Body
Angel, the problem I have with all of this information revealing the
fact that magnetic flux is converted into electrical energy does not
answer the PHYSICS behind the conversion at the atomic level or maybe
sub-atomic particle level. What are the mechanics involved here? Other
research articles delve into rearrangement of the atomic lattice
structure and movement within the periodic tables. See
http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/117663/1/pressure-induced%20magnetic.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26721092_Pressure-Induced_Magnetic_Transition_in_Manganite_La075Ca025MnO3
https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/First-Principles-Study-of-Pressure-Induced-Phase-Transition-Electronic.pdf
https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
On 1/3/2019 11:20 AM, Angel A. Alvarez-Castillo wrote:
>
> Thanks, I like the commentary!
>
> Angel A. Alvarez P. E.
> Program/Project Manager
>
> Cordoba Corporation | Making A Difference
> 1611 E. 17th Street | Santa Ana, CA 92705
> (714) 558-6124 | c: (949) 632-8315
> [email protected] | cordobacorp.com
> LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube
>
> *From: *Norman Wootan <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 3, 2019 8:05 AM
> *To: *Bert Pool <mailto:[email protected]>; Bob Paddock
> <mailto:[email protected]>; joel mcclain
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Lane Wootan
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Mbking42 <mailto:[email protected]>;
> Steven Elswick <mailto:[email protected]>; Toby Grotz
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Walt <mailto:[email protected]>;
> Angel Alvarez <mailto:[email protected]>; Fredric Fletcher
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Jeane Manning <mailto:[email protected]>;
> Jon Gentry <mailto:[email protected]>; Phil Rembold
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; nwootan <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] re: Longitudinal wave antenna
>
> http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/115/a115z626.pdf About sums it
> up. Norm
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>
> *Subject: *
>
>
>
> Re: [EVGRAY] re: Longitudinal wave antenna
>
> *Date: *
>
>
>
> Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:50:33 -0600
>
> *From: *
>
>
>
> Norman Wootan <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> *To: *
>
>
>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> Ole See comments below!
>
> On 1/3/2019 6:19 AM, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Mick,
>
> "/As for Wilbur Smith he has some great stuff too but I don't
> agree that gravity has it's own particles but rather, more likely,
> is a result of the background quiescent aether flux that allows
> field lines to exist or propagate./"
> The Smith/Hooper theory suggests that gravity is made from the
> difference in the motional electric field formed from electrons
> orbiting in atoms. The slight difference in the field strength
> from when the electron is in front of the nucleus versus behind
> the nucleus could be the cause of gravity according to their
> theory. The motional electric field always has the same direction
> from the moving charge regardless of how it's moving and it can't
> be shielded. Gravity has similar properties. According to Smith's
> theory the aether is electrons or positrons which are the smallest
> physical particle to exist. All bigger particles can be made by
> combinations of electrons (or positrons). This is also suggested
> by the Rhythmodynamics theory.
>
> "/Sadly Norm's applied proofs all come from weapons research
> because this planet is run by very lazy people who use the most
> base animal emotions, hatred, jealousy and fear in order to
> motivate and bound capital flow because it's time proven to work
> very very well./"
>
> Ole, Your comments are so true regarding the source of advancements
> in the magical world of magnetic flux annihilation/Reconnect. The big
> buck Black Budget Government programs have advanced all the knowledge
> learned by studying your favorite researchers down through the
> years. That is exactly how they got there. We now know that Weapons
> Research Programs have unlocked the secret as to how to tap the
> Zero-Point, Space background, aether, if you like, to provide a
> phenomenal amount of real power. If you have the ability to destroy a
> powerful magnet flux field in a nano sec via 23GPa over pressure from
> an explosive and yield voltage and current potentials in KV and KA
> then think about how to apply this knowledge to tap other magnetic
> flux fields like Don Smith wanting to tap the anomalous earth magnetic
> fields. He was not far off in his thinking. Tesla, in a very
> fundamental way achieved to same magneto-strictive effect (over
> pressures) (now known as Z pinch) by supersaturation of iron cores to
> yield the conversion effect. Our MRA used the ultra high Q at
> resonance to achieve the effects in a small way as did Floyd Sweet in
> his VTA. There are several alternatives to tap the power of the
> magnetic flux fields.
>
> See https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator
>
> http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/115/a115z626.pdf
>
> The direct conversion of magnetic flux particles into real electrical
> power is a living reality. Yes, derived from the research of a lot
> of you age old favorites. REALITY CHECK. Norm
>
> I watched the following video from a former US military colonel.
