Body
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
The prime question arises as to what conducts these constituents of magnetic flux, photons ? The answer was given in the Army directed weapons program where they used ionized beams to direct the super high energy to target. IONS are the conductor.
----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Norman Wootan" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "nwootan" <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:50 Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reco
-------- Forwarded Message --------
| From: | 58 2018 <> |
| X-Mozilla-Status: | 0001 |
| X-Mozilla-Status2: | 00800000 |
| X-Mozilla-Keys: |
|
| Subject: | Fwd: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| From: | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |
| To: | [email protected] |
| X-Forwarded-Message-Id: | <[email protected]> |
| Message-ID: | <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2018 07:30:57 -0600 |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <[email protected]> |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4D6B28C7C79A5091177B8EB5" |
| Content-Language: | en-US |
Mick.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm?? Table top laser/ Plasma studies make it possible to study the phenomenon of the magnetic flux re-connect.? My Neutral Spike phenomenon occurred at the point of a plasma development at the contactor opening event.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
| Subject: | Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect--Striving to CATCH UP |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Dec 2018 07:46:40 -0600 |
| From: | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |
| To: | Jon Gentry <[email protected]> |
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html
http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/
Jon, remember our discussion as to where John Mileweski and others originated the SUPER LIGHT theory?? Based on the latest out of SLAC, the Hotson Vortex-Anti vortex flows and magnetic flux annihilation-Reconnect (BEC) is correct.? In the counter vortex (anti-parallel) flux interaction, the Alfvin waves (transverse) provide the compression of the current sheets (Z pinch effect) which causes the collision (at precise crossing angles) of the anti-parallel flux flows, annihilation, cross, then re-connection with the burst of the magnetic flux constituent particles.? Who would have thought that magnetic flux flow was actually sub-atomic particle flow (Aether ???).? Now the question arises as to just what are these particles and characteristics of same.? You have to admit that this is all CURRENT EVENTS. See date of SLAC report.
On 11/22/2018 9:11 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
Please read the attached Dirac Equation!
On 11/22/2018 9:05 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Superlight.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Tiller
https://www.scribd.com/document/240940332/Subtle-Energies
https://fmbr.org/the-new-physics/
http://www.blue-science.org/articles/2013/07/06/aether-theory-101/
http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html
https://www.blue-science.org/articles/suggested-articles/
On 11/22/2018 12:15 PM, Jon Gentry wrote:
Norm,
All the while we're talking about capturing light, I'm looking at Mileweski's quote, which I presume is from his website; and I have to admit I really do not "know" Maxwell's Equation to be THE universal "famous" wave equation.? I thought it had more to do with "fields".? I'm probably wrong, and the link in the email does not go anywhere when I click on it for me to clarify my error.? But one equation I DO know solved for a universal wave equation AND had a negative numbers solution within it was Dirac's Equation . . . that Heisenberg objected to, bifurcated (maimed) and re-cast as having to do with the electron.? So, Bless Milewski, he's up in years and I'm getting there as well.? Maybe someone can clarify if perhaps John is talking about Dirac's Equation.? Because if he's not, there is that secondary equation which ALSO describes very well the existence of Super Light.? If you doubt me--and I hope I'm not being tiresome here constantly referring back to this--check out Don Hotson's 2-part exposition here . . . . and now I find I can't search up the pdf; which I've been warning people to save it.? Here's a discussion BASED on it, while I continue looking:
http://www.theomparticle.com/OnHotsonAndTheUniversalBEC.html
Sometimes, yes, things just drop out of sight on the internet.? But Hotson's work, from my perspective, was groundbreaking; not something to lose down the memory hole.? Okay, I found the pdf for Part II.? For the purposes of discussion here, the first page of the pdf engaged in a debate and defense of Dirac's Equation.? Even with the missing Part I, which I will continue to look for, this might be a good place to start:
https://ethw.org/w/images/7/72/PVB_Dirac%27s-sea-of-negative-energy-%28part_2%29.pdf
Okay, my search engine is not bringing up a link to Part I the way I'm searching.? But if you examine the "panel" on the first page of Part II that does a summary of the missing Part I that I'm looking for; which should be sufficient to answer my question for this discussion here.? I think I actually recall that Colonel Sanders billboard.? But today it's the other bird; and that would make Sanders a turkey.? So we can all posthumously? give the Colonel "the bird".?
So, just to focus back, my question is: Did Milewski inadvertently reference the wrong equation (Maxwell); or does that mean there are two equations solving for "everything that waves"??
The telling detail I conjecture: Did Maxwell's Equation employ a negative number solve?? ????
