and unsupported maths, but also fromlearning anything about their character or veracity. They purposelyavoid telling me anything I might be able to use in judging them ortheir theories. This is because the sentences don't say anything. Mostoften, they are sentences with form but little or no content. Theyhave no emotional content, of course, because that is forbidden inscience. But they also have very little content of any other kind. Wedon't get science, we get science-speak. We get a lot of lingo, math,and claims of relevance, but no real ideas or opinions.

Readers will tell me, “We don't want ideas or opinions, we want facts.We want data.” Really? Is that really what physics is? Facts anddata? No. That is what we have been taught, but it is false. Physicsisn't facts and data. We have lots of facts and data now, and almost nophysics, since no one can read that data. We don't need more facts anddata, although they are always nice to have. We need a coherentreading of centuries of data, going back to Galileo. We don't have it,therefore we don't have physics. We have data, we have facts, and wehave math, but we have very little physics, because we have very littlein the way of good ideas or opinions about how to explain that data.

Math is not an explanation of data, although many modern physicists seemto think that it is. Any monkey can force-fit data into equations.But if the equations don't naturally represent some comprehensiblemechanics, we don't have physics. All we have is the pretense ofphysics. We have a bunch of big equations that overpaid people can fillblackboards with, but we have no real physics. Physics meansmechanics. Look up the definition of the word. We have been sold anon-mechanical physics, but that is about as logical as non-aestheticart or non-constructive architecture or non-aqueous water. If you willaccept a non-mechanical physics, you will accept anything. Basically,the modern world has accepted anything, in all fields. It hasaccepted everyday, untouched objects as art; it has accepted thuggeryand looting as government; it has accepted mobsters as politicians; andit has accepted magic and mysticism as physics.

If this doesn't make you angry, I don't know what to say. You must beunder the influence of some strong sedative, and all sedatives aren'tpharmacological. Your sedative may be wealth or career or position orprestige. I can't say. All I can say is that I will continue to toneit UP, to sharpen my theories as well as my tongue and my wit and mysense of humor. If that isn't to your taste, you will have to do yourscience reading elsewhere, I suppose. Good luck with that, since youare unlikely to find healthy opinions or ideas from those who aresitting on their emotions.  #yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292 -- #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp #yiv7418092292hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp #yiv7418092292ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp .yiv7418092292ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp .yiv7418092292ad p {margin:0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mkp .yiv7418092292ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ygrp-lc #yiv7418092292hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ygrp-lc .yiv7418092292ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292activity span .yiv7418092292underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 dd.yiv7418092292last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 dd.yiv7418092292last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 dd.yiv7418092292last p span.yiv7418092292yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292file-title a, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292file-title a:active, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292file-title a:hover, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292photo-title a, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292photo-title a:active, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292photo-title a:hover, #yiv7418092292 div.yiv7418092292photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 div#yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7418092292ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7418092292yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv7418092292 o {font-size:0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv7418092292 .yiv7418092292replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv7418092292 input, #yiv7418092292 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7418092292 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7418092292logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-msg p#yiv7418092292attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-reco #yiv7418092292reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-sponsor #yiv7418092292ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv7418092292 #yiv7418092292ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv7418092292

Look I get it youse guys has studied a lot of physical phenomena. Mechanical contraptions. 

 

 Has any one here in this group any testimonies or 'devices' that show "any" non physical phenomena studies or reports??  

 

 What did Tesla mean by Non Physical?  Just what is it that this group hopes to achieve with another 2 decades of Physical Phenomena research that they failed to achieve in the last 18 years?  A greater understanding of Physical Phenomena? 

 

 I built a twin 4 rodded Silver Generator for the Manipulation of DNA 3 years before Joe Built his 4 rodded Silver Generator (2004) for the activation of the Meridian Energy Lines and transmuting of water into silver.
 

 Here's the spiel and the schematics for the study of non physical phenomena for beginners. Everyone starts some where.
 

 Just for the Lab Rats amongst us
 Or you could be a health nut
 Its even for the Sceptics 
  
 I present to the World of Free Energy     
 The apparatus for Transmutations
 The space age Upgrade to Medicinal Silver.
 Your one stop design product for Magnetic Field Science Design specs for practical applications. 
  
 The SilverJoeCell.
 http://joecellwaterscience.com/silverjoe_cell_11.html http://joecellwaterscience.com/silverjoe_cell_11.html
  
 with Just some of the secret wiring exposed here 
 http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf
  
 with the special stirring instructions shown here
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TlP9q6TnY4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TlP9q6TnY4
  
 Its not limited to just Silver. Any range of materials can be toyed with. Silver, Gold, Platinum, Copper and Stainless 316 being experimented with so far. In the USA the SS316 version, separated gold from ores. The Silver Cell design is an excellent choice for the beginner. It not only teaches Water Quality by the differing results one obtains from each source in taste and smell (yes it makes water Smell of the Memory of where is came from) it has the benefit of tickling the Thyroid gland if it is in need of attention. This Elixir recipe Design construct Charges good clean Spring waters and just needs lots of Outside the Box thinking to utilize its Unique Energy Format. Lots of Industries could use this type of energy.
 

