Body
Back on new years day, Bert gave an excellent explanation of magnetic
fields. Please review.
On 1/1/2019 9:20 AM, Bert Pool wrote:
>
> 1) Faraday generator experiments show that the magnetic field coming
> out of a magnet pole does NOT rotate when the magnet is rotated. You
> can glue a Faraday disk to the magnet and rotate both and the disk
> generates a current. I.e., the lines of force surrounding the magnet
> are stationary, even if the magnet rotates! The magnet has to be
> there to align the flux lines and concentrate them, but the lines of
> flux are part and parcel of space and do not originate with the
> magnet. Think of the magnet as a necessary "catalyst" for the flux.
> To me, this shows that magnets do NOT produce a magnetic field, but
> instead they align and condense _magnetic flux that is already in that
> space_.
>
> 2) I visualize space as being filled with billions and billions of
> flux lines all coming from every possible direction and every possible
> north/south polarity. Think of space as filled with a mass of boiled
> spaghetti, representing a chaotic mixture of flux lines. Since these
> lines are completely random as to polarity, the sum values of all the
> flux in any one spot averages to zero. But, when you place a chunk of
> special metal (we call it a magnet) into that space, it bends and
> aligns these random flux lines all into the same direction and
> polarity. A magnet does not produce a magnetic field, it brings order
> and coherence to the mass of field lines that already exist in that
> space surrounding the magnet. Think of it as taking that mass of
> bent, twisted and random spaghetti and straightening it out into nice,
> neat straight aligned fields.
>
> 3) Why do certain metal combinations affect magnetic lines of flux,
> while others do not? I don't think anyone has a good answer to that.
> For example, Alnico magnets are made of aluminum and cobalt. Aluminum
> is non-magnetic, so why is aluminum required for an alnico magnet to
> work?
>
> 4) If space is filled with a random mass of magnetic flux lines that
> sum to zero, and are only evident to us as observers when a mass of
> appropriate metal alloy (a magnet) is present, then I wonder are there
> other kinds of flux filling space, somewhat like lines of magnetic
> flux, that are not apparent to us because they too sum to zero, but
> would appear if only a different kind of "magnet" were constructed
> which aligns those other non-magnetic fields, thus making them
> evident. For example, it could be that gravity fields cross through
> space from all directions and with random orientations and normally
> sum to zero. If I place you into space a few billion miles from
> anything else, will you experience "gravity"? No. But place a
> suitable piece of properly made alloy into that space, and it would
> align and concentrate those lines of gravitational flux so that we can
> percieve this new thing we might call a gravitational field.
> Fortunately, the alloy for gravitational flux already exists, and is
> called "matter." Some alloys work better at aligning and
> concentrating gravitational flux lines, just as different metal alloys
> differ in their ability to align and concentrate magnetic flux lines.
> Some kinds of metals work better as magnets than others. Some kinds
> of mass work better as gravity concentrators than others (i.e.,
> styrofoam versus lead.)
>
> 5) Magnetic field lines can be affected by electrical coils, which
> perform the same alignment and concentration of flux lines in space
> that permant magnets do. It might very well be possible that
> producing a gravitational analog is possible. Of course, the question
> becomes, what would the "coil" be made of, and what kind of energy
> would flow through it to align and concentrate gravity? And perhaps
> not only gravity. There could be other kinds of energy that fills
> space and sums to zero without the presence of a suitable nearby
> "magnet." Dark energy comes to mind as a possible example.
>
> Bert
>
>
>
>
> On 12/31/2018 7:03 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
>> When you set out to research a topic, You have to first define it.
>> Boy, the jury is still out, so to speak for the experts still do not
>> know the exact composition of magnetic fields or lines of force.
>> Just just have to laugh. See
>>
>> Ohttps://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>
>> Ok, guys, what is your idea as to composition of magnetic flux??
>>
>>
>> On 12/31/2018 5:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator
>>> Source doc. for "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition."
>>>
>>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This
>>>> document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.
>>>> My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which
>>>> according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that
>>>> can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are
>>>> the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction
>>>> and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory. Folks, this is
>>>> whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly
>>>> destroying magnet flux. Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla
>>>> one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of
>>>> "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in KV
>>>> @ KA. BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on. Lol
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look
>>>>> at this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/
>>>>> In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV
>>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful
>>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP
>>>>> (Magneto-electric pulse). It reasoned that the new family of Neo
>>>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy
>>>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil. With a super fast explosive
>>>>> , Octanitrocubane could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range
>>>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle
>>>>> flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux
>>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon. Here is a first step into
>>>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect. Just build
>>>>>> sensors. See attachment. Now that you have a sensor lets look
>>>>>> at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very
>>>>>> powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives. Remember that energy
>>>>>> cannot be destroyed but can convert into another form of energy
>>>>>> we call the Magnetoelectric EMP. See
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator
>>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field
>>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage
>>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative. See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential. The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>