Regards,
JG
On 12/14/2018 4:01 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASJ...62..993K
https://wsx.lanl.gov/RSX/RSX_publications/intrator_3Drcxn_onset_pileup_NatPhys2009.pdf
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/062/meta
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/article/div-classtitlerole-of-z-pinches-in-magnetic-reconnection-in-space-plasmasdiv/2292C53A41E958AB27B9BF299899F45B
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ASSL..427..521G
The two helix magnetic fields are anti-parallel flows and bases on Z pinch effect of Alfvin waves cause an annihilation event and reconnection at crossing. Compression of current sheet at critical angle.
http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/175820
Reconnection of antiparallel magnetic flux tubes
Many examples of solar activity, such as large two-ribbon flares and prominence eruptions, are widely believed to involve the fast reconnection of magnetic flux tubes. Because of the difficulties associated with calculating the evolution of three-dimensional (3-D) flux tubes, however, the details of the energy-release process are poorly understood. In this paper we describe our first attempts to shed light on this important process. We describe the results of 3-D numerical simulations of initially distinct magnetic flux tubes interacting via magnetic reconnection. As a typical case, we consider an initial magnetic field given by a compact support function distribution so that the initial topology consists of two antiparallel flux tubes. We then impose an initial velocity field on this system which causes the flux tubes to move toward each other. As a result of this initial velocity, the tubes first flatten against each other and an electric current sheet begins to develop at the interface between them. After approximately 10 Alfven times we observe a burst of reconnection. The turbulent kinetic energy rises dramatically as two reconnection jets form, which are aligned parallel to the initial field. The reconnection phase lasts for approximately 20 Alfven times, by which time the central region of the initial tubes has been completely dissipated so that the system now consists of four tubes that are relatively widely separated and hence stop interacting. We find that the excitation of small-scale spatial structure in the flow field depends critically on the value of the Lundquist numbers. Compressible effects are insignificant for this particular case of flux tube reconnection. The numerical simulations are carried out using a three-dimensional explicit Fourier collocation algorithm for solving the viscoresistive equations of compressible magnetohydrodynamics. We also report on the performance of a new parallelized version of the code. 15 refs., 5 figs.??less
?
https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrTcdglugNXT38App4nnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByNWU4cGh1BGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Antiparallel+Flux+Lines+of+a+Magnet&fr=ytff1-tyc-sc&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-006
?
http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf
?
Merging plasma!???? "Deep do-do"!?? http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf
For? parallel? flux? tubes? (field? lines)? this? force? is? repulsive
keeping the parallel field lines at the largest possible mutual
distance,? an? effect? well-known? from? the? tendency? of? mag-
netic fields to expand into field-free space, while anti-parallel
flux tubes attract each other.
The implication is that,? in elementary field-line merging
events in which two anti-parallel sections of field lines at-
tract and touch each other, the amount of 2
8
0
of magnetic
flux will be annihilated.? The annihilated amount of flux is
exactly 2
8
0
because each field line carries just one flux quan-
tum, and because flux quanta cannot be divided into half or
any fraction such that there is no half flux quantum available
which could be added to another half in order to annihilate
1
8
0
.? Conversely, since field lines are composed of one flux
quantum only they contribute 1
8
0
to annihilation in merging,? not more and not less.? This annihilation happens in a
certain time
1t
.? Thus the elementary flux annihilation cor-
responds to the generation of an induced electromotive force
(emf
?
Hi! Ole, been doing a lot of "leg work" trying to figure out "where and how" we get such a huge manifestation of the very unusual "spike energy"!? The occurrence of anti-parallel magnetic flux lines annihilating with a yield of "EMF" may give us a clue.? Take a look at this:?? http://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1121/2011/angeo-29-1121-2011.pdf??? The creation of anti-parallel flux annihilation may be the answer!? "Opinion please"!
On 3/23/2016 7:04 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
Hi Norman,
'"Now carefully think this out, for a cap discharge back into a saturated iron decaying flux is a unidirectional "DC" event, not AC" because AC line is no longer connected. ?? (contactor is open).'
As both inductance and capacitance are at play it will make oscillations until the energy is dissipated so no guarantee for a true unidirectional pulse. The circuit forms an LC-tank circuit. Also as the inductance is decreasing because of the saturation the current is increasing. An increasing current gives a squared increase in stored energy while the decrease in inductance only dampens the stored energy in a linear way making the total energy increase very fast. When breaking the circuit the magnetic energy can't be stored any longer and has to go somewhere like an EMP or melting something. The voltage will take whatever value it needs to keep the current flowing at the value it had at the breaking point as the current through an inductor can't be discontinuous. Think of the mechanical analog of instantly stopping a flywheel. The spin (current) will make the stopping force (voltage) approach infinity. In real systems something breaks down before reaching infinity by melting or exploding. In electrical systems the air may ionize and form an arc burning away the metal. The arc is conducting thus closes the circuit while dissipating a lot of heat until the energy of the inductor and capacitor is dissipated.
