Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Norman Wootan Research Files.

Database ID: 111149
2018-12-11T16:31:33-06:00
Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR14MB0583266999C719033C9F877BD0A60@CY1PR14MB0583.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Body

Randy, the first prototype Sonodiffuser designed specifically for 
imprinting oxygen into water used even-odd numbers of holes in rotor vs 
stator ( no two holes crossing at same time) at a diameter of 1/4 inch 
bore with a 1/4 inch depth with standard drill bit taper at point. an 
oxygen feed hole was drilled with 1/16 inch bit so as to feed rotor with 
pressurized oxygen through hub. The reason it was called Sono- diffuser 
was that it operated in high sonic frequency due to different rows of 
holes having different numbers of holes. You have to understand the 
concept or principle of beat frequencies, sum and difference and 
harmonics. One rotor with 6 rows of holes, each row different number of 
holes gave a great number of permutations.ï¿½ See, Sono-Chemistry.ï¿½ Have 
fun for this is very simple and does imprint oxygen in water that 
persist for long storage times. Like months. University of Texas 
Professors were stymied trying to explain now the water moleculs held 
the oxygen. Moray King told me it was at the Nano level. 600% 
(60mg/liter) persist for nearly a month in storage.ï¿½ Remember saturation 
of water by oxygen is 100% = 10mg/liter.ï¿½ Ice cold flowing water in 
streams can take water to supersaturated condition of 120% where trout 
and other fish willï¿½ die.

THE INTENTION EXPERIMENT

The Roy Water Experi

ment: April 26, 2008

With this study we wished to delve further into water, by testing

whether intention can changes the molecular structure of water.

This time, we decided to work with Rustum Roy, professor of

materials science at Pennsylvania State University, who is arguably

one of the worldï¿½s experts on wate

r. We wished ascertain whether

there were any changes in the structural organization of our water

sample by looking for any changes in the scattering of light waves

through our water sample.

Structured water

The way in which water molecules cluster together can vary

enormously. For instance, water can contain molecular clusters of

up to several hundred H

2

O units apiece.

The ï¿½structureï¿½ of water, from a scientific point of view, refers to the

molecular arrangements of individual water molecules (which are,

you know two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen). The

molecules form units, or ï¿½clustersï¿½, which remain stable anywhere

from a part of a second to several weeks.

As Dr. Roy explains it, think of water molecules as analogous to

individual bricks. When you assemble them into a house, the

various rooms youï¿½ve created with bricks put together in a

particular fashion are its structure.

ï¿½Structured water is found in the cytoplasm of healthy tissues and it

is characterized by having a high

solubility for body minerals. It is

also found in healing waters. This appears to be the structure

shared by very different healing wa

ters from some healing spas to

silver aquasols used worldwide,ï¿½ says Roy.

Weak bonds

Structured waters have been produced in laboratory experiments

using various forms of energy, such as light, sound, heat, pressure

and radiation.

As Roy has written, water molecules adhere not only through

hydrogen bonds but also a wide ra

nge of very weak bonds (known

as van der Waals bondsï¿½).

ï¿½It is this range of very weak bonds that could account for the

remarkable ease of changing the structure of water, which in turn

could help explain the half doze

n well-known anomalies in its

properties,ï¿½ writes Roy.

ï¿½In its subtler form, such weak bonds would also allow for the

changes of structure caused by electric and magnetic fields and by

radiation of all kinds, including possibly so-called ï¿½subtle energiesï¿½,

which are the basis of an enormous range of claims about specially

ï¿½structuredï¿½ water,ï¿½ he says.

This is important, in terms of determining the power of intention,

because it is ï¿½structure (not composition) that largely controls

properties and structures can easily be changed-without any change

of composition,ï¿½ says Roy.

A perfect example of this is diamond and graphite. Both share

identical composition, yet diamond is one of the hardest substances

on earth and graphite one of the softest.

Healing intentions

ï¿½Besides being physically necessary

to life, since ancient times,

water has been closely associated with the psyche, intuition and

healing, and many ancient cultures acknowledge that the great flow

of life is absolutely and inextric

ably linked to water,ï¿½ he says.

ï¿½Although this link has been ignored by modern medical research,

most religious traditions give water a key place in their rituals ï¿½

from baptisms and anointing to special blessings.

ï¿½It may well be that these blessings, given with true loving

intentions, actually change the structure ï¿½ hence the properties ï¿½ of

water. That is the basis of our experiment.

