Body
Copper is one thing but most use carbon as in the spark gaps.lithium has
the greatest out put of all in the millions .when I read this I laughter
.is life reflecting the movies .lithium ? Remember star trek ? With burned
out di lithium crystals ?.and you just need voltages over 100 volts to work
it .the higher the better .and magnets along side the carbon to give the
beta radiation polarity and keep it in the wires .
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> A Field,
>
>
> Why did the people whom first ciphered electricity using equations, come
> up with the "A" Field?
>
> What is the A field? It was labeled a linear force, that travels in a
> straight line. Basically the Tesla wave. It had no electric charge so could
> not be directly measured, so why did they theorize it had to exist?
>
>
> These guys knew that from direct measurements of the fields, the electric
> field was basically shorted out by an iron core slug. The electric field
> could not penetrate to the core of the iron and generate magnetic flux all
> the way through it like they saw happening. It would flow around it but not
> through it.
>
>
> So how does a loop of wire magnetize a large iron core all the way through
> it evenly, such that on the ends the flux aligns with a field density that
> is constant all the way across the iron?
>
>
> They had to accept there is another force present inside that copper coil
> loop that can penetrate all the way to the iron atoms cores and flip the
> field to polarize all the atoms in the iron core, and it could not be EM as
> we have been taught. This should be a glaring self evident thing, if not
> hidden in the error-ed teaching process where the concept was removed as
> not important, because they could not at that time identify the Source of
> this A field.
>
>
> "A" field however is pretty much defined as a Tempic or a pure vibration
> field, it travels in a straight line and falls off with distance linearly.
> From today's knowledge we can come to the realization that it must
> originate at the Isotope level of the copper atoms as a nuclear vibration
> system field. The nuclear force always attempts to counter the electron
> shell force disturbances. At room temprature, the Isotopes polarities are
> about 50/50, so they basically cancel themselves out and stay balanced
> between the hi energy state and the low energy state.
>
>
> The A field will resonate with space. And if we make a small scalar coil,
> we can link into it using the correct frequency and get all the Isotopes in
> the copper wire loop flipping as one coherent field. This is a basic NMR
> technique. What is no longer remembered is that when we do this with a
> copper wire loop, we start to vibrate up all the space by volume inside the
> wire loop to a center point. The A field can be resonated as a vibration
> system and become a coherent field everywhere inside the wire loop. The
> calculation is volume in mm = khz, or volume in cm = mhz.
>
>
> Now when we do this using a scalar coil, we still have the 50/50 polarity
> problem, and all the EM still cancels out in this resonating vibration
> loop. This is why the energy can pass through the electron shell without
> being effected.
>
> It's not an electric field.
>
>
> The problem then is how do we get all the Isotopes to flip 100 percent in
> the same direction so the system begins to become an Electric field
> generator on the electron shells.
>
>
> We have to align them using another coil that is not scalar cancelling,
> and do it in such a way that it does not disturb the field of the scalar
> coil. We have to apply an electrical polarity.
>
>
> The only way you can orient the two coils so the fields do not interact is
> by setting them at 90 degrees to one another. Now as the Isotope fields
> flip they will cross through the 90 degree polarized field and all of them
> will begin to move into the hi energy state, and the A field balance will
> begin to shift to a polarized EM field that is now riding on top of the
> resonating Isotope field coherence.
>
>
> Since the nuclear force has ability to operate on the electron shell, to
> make corrections in its balance, the flipping nuclear field will become a
> generator. However the current and voltage will be 90 degrees out of phase
> as is the normal atomic structure operation. The peaks of voltage will be
> 180 degrees out of phase, and the nuclear force is trying to cancel the
> force on the electron shell.
>
>
> How do we extract the two fields that are in opposition with each other
> inside the atoms and running 180 degrees out of phase so as to cancel the
> in-stability of the copper atoms between electron and proton shells?
>
> We have to extract each one individually and then reverse the phase of the
> extraction coils so they add rather then subtract.
>
>
> Inside the the atoms these two fields operate to cancel out, but if we
> extract both individually, we can then do whatever we like with them. We
> use two coils at 90 degree and then flip the polarity on one and wire them
> in series. The atom will fight to fix its shape with Strong Force power,
> and we can then extract both sides of this and couple them so they amplify
> on the outside of the atoms in our circuits.
>
>
> This approaches a no loss transformer system if we power it from outside,
> but if we add the A field vibration resonance as the Source of the power,
> then it will fight to "self sustain."
>
>
> Manipulation of the nuclear Isotopes will now become the grid of our
> triode tube, and the electrons shell the plate in a system of amplification
> of energy in to energy out.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
>
>
> In many of the old self powering system we see these 90 degree coils, and
> someone who hit on this by trial and error, or could feel it working as
> they were sensitive to vibration. In NMR machines they are used exclusively
> for the purpose of measurement and identification of the density of an
> element based on how strong the coherent Isotope field becomes. However we
> can align these Isotopes also using vibration directly, rather then using
> polarized coils, and the calculations become very simple. You can align
> them using a SS caliper for that matter. Here is something I discovered
> some years back, and now revisited after doing a coil experiment on a
> spherical copper ball, and another on a spherical crystal ball.
>
>
> Resonance and Geometry:
>
>
> Yes you can use EM resonance outside the atoms countering field by adding
> capacitors to the coil driven systems and at one RPM and load level this
> may reach a no loss situation at one frequency. Change the load and you
> lose it, change the frequency and you loose it.
>
>
> A better way is to use geometry to reconnect the two fields that separated
> inside the copper atoms and pass all the frequencies that went in, to two
> coils at 90 degrees wired in series coming out. You can pass a square wave
> right through the coil system. You wire the two coils so the nuclear
> frequencies are reverse phased, and the electron shell frequencies are not
> reverse phased, and you get all of the power back out at all frequencies.
