Body
https://www.quora.com/What-happens-to-the-electric-force-between-two-objects-when-the-distance-between-them-increases-Decreases
I would guess a car or truck around a Positive charged tornado would be
just like a pith ball in our Science Lab. Lol
On 2/25/2019 5:08 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://www.actforlibraries.org/what-is-supercell-lightning-4/ If you
> can visualized a large metal object in the vicinity of a full blown
> tornado with eddy vortex action doing the ionizing to a net negative
> condition then it would be easy for a huge positive charge to
> magically lift the object just as would be done by a huge magnet.
> Just a thought. Norm
>
> On 2/25/2019 4:24 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Moray, Of particular interest to you is the subject of Sprites above
>> Super-cell Thunderstorms, Positive charge and the connection to the
>> ionosphere. Since old Robert Golka did Project Lightning and the
>> Cape Canaveral, lightning study of space launch vulnerability, we
>> learned something about the small percentage of the Positive variety
>> of lightning. First, we have to go back to Physics 101, 9th grade
>> Science Class and understand charge. See
>> https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Field-and-the-Movement-of-Charge
>>
>> https://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circuits/u9l1b.cfm
>>
>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>
>> Excerpt, Positive lightning has been identified as a major source
>> for the recently discovered sprites and elves. Sprites and elves are
>> most likely lightning discharges but occur from 18-60 miles (30-95km)
>> in altitude, well above the parent thunderstorm.
>>
>> Some studies have found a correlation between tornado genesis and
>> positive lightning strikes spikes.
>> http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jan/?n=local_research_positive_strike
>> http://radarmet.atmos.colostate.edu/steps/positive_cloud/
>>
>>
>> Recap:
>>
>>
>> *Negative Lightning:*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *90-95% of all strikes*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *300,000,000 Volts*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *30,000 AMPS*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *50,000° Hot*
>>
>>
>> *Positive Lightning:*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *5-10% of all strikes*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *1,000,000,000 volts*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *300,000 AMPS*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *50,000° Hot but lasts 10 times longer.*
>>
>> On 2/24/2019 2:01 PM, Mbking42 wrote:
>>> Norm,
>>> You wrote: "Remember, if a charge moves it creates an electric field
>>> with attendant magnetic field. Physics 101."
>>> Small correction: A stationary charge exhibits an electric field. A
>>> moving charge exhibits a magnetic field in addition.
>>>
>>> Experiments with charged heavy particles (protons, nuclei, charged
>>> dust particles, etc.) in vortex motion might yield some surprising
>>> anti-gravity effects.
>>> It just might be that simple!
>>>
>>> -Moray
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>> To: EVGRAY <[email protected]>; Art Devine <[email protected]>;
>>> Bert Pool <[email protected]>; Bob Paddock
>>> <[email protected]>; joel mcclain <[email protected]>; Lane
>>> Wootan <[email protected]>; Mbking42 <[email protected]>; Walt
>>> <[email protected]>; Toby Grotz <[email protected]>; Steven
>>> Elswick <[email protected]>; Angel Alvarez
>>> <[email protected]>; Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>;
>>> Jeane Manning <[email protected]>; Jon Gentry
>>> <[email protected]>; Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2019 7:34 am
>>> Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Anti-gravity effect, Ionization, virtual
>>> rotation in molecular structure??
>>>
>>> https://m.phys.org/news/2018-09-scientists-tuneable-quantum-state.html
>>> They are hot on the trail. Ole.
>>> https://m.phys.org/news/2018-08-marriage-topology-magnetism-weyl.html
>>> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-quantum-magnet-topological.html
>>> Ole, please see attached
>>> On 2/21/2019 7:32 PM, [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> It's hard time following up on all of your links if having to read
>>> all of them. I definitely don't have the time and must be very
>>> selective. Links without any good reason for reading them are discarded.
>>>
>>> "Take it for what it is worth, for I believe that the AG effect is
>>> due to gross ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization
>>> of an object causes a great amount of electron movement in the
>>> molecular structure and the attendant manifestation of electric
>>> fields ( Ole, Hooper Motional electric field?? ) and Magnetic
>>> flux. Remember, if a charge moves it creates an electric field with
>>> attendant magnetic field. Physics 101.
>>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I feel,
>>> sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol Norm PS: Moray,
>>> there may be some plasma reconnect phenomenon occurring here also."
