Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP

Mick.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm Table top 
laser/ Plasma studies make it possible to study the phenomenon of the 
magnetic flux re-connect.� My Neutral Spike phenomenon occurred at the 
point of a plasma development at the contactor opening event.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux 
annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP
Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 07:46:40 -0600
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
To: 	Jon Gentry <[email protected]>



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/


Jon, remember our discussion as to where John Mileweski and others 
originated the SUPER LIGHT theory?� Based on the latest out of SLAC, the 
Hotson Vortex-Anti vortex flows and magnetic flux annihilation-Reconnect 
(BEC) is correct.� In the counter vortex (anti-parallel) flux 
interaction, the Alfvin waves (transverse) provide the compression of 
the current sheets (Z pinch effect) which causes the collision (at 
precise crossing angles) of the anti-parallel flux flows, annihilation, 
cross, then re-connection with the burst of the magnetic flux 
constituent particles.� Who would have thought that magnetic flux flow 
was actually sub-atomic particle flow (Aether ???). Now the question 
arises as to just what are these particles and characteristics of same.� 
You have to admit that this is all CURRENT EVENTS. See date of SLAC report.


On 11/22/2018 9:11 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:

Please read the attached Dirac Equation!

On 11/22/2018 9:05 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:

http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Superlight.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Tiller

https://www.scribd.com/document/240940332/Subtle-Energies

https://fmbr.org/the-new-physics/

http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

https://www.blue-science.org/articles/suggested-articles/


On 11/22/2018 12:15 PM, Jon Gentry wrote:
Norm,
All the while we're talking about capturing light, I'm looking at 
Mileweski's quote, which I presume is from his website; and I have to 
admit I really do not "know" Maxwell's Equation to be THE universal 
"famous" wave equation.� I thought it had more to do with "fields".� I'm 
probably wrong, and the link in the email does not go anywhere when I 
click on it for me to clarify my error.� But one equation I DO know 
solved for a universal wave equation AND had a negative numbers solution 
within it was Dirac's Equation . . . that Heisenberg objected to, 
bifurcated (maimed) and re-cast as having to do with the electron.� So, 
Bless Milewski, he's up in years and I'm getting there as well.� Maybe 
someone can clarify if perhaps John is talking about Dirac's Equation.� 
Because if he's not, there is that secondary equation which ALSO 
describes very well the existence of Super Light.� If you doubt me--and 
I hope I'm not being tiresome here constantly referring back to 
this--check out Don Hotson's 2-part exposition here . . . . and now I 
find I can't search up the pdf; which I've been warning people to save 
it.� Here's a discussion BASED on it, while I continue looking:

http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html

Sometimes, yes, things just drop out of sight on the internet.� But 
Hotson's work, from my perspective, was groundbreaking; not something to 
lose down the memory hole.� Okay, I found the pdf for Part II.� For the 
purposes of discussion here, the first page of the pdf engaged in a 
debate and defense of Dirac's Equation.� Even with the missing Part I, 
which I will continue to look for, this might be a good place to start:

https://ethw.org/w/images/7/72/PVB_Dirac%27s-sea-of-negative-energy-%28part_2%29.pdf

Okay, my search engine is not bringing up a link to Part I the way I'm 
searching.� But if you examine the "panel" on the first page of Part II 
that does a summary of the missing Part I that I'm looking for; which 
should be sufficient to answer my question for this discussion here.� I 
think I actually recall that Colonel Sanders billboard.� But today it's 
the other bird; and that would make Sanders a turkey.� So we can all 
posthumously� give the Colonel "the bird".

So, just to focus back, my question is: Did Milewski inadvertently 
reference the wrong equation (Maxwell); or does that mean there are two 
equations solving for "everything that waves"?
The telling detail I conjecture: Did Maxwell's Equation employ a 
negative number solve?� ???

