Re: Fate of the Magnetic Resonant Rectifier (MRA)

Thanks! Angel, I have been involved with the Cold Fusion Research since 
back in the early 80s and  BTW, attended the famous American Chemical 
Society Conference in Dallas where Fleishman did the revelation of the 
Utah Cold Fusion findings.  I did a Patent search on my theory of 
operation which dealt with the resonant phenomenon in the cell.  My 
closest contacts was with the TA&M, Professor Bockris. Lots of history 
here. That is how I got into the Elemental Replication Phenomenon while 
Dr. Bockris and Dr. Bass were seeking Patents on the lateral 
transmutation in the Cold Fusion Cell.   Dr. Bass was our Patent 
Attorney for the MRA.   As Moray King has found in his micro plasmas in 
liquids research, there is more to all this than has been publicized.

Consider this when it comes to inter-atomic resonance  My work was with 
Atomic Resonant Frequency Templates of the Elements. Walter Russell 
broke it down very simply, in that Atomic Hydrogen and Atomic Oxygen is 
the Mother and Father of all elements.  Given a pattern or template and 
you can make any element given the proper feed stock.  Almost like 3D 
printing, all you need is a digital template.  Lol

Message 11268                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 07:17
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: Inter-Atomic Resonance
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

For a long time I have been struggling with an idea or theory which I
will share with everyone now and will write up for Jerry as a file if
he wants to post it.  It goes like this: In 1892 Nikola Tesla created
electrostatic discharges from an induction coil that possesed every
characteristic of what we commonly know as a chemical decomposition
flame and posed the question to the scientific world; "Is a chemical
flame simply a release of atomic electrostatic rewsonances during
transition between states of matter?"  My Cold Fusion Patent search was
based on the theory that since electrostatic forces are the "glue" or
binding force which holds all mater together then if we use resonant
standing waves (scalar effect) then we could disassemble the atomic
structure which is what Tesla had proposed during his Lecture before
the Electrical Engineering Conference in London when de discribed his
carbon button lamp experiments. My theory explains the dissosation
process in the electrolytic cell when we separate hydrogen and oxygen
from water. It is the inter-atomic resonances that cause the
disassociation of the hydrogen from the oxygen in the simple
electroylisis of water.  The normally strong molecular bond of the H2O
molecule is broken by the difference in resonant frequencies of
hydrogen and oxygen which are excited by the flow of electric current.
When hydrogen is oxidized by oxygen (combustion) the results, water and
a release of energy which we perceive as heat and light is actually a
broad band of electrostatic resonances. This conforms with Tesla's
observations. Since the electromagnetic spectrum goes from "0"HZ or DC
all the way up to Cosmic Rays and who knows how much higher (infinity)
with no differentation or categories of energy then why can't all
frequencies be electrostatic resonances. When we feel heat we say that
is "heat" but it is actually and electrostatic resonance that we
perceive as heat and if the frequency is high enough it becomes visible
red or even higher freq it becomes white light if the resonances are
broad band to encompass enough frequenciesa
More later on this subject for Jerry does not want files in the message
base.  Think about this one.  Norm


