Re: [EVGRAY] Free Energy? Links

Body

The big question then is which component(s) is/are delivering the excess
energy? My thinking its isotope flipping of some of the copper or the gas
in the tube ..this happens above 100 volts and I think this is running over
twice that ?.of coarse I could be wrong .I'll blame it on the wine .

On Saturday, August 17, 2019, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> C3 must charge L to saturation at start up , if L tested is OU coil
> "whatever" in will return C3 charge to exceed initial potential but will be
> dissipated regulated by the tube itself and will flash perpetually
> as long as the parts remain operational  reverse diode must be 1KV fast
> switching , capacitor OIL with value required to set L to saturation as is
> fired by the scr switcher igniter TR capacitor  ,
>
> Notice:
> This info is not for paper or patenting © Ark Research 1988.2019
> If experimenter coil is OU it will Operate with this test device
> PERPETUALY .... all else is pure bullshit !
>
> calculate gain & remove partial extra energy for whatever application
> required without killing the effect  ,,
>
> that's all, with it all supposedly OU coil devices can be tested .
>
> (H)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <onielsen@...> wrote :
>
> Analysis of the output part of the circuit
>
> When activating SW1 the discharge tube U1 fires and discharges the
> capacitor C3 into the coil L. The voltage across the then parallel L-C3
> tank then declines in a sine curve way from its peak value. The current in
> the tank increases as a sine curve starting from zero. When the voltage
> crosses zero the discharge tube turns off and the current has then reached
> its peak level. As the current is turned off the voltage flies back going
> negative as the coil turns into a source discharging its stored energy. The
> current then declines in a sinusoidal way from its peak value while the
> flyback voltage also goes negative as a sine curve reaching its negative
> peak value when the current passes zero. But the negative going spike
> either will reach the reverse breakdown voltage of the diode across the
> discharge tube or the breakdown voltage of the tube itself. This will again
> complete the circuit of the L-C3 tank which charges C3 in the reverse
> direction. When C3 has reached its negative peak voltage as the current
> passes zero it then starts discharging through the diode in the diode's
> forward conduction direction with the current then being negative. As the
> current reaches its negative peak the voltage across the tank passes zero
> and again starts to charge the capacitor to a positive value. The current
> then declines towards zero from its negative value at which the voltage
> reaches its positive peak value.
>
> If there is free energy from the circuit the voltage across the capacitor
> after this completed cycle must be greater than the initial voltage of the
> cycle. The big question then is which component(s) is/are delivering the
> excess energy? The discharge tube and the diode as well as the LC-tank are
> probably all critical components. Also the wires of this part of the
> circuit could be critical. The negative flyback spike could be destructive
> as it reaches the breakdown voltage of something if the coil doesn't have
> enough parasitic capacitance to limit any breakdown of the other
> components. If it is the diode that goes into avalanche breakdown this
> could happen very fast like in nanoseconds. Be careful if trying to measure
> such spikes as the instruments could be damaged even before registering the
> event. If the diode breaks down at 1kV the device measuring this must be
> able to handle this voltage even if it isn't fast enough to actually see
> such a spike. The voltage could even be transformed up or down by loops
> formed. This is very radiant energy.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <arkresearch@...> wrote :
>
> The captain in florida  was the first to replicate ,  as told he went to
> create his own liturgy & religion  but fact is fact if it is OU coilbanger
> will drive it !
>
> if not it will fart blood & die !
>
> as  told a million times coilbanger is a test tool !
>
>
> (H)
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <jglinski01@...> wrote :
>
> This is why I'm looking at other alternatives .my thinking is a closed
> system is just recycling old energy a type of circular logic .in every case
> where ou is really there it seems to be isotope flipping involved
> .tests.gray.the Swiss wheel.Newman need to take a hard look at this .easy
> testing filling caps and timing . hector your coil banger if no one can
> replicate it its like its not there .
>
> On Friday, August 16, 2019, arkresearch@... [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> There are hundreds of claims this coil is ou! my kitchen sink with 2,000
> turns of cuadrafillar wire is oU . my boat anchor with 2 turns of #4
> welding cable turns is OU ! , kapednadze, John smith , Newman , well I
> designed the coilbanger to specifically  excite a coil and harvest its CEMF
> pulse back to the same capacitor and if it does not have ou it will simply
> fart & dia after a few cycles !
>
> don smith circuit is NOT ou !  a Newman coil properly oriented to a magnet
> IS OU, MRA circuit coilbanged to its specifics IS OU !  MEG coilbanged in
> parallel and CEMF in series is OU
>
> things i have TOLD a million times, an OU circuit requires an specific
> Joule potential to SATURATE in order to obtain gain !
>
> Norman has taught a billion times about "neutral spike" tailor a
> coilbanger to produce a NEUTRAL spike within a NORMAL transformer and you
> are in for the trip !
>
> One potential to excite one frequency . another to collect the spike , and
> yes it is OU, the reason i don't give values is evident with 10%
> tolerances  in actual electronic components  you cant work
> at .003 tolerance were a wire length of one forth of a turn can mess your
> day ..
>
> now do i need 3 days for the post to be ejaculated into the forum from
> Yahoo ballsack !?
>
> maybe !
>
> (H)
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <schoonersolsticemoon@...> wrote :
>
> Hector
> Your coil banger has driven me crazy trying to make it go. I bought two
> exact units as you described.
> I am not disputing that you got it to go, but you present it more as a
> puzzle to be solved, which I suppose, no doubt, it really, and truly is, in
> some senses, but nuts, and bolts, hands on advice, are in short supply.
> The concept needs to be generally known, and it needs to be in many hands,
> so it gets generally adopted.
> You are conflicted about this, as it pisses you off that sleazy gits take
> your work and run with it, getting rich.
> I think the worse part, is that they take authorship, which is wrong, and
> grossly unfair, if not fraudulent.
> In my own experience, I have found one rarely gets fame, and fortune, as a
> combined package.
> You get one, or the other, but not both. You must decide. Thet both have
> benefits, and deterrents.
> I am retired, whatever that means. I guess I have decided that I am not
> racing other rats through the maze.
> As surviving members of society, we have a certain obligation to future
> generations, as teachers, and, God forbid, sources of wisdom, and good
> advice.
> Now, coil bangers need to be made. Every kid should have one by next
> Christmas, as a plastic bag full of parts, a kit for all ages.
> You need perfect fool proof instructions, that are tested with several
> groups of school kids, and found to work.
> This is a project.
> It is totally worth doing.
> It is work.
> It will cost money to supply the little baggies of parts.
> You have make one and show it to science teachers or "shop" teachers (if
> they even have such things now.)
> Failing this method, you hire a marketing research firm, and this is what
> they will do, when contracted by the advertising agency, you have also
> hired.
> Ka-ching,ka-ching! Then packaging, then bundling it with other "science"
> toys.
> Yes, you can make a shit load of money, eventually.
> Is that exactly what you wish to do, and need now in your life, because it
> is a job, and a full time one at that?
> It is your choice, but getting this flailing group of geeks to actually
> make a coil banger work is not a bad idea.
> If enough of us get them happening, with some success, the general
> honesty, and interest of the group will help refine the idea in ways none
> of us might expect.
> There is no dispute that you are the author.
> Now you have to make it work!
> To do that it needs to be replicated with success.
> Your fame will be earned.
> It takes, time, work, and energy, to make money, and sometimes you don't.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Fri., 16 Aug. 2019 at 6:57 a.m., arkresearch@... [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> You know how many times i posted about the coilbanger ? years explaining
> it and the only guy who made it work went to do his own religion based on
> it .......may a chicken give him a blow job !
>
> 
>