Body
https://www.wired.com/story/yes-there-is-gravity-in-space/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/09/06/scientists-admit-embarrassingly-we-dont-know-how-strong-the-force-of-gravity-is/
https://science.howstuffworks.com/satellite6.htm
On 2/15/2019 8:13 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Ole, Of all the anti-gravity displaying devices that I have looked
> into, the Neiper Ring is most familiar sine Joel McClain built and
> tested it. In his book, Revolution in Technology, Medicine and
> Society the Neiper Ring was revealed. The Neiper Ring is a three
> transistor triangle circuit in which a circulating, chase the tail
> high freq current is induced.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Niepers-Revolution-Technology-Medicine-Society/dp/392518807X
>
> http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/nieper.htm
>
> http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/2mra.htm
>
> http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/articles/The-Secret-of-Antigravity.pdf
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 9547 DATE/TIME: 11/28/94 10:15
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: Nieper Ring
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Hi Norm,
>
> Studied the Nieper/Seike Ring, aka Delta-T, aka gravity absorber,
> which is described as achieving a 15% weight reduction. I think
> that this is essentially a tetrode (there's that TET again!) tuned
> oscillator, which is biased in Class A (continuous curent) mode.
> Transistors simplify the construction and testing. However, using
> identical transistors is similar to using a "special" tetrode with
> grid helixes of the same pitch for the purpose of power beam gen-
> eration. In the xistor version, the "beam" is a standing wave of
> vibrating energy above the xistors, as seen by the fact that a weight
> INCREASE occurs when the circuit is placed upside down. The weight
> effects occur after the circuit has been energized for about 15 min's
> which may have to do with molecular atmospheric density variations as
> a result of the xistor's heat. This alone would not cause weight
> reduction to any measurable degree, but may form a "duct", similar
> to a tropospheric duct, for the standing wave.
>
> The standing wave includes a scalar component, but only for the
> switching components, not for the passive components, which means
> that the ring is NOT at mass aggregate resonance, only partial, and
> therefore cannot achieve complete weight reduction. With a tetrode,
> this can be compensated via using interelectrode capacitance, which
> is the medium of the space charge, to replace physical capacitors,
> and with tuned inductors whose Xl would equal the resistive values
> needed for resonance. Cavity resonance will occur naturally, so
> that the entire circuit could "float" in its' own tachion field.
>
> The Nieper design, as it stands, could easily be used for inertial
> propulsion by mounting one circuit, or several of them on the
> spokes of a wheel, either vertically or horizontally, although the
> vertical wheel, positioned on a magnetic N/S axis, should be more
> efficient, since in theory, the circuit reduces the quadrupole effect
> of earth's electromagnetic field relative to the mass density of
> transistors. I would suggest mounting the xistors on the corners of
> a triangular board, inverting the Delta-T to include the passives
> within the overlapping scalar fields, or "piggyback" on each other,
> to maintain and increase the field proportionally to the gain of each
> xistor.
>
> Much to be done with this!
> ===============================================================================
>
> ==============================================================================
>
> Message 9687 DATE/TIME: 12/04/94 23:19
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To : ALL
> Subject: Easy Weight Loss
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Norm brought over his Dec-O-gram precision scale, and we used it to
> determine whether the Nieper ring would become "lighter", as was
> reported in the New Energy News. It does work...weight loss was
> measured to be 350 milligrams, as opposed to the maximum loss of 500
> milligrams that N.E.N had seen. The weight loss occurs over a period
> of about 15 to 20 minutes, also as reported. However, the weight
> gain after the circuit was deenergized took considerably longer.
> After about 20 mimutes, only 200 mg had been regained, at which
> point we disassembled the test setup for another test. We will
> upload a file with the circuit description if anyone wants to try
> this.