Regards,

JG



On 12/14/2018 4:01 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASJ...62..993K
>
> https://wsx.lanl.gov/RSX/RSX_publications/intrator_3Drcxn_onset_pileup_NatPhys2009.pdf
>
> http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/062/meta
>
> https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/article/div-classtitlerole-of-z-pinches-in-magnetic-reconnection-in-space-plasmasdiv/2292C53A41E958AB27B9BF299899F45B
>
> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ASSL..427..521G
>
>
> The two helix magnetic fields are anti-parallel flows and bases on Z 
> pinch effect of Alfvin waves cause an annihilation event and 
> reconnection at crossing. Compression of current sheet at critical angle.
>
>
> http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/175820
>
> Reconnection of antiparallel magnetic flux tubes
>
> Many examples of solar activity, such as large two-ribbon flares and 
> prominence eruptions, are widely believed to involve the fast 
> reconnection of magnetic flux tubes. Because of the difficulties 
> associated with calculating the evolution of three-dimensional (3-D) 
> flux tubes, however, the details of the energy-release process are 
> poorly understood. In this paper we describe our first attempts to 
> shed light on this important process. We describe the results of 3-D 
> numerical simulations of initially distinct magnetic flux tubes 
> interacting via magnetic reconnection. As a typical case, we consider 
> an initial magnetic field given by a compact support function 
> distribution so that the initial topology consists of two antiparallel 
> flux tubes. We then impose an initial velocity field on this system 
> which causes the flux tubes to move toward each other. As a result of 
> this initial velocity, the tubes first flatten against each other and 
> an electric current sheet begins to develop at the interface between 
> them. After approximately 10 Alfven times we observe a burst of 
> reconnection. The turbulent kinetic energy rises dramatically as two 
> reconnection jets form, which are aligned parallel to the initial 
> field. The reconnection phase lasts for approximately 20 Alfven times, 
> by which time the central region of the initial tubes has been 
> completely dissipated so that the system now consists of four tubes 
> that are relatively widely separated and hence stop interacting. We 
> find that the excitation of small-scale spatial structure in the flow 
> field depends critically on the value of the Lundquist numbers. 
> Compressible effects are insignificant for this particular case of 
> flux tube reconnection. The numerical simulations are carried out 
> using a three-dimensional explicit Fourier collocation algorithm for 
> solving the viscoresistive equations of compressible 
> magnetohydrodynamics. We also report on the performance of a new 
> parallelized version of the code. 15 refs., 5 figs._��less 
> <http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/175820>_
>
> https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrTcdglugNXT38App4nnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByNWU4cGh1BGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Antiparallel+Flux+Lines+of+a+Magnet&fr=ytff1-tyc-sc&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-006
>
> http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf
>
> Merging plasma!���� "Deep do-do"! 
> _http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf_
>
> For� parallel� flux� tubes� (field� lines)� this� force� is repulsive
> keeping the parallel field lines at the largest possible mutual
> distance,� an� effect� well-known� from� the� tendency� of mag-
> netic fields to expand into field-free space, while anti-parallel
> flux tubes attract each other.
> The implication is that,� in elementary field-line merging
> events in which two anti-parallel sections of field lines at-
> tract and touch each other, the amount of 2
> 8
> 0
> of magnetic
> flux will be annihilated.� The annihilated amount of flux is
> exactly 2
> 8
> 0
> because each field line carries just one flux quan-
> tum, and because flux quanta cannot be divided into half or
> any fraction such that there is no half flux quantum available
> which could be added to another half in order to annihilate
> 1
> 8
> 0
> .� Conversely, since field lines are composed of one flux
> quantum only they contribute 1
> 8
> 0
> to annihilation in merging,� not more and not less.� This annihilation 
> happens in a
> certain time
> 1t
> .� Thus the elementary flux annihilation cor-
> responds to the generation of an induced electromotive force
> (emf
>
> Hi! Ole, been doing a lot of "leg work" trying to figure out "where 
> and how" we get such a huge manifestation of the very unusual "spike 
> energy"! The occurrence of anti-parallel magnetic flux lines 
> annihilating with a yield of "EMF" may give us a clue.� Take a look at 
> this: _http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf_ 
> The creation of anti-parallel flux annihilation may be the answer!� 
> "Opinion please"!
>
> On 3/23/2016 7:04 AM, [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>_ [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> '/"Now carefully think this out, for a cap discharge back into a 
> saturated iron decaying flux is a unidirectional "DC" event, not AC" 
> because AC line is no longer connected. �� (contactor is open)./'
> As both inductance and capacitance are at play it will make 
> oscillations until the energy is dissipated so no guarantee for a true 
> unidirectional pulse. The circuit forms an LC-tank circuit. Also as 
> the inductance is decreasing because of the saturation the current is 
> increasing. An increasing current gives a squared increase in stored 
> energy while the decrease in inductance only dampens the stored energy 
> in a linear way making the total energy increase very fast. When 
> breaking the circuit the magnetic energy can't be stored any longer 
> and has to go somewhere like an EMP or melting something. The voltage 
> will take whatever value it needs to keep the current flowing at the 
> value it had at the breaking point as the current through an inductor 
> can't be discontinuous. Think of the mechanical analog of instantly 
> stopping a flywheel. The spin (current) will make the stopping force 
> (voltage) approach infinity. In real systems something breaks down 
> before reaching infinity by melting or exploding. In electrical 
> systems the air may ionize and form an arc burning away the metal. The 
> arc is conducting thus closes the circuit while dissipating a lot of 
> heat until the energy of the inductor and capacitor is dissipated.
>
