Body
http://www.actforlibraries.org/what-is-supercell-lightning-4/ If you can
visualized a large metal object in the vicinity of a full blown tornado
with eddy vortex action doing the ionizing to a net negative condition
then it would be easy for a huge positive charge to magically lift the
object just as would be done by a huge magnet. Just a thought. Norm
On 2/25/2019 4:24 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Moray, Of particular interest to you is the subject of Sprites above
> Super-cell Thunderstorms, Positive charge and the connection to the
> ionosphere. Since old Robert Golka did Project Lightning and the Cape
> Canaveral, lightning study of space launch vulnerability, we learned
> something about the small percentage of the Positive variety of
> lightning. First, we have to go back to Physics 101, 9th grade
> Science Class and understand charge. See
> https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Field-and-the-Movement-of-Charge
>
> https://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circuits/u9l1b.cfm
>
> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>
> Excerpt, Positive lightning has been identified as a major source
> for the recently discovered sprites and elves. Sprites and elves are
> most likely lightning discharges but occur from 18-60 miles (30-95km)
> in altitude, well above the parent thunderstorm.
>
> Some studies have found a correlation between tornado genesis and
> positive lightning strikes spikes.
> http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jan/?n=local_research_positive_strike
> http://radarmet.atmos.colostate.edu/steps/positive_cloud/
>
>
> Recap:
>
>
> *Negative Lightning:*
>
> *
>
>
> *90-95% of all strikes*
>
> *
>
>
> *300,000,000 Volts*
>
> *
>
>
> *30,000 AMPS*
>
> *
>
>
> *50,000° Hot*
>
>
> *Positive Lightning:*
>
> *
>
>
> *5-10% of all strikes*
>
> *
>
>
> *1,000,000,000 volts*
>
> *
>
>
> *300,000 AMPS*
>
> *
>
>
> *50,000° Hot but lasts 10 times longer.*
>
> On 2/24/2019 2:01 PM, Mbking42 wrote:
>> Norm,
>> You wrote: "Remember, if a charge moves it creates an electric field
>> with attendant magnetic field. Physics 101."
>> Small correction: A stationary charge exhibits an electric field. A
>> moving charge exhibits a magnetic field in addition.
>>
>> Experiments with charged heavy particles (protons, nuclei, charged
>> dust particles, etc.) in vortex motion might yield some surprising
>> anti-gravity effects.
>> It just might be that simple!
>>
>> -Moray
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> To: EVGRAY <[email protected]>; Art Devine <[email protected]>;
>> Bert Pool <[email protected]>; Bob Paddock
>> <[email protected]>; joel mcclain <[email protected]>; Lane
>> Wootan <[email protected]>; Mbking42 <[email protected]>; Walt
>> <[email protected]>; Toby Grotz <[email protected]>; Steven
>> Elswick <[email protected]>; Angel Alvarez
>> <[email protected]>; Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>;
>> Jeane Manning <[email protected]>; Jon Gentry
>> <[email protected]>; Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2019 7:34 am
>> Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Anti-gravity effect, Ionization, virtual
>> rotation in molecular structure??
>>
>> https://m.phys.org/news/2018-09-scientists-tuneable-quantum-state.html
>> They are hot on the trail. Ole.
>> https://m.phys.org/news/2018-08-marriage-topology-magnetism-weyl.html
>> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-quantum-magnet-topological.html
>> Ole, please see attached
>> On 2/21/2019 7:32 PM, [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>> Hi Norman,
>>
>> It's hard time following up on all of your links if having to read
>> all of them. I definitely don't have the time and must be very
>> selective. Links without any good reason for reading them are discarded.
>>
>> "Take it for what it is worth, for I believe that the AG effect is
>> due to gross ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization
>> of an object causes a great amount of electron movement in the
>> molecular structure and the attendant manifestation of electric
>> fields ( Ole, Hooper Motional electric field?? ) and Magnetic flux.
>> Remember, if a charge moves it creates an electric field with
>> attendant magnetic field. Physics 101.
>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I feel,
>> sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol Norm PS: Moray,
>> there may be some plasma reconnect phenomenon occurring here also."
