Body
https://www.space.com/41077-einstein-general-relativity-survives-test.html
https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-how-the-magnetosphere-enveloping-our-planet-protects-us
On 2/15/2019 10:41 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> https://www.wired.com/story/yes-there-is-gravity-in-space/
>
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/09/06/scientists-admit-embarrassingly-we-dont-know-how-strong-the-force-of-gravity-is/
>
> https://science.howstuffworks.com/satellite6.htm
>
> On 2/15/2019 8:13 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Ole, Of all the anti-gravity displaying devices that I have looked
>> into, the Neiper Ring is most familiar sine Joel McClain built and
>> tested it. In his book, Revolution in Technology, Medicine and
>> Society the Neiper Ring was revealed. The Neiper Ring is a three
>> transistor triangle circuit in which a circulating, chase the tail
>> high freq current is induced.
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/Niepers-Revolution-Technology-Medicine-Society/dp/392518807X
>>
>> http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/nieper.htm
>>
>> http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/2mra.htm
>>
>> http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/articles/The-Secret-of-Antigravity.pdf
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9547 DATE/TIME: 11/28/94 10:15
>> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
>> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: Nieper Ring
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> Hi Norm,
>>
>> Studied the Nieper/Seike Ring, aka Delta-T, aka gravity absorber,
>> which is described as achieving a 15% weight reduction. I think
>> that this is essentially a tetrode (there's that TET again!) tuned
>> oscillator, which is biased in Class A (continuous curent) mode.
>> Transistors simplify the construction and testing. However, using
>> identical transistors is similar to using a "special" tetrode with
>> grid helixes of the same pitch for the purpose of power beam gen-
>> eration. In the xistor version, the "beam" is a standing wave of
>> vibrating energy above the xistors, as seen by the fact that a weight
>> INCREASE occurs when the circuit is placed upside down. The weight
>> effects occur after the circuit has been energized for about 15 min's
>> which may have to do with molecular atmospheric density variations as
>> a result of the xistor's heat. This alone would not cause weight
>> reduction to any measurable degree, but may form a "duct", similar
>> to a tropospheric duct, for the standing wave.
>>
>> The standing wave includes a scalar component, but only for the
>> switching components, not for the passive components, which means
>> that the ring is NOT at mass aggregate resonance, only partial, and
>> therefore cannot achieve complete weight reduction. With a tetrode,
>> this can be compensated via using interelectrode capacitance, which
>> is the medium of the space charge, to replace physical capacitors,
>> and with tuned inductors whose Xl would equal the resistive values
>> needed for resonance. Cavity resonance will occur naturally, so
>> that the entire circuit could "float" in its' own tachion field.
>>
>> The Nieper design, as it stands, could easily be used for inertial
>> propulsion by mounting one circuit, or several of them on the
>> spokes of a wheel, either vertically or horizontally, although the
>> vertical wheel, positioned on a magnetic N/S axis, should be more
>> efficient, since in theory, the circuit reduces the quadrupole effect
>> of earth's electromagnetic field relative to the mass density of
>> transistors. I would suggest mounting the xistors on the corners of
>> a triangular board, inverting the Delta-T to include the passives
>> within the overlapping scalar fields, or "piggyback" on each other,
>> to maintain and increase the field proportionally to the gain of each
>> xistor.
>>
>> Much to be done with this!
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9687 DATE/TIME: 12/04/94 23:19
>> From : JOEL MCCLAIN
>> To : ALL
>> Subject: Easy Weight Loss
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> Norm brought over his Dec-O-gram precision scale, and we used it to
>> determine whether the Nieper ring would become "lighter", as was
>> reported in the New Energy News. It does work...weight loss was
>> measured to be 350 milligrams, as opposed to the maximum loss of 500
>> milligrams that N.E.N had seen. The weight loss occurs over a period
>> of about 15 to 20 minutes, also as reported. However, the weight
>> gain after the circuit was deenergized took considerably longer.
>> After about 20 mimutes, only 200 mg had been regained, at which
>> point we disassembled the test setup for another test. We will
>> upload a file with the circuit description if anyone wants to try
>> this.