> ===============================================================================
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 9693 DATE/TIME: 12/05/94 10:27
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To : ALL
> Subject: Nieper Ring = Tetrahedron
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> First it had to be verified that the Nieper Ring worked as described
> by both Nieper and the N.E.N evaluation. Next, it has to be under-
> stood why this anomolous reaction occurs. Questions:
>
> 1. Why use audio power transistors in a circuit which is going to
> "run" at 1.3MHz? Transistors are designed around an "alpha cut-
> off frequency", which is five times the maximum expected freq-
> uency to be used. For an audio xistor, that is 5 X 20KHz, or 100
> KHz. The xistors are over ten times out of their range.
>
> 2. Why use a fixed bias to drive the xistors into hard conduction
> with no input except capacitive coupling from a previous stage?
> Why use common emitter configuration, which is capable of the
> highest power gain, but with a collector load resistor value so
> low that power gain is negligible?
>
> 3. Why drive the xistors into a collector load value that is so low
> that both the xistors and the load resistors become hot? Since
> the weight loss only occurs after about 15 minutes, does the
> accumulated heat play a part in this effect?
>
> 4. Why use three stages, coupled from output to input? Does it make
> any difference how many stages are used? Is more better?
>
> 5. Why does the circuit free-oscillate at 1.3MHz, or oscillate at
> all for that matter? Why is the collector signal a mixed bag of
> harmonics? What does 1.3MHz have to do with gravity?
>
> Answers (I think..)
>
> 1. Silicon atoms form a crystal lattice structure, and the crystals
> are tetrahedral in shape, with each of the four valence electrons
> forming a covalent bond with each of the four adjacent atoms.
> This is the key to understanding the Nieper Ring. An audio tran-
> sistor in forced conduction with no input signal is stressed by
> the biasing potential. As heat builds at the junction, the lat-
> tice structure begins to resonate at its' own frequency, ie, that
> of a natural tetrahedron. Using audio xistors is effectively a
> low-pass filter, keeping out high freq noise or ambient signals.
>
> 2. The Nieper Ring design produces junction heat, but within the
> design parameters of the xistors. Potential and heat provide the
> stress which permit the tetrahedral resonance.
>
> 3. Accumulated heat over time allows the silicon to reach the level
> of resonance which is limited by the collector load resistor.
>
> 4. There is a natural symmetry to the circuit. Viewed as a point-
> to-point diagram, the ring is a Delta-T, or tetrahedron. Viewed
> as a conventional schematic, this is not apparent. However, if
> you WIRE it point-to-point, you are building a tetrahedron of
> material which is tetrahedral in its' atomic structure. Three
> xistors form the base, and the EB and CB networks meet at the B+
> point, which is the fourth corner of the tetrahedron.
>
> 5. The output "waveform" is a complex wave, whose major component is
> approx. 1.3 MHz as measured on an oscilloscope. However, using a
> frequency counter, the AGGREGATE frequency is 1.1MHz, and using
> signal injection at the xistor bases, the waveform will peak at
> harmonics of the 1.1MHz aggregate. One of those harmonics is the
> ferromagnetic resonant frequency used by Nikola Tesla, and it is
> this harmonic which may be responsible for the weight reduction.
> The small level of this harmonic, at 1/6 of aggregate resonance,
> is nevertheless amplified in effect by a factor of 1000 because
> it is incorporated into a resonant tetrahedral lattice structure.
> The EFFECT is measured by the weight loss.
>
> I see this circuit as a spinning pyramid, where the walls (electrons)
> are forced to spin in a tetrahedral pattern, creating a vortex at the
> natural resonance of a tetrahedral lattice. The walls appear to be
> stationary, but the material that forms the walls is moving, as if
> the walls were hollow and water were being pumped through the void.
>
> There are many potential uses for this circuit...it is an excellent
> investigation tool, and with no further modification, is a natural
> gravity detector. It could also be used to test time = gravity, by
> placing a synchronized watch into the field, and observing changes
> that occur. I'm sure that there are many other uses, but those two
> come to mind.
>
> The Nieper Ring is essentially a passive device. Actively "pumping"
> the output via an external amplifier may result in even greater
> effect, provided that the input impedance of the external device is
> high enough not to disturb the naturally occuring resonance.
