Re: no lenz generator (ferroresonant) so the elites go to shit with their little secrets !

Body

Hi Hector, Ron,

With the stator and rotor both having only two poles it can't be a switched reluctance motor: 
https://wiki2.org/en/Switched_reluctance_motor https://wiki2.org/en/Switched_reluctance_motor.

Having the same number of stator and rotor poles could make it a flux switching alternator (Ecklin generator: US patent 4567407 https://patents.google.com/patent/US4567407A/en P. Lindemann article: http://www.borderlands.de/Links/QEG-LindemannBoS http://www.borderlands.de/Links/QEG-LindemannBoS):
https://wiki2.org/en/Flux_switching_alternator https://wiki2.org/en/Flux_switching_alternator. According to Peter Lindemann they achieved a COP of 1.2 on the Ecklin design. Ecklin's design doesn't have two resonant tanks and is DC magnetized by permanent magnets. Permanent magnets have high reluctance like air or saturated electromagnets. Lindemann calls it a variable inductance generator instead of switched reluctance generator as the inductance is changing too. This also makes it a parametric pumped generator. Lindemann also mentions that the generator self excites when capacitive loaded.

But are the two LC-tanks a fundamental and a harmonic frequency? Is one of the coils for exciting? Etc...
Either a simulation or a physical model is needed or some AC circuit calculations to tell what happen. Say the core has some remanence and the rotor pumps the magnetic flux. This could resonate one of the LC-tanks at its fundamental frequency. The other tank is then double or half the fundamental frequency.

Regards
Ole

---In [email protected], <arkresearch@...> wrote :

 


lets see if some can interpret or if it will be buried within the bullshit ! 

long years old ......

(H)