Measuring subtle changes

In this experiment, we used Raman spectroscopy to measure any

change. In 1928, an Indian

physicist named Chandrasekhara

Venkata Raman discovered that when

light is transmitted through

matter, part of the light scatters randomly. A small portion of this

light has different (usually lower)

frequencies to that of the light

source.

This discovery earned Raman a Nobel Prize in 1930. Then, in 1998,

the Raman Effect, as it grew to be called, was named as an ACS

National Historical Chemical La

ndmark in recognition of its

usefulness as a tool for analyzing the composition of liquids, gases

and solids.

The Raman Effect is usually caused by a subtle change in the

vibration of a molecule, caused by a number of factors. Scientists

like Dr. Rustum Roy have recorded changes in the structure of

water molecules with electromagnetic radiation. So with this

experiment, we decided to examine whether the energy of our

collective thoughts can cause these changes.

Any changes in the scattering of light rays would suggest changes

in the structure of the water molecules themselves.

The scientists chose to use Raman spectroscopy because they

discovered one published study showing that Qigong Grandmaster

called Dr. Yan Xin significantly altered the structure of a water

sample, as measured by a Raman spectrometer, when he sent his

Qi from a place seven kilometers away from the water sample.

The importance of the Raman effect and the Raman spectroscopy,

in terms of Intention Experiment, is that we employed a system of

measurement that is universally recognized by the scientific

community to record any sort of subtle change.

How the experiment worked

In the experiment, a probe was inserted into a beaker of water

sample and measurements were taken periodically with the Raman

spectrograph (shown below) for several hours before the

experiment began.

A long cable connected the probe to

a highly sensitive CCD camera

on the instrument sensed any the weak Raman scattering from the

water molecules as they vibrated in response to a red laser light on

the water sample.

According to our protocol, the team continued to take

measurements of the water at regular intervals since the scientists

did not know exactly when we were going to send intention.

Dr. Roy and his team measured the ï¿½beforeï¿½ state of the water,

which was essentially identical to the blue curve shown in the graph

below.

All of the participants focused on changing the waters in the same

direction as other healing waters ï¿½ to look more like the green

curve in the figure.

Unusual calibrations

Professor Roy and his colleagues, Dr. Manju Rao and Dr. Tania

Slawecki, found had a great deal of variation in the water one hour

before

we sent intention.

Our sample water had enormous variation in light scattering to

begin with ï¿½ a situation that became apparent when the data was

graphed in a different program. So it is possible that the water itself

went through changes before the official time we were supposed to

send intention.

Ultimately, they determined that

our results were inconclusive.