>>>
>>> The motinal electric field in an ionized tornado could be great. The
>>> magnetic field will have to go through its axis of spin. Radially
>>> away from the funnel the magnetic field parts almost cancels. Only
>>> the part along the spin axis exists to any amount. The induction
>>> from difference in the motional field from the ions moving in
>>> different directions on the front side versus the back side of the
>>> tornado is what Hooper and Smith suspected was the cause of gravity.
>>> Of course they discussed the front and back of electrons orbiting
>>> the nucleus of atoms. But the principle would be the same for such
>>> macro scale I guess.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>> ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>> <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>> https://extremeplanet.me/tag/heaviest-moved-by-tornado/
>>> *IVh. The Heaviest Object Ever Lifted by a Tornado*
>>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado's path,
>>> an oil production facility was destroyed (at left) and three oil
>>> tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the east. Two of
>>> the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40 degree incline.
>>> This is one of the most impresive instances of tornado damage ever
>>> recorded and perhaps the only instance of an object over 100,000lbs
>>> being moved a great distance.
>>> <https://extremeplanet.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/largest-ever-moved-tornado.png>
>>>
>>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado’s path
>>> in Bakersfield Valley, a production facility was destroyed (at left)
>>> and three oil tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to
>>> the east. Two of the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40
>>> degree incline. This is one of the most impressive instances of
>>> tornado damage ever recorded and perhaps the only documented
>>> instance of an object over 100,000 lbs being moved a long distance.
>>> (Images by Wayne Greene)
>>> A note here of which I have stated before: "Bernoulli and Newton's
>>> third Law" was not involved here.
>>> Over many years, I have been experimenting with the Negative Ion
>>> Generators which are so common for cleaning environmental air and
>>> the supposed good health effects. I have one running continuously in
>>> my home. Besides creating some ozone via the formation of the
>>> tri-atomic bond of oxygen you see the drop out of dust particles
>>> from the air due to the charge. Yep you have to dust frequently
>>> cause that is how the air cleaning principle works. That is how
>>> they are used in the old bars, dance halls etc. where there is heavy
>>> smoking. They were called Smoke Eaters.
>>> That aside lets discuss some interesting facts regarding negative
>>> ionization and the attendant effects. No one noticed back in the
>>> early 90s that ALL, I say again, ALL interesting discussion of the
>>> negative ionization effects were removed from the Internet feed on
>>> purpose. Good reason cause the paragraph at the beginning of this
>>> page where objects weighing over 100,000 lbs. were moved is a
>>> classic example of the anti-gravitic effects of ionization of
>>> molecular lattice in material. When I first got interested in the
>>> subject, you could go online and pull up numerous interesting
>>> articles on the subject. One of the most revealing articles was on
>>> the un-exploded ordinance recovery, robotic vehicles which had too
>>> frequent failures due to electronics on board over heating.
>>> Engineers knew about negative ionization cooling so they simply
>>> installed a HVDC power unit and maintained a gross negative charge
>>> on the vehicle and it remained cool in the scorching desert heat.
>>> Many interesting articles have been removed from the Internet on
>>> purpose.
>>> Now you ask, OK, smart ASS, how does it work"? Examine the
>>> Schauberger Implosion Vortex phenomenon to understand as in the case
>>> of a natural tornado, that there is an inflow of warm, moist air
>>> tangentially into a very strong low pressure region with extreme air
>>> velocities being achieved. The low pressure gradient causes the
>>> cooling and condensation of huge volumes of moisture from the air
>>> with off the scale electrostatic charge. PHASE CHANGE IS
>>> ELECTROSTATIC RE-ARRANGEMENT OF ELECTRONS IN THE ATOMIC LATTICE.
>>> You in effect have the worlds largest Van de Graff Generator.
>>> Reference the Armstrong Electrostatic Steam Generator. In the high
>>> velocity inflow air currents there are a huge number of eddy vortex
>>> actions occurring which leave material objects grossly ionized.
>>> Take it for what it is worth, for I believe that the AG effect is
>>> due to gross ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization
>>> of an object causes a great amount of electron movement in the
>>> molecular structure and the attendant manifestation of electric
>>> fields ( Ole, Hooper Motional electric field?? ) and Magnetic
>>> flux. Remember, if a charge moves it creates an electric field with
>>> attendant magnetic field. Physics 101.
>>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I feel,
>>> sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol Norm PS: Moray,
>>> there may be some plasma reconnect phenomenon occurring here also.
>>>
>>>