Re: [EVGRAY] NH3-Ammonia fuel

Body

James yes you are completely correct but nothing wrong with some extra
CO2 as within a few months it is converted to extra oxygen.  Studies
have show the more CO2 the more the plants convert it.  I agree turning
off the carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide etc but not the carbon
dioxide else we will exacerbate the problem you brought up.  Plants
thrive on C02 as any good dope grower knows and the more oxygen they
make us the better as it also out gasses into space as O1.  Meanwhile
someone has released a very suspect looking graph of oxygen levels
dropping very evenly but likely the number one cause of lowered oxygen
is the bunker fuel used in super cargo carriers.  18 of these pollute
the equivalent of every car on the planet and there are thousands
killing off the ocean with tar shit.  The oceans are very large and can
take a lot of abuse but when this film of shit floats to the surface it
corrupts the gas exchange mechanism to make what we all breathe.   At
the very least we could be burning Hydrogen and using all the present
technology with slight mods and no more problem, not to mention it's the
most plentiful element in the known universe.  Hydrogen instead of
hydrocarbons, problem solved with existing tech!   So notwithstanding
the energy researchers around here and unproven bleeding edge tech, why
are we not doing that?  My Dad was a chemist and told me this as a child
how we should be using Hydrogen as a fuel rather than the polluting
hydrocarbons.   If the scientists pushing the carbon dioxide=death
agenda for wall street futures brokers really gave a shit about anything
rather than making money off all energy sales out the ass they would
sound the alarm now to switch to Hydrogen power, as no CO2 that way
either, plus it removes the real pollution.  Oh but there is no carbon
chit in it for them-see how that works!
The assholes here are forcing the removal of our hydro power dams in
order we import our energy rather than make it in the least polluting
way, also the most carbon neutral way.   The old fish ladders have
rusted and are out of commission and the fish no longer have a way past
the dams.  Rather than repair the fish ladders (because it would be too
expensive) they want to remove the damns for the poor Salmon forcing us
to import energy.  Meanwhile what the fucking morons forgot to take into
account is the fur trappers killed off the beaver and the natural dams
are no more so everything is becoming desert as the water tables drop,
plenty of water but it's much deeper down.  Soon the northern California
San Joaquin food bowl of the world will be desert and a dust bowl
because of these moron fucks not allowing farmers and ranchers water. 
The one place in Oregon, Appellate they already removed one of the dams
the farmers have no water.  The farms there are being put out of
business not to mention it looks ugly in summer with everything brown
and ready to burn.  Hey but the government can make more selling the
water to the people after they assume total control of it when the dams
are gone and can place themselves in the middle of out of state energy
deals.


