Re: Science Explained: The Physics of Cold Fusion

Database ID: 113449
2019-06-06T10:45:41+00:00
onielsen2000 <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Hi MerLynn,

"I published a theory of Density of Gas with the experiment to prove it. Once published the onus is on you to do the proving. If its not independently repeatable, then call me about your findings."

I really don't have the time for all kinds of experiments or even the money to buy everything. I have my own experiments taking time and resources. There is nothing wrong in oneself making proofs. Use the scientific method which is far from the way the flat earthers are doing science. Flat earthers do it more like religion (or belief) and won't even watch experiments disproving or showing faults or omissions in their theory or experiments. The scientific method https://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/science-fair/steps-of-the-scientific-method is for finding the truth much like a trial. Look at all causes that can explain the observed phenomena. As you're using extremely high tension (EHT) to supply the current it will jump gaps and it will burn things. Experiments can be made to make sure seals aren't burned by preventing sparks jumping them. I'm not convinced that this doesn't happen with the limited explanation of the experiment. EHT can and will destroy any dielectrics when the tension reaches the breakdown voltage of the dielectric.

"Touch the extended shaft right near where it is grounded to the frame of the car."
That's the problem as we don't really know which way the current passes. Both ends of the strut could be the path of least resistance. My suggestion is to have full control of which end the current enters and leaves the strut. This means connecting the ground to either the same or opposite end of the part where the current enters. Only this way it is possible to make a proper conclusion.

You really don't tell which way the current runs like if it has to pass the gas. If it does so it also has to jump between the cylinder wall and the rod. If doing that the current will take the path of least resistance which is probably along the dielectric of the piston (creep current) or at the end seal. I see burning a seal just as good an explanation as changing the density of the gas.

The gas could also become even higher pressure by heating it with a plasma arc like in the Papp engine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNSAXbZfnbE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNSAXbZfnbE (19:25). This could perhaps let it pass or destroy the sealing.

"All you want to do Ole is prove me wrong and you superior."
Definitely not! Just prove yourself right! I see too many loose ends at the moment. Just close them to let the truth come forth.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <eagleseeone@...> wrote :

 Look Ole...  it works like this.. One publishes a theory based upon a practical experiment that even you can do.
 Then you do the experiment to either prove or disprove the theory.
 

 I published a theory of Density of Gas with the experiment to prove it. Once published the onus is on you to do the proving. If its not independently repeatable, then call me about your findings. 

 

 So NO, you cannot judge the Theory by your Flat Earth Mentality without doing the experiment. Which makes your opinion about as valuable as the Flat Earthers. 

 

 Oh and dont just touch the spark to the same spot 3 times, vary the current flow so that the gas isnt in the flow of current so no burning holes or leaky rubber seals by burning eventuates.Touch the extended shaft right near where it is grounded to the frame of the car. Do I really have to tell you everything? Do you just exist to stop learning by your pathetic ridicule of flat earth comparison thinking?

 

 All your 'concerns' can be answered if you buy enough struts. 

 

 All you want to do Ole is prove me wrong and you superior. Or you want Pearls on a silver platter. You have no intention to ever do a single experiment I refer to, preferring to be an armchair internet sleuth pseudo Physicist instead.. It sucks to be you using flat earth theories to prove your point sheesh.
 

 Change your mindset Ole...  Try to see that what I say is 100% correct and ask for clarification. Not your rubbishing attitude. Its not a lot of fun dealing with such a mindset as yours. Kone and his no traction in levitation is another. literally 100's saw it and so to did Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation in Canberra see it too. The only reason Joe is alive is they cant reverse engineer it. I have much better conspiracies than the flat earthers.