The peak current of the circuit at the moment the over current relay (contactor) opens should be measured. It would be hard to protect the contactor with a spark gap or something without any damping as the contact points have to move away from zero distance to open the circuit. As soon as this happens the high voltage ionizes the air and an electric arc is formed across the breaking points. Perhaps an electronic interrupter with an external spark gap could be used for the experiment. The electronic circuit breaker would have to be able to work at a voltage above the firing voltage of the spark gap. The spark gap has to be placed close to the electronic circuit breaker to be able to protect it from over voltage. I.e. inductance of the wires must be small or the circuit breaker will be fried.
Normally capacitors are placed across the contact points to absorb the energy for preventing arc over which eats the metal of the contacts (or welds them together). This is also done for preventing the EMP from disturbing sensitive equipment in the vicinity. Capacitors absorbing the pulse may prevent the destructive effect of the experiment if they can take the excess energy. This is much higher than in an ordinary circuit as just double voltage and double current (changing from full forward to full reverse) gives four times the normal power. The decrease of the inductance by saturation even adds to this meaning many times the normal power.
Regards
Ole
http://reu.physics.ucla.edu/common/papers/2012/sarah_smolenski.pdf
http://www.skif.biz/download/pub/4/0/Magnetic%20Technology.pdf
http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/ns545_fall2009_notes02/NS545_session02_reading.pdf
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/antiparticle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_reconnection
SUM of all the above.?????
On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Jon Gentry wrote:
#yiv1101708480 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Norm,
Okay, maybe just bats in the belfry swooping around; but when they're talking about non-parallel I'm thinking the older term that I do not know what area it came from called Reverse Particle Flow; which does not need to be at right angles, necessarily; but it helps.? I've already
gotten lost in all the talk of magnetic fields and plasma; lost figuring how this all is ordered together.? But here is what I'm visualizing as
a potential experiment.? We know there are now "tasers" that carry an electrical charge on low intensity UV spectrum dual laser beams;
that can carry a lot of volts, up in the hundreds of thousands.? The target's body or articles of clothing complete the circuit when hit by the dual beams, and provide resistance against a "dead short" while target "cooks".? So that particular UV band does carry electrons with a
certain amount of humidity in the air as a conductive medium.? You might have a bit of difficulty in Tucson or Mojave Desert.? But above
15% humidity minimum, the tasers will carry a hefty charge to put someone into a non-attack mode.?
What you would need.? Two of these tasers.? A strong magnetic field with emphasis on projection past the physical end of the magnet . . .
don't know what shape would be ideal, maybe a large horseshoe magnet; or several bar magnets in a bucking configuration to each other.?
Some kind of lab equipment to secure each laser at a precise angle of height and direction.? I have no conclusion as to what setup should
sub for the attackers' bodies at each end of the now dual-dual beams.? Because I do not know how or where one would harvest energy from this process.? If you expect an immense bump up of electrical energy or discharge of some kind, then whatever body substitute should be
able to provide either the resistance needed to keep from blowing the whole assembly or the ability to tap off the energy.? The lasers are
positioned so that they pass very close, but do not "physically" interact on the particle level.? The beams do not intersect, in other words.?
Then you have the beams passing through your "strong" magnetic field.? I'm presuming permanent magnets.? But for experimental purposes such as positioning an electromagnet might be practical.?
And if we are able to fire both tasers simultaneously--or have them firing then switch on the electromagnet--we are then expecting what?
A plasma effect at that point?? Ball lightning??
Taking into account critical measurements such as the distance between the non-intersecting beams, what are we looking at happening??
In Pantone's Geet experiments the "reverse particle flow" is causing charge interaction from the flows in opposing directions.? In Adair's
rocket, employing some neat things like Deuterium in the figure 8 "raceway" particle accelerator you--according to Adair--get a small
hydrogen explosion stream at right angles to the raceway driven by a similar charge interaction.? Personally I would like to draw the line
at Pantone's mono-molecular phenomenon, or at the most a ball lightning event, rather than doing something nuclear as Adair claimed.?
I'm posing this experimental model to get feedback as to what is meant to happen here?? Would we have the two dual laser beams
bending together in some magnetic flux annihilation event?? What would it even mean to have a magnetic flux annihilation if you have
a permanent magnet?? Are we looking at some continuous flow of electrons over input showing up in this process.? IF so, WHERE in the
process.?
Hopefully this is clear enough you can use this as a starting point to answer questions.?
Thanks,
JG
From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 5:47 AM
To: [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; Mbking42; Lane Wootan; Toby Grotz; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric Fletcher; Jeane Manning; joel mcclain; Jon Gentry
Subject: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect ? Bert Pool sent this to me:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect
> theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>
> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>
>
> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>
>
> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>
> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> See: attached doc.? Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of
>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in
>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!