 The Wiring format can be done several ways to understand the splitting of the Phases to glean more on the flow of magnetic Current. Non Physical. The Unseen part of Matter. Its magnetic Fields. Just like you can split water into two parts and get sparks aka Lord Kelvin, So too can splitting the Water (electricity) in a Circuit or when connecting 2 electromagnets (or more) to one power source that will givemulti fields that cause all kinds of emf and emp disturbance.

 
 

 There was a cheap chinese goods importer that coulndt find buyers for a 12V motor. In another line of goods in their shop another chinese company had sent over generators about the same size. Both had a 12mm Hex drive and input shaft. So they direct coupled together like a socket and ratchet handle and it weighed about 5 kilos all up. A ready made rotoverter. Several KVA too I might add.They didnt know much and sent them all to the scrap dealers where the employees ring us up if anything interesting comes in. I took lots of pictures of the overunity device but with an iphone. For some reason iphone photos when downloaded onto my home computer and then transferred to a 2 T bite storage they came out as the wrong format. so all was lost. Joe never builds 2 of anything and he said I had learned enough to use the tech to find a westinghouse benefactor for Field Science.

 

 



---In [email protected], <arkresearch@...> wrote :

 Have you ever built & tested a Rotoverter ? Normans MRA ?  a Kone motor?  , a Newman motor ? a coil banger ? ....

still curious ? 

 (H)

ok!

---In [email protected], <schoonersolsticemoon@...> wrote :

 Hector Start putting your feelers out for a used Samsung or LG front loading washing machine motor in Puerto Rico cheap. We need your brains here.
 I posted a picture of what it should look like.
 A plus, and bummer, of the design is that you need a shaft and bearing for it.
 I attached mine to the end of a 2.6 kw generator, using it's bearing, and shaft. (See picture), separate post to Doug 
 Cheers Warren

 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature
 
 On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 9:33 AM, arkresearch@... [EVGRAY]
 <[email protected]> wrote:
 
   Have you ever built & tested a Rotoverter ? Normans MRA ?  a Kone motor?  , a Newman motor ? a coil banger ? ....

still curious ? 

 (H)  





 

---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :

 http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Silver.pdf
 I made their list....
 but they just cant get their mind around the fact that it transmutes the water into silver.
 

 

 Why I write the way I do....
 

 http://milesmathis.com/anger.html http://milesmathis.com/anger.html

 

I often get emails, from fans and opponents alike, asking why I seem to be so angry and confrontational. Can't I just present the facts in a scientific manner without all the emotion? No, I can't. It isn't my style, for one thing. And I have no desire to change my style. Many will think this is just caprice or ego, but it isn't. I keep my style, and even play it up, not from ego but from a firm belief that it is both called for and necessary. If you are one of the ones bothered by my anger, my reply to you is, “Why aren't you angry? You should be. Given all the lies you have been told, all the misdirection you have been hit with, all the dodging and fudging and faking you have been presented with as science, you should be furious. You should be just as mad at the current scientists as you are at the current politicians, and for the same reason. You have been sold a bill of goods, taught a bunch of fake and false equations in high school and college, heard decades of loud and obnoxious promotion for novel theories that turn out to have been created from nothing, been presented with new heroes who are nothing more than conmen, and been taxed to support all these careerists and their bloated projects. What you are told is true is not, and what you are told is false is often full of promise. While bad new ideas from entrenched phonies are shoved down your throat in all the magazines and other media, good new ideas are slandered, belittled, and buried, to protect these same phonies. If you aren't mad, you either aren't paying attention, or you are taking too many sedatives. 

 Still, I often hear that “anger is not productive.” Scientifically, that is false. Anger is one of the most productive things. It is one of the primary engines of human action. Anger and sex are the two biggest motives of human action, and anger may have even more potential than sex, especially in extraordinary situations. The modern or contemporary belief that anger is unproductive is actually just one more lie you have been fed, to keep you quiet. Along with all this fake and false science, you are taught to be embarrassed by your own emotions. This keeps you from channeling your anger into positive action. Instead, you sit on it and try to squelch it, as something low and unscientific. This is just what your teachers and handlers want. They want you to spend all your time reacting against your own natural emotions, and no time reacting against their theories and projects. They need you to be docile, so they teach you there is something wrong with anger. This insures you do nothing. Instead, you rationalize your inaction as some sort of emotional purity. You are “above all that.” You are not a coward, you are a yogi or a Zen master, enlightened and above the fray. While you are doing that, they sell you an upside-down world as some advance. While you are admiring the purity of your navel, they steal the food from your lips, the socks from your feet, the very air from your lungs. That's not hyperbole, either. They are stealing the air from your lungs and the lungs of your children, whether or not you have the gumption to be angry about it. 

