Re: [EVGRAY] Congratulations from a fellow researcher!

Body

Norm,

It's hard to believe the black boxes can be recovered from such a disaster.

Every time I read that book it seems like I have an epiphany but then
when I put it down I forget.  That is one book I have a major disconnect
with, can you recommend another book that might put me in proper head
space for PSoM in as much as I may get more out of the Davson book by
re-reading after book X?

BTW I think you could write a really excellent book because your one of
the most knowledgeable people around with the ability to dovetail
diverse concepts of science and para science few to none have thought of.

Mick

On 3/17/2019 4:09 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Read your letter to Doug with a great interest since you are talking
> about the conversion of hydrogen into H3 in the magnetic core.  All of
> this takes you directly to the subject of The Physics of the Primary
> State of Matter, Schappeller, as published in the only writing of his
> work with Glowing Magnetism by Davson in 1955.  
> https://www.amazon.com/physics-primary-matter-Facsimile-Publication/dp/B06Y4XB7CR
>
> Tom Bearden told me  about a copy of this book that was in a Boston
> book store and I bought it for $450, signed copy by the author, Cyril
> Davson, 1955.
>
> Wikipedia: Sonoluminescence
> <http://www.energeticforum.com/redirect-to/?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSonoluminescence>
>
> Schappeller's device is based on creating a sun inside a sphere
> according to how nature forms a sun. The Star in a Jar is like a
> mini-sun in a bubble which uses sound waves of sufficient intensity.
>
> What sets Schappeller's device apart from Sonoluminescence, is there
> are no input energy requirements in Schappeller's device because it's
> using the permenant static electric field of the electret to bring the
> core to the glowing state, instead of using an input energy to
> generate the sound waves in Sonoluminescence. Even if Schappeller's
> device is brought to the glowing state without fusion as seen by
> Sonoluminescence, it will still produce more output energy than input
> energy, because the input energy requirements is 0. Another difference
> between the two is, Schappeller's device is based on using the primary
> state of matter, while Sonoluminescence is based on using the
> secondary states of matter.
>
> IMO, Schappeller's device is the real deal.
>
>
> http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3781-physics-primary-state-matter-10.html
>
> GB
> <http://www.energeticforum.com/#>
> <http://www.energeticforum.com/#><http://www.energeticforum.com/#><http://www.energeticforum.com/#><http://www.energeticforum.com/#>
> Originally Posted by *Sonoluminescence: A Star in a Jar*
> If the bubble contained deuterium, it would become hot enough to
> generate fusion if the radius became as small as 10nm.
>
>