> He said W.B. Smith was a brilliant man. The military leaders think
> and act as to protect their country but are too lazy to follow up
> on things beside that. This makes lots of things look like secrets
> but could be attributed to forgetting about them. Then they get
> stored away forgotten and disappear until someone retires. The
> colonel's opinion is that even the government will disappear from
> itself if left to itself. Here is the video 'Roswell Revisited --
> Colonel Phillip J. Corso:'
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfTY7NuceQ (20:12). His opinion
> is that ET technology should help us before being all forgotten
> which is why he has written a book on what he know.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
> <mkjekyll@...> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Ole,
>
> I like Catt's concept of treating components as a transmission
> line, it is very elegant for engineering and his capacitor
> definition is much more accessible. Whatever works the best for
> engineering I am all for. As for Wilbur Smith he has some great
> stuff too but I don't agree that gravity has it's own particles
> but rather, more likely, is a result of the background quiescent
> aether flux that allows field lines to exist or propagate. There
> are so many little odd anomalies we have no idea about and I don't
> think much of the physicists who get paid to create math problems
> only they can solve or halfway prove with trillion dollar research
> facilities. The Rythmodynamics is also very special and makes
> much more sense when it comes to the aether flux and interference
> patterns.
>
> I still think we are leaving out something very fundamental and
> very difficult to observe from our perspective. This little
> function or parameter or what have you would explain the
> transitional states we can't seem to pear into and presently only
> guess at.
>
> I agree with Dr Tesla's idea of doing ones best with engineering
> math but then for instance separating RF transmitter and receivers
> in real field tests in order to actually prove something before
> writing it down as a gospel.
>
> There has become too large an abyss between theoretical and
> applied and I think the research money is going to the wrong one.
> But then the research money goes where the politicos at the think
> tanks decide it should, often to the detriment of humans and
> truth. Scientists are paid not to think empirically so it is
> always refreshing to find one who still does.
>
> Sadly Norm's applied proofs all come from weapons research because
> this planet is run by very lazy people who use the most base
> animal emotions, hatred, jealousy and fear in order to motivate
> and bound capital flow because it's time proven to work very very
> well. If the average person was brought up respecting science and
> real accomplishment rather than childish sports and glamour the
> human race could evolve rather than devolve. For now defense
> contractors are going to be our best source of fringe science.
> Remember what John Hutchinson said, something to the effect the
> civilian scientists and universities were the first to blow him
> off but the ones from the military defense contractors took him
> seriously enough to come out and have a serious look at things and
> patiently listen to him and watch his demos.
>
> On 12/31/2018 11:56 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Mick,
>
> The theory of Wilbert B. Smith starts from nothing at all
> like pure emptiness without any space. Then he first
> builds up the space and fills in some density to construct
> the fields. The three fundamental fields are then Tempus
> (field of change) the electric field (divergence) and the
> magnetic field (curl). After that the fundamental
> particles (the electron and positron) are build which
> extends to quarks and other fractions of atoms.
>
> Thus to say which is the most fundamental of E and B it is
> the electric field E according to Smith. T or the tempic
> field is even more fundamental as this is the density
> required for making the electric field (divergence of
> density) and the electric field is required for making the
> magnetic field (stirring the electric field). Actually the
> fields can't be separated from each other as I understand
> it as the fields are unified into each other as shown by
> Ivor Catt. This causes trouble for Faraday's law of
> induction. The scientific society won't touch the theory
> of Catt even though seen from an engineering point of view
> it gives solutions instead of paradoxes. But also new
> problems arise as shown by Forrest Bishop. True science
> will solve the problems instead of turning away from the
> problems.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>, <mkjekyll@...>
> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Norm,
>
> Hard to say it's the chicken and the egg again. B before
> the E and H... OK photons are the current answer
> according to the link, however what if the B fields were
> there first, then it would be like magnetic super strings
> of some kind. Now would these be particles or just
> pertubations of the background quiescent aether space
> flux? There are the monopole particle theories such as Ed
> Leedskalnin or Russells magnetic light. My theory would
> be a magnetic particle is the inverse of a photon and as
> such something not presently detectable directly.
>
> On 12/31/2018 8:03 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> When you set out to research a topic, You have to
> first define it. Boy, the jury is still out, so
> to speak for the experts still do not know the
> exact composition of magnetic fields or lines of
> force. Just just have to laugh. See
>
> Ohttps://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>
> Ok, guys, what is your idea as to composition of
> magnetic flux??
>
> ...
>
>
>