On 2/16/2019 9:00 AM, Angel Alvarez wrote:
> You guys are onto something, I just enjoy and cherish your knowledge 
> and research; some of it is beyond my comprehension. Cold Fusion is 
> here; I have a friend that is now inactive but his knowledge is 
> fantastic on the subject, thank you.
>
> Sent from my mobile phone
> Angel A.  Alvarez P. E.
> President and Manager of
> Vortex Energi, LLC
> 949 632 8315
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and 
>> would like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the 
>> demise of the MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.
>>
>> 12/11/94
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: AC Battery
>>
>> Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected 
>> to an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in 
>> series with a coil connected to a sig gen. The sig gen is putting out 
>> a measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo and 
>> the coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium 
>> ferrite magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is 
>> ONLY possible because the piezo is being resonated at the third 
>> octave of the resonant freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this 
>> up and give Mr. Puthoff a call.  ~ Joel
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9869                                   DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
>> From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- PRIVATE -- -- RECEIVED --
>> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
>> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>>       and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
>>                              --------------------
>> Hi Joel!  I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
>> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
>> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
>> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
>> the one we saw in 1994).  That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
>> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
>> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
>> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
>> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
>> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
>> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
>> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
>> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
>> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
>> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
>> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
>> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
>> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
>> others...>>>  Jerry
>> ===============================================================================
>> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>>
>> 01/23/95
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: Hal's Test Report
>>
>> Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50% 
>> of unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms, 
>> and measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current. 
>> In effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below 
>> unity. I had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't 
>> know why he did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he 
>> suggested that I immediately write back to Hal and point this out, 
>> and to keep a dialog going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below 
>> this message to you. It's going to be up to us to provide the 
>> self-sustaining mode of operation, and refute Hal's test report. I 
>> think that Hal is being straight with us, and that he believes his 
>> test results. Let's be very cool about this... eventually, the truth 
>> will be known. We know, and for now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel
>>
>>  FAX Page 1 of 1
>> To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From:  Joel McClain
>> Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements
>>
>> First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave 
>> to the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your 
>> measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.
>>
>> I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to 
>> the method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with 
>> regard to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had 
>> found that adding resistance in series with the primary had the 
>> effect of increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to 
>> you in one of our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you 
>> might shed some light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.
>>
>> We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter, 
>> is greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with 
>> only the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using 
>> the equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current 
>> from the source is much lower than your tests indicate.
>>
>> Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate, 
>> cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You 
>> have verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't 
>> know how to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We 
>> attempted, but were unable to determine this.
>>
>> The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM  
>> circuit. However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of 
>> outputs above unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to 
>> eliminate the over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will 
>> consider further tests which do not add resistance to the primary.
>>
>> Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards  ~ 
>> Joel McClain
>>
>> 01/25/95
>> From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
>> Subject: MRA Testing
>>
>> Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the  
>> MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go 
>> ahead and say it "I told you so in the very beginning".  We live and 
>> learn.  The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive 
>> the MRA below unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series 
>> with the primary, what did he do, placed a resistor in series and 
>> made the MRA into an ordinary series resonant transformer which is 
>> below unity and then based his report of findings on this very point 
>> which we had already told him was not a valid test for it modified 
>> the MRA so that it could not possibly be an over-unity device. He 
>> just doesn't get it. We are proceeding full speed and I have a 
>> special MRA running at 7.5 Watts output. I am faced with the same 
>> problem that you have in that I still need that oscillator and front 
>> end driver to make it
>> "stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11346                                  DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To     : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Test Results
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
>> conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
>> diplomatic the I.  Well I have a few comments for all who are
>> interested to really ponder.  First let us consider the true nature of
>> the piezoelectric element in the MRA.  This is probably the most "NON
>> LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows
>> just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
>> asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
>> this little device.  Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
>> First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
>> coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
>> "ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
>> composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
>> LINEAR".  What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
>> devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
>> one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
>> purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
>> against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
>> achieve over-unity?????  Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
>> have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
>> PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
>> simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
>> theory or logic.  Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
>> LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
>> MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
>> of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
>> highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
>> case of the MRA,  I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
>> is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
>> make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe".  Norm
>>
>>
>> BTW,  The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by 
>> Terman, Stanford University, See attachment.
>>
>> Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich 
>> harmonic field.
>>
>> <ailmfnafnmdemofb.jpg>
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11238                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To     : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
>> right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
>> of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
>> coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
>> take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
>> did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
>> brought out about every 1000 feet of winding.  This way you can play
>> some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
>> wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
>> Coils.  Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
>> peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
>> me some rather impressive data.  Now there is no doubt about over-unity
>> for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
>> to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
>> potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
>> source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
>> gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
>> and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
>> bulb across the bridge rectifier.  Real interesting what happens when
>> you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
>> windings.  This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
>> point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
>> will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
>> serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others.  Norm
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11288                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
>> To     : BOB PADDOCK
>> Subject: MRA Driver
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Bob:  That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
>> Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"?  I attended the
>> Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
>> Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
>> presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference.  A lot
>> of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
>> when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
>> cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
>> something you may find interesting.  Back several weeks ago I mentioned
>> to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
>> be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
>> a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
>> requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
>> energy out of the piezo.  Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
>> Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
>> and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
>> unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
>> strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
>> inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
>> voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright". Darn near
>> blew it out.  We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
>> "Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
>> up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
>> source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
>> just to check out this phenomenon.  May be the answer to this "vexing"
>> driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out.  Norm
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>>
>> <Terman-Electronic_and_Radio_Engineering-4th-ed.pdf>