>
> Joel
>
> =======================================================================
>
>
> Message 9724 DATE/TIME: 12/06/94 13:22
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: More Tests
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Ran two more tests today on the Nieper Ring. First test was to re-
> move DC power to the circuit and replace it with 174.9KHz from the
> sig. gen. In this way, it was hoped that the silicon would be res-
> onated via symapthetic vibrations at magnetic resonance, which if it
> worked, would enable the circuit to be used without generating excess
> heat. The circuit gained weight.
>
> The second test was to place a neodymium magnet under the circuit,
> and reset the scale balance to compensate for the magnetic pull on
> the circuit components. The magnetic pull from below tended to make
> the circuit measure as heavier due to it pulling down on the circuit.
> After the scale was balanced and steady, DC was applied to the ring.
> Weight loss was much faster than without the magnet, ie 5 minutes as
> opposed to 15-20 minutes.
>
> Also ran tests on the single tet to determine its resonant freq.
> It provides the highest gain at 553KHz. Signal was applied indirect-
> ly via a lead from the sig. gen. attached to a magnet inside the
> frame of the tet. A resonant peak occurs at 174.8KHz as the magnet
> is being 'tickled'. However, the tet as an antenna is tuned by its
> dimensions to 553KHz. A larger tet to match the magnetic resonance
> freq. wavelength would effectively 'spin' faster. I believe that the
> difference that we measure, ie, 174.8 or 174.925, is due to variation
> in our equipment.
> ========================================================================
>
> Message 9745 DATE/TIME: 12/07/94 20:02
> From : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To : JOEL MCCLAIN
> Subject: Tet's
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Joel: Sounds like you have been busy. Sounds real "Biblical" using the
> "cubits" and all. We should wind up with a real "virtual spinning"
> pyramid. I'm curious as to no one picking up on the Virtual electronic
> spinning of the tets. Karen still standsa by her description of the
> virtual spinning tetrahedral geometry being the key to the lift and
> propulsion ot the space craft. She says that is how they achieve zero
> gravity and an inertialess massless flight characteristics. I need to
> get Bert's video system out to you but looks like we are in for some
> cloudy weather over the next few nights. Hope it clears up by the
> weekend. We need some good "friend" viewing nights. Norm
> PS Have you had a chance to look into the "Hartley oscillator" circuit
> so we can drive the Tets with some serious RF?
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 9869 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
> From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) -- PRIVATE -- --
> RECEIVED --
> To : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
> and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
> --------------------
> Hi Joel! I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
> the one we saw in 1994). That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
> others...>>> Jerry
> ===============================================================================
> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>
> On 2/15/2019 3:53 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Hi laser.rod,
>>
>> Usually I don't have the time to check out links with no description
>> or reason for checking out. Checking out frauds could also be totally
>> waste of time except if learning to distinguish false from truth. But
>> I happened to click on your link which is from Alexey Chekurkov's
>> channel. Chekurov has his simple antigravity device that uses
>> motional electric fields to achieve levitation. W.J. Hooper tried to
>> achieve the same thing but totally solid state which gives a much
>> weaker motional electric field. The Dotto ring also seems to produce
>> this kind of field by moving the charge (current) with a temperature
>> gradient along the copper conductor. The electrons in normal
>> conductors in closed circuits move at very slow speeds which
>> generates very weak motional fields. Devices like the Searl effect
>> generator, Dotto ring, Alexey's device, Floyd Sweet's VTA etc. have
>> much higher speeds of the electrons which makes the motional electric
>> field much greater. The motional electric field can't be shielded and
>> may be the same thing as gravity according to W.J. Hooper and W.B. Smith.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ole
>>
>>
>>
>> ---In [email protected], <laser.rod@...> wrote :
>>
>> Men,
>> check out this russian mans youtube channel, might be worth your time.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JeeaZlYonc&list=UUzZxKT3BzBZOVVy8_YzP6Yw&index=8
>>
>>
>>