>>
>> The motinal electric field in an ionized tornado could be great. The
>> magnetic field will have to go through its axis of spin. Radially
>> away from the funnel the magnetic field parts almost cancels. Only
>> the part along the spin axis exists to any amount. The induction from
>> difference in the motional field from the ions moving in different
>> directions on the front side versus the back side of the tornado is
>> what Hooper and Smith suspected was the cause of gravity. Of course
>> they discussed the front and back of electrons orbiting the nucleus
>> of atoms. But the principle would be the same for such macro scale I
>> guess.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ole
>>
>>
>> ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>> <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>
>> https://extremeplanet.me/tag/heaviest-moved-by-tornado/
>> *IVh. The Heaviest Object Ever Lifted by a Tornado*
>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado's path,
>> an oil production facility was destroyed (at left) and three oil
>> tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the east. Two of
>> the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40 degree incline.
>> This is one of the most impresive instances of tornado damage ever
>> recorded and perhaps the only instance of an object over 100,000lbs
>> being moved a great distance.
>> <https://extremeplanet.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/largest-ever-moved-tornado.png>
>>
>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado’s path in
>> Bakersfield Valley, a production facility was destroyed (at left) and
>> three oil tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the
>> east. Two of the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40
>> degree incline. This is one of the most impressive instances of
>> tornado damage ever recorded and perhaps the only documented instance
>> of an object over 100,000 lbs being moved a long distance. (Images by
>> Wayne Greene)
>> A note here of which I have stated before: "Bernoulli and Newton's
>> third Law" was not involved here.
>> Over many years, I have been experimenting with the Negative Ion
>> Generators which are so common for cleaning environmental air and the
>> supposed good health effects. I have one running continuously in my
>> home. Besides creating some ozone via the formation of the tri-atomic
>> bond of oxygen you see the drop out of dust particles from the air
>> due to the charge. Yep you have to dust frequently cause that is how
>> the air cleaning principle works. That is how they are used in the
>> old bars, dance halls etc. where there is heavy smoking. They were
>> called Smoke Eaters.
>> That aside lets discuss some interesting facts regarding negative
>> ionization and the attendant effects. No one noticed back in the
>> early 90s that ALL, I say again, ALL interesting discussion of the
>> negative ionization effects were removed from the Internet feed on
>> purpose. Good reason cause the paragraph at the beginning of this
>> page where objects weighing over 100,000 lbs. were moved is a classic
>> example of the anti-gravitic effects of ionization of molecular
>> lattice in material. When I first got interested in the subject, you
>> could go online and pull up numerous interesting articles on the
>> subject. One of the most revealing articles was on the un-exploded
>> ordinance recovery, robotic vehicles which had too frequent failures
>> due to electronics on board over heating. Engineers knew about
>> negative ionization cooling so they simply installed a HVDC power
>> unit and maintained a gross negative charge on the vehicle and it
>> remained cool in the scorching desert heat. Many interesting
>> articles have been removed from the Internet on purpose.
>> Now you ask, OK, smart ASS, how does it work"? Examine the
>> Schauberger Implosion Vortex phenomenon to understand as in the case
>> of a natural tornado, that there is an inflow of warm, moist air
>> tangentially into a very strong low pressure region with extreme air
>> velocities being achieved. The low pressure gradient causes the
>> cooling and condensation of huge volumes of moisture from the air
>> with off the scale electrostatic charge. PHASE CHANGE IS
>> ELECTROSTATIC RE-ARRANGEMENT OF ELECTRONS IN THE ATOMIC LATTICE. You
>> in effect have the worlds largest Van de Graff Generator. Reference
>> the Armstrong Electrostatic Steam Generator. In the high velocity
>> inflow air currents there are a huge number of eddy vortex actions
>> occurring which leave material objects grossly ionized. Take it for
>> what it is worth, for I believe that the AG effect is due to gross
>> ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization of an object
>> causes a great amount of electron movement in the molecular structure
>> and the attendant manifestation of electric fields ( Ole, Hooper
>> Motional electric field?? ) and Magnetic flux. Remember, if a charge
>> moves it creates an electric field with attendant magnetic field.
>> Physics 101.
>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I feel,
>> sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol Norm PS: Moray,
>> there may be some plasma reconnect phenomenon occurring here also.
>>
>>