On 3/4/2019 12:18 PM, James Glinski [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> I'm just saying its important to get to free energy to turn off the
> burning of carbon as an energy source and let our oxygen level return
> .cancer can't live in a oxigen rich environment or a alkaline one .it
> may be a cause of it or at lest a contribution to it .either way were
> dead if we run low on oxigen and burning shit its the cause along with
> cutting down the trees .I know we he much from the seas and general
> plants but stop and think if we push it there is no future regardless
> of your view point .so free energy that doesn't burn shit its a
> extremely important issue .and the assholes are running around killing
> off the researchers to hold on to the power or control of burning oil
> when well die from it .stupid humans they didn't shoot them selves in
> the foot they shot them self's in the mouth.
>
> On Sunday, March 3, 2019, Mick [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>      
>
>     James,
>
>     Interesting and something to be concerned about for sure. 
>
>     Yes the global warming had to change the name to climate change
>     because the science was not backing up the outlandish claims. 
>     Still have not received an answer from the various "climate
>     scientists" I have inquired as to why Co2 is treated like a wide
>     band perfect black body radiator rather than 3 narrow band
>     absorber emitter in all the IPCC alarmist claims. 
>     We just entered the bifurcation point of the temperature drop
>     beginning as can be seen from the lack of hurricanes this year and
>     the rebuilt ice packs at the poles.  People will be wishing for
>     warmth soon! 
>     There was a meeting in Oregon last week where many people from
>     local trucking companies and other businesses showed up to counter
>     the cap and trade they are trying to lay down in this state which
>     will make quite a few businesses leave the state.   No one seemed
>     concerned about putting out the fires which dumped insane amounts
>     of CO2 but since we are mostly rural and other than fires have
>     some of the cleanest air in the US.  Well anyways the tax they are
>     set on adopting will raise the cost of gas to the point it will be
>     the highest in the country.  Everyone's food prices will go up
>     etc.   Meanwhile all the money they collect will go to the
>     politicians coffers and into state financed "studies" to determine
>     the best use of the money.  All the carbon alarmists wanted the
>     fires to keep burning because "it's natural".  Meanwhile they are
>     practically crying their children will all be dead in 10 years if
>     we don't impose this tax.  Just like when Gore claimed by 2018 the
>     ocean will be 50 feet higher no doubts about it, it's science.   
>     I love how transparent this con is and the fact they just want to
>     charge everyone to use energy an extra tax so Wall Street can make
>     more money trading worthless meaningless paper.  And if a company
>     needs to emit more carbon they just buy a chit or move to India or
>     China which are exempted.  What total nonsense...
>
>     Gore was asked how he could be carbon neutral if one of his houses
>     way using over 30 grand a month in electricity, his answer "I just
>     buy carbon offsets from a company for a few hundred dollars and I
>     am carbon neutral".  So it's a self guilt tax and this is the
>     level of intelligence we have accorded to the human race in the 21
>     century.   Meanwhile real pollution is happening, not a beneficial
>     carbon cycle which gives us more oxygen which as you say we really
>     need, but real bad stuff such as fracking toxifying the fresh
>     water tables and bunker fuel toxifying the oceans.
>
>
>     On 3/3/2019 3:56 PM, James Glinski [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>      
>>
>>     I'm not a global warming person .but I did see something that
>>     gave me pause .it the oxygen level drop from the 1800 ' s is real
>>     dramatic .were at around 15% now and at or below 10% we die the
>>     whole dam world ..we could be stupiding our selfs to death  this
>>     needs a good looking at .or not as usual we can just wait till we
>>     get a significant body count  to do our thinking for us ..
>>
>>     On Sunday, March 3, 2019, Warren Keillor
>>     [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>          
>>
>>         Bart
>>
>>         I just got 80 panels made in Canada that are three years old
>>         from a building that is being demolished for pennies on the
>>         dollar.
>>         Cheers Warren
>>
>>         Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>         <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>             On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 at 12:31 PM, bart woodard
>>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>             wrote:
>>              
>>
>>             Here Warren!
>>                                        Set up an additional panel
>>             arraignment.  Get in touch with Gordy! See what it takes.
>>             I helped a friend set up a megawatt install on his
>>             property in Fonthill so he could get paid from the province .
>>             Not sure what the status is nowadays but just takes a
>>             call. Once I knew all the owner operators of solar
>>             manufacturing
>>             here in Ontario. I do have a number I will fetch for you
>>             regarding seconds or discontinued stock or what have you.
>>             You do have to purchase a truck load ....as is sort of
>>             thing. You may even have to fly out some-wheres.
>>             Also I know an electronics engineer in Markham that is
>>             setting up solar manufacturing in Romania,
>>             but watch out for him , he will download your phone
>>             standing next to him lol.
>>             Here  is  Gordy! Would think you could build to scale.
>>
>>             https://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/hes-creating-a-new-fuel-out-of-thin-air-for-85-cents-per-gallon/92686
>>             <https://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/hes-creating-a-new-fuel-out-of-thin-air-for-85-cents-per-gallon/92686>
>>             alt
>>             <https://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/hes-creating-a-new-fuel-out-of-thin-air-for-85-cents-per-gallon/92686>
>>             	
>>             He's Creating a New Fuel Out of Thin Air — for 85 Cents
>>             per Gallon | Rising Stars | OZY
>>             <https://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/hes-creating-a-new-fuel-out-of-thin-air-for-85-cents-per-gallon/92686>
>>             Advocates of America’s Green New Deal or other radical
>>             efforts to decarbonize the world economy in the face of a
>>             looming climate crisis may well have one of their
>>             greatest champions in a rumpled ...
>>             www.ozy.com <http://www.ozy..com>
>>
>>
>