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9693 DATE/TIME: 12/05/94 10:27
>> From : JOEL MCCLAIN
>> To : ALL
>> Subject: Nieper Ring = Tetrahedron
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> First it had to be verified that the Nieper Ring worked as described
>> by both Nieper and the N.E.N evaluation. Next, it has to be under-
>> stood why this anomolous reaction occurs. Questions:
>>
>> 1. Why use audio power transistors in a circuit which is going to
>> "run" at 1.3MHz? Transistors are designed around an "alpha cut-
>> off frequency", which is five times the maximum expected freq-
>> uency to be used. For an audio xistor, that is 5 X 20KHz, or 100
>> KHz. The xistors are over ten times out of their range.
>>
>> 2. Why use a fixed bias to drive the xistors into hard conduction
>> with no input except capacitive coupling from a previous stage?
>> Why use common emitter configuration, which is capable of the
>> highest power gain, but with a collector load resistor value so
>> low that power gain is negligible?
>>
>> 3. Why drive the xistors into a collector load value that is so low
>> that both the xistors and the load resistors become hot? Since
>> the weight loss only occurs after about 15 minutes, does the
>> accumulated heat play a part in this effect?
>>
>> 4. Why use three stages, coupled from output to input? Does it make
>> any difference how many stages are used? Is more better?
>>
>> 5. Why does the circuit free-oscillate at 1.3MHz, or oscillate at
>> all for that matter? Why is the collector signal a mixed bag of
>> harmonics? What does 1.3MHz have to do with gravity?
>>
>> Answers (I think..)
>>
>> 1. Silicon atoms form a crystal lattice structure, and the crystals
>> are tetrahedral in shape, with each of the four valence electrons
>> forming a covalent bond with each of the four adjacent atoms.
>> This is the key to understanding the Nieper Ring. An audio tran-
>> sistor in forced conduction with no input signal is stressed by
>> the biasing potential. As heat builds at the junction, the lat-
>> tice structure begins to resonate at its' own frequency, ie, that
>> of a natural tetrahedron. Using audio xistors is effectively a
>> low-pass filter, keeping out high freq noise or ambient signals.
>>
>> 2. The Nieper Ring design produces junction heat, but within the
>> design parameters of the xistors. Potential and heat provide the
>> stress which permit the tetrahedral resonance.
>>
>> 3. Accumulated heat over time allows the silicon to reach the level
>> of resonance which is limited by the collector load resistor.
>>
>> 4. There is a natural symmetry to the circuit. Viewed as a point-
>> to-point diagram, the ring is a Delta-T, or tetrahedron. Viewed
>> as a conventional schematic, this is not apparent. However, if
>> you WIRE it point-to-point, you are building a tetrahedron of
>> material which is tetrahedral in its' atomic structure. Three
>> xistors form the base, and the EB and CB networks meet at the B+
>> point, which is the fourth corner of the tetrahedron.
>>
>> 5. The output "waveform" is a complex wave, whose major component is
>> approx. 1.3 MHz as measured on an oscilloscope. However, using a
>> frequency counter, the AGGREGATE frequency is 1.1MHz, and using
>> signal injection at the xistor bases, the waveform will peak at
>> harmonics of the 1.1MHz aggregate. One of those harmonics is the
>> ferromagnetic resonant frequency used by Nikola Tesla, and it is
>> this harmonic which may be responsible for the weight reduction.
>> The small level of this harmonic, at 1/6 of aggregate resonance,
>> is nevertheless amplified in effect by a factor of 1000 because
>> it is incorporated into a resonant tetrahedral lattice structure.
>> The EFFECT is measured by the weight loss.
>>
>> I see this circuit as a spinning pyramid, where the walls (electrons)
>> are forced to spin in a tetrahedral pattern, creating a vortex at the
>> natural resonance of a tetrahedral lattice. The walls appear to be
>> stationary, but the material that forms the walls is moving, as if
>> the walls were hollow and water were being pumped through the void.
>>
>> There are many potential uses for this circuit...it is an excellent
>> investigation tool, and with no further modification, is a natural
>> gravity detector. It could also be used to test time = gravity, by
>> placing a synchronized watch into the field, and observing changes
>> that occur. I'm sure that there are many other uses, but those two
>> come to mind.