On 12/11/2018 2:43 PM, Randy Hï¿½bert [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Very interesting stuff Norman, thanks for posting. Would you be 
> willing to divulge how deep the holes in the rotor and stator were? I 
> know it most likely depends on what fluid you're using and what you're 
> trying to accomplish. Just looking for a good starting point for 
> increasing the oxygen in water. Seems like the benefits are endless.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ------ Original message------
> *From: *Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
> *Date: *Tue, Dec 11, 2018 9:22 AM
> *To: *[email protected];Bert Pool;Bob Paddock;Lane 
> Wootan;Mbking42;Steven Elswick;Toby Grotz;Phil Rembold;Angel 
> Alvarez;Fredric Fletcher;Jeane Manning;Jon Gentry;
> *Cc: *
> *Subject:*Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Norman Wootan Research Files.
>
>
> 	
>
> ( 1of1)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> United States Patent
>
> 	
>
> 6,386,751
>
> Wootan , ï¿½ et al.
>
> 	
>
> May 14, 2002
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Diffuser/emulsifier
>
> Abstract
>
> A diffuser for incorporating one or more infusion materials into a 
> host material. The diffuser includes a rotor 12 and stator 30 rotating 
> relative to one another. The infusion materials are drawn through 
> openings in the rotor and stator. During movement of the rotor, the 
> openings cause cavitation of the host material in the channel 32 
> resulting in diffusion of the infusion materials through the openings 
> and into the host material. The opening patterns in the rotor and 
> stator can be designed to operate at a single frequency or a multiple 
> frequencies. The frequencies of operation may affect bonding between 
> the infusion materials and the host material and may also be effective 
> in breakdown of complex molecular structures.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Inventors:
>
> 	
>
> Wootan; Norman L.(Dallas, TX), Wood; Anthony B. (Dallas, TX)
>
> Assignee:
>
> 	
>
> Diffusion Dynamics, Inc.(
>
> Appl. No.:
>
> 	
>
> 08/957,530
>
> Filed:
>
> 	
>
> October 24, 1997
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Current U.S. Class:
>
> 	
>
> 366/170.3; 366/171.1; 366/172.1; 366/181.7; 366/305
>
> Current International Class:
>
> 	
>
> B01F 7/00ï¿½(20060101); B01F 3/08ï¿½(20060101); B01F 3/04ï¿½(20060101)
>
> Field of Search:
>
> 	
>
> 366/169.1,168.1,170.3,171.1,172.1,176.1,181.4,181.7,305,348,174.1
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> References Cited _[Referenced By] 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PALL&Query=ref/6386751>_
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> U.S. Patent Documents
>
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
>
> _1650561 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F1650561>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> November 1927
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Deniston
>
>
> 	
>
> _3333771 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F3333771>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> August 1967
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Graham
>
>
> 	
>
> _3791349 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F3791349>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> February 1974
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Schaefer
>
>
> 	
>
> _4004553 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4004553>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> January 1977
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Stenson
>
>
> 	
>
> _4128342 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4128342>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> December 1978
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Renk
>
>
> 	
>
> _4136971 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4136971>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> January 1979
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Varlamov et al.
>
>
> 	
>
> _4143639 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4143639>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> March 1979
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Frenette
>
>
> 	
>
> _4361414 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4361414>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> November 1982
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Nemes et al.
>
>
> 	
>
> _4424797 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4424797>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> January 1984
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Perkins
>
>
> 	
>
> _4778336 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4778336>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> October 1988
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Husain
>
>
> 	
>
> _5188090 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5188090>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> February 1993
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Griggs
>
>
> 	
>
> _5263774 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5263774>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> November 1993
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Delcourt
>
>
> 	
>
> _5419306 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5419306>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> May 1995
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Huffman
>
>
> 	
>
> _5590961 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5590961>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> January 1997
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Rasmussen
>
>
> 	
>
> _5782556 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5782556>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> July 1998
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Chu
>
>
> 	
>
> _5810052 
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5810052>_
>
> 	
> 	
>
> September 1998
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Kozyuk
>
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
>
> Other References
>
>
> Faul, C. Sonochemistry-General Overview [online], Jan. 1997 [retrieved 
> on Sep. 26, 1997]. Retrieved from the Internet: 
> <http://www.und.ac.za/prg/sonochem/ultragen.html>.* .
> Sonochemistry, General Overview, Internet 
> site--http://www.und.ac.za/prg/sonochem/ultragen.html..
>
>
> /Primary Examiner:/ Drodge; Joseph W.
> /Assistant Examiner:/ Cecil; Terry K.
> /Attorney, Agent or Firm:/ Howison, Chauza, Thoma, Handley & Arnott, 
> L.L.P.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /Claims/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> What is claimed is:
>
> 1. A diffuser comprising:
>
> a first member having a surface incorporating surface disturbances;
>
> a second member having a first side positioned relative to said 
> surface of said first member to form a channel therebetween through 
> which a first material provided from a first inlet into said channel 
> flows and into which a second material provided from a second inlet 
> through a second side of said second member is introduced, said 
> diffuser configured such that a substantially continuous flow path is 
> provided from said first inlet to said channel throughout operation 
> thereof; and
>
> means for moving said first material through said channel relative to 
> said surface disturbances to create cavitation in said first material 
> within said channel to diffuse said second material into said first 
> material.
>
> 2. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said second member also has a 
> surface incorporating surface disturbances.
>
> 3. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein one or more of said surface 
> disturbances comprise impressions.
>
> 4. The diffuser of claim 3 wherein said impressions comprise boreholes.
>
> 5. The diffuser of claim 4 wherein said impressions comprise grooves.
>
> 6. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said surface disturbances comprise 
> protrusions.
>
> 7. The diffuser of claim 6 wherein said protrusions comprise bumps.
>
> 8. The diffuser of claim 7 wherein said protrusions comprise ridges.
>
> 9. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein either or both of said first member 
> and said second member has one or more orifices formed therein to pass 
> said second material into said channel prior to mixing with said first 
> material.
>
> 10. The diffuser of claim 9 wherein orifices are formed in both said 
> first member and said second member for passing two different 
> materials to said channel prior to mixing with each other.
>
> 11. The diffuser of claim 1 and further comprising a pump for drawing 
> said first and second materials through said channel.
>
> 12. The diffuser of claim 1 and further comprising a pump for driving 
> said first and second materials through said channel.
>
> 13. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said first member has a 
> cylindrical shape.
>
> 14. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said first member has