 But the only thing wrong with anger is bottling it up. Instead, you should use it. That is what it is there for. We don't need any more yogis or Zen masters or other purists. We need some people with some fight left in them, people who can't placidly watch the world crumble while they coddle themselves and talk of objectivity. 

 “All right,” you will say, “maybe so, but it doesn't have to make its way into the actual research. Be angry if you want, but give us a paper that is calm and objective.” Again, that tends to sound good, because it is what we are taught. We are taught to separate ideas from emotion. Reason is good, emotion is bad. But I don't buy it, because it is false. Emotion is not bad; and besides there is no possible way to separate reason and emotion. In reality, they are always informing one another. Therefore, a writing style that tries to excise the emotions must be a falsification. It is a sort of lying to the audience, trying to convince it that you are emotionless when you can't be. In that sense, any “objectivity” is fake. A writer cannot be objective, because a writer is a single person, a subject, who has opinions and emotions. Any objectivity is a pretense. It is better to just say what you intend to say, with the emotion in it, and let the reader see the two together. 

 It is actually easier to judge “facts” when they are couched in the emotions they cause. That is to say, it is much easier to spot a lie when a writer is not trying to be objective than when he is. We are taught that scientific writing was chosen as a style historically because it is the most transparent. But again, that is false. Not only false, but a lie. Scientific writing was chosen and kept because it has proven to be a great way to hide. When all emotion is excised from writing, it becomes very difficult to judge the veracity and character of the writer. The writer becomes invisible. The invisibility of the writer would seem to be a good thing, but it actually isn't. The invisibility of the writer is like the invisibility of the magician's hand: it allows for all sorts of things to be passed off in the dark. 

 To see what I mean, compare what you know about me from my style to what you know about famous physicists from their style. You may or may not like my style, or the personality it exhibits, but you have to admit it tells you who I am. It informs you about my veracity. Many readers will doubt my humility, but few will doubt my veracity. I don't seem to be hiding anything. It's all right there, good or bad. Can you say that about other physicists? I can't. I feel pretty sure, even before I check their facts, that they are hiding something. Their style is a dead giveaway. From the first sentence, they are trying to divert me. They are diverting me not only from the fundamental questions, by taking me immediately into side alleys and unsupported maths, but also from learning anything about their character or veracity. They purposely avoid telling me anything I might be able to use in judging them or their theories. This is because the sentences don't say anything. Most often, they are sentences with form but little or no content. They have no emotional content, of course, because that is forbidden in science. But they also have very little content of any other kind. We don't get science, we get science-speak. We get a lot of lingo, math, and claims of relevance, but no real ideas or opinions. 

 Readers will tell me, “We don't want ideas or opinions, we want facts. We want data.” Really? Is that really what physics is? Facts and data? No. That is what we have been taught, but it is false. Physics isn't facts and data. We have lots of facts and data now, and almost no physics, since no one can read that data. We don't need more facts and data, although they are always nice to have. We need a coherent reading of centuries of data, going back to Galileo. We don't have it, therefore we don't have physics. We have data, we have facts, and we have math, but we have very little physics, because we have very little in the way of good ideas or opinions about how to explain that data. 

 Math is not an explanation of data, although many modern physicists seem to think that it is. Any monkey can force-fit data into equations. But if the equations don't naturally represent some comprehensible mechanics, we don't have physics. All we have is the pretense of physics. We have a bunch of big equations that overpaid people can fill blackboards with, but we have no real physics. Physics means mechanics. Look up the definition of the word. We have been sold a non-mechanical physics, but that is about as logical as non-aesthetic art or non-constructive architecture or non-aqueous water. If you will accept a non-mechanical physics, you will accept anything. Basically, the modern world has accepted anything, in all fields. It has accepted everyday, untouched objects as art; it has accepted thuggery and looting as government; it has accepted mobsters as politicians; and it has accepted magic and mysticism as physics. 

 If this doesn't make you angry, I don't know what to say. You must be under the influence of some strong sedative, and all sedatives aren't pharmacological. Your sedative may be wealth or career or position or prestige. I can't say. All I can say is that I will continue to tone it UP, to sharpen my theories as well as my tongue and my wit and my sense of humor. If that isn't to your taste, you will have to do your science reading elsewhere, I suppose. Good luck with that, since you are unlikely to find healthy opinions or ideas from those who are sitting on their emotions.