>
>
> Inside the atom they fight each other, but if we extract them separately
> and reverse phase one of them by 180 degrees then coming back out they add
> again. This is such a simple way to hit resonance at all frequencies it
> will make your head spin. Floyd Sweet had this understanding of the 90
> degree coil system as a spherical system, and it comes directly from the
> atomic model of the atom.
>
>
> You can set up a coil system and show this to yourself, using F gens, O
> scopes, and meters.
>
> The fast transients, will jump into the 90 degree coil instantly and be
> recovered, but the slow moving power frequencies all stay close to the
> input coils angle. The normal transformer will round off the waves, by not
> intercepting the fast or high frequency harmonics. This is because the
> electron shell can rotate around at microwave ranges, and the nuclear mass
> rotates around at radio frequencies that are much lower, and when both are
> active on the two layers of the atom the inner core tries to cancel out the
> outer core to stabilize the atoms. The only angle it cannot counter this
> at, for two fields, is 90 degrees where both fields will appear at full
> power levels.
>
>
> Because these two fields separate geometrically in real time, and at 90
> degrees neither can attenuate the other, it works.
>
>
> The spherical transformer, is the ultimate in no loss power transfer, near
> as I can tell from the measurements I have taken from the ones I
> constructed and loaded. And you do not have to mess with any capacitors to
> get it to work. You are fixing the problem at the level of the atoms where
> the fields are powering from. It is a geometric issue caused by frequency
> splitting in the spectrum, and the atoms natural ability to stabilize the
> electron shell, which is the source of the back emf if not intercepted.
>
>
> Now when you load the system much of the tension energy [tensor] is pushed
> upwards in frequency and carries more on the electron shell rotation layer,
> if you change the load very fast a lot of the energy will jump into the 90
> degree coil and less will stay in the parallel coil. If the 90 degree coil
> is not there to catch it, it becomes a shock wave [ Teslas T wave, Wilbert
> Smiths Tempic field or Tensor energy] The energy will shoot out of the
> transformer and hit you in the face. With an iron core it will likely stay
> in the core and heat it up more.
>
>
> All the electronics formulas and theories, are effected to some degree,
> when you move into the nuclear model and start working with the opposing
> spin fields of electron and proton, where Proton polarity moves with the
> tilt of the mass of the atom at much slower rates.
>
> .
>
> The very concept of countering EMF [cmf], is explained, along with why the
> atom has to work that way to remain a stable system, always correcting it's
> frequency and form, from anything we shoot at it less then a nuclear
> explosion.
>
>
> I would think some people here might want to verify something like that
> also as I did, as Floyd Sweet succeeded using a set of these 90 degree type
> of coil systems, with scalar cancelling ones at the center, which work
> directly with the vibration systems I have been working with for many years
> now. Yes he sets them up at 90 degrees also.
>
>
> People like Bearden, have given a superficial explanation for some of
> these effects like two elephants heads butting. But still thinking on the
> electron shell levels, so an incomplete picture is given, not strong enough
> to start "tinkering" with really and realizing what you are actually doing
> with the mass versus electron shell splitting of the energy path through
> frequency ranges.
>
>
> Then when we have a concept for the tensor field [Wilbert Smith], setting
> in the direct line of motion, and that the motion itself is a field with
> pressure, not entirely always related to EM at all but operating at 90
> degrees to both fields of EM, it becomes self evident where the energy is
> going and how it can be recombined.
>
>
> Here is something that works and no one has been really interested in
> using it for designs at this time. The ones whom do, have no clue why it
> works, and tend to keep this mysterious method a secret, having found some
> of the sweet spots where it happens work. Many of the old devices had these
> 90 degree winds on them.
>
>
> When you get an electrical field pulsing up under a load condition, all
> kinds of energy is lost out the 90 degree vector of the coils because it
> cannot re couple back to the output side of the energy system. This field
> can be also recovered as a vibration system by setting the coils up in a
> platonic form and letting that energy converge to the center then reflect
> back outwards again, if you know how to set up the distances for a
> resonance field bubble to form around the device. These fields can be
> measured and calculated using the caliper, or matching them for zero beat
> with an F gen and scalar coil system.
>
>
> Measurement of the mass vibration fields, is the only way forwards for a
> science to progress along this path.
>
> At this point we can predict the "octave distances" of the mass of a
> specific element, and also the conical fields that actually bring the
> energy up and out of the atoms from the nuclear levels as a pure vibration
> that responds well to small scalar cancelling coils at very low power
> levels.
>
>
> Tesla measured the wire lengths in his coils. He was not totally stuck in
> the turns count so much. In the TPU project we discovered cutting wire
> lengths accurately can resonate up the vibration field so powerfully it
> will blow up the coil of wire at specific platonic form distances around
> the loop.
>
>
> Tesla knew the propagation velocity of the waves down the wires. And he
> could likely either see or feel the vibration fields forming around them.
> So he was very likely finding these mass vibration sweet spots all the
> time, even though back then there was no complete modeling of the atomic
> levels or the frequency formulas for them we now have access to in NMR
> calculators.
>
>
> The measurement systems for this new energy, is not yet straight forwards,
> and what we need are people willing to go down to this level, and start to
> work with them directly. Then we can begin to let go of the older mental
> models that limit us so badly to the en-tropic electron shell, and are not
> fully accurate.
>
>
> If we want our systems to self power as atoms do, then we need to start
> including all the data in the way we design them, and we need to understand
> how these two fields interact with one another. These mysterious "sweet
> spots"
>
> do have a connection to the source of their power.
>
>
> Dave L
>
>
>
>
>