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 59709 invoked by uid 102); 6 Jun 2019 10:45:57 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.224.239) by m15.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2019 10:45:57 -0000
X-Received (qmail 18782 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2019 10:45:57 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4003.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.221.10.34) by mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2019 10:45:57 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of yahoogroups.com designates 66.163.189.43 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG XtoVrPgWLDvrJX0uSeFy0lnmN45cAHst6Pavua9HRnrnr0sM esXA.dE8jsGqx4MFiyATGQ7B0HKWIT1e_NNMeTZ.KiTqjFUAWwozIbfaCZ2G _nbRC5I5HLt.ENOOYii5OmzPsA27fWWF68tEvhT83mpXwEq32JlyjGoGNu__ h2oM8itv.hQmsKgghhjEymGEZQmd0Z_2KKRYGnO7ih5YWQs1K1om3Qdc0Xym aoz7NKL55bY3WxR.IGG88xrSwCTdz1kSY3Z718ZgGJ5bqCY8WOM_90OfngGv W3SkQFC96JvGGTnsyz4gZONgbvY_ezfMA2HPx2KY3hv7pInf2Gv66VszF3NY bAQf76hfFEGS.AZb9bxuadbHmbdds554xzgS4cmiu8yhZ2NfV1EEEZMSjtYN ITZL85LdJm6asPvAGy9RYD_HdkZSnXcXvZrxnXacxCTDtMkbFVDX6GVCgnKd 66WSxpRAz9dVDP9FMt3xIInYL0wmcyS3khgZkeC7FWDvxW0qOqMbSq8ntmfy 60Qe49gKuhkIX4FFiGwA8_HGQvsM0YuDshwH_EgsOX9KEoExmfGbKBlCRqz_ 0gAzRz2r6HSIJ415w5u_WnMqXhq40u8.NCgDJrnMBY76eIytVEljR.IsXnnd vnHOT5_S8wUIeShZCwHJRr7l05Bd0h6UjNIdjHNSzmgfuKqVB5XzpjLawjv9 vPdiWPGGnxZ0ynsWz_KY7jxjtbCDj4AFR3aSnb337tz3fxULAoJDb0lPWUOv PS3vr3oQCAIjazuldEksspm7yy5ErXjTonKc97VXr1gdQfYBzsCpMGCHa4GD nL2fxpPspriict6JYKr4Li8FSLP0zcX3Jv2aj7mLQbZGPstTccHS5caYekI4 Q2WfQ1FvIcUQDldRJEp0AWtGDclxNpg8bFkx_sudLvWY6LguGxkc4nQ.4Jow SwYT4oVtfBjNmg297FrmbmvuFGL8fT2dQXMNmGQVjeJh6D10q.prDHLRbpW1 Th9vWvJQ9yO_7zj8U6bTfhD2pogYCFYhpqWPB.tFuBwyYgnIXbVtWFME7gJn MhHiZT6e6u7e7F_BsG8.FNNoArdQluQ.D43RZmpGREtAqMB88rxKgSJHfXhg h4rpDANyT22ZF65Wgk_ybeuM0tj5PUYVskuh51UWz2Azjw6nuCLUc_URoWp1 1tSm.qTL8Glp5LcE4vLS5Kk3tGl2WpBalyL7cnOqMVju0quHq4g-
Authentication-Results mta4003.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=echoe; dkim=permerror (bad sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic322-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.189.43) by mta4003.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:45:57 +0000
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic322.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:45:57 +0000
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:45:41 +0000
X-Received from [127.0.0.1] by gapi6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2019 10:45:41 -0000
To [email protected]
X-Original-Return-Path [email protected]
X-Original-From [email protected]
X-Mailer Yahoo Groups Message Poster
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property groups-compose
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="9nlWnTS9ocNmxdhsK3FKVLWiM6a5jwOaA8HvrLV"
X-Originating-IP 85.81.24.76
X-Yahoo-Post-IP 85.81.24.76
Reply-To [email protected]
Subject Re: Science Explained: The Physics of Cold Fusion
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=115023864; y=5_CFhQdG0fMHidqUNeDiZS4Cp8tuP3LHwOUQT_77xYsRGvrJWeA7
X-Yahoo-Profile onielsen2000
From [email protected]