Re: [EVGRAY] Simple buzzer circuit

Body

I will just go ahead and explain it anyway...

So, the first observation is that in the center of circles, coils with
aetheric flow was a central point of compression, a neutral center if you
will.

In this focal center point I could feel a dense energy emitting out
providing the center of it was "white" in my images, or otherwise contained
energy, if it was black it would instead be an energy sink.

This focal point of high pressure could be felt radiating, I found the
nature of the energy was in part related to the nature of the design, but I
also found that it tended to radiate in up down and 8 horizontal directions
north, south, east, west and diagonals.

I also found others had recognized these same 8 rays.

I would often find these energies to be stronger if I only intercepted one
side of the energy, I came to realize that the energies moving in opposite
directions would annihilate if combined!

Realizing that there is a gap in conventional science's explanation for
what happens when virtual particles annihilate, they somehow demonstrated
zero energy output, and yet if one is swallowed by a black hole the other
is suddenly assumed to have energy...  That makes no sense.

I figured that maybe these virtual particles are like empty containers?!
 Empty containers which over time fill with energy.

And so the longer the annihilation is delayed, the more energy liberated on
eventual annihilation, and it works amazingly, indeed it was too powerful...

It seems that the central focal point of a circle, especially if energetic
itself either increases the rate, or initial energy content of virtual
particles.
Then various polarities, artificially applied, or the earth fields split
energies up which stops them from annihilating immediately.

But if they can be kept alive for long enough, maybe by being caught in a
magnetic circuit?????

Then when they do annihilate they release a density of energy that can
manifest!



On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:28 PM Jonathan Berry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can you clarify that a bit more, how does one create magneto-electric?
>
> Opening a locked induction motor??   Breaking a closed magnetic circuit?
>
> I have also discovered that there are energies which normally annihilate,
> this relates to apparent virtual particles which is not annihilated to
> quickly gain more substance over time...
>
> I am happy to go into that if interested, basically it seems to be a
> connection between my work and quantum physics of virtual particles and
> what happens when they aren't allowed to immediately annihilate.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:28 AM Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Excellent observation and theory.   In my experimentation, I have found
>> that the kinetic energy of the photon emission, magneto-electric effect, is
>> an order of magnitude greater that the original magnetic flux before
>> annihilation- reconnect.   The magnetic flux is comprised of photons which
>> is your artheric energy.  Paired photons of opposite polarity create an
>> electron. Magnetic flux is speed of light streaming of photons. Thanks, Norm
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 20:40, Jonathan Berry [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Norm, I have concluded EMI is key to this work.
>>
>> The rumor is that the Kipper motor worked with microwave type radiation
>> around it.
>>
>> The Hutchison effect
>>
>> An experimenter named David Lowrance is also is a ham enthusiast and he
>> has gone some strange effects that have been hard to replicate by others.
>>
>> Steven Marks demonstrated his toroid in a house near a major electrical
>> station.
>>
>> Prentice, Tesla, Hermann Plauson...  All had clear examples of EMI...
>>
>> What about the spark gap lighting of Stubblefield and Louis Rota with
>> earth energy (multiple buried metals).
>>
>> Everyone doing this long ago would have been into ham radios, or used
>> noisey switching, at the time these effects popped up more readily!
>>
>> Consider Earl C. Amman, he used an "activating transformer" in his
>> basement that made his Free Energy device work, was that a massive source
>> of EMI?
>>
>> What I have established is that aetheric energy in the air needs to be
>> dense with electromagnetic fields, radiation, ions, ozone, this energy then
>> flows through metals, but first the air must be made energetically dense.
>>
>> This is a major point in my own experiments, for the aetheric energy to
>> flow, it must be dense around it.
>>
>> Something similar occurs with the brain the myelin sheath, the more
>> Myelin around the "wiring" the faster and more powerful the signals.
>>
>> In the same way, the more powerful the energization, the energy density
>> and indeed stagnation in the air, the faster energy moves through metal!
>>
>> I would add the following improvement to your buzzer, make it of many
>> iron wires bundled together, this create some powerful aetheric effects.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:10 AM Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Please take note?? regarding the simple circuit depicted.?? When you
>> float this circuit, with no ground reference and have the make /break
>> contact opening, you will get the EMI radiation due to the antiparrallel
>> magnetic flux being converted into photon energy in the contact arcing.??
>> We call it radio hash and you can hear it with the old analog AM radios.??
>> On 9/26/2019 9:57 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> ??
>> [image: alt]
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>> At contact opening an input voltage of 12VDC will multiply to over 1,000
>> V due to Oles explanation of conservation of energy.
>>
>> 
>>
>