> The peak current of the circuit at the moment the over current relay 
> (contactor) opens should be measured. It would be hard to protect the 
> contactor with a spark gap or something without any damping as the 
> contact points have to move away from zero distance to open the 
> circuit. As soon as this happens the high voltage ionizes the air and 
> an electric arc is formed across the breaking points. Perhaps an 
> electronic interrupter with an external spark gap could be used for 
> the experiment. The electronic circuit breaker would have to be able 
> to work at a voltage above the firing voltage of the spark gap. The 
> spark gap has to be placed close to the electronic circuit breaker to 
> be able to protect it from over voltage. I.e. inductance of the wires 
> must be small or the circuit breaker will be fried.
>
> Normally capacitors are placed across the contact points to absorb the 
> energy for preventing arc over which eats the metal of the contacts 
> (or welds them together). This is also done for preventing the EMP 
> from disturbing sensitive equipment in the vicinity. Capacitors 
> absorbing the pulse may prevent the destructive effect of the 
> experiment if they can take the excess energy. This is much higher 
> than in an ordinary circuit as just double voltage and double current 
> (changing from full forward to full reverse) gives four times the 
> normal power. The decrease of the inductance by saturation even adds 
> to this meaning many times the normal power.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
> http://reu.physics.ucla.edu/common/papers/2012/sarah_smolenski.pdf
>
> http://www.skif.biz/download/pub/4/0/Magnetic%20Technology.pdf
>
> http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/ns545_fall2009_notes02/NS545_session02_reading.pdf
>
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/antiparticle
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_reconnection
>
>
> SUM of all the above.
>
>
> On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Jon Gentry wrote:
>> Norm,
>>
>> Okay, maybe just bats in the belfry swooping around; but when they're 
>> talking about non-parallel I'm thinking the older term that I do not
>> know what area it came from called Reverse Particle Flow; which does 
>> not need to be at right angles, necessarily; but it helps.� I've already
>> gotten lost in all the talk of magnetic fields and plasma; lost 
>> figuring how this all is ordered together.� But here is what I'm 
>> visualizing as
>> a potential experiment. We know there are now "tasers" that carry an 
>> electrical charge on low intensity UV spectrum dual laser beams;
>> that can carry a lot of volts, up in the hundreds of thousands.� The 
>> target's body or articles of clothing complete the circuit when hit 
>> by the
>> dual beams, and provide resistance against a "dead short" while 
>> target "cooks".� So that particular UV band does carry electrons with a
>> certain amount of humidity in the air as a conductive medium.� You 
>> might have a bit of difficulty in Tucson or Mojave Desert.� But above
>> 15% humidity minimum, the tasers will carry a hefty charge to put 
>> someone into a non-attack mode.
>>
>> What you would need.� Two of these tasers.� A strong magnetic field 
>> with emphasis on projection past the physical end of the magnet . . .
>> don't know what shape would be ideal, maybe a large horseshoe magnet; 
>> or several bar magnets in a bucking configuration to each other.
>> Some kind of lab equipment to secure each laser at a precise angle of 
>> height and direction.� I have no conclusion as to what setup should
>> sub for the attackers' bodies at each end of the now dual-dual 
>> beams.� Because I do not know how or where one would harvest energy from
>> this process.� If you expect an immense bump up of electrical energy 
>> or discharge of some kind, then whatever body substitute should be
>> able to provide either the resistance needed to keep from blowing the 
>> whole assembly or the ability to tap off the energy.� The lasers are
>> positioned so that they pass very close, but do not "physically" 
>> interact on the particle level.� The beams do not intersect, in other 
>> words.
>> Then you have the beams passing through your "strong" magnetic 
>> field.� I'm presuming permanent magnets.� But for experimental purposes
>> such as positioning an electromagnet might be practical.
>>
>> And if we are able to fire both tasers simultaneously--or have them 
>> firing then switch on the electromagnet--we are then expecting what?
>> A plasma effect at that point?� Ball lightning?
>>
>> Taking into account critical measurements such as the distance 
>> between the non-intersecting beams, what are we looking at happening?
>> In Pantone's Geet experiments the "reverse particle flow" is causing 
>> charge interaction from the flows in opposing directions.� In Adair's
>> rocket, employing some neat things like Deuterium in the figure 8 
>> "raceway" particle accelerator you--according to Adair--get a small
>> hydrogen explosion stream at right angles to the raceway driven by a 
>> similar charge interaction.� Personally I would like to draw the line
>> at Pantone's mono-molecular phenomenon, or at the most a ball 
>> lightning event, rather than doing something nuclear as Adair claimed.
>>
>> I'm posing this experimental model to get feedback as to what is 
>> meant to happen here?� Would we have the two dual laser beams
>> bending together in some magnetic flux annihilation event?� What 
>> would it even mean to have a magnetic flux annihilation if you have
>> a permanent magnet?� Are we looking at some continuous flow of 
>> electrons over input showing up in this process.� IF so, WHERE in the
>> process.
>>
>> Hopefully this is clear enough you can use this as a starting point 
>> to answer questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> JG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 7, 2018 5:47 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; Mbking42; Lane 
>> Wootan; Toby Grotz; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric 
>> Fletcher; Jeane Manning; joel mcclain; Jon Gentry
>> *Subject:* Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>
>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> >
>> > This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect
>> > theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>> >
>> > 
>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>> >
>> > On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> >> See: attached doc.� Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of
>> >> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in
>> >> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!