>>
>> The Nieper Ring is essentially a passive device. Actively "pumping"
>> the output via an external amplifier may result in even greater
>> effect, provided that the input impedance of the external device is
>> high enough not to disturb the naturally occuring resonance.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> =======================================================================
>>
>>
>> Message 9724 DATE/TIME: 12/06/94 13:22
>> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
>> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: More Tests
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> Ran two more tests today on the Nieper Ring. First test was to re-
>> move DC power to the circuit and replace it with 174.9KHz from the
>> sig. gen. In this way, it was hoped that the silicon would be res-
>> onated via symapthetic vibrations at magnetic resonance, which if it
>> worked, would enable the circuit to be used without generating excess
>> heat. The circuit gained weight.
>>
>> The second test was to place a neodymium magnet under the circuit,
>> and reset the scale balance to compensate for the magnetic pull on
>> the circuit components. The magnetic pull from below tended to make
>> the circuit measure as heavier due to it pulling down on the circuit.
>> After the scale was balanced and steady, DC was applied to the ring.
>> Weight loss was much faster than without the magnet, ie 5 minutes as
>> opposed to 15-20 minutes.
>>
>> Also ran tests on the single tet to determine its resonant freq.
>> It provides the highest gain at 553KHz. Signal was applied indirect-
>> ly via a lead from the sig. gen. attached to a magnet inside the
>> frame of the tet. A resonant peak occurs at 174.8KHz as the magnet
>> is being 'tickled'. However, the tet as an antenna is tuned by its
>> dimensions to 553KHz. A larger tet to match the magnetic resonance
>> freq. wavelength would effectively 'spin' faster. I believe that the
>> difference that we measure, ie, 174.8 or 174.925, is due to variation
>> in our equipment.
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Message 9745 DATE/TIME: 12/07/94 20:02
>> From : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To : JOEL MCCLAIN
>> Subject: Tet's
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> Joel: Sounds like you have been busy. Sounds real "Biblical" using the
>> "cubits" and all. We should wind up with a real "virtual spinning"
>> pyramid. I'm curious as to no one picking up on the Virtual electronic
>> spinning of the tets. Karen still standsa by her description of the
>> virtual spinning tetrahedral geometry being the key to the lift and
>> propulsion ot the space craft. She says that is how they achieve zero
>> gravity and an inertialess massless flight characteristics. I need to
>> get Bert's video system out to you but looks like we are in for some
>> cloudy weather over the next few nights. Hope it clears up by the
>> weekend. We need some good "friend" viewing nights. Norm
>> PS Have you had a chance to look into the "Hartley oscillator" circuit
>> so we can drive the Tets with some serious RF?
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9869 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
>> From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) -- PRIVATE -- --
>> RECEIVED --
>> To : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
>> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>> and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
>> --------------------
>> Hi Joel! I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
>> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
>> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
>> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
>> the one we saw in 1994). That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
>> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
>> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
>> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
>> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
>> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
>> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
>> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
>> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
>> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
>> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
>> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
>> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
>> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
>> others...>>> Jerry
>> ===============================================================================
>> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>>
>> On 2/15/2019 3:53 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi laser.rod,
>>>
>>> Usually I don't have the time to check out links with no description
>>> or reason for checking out. Checking out frauds could also be
>>> totally waste of time except if learning to distinguish false from
>>> truth. But I happened to click on your link which is from Alexey
>>> Chekurkov's channel. Chekurov has his simple antigravity device that
>>> uses motional electric fields to achieve levitation. W.J. Hooper
>>> tried to achieve the same thing but totally solid state which gives
>>> a much weaker motional electric field. The Dotto ring also seems to
>>> produce this kind of field by moving the charge (current) with a
>>> temperature gradient along the copper conductor. The electrons in
>>> normal conductors in closed circuits move at very slow speeds which
>>> generates very weak motional fields. Devices like the Searl effect
>>> generator, Dotto ring, Alexey's device, Floyd Sweet's VTA etc. have
>>> much higher speeds of the electrons which makes the motional
>>> electric field much greater. The motional electric field can't be
>>> shielded and may be the same thing as gravity according to W.J.
>>> Hooper and W.B. Smith.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---In [email protected], <laser.rod@...> wrote :
>>>
>>> Men,
>>> check out this russian mans youtube channel, might be worth your time.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JeeaZlYonc&list=UUzZxKT3BzBZOVVy8_YzP6Yw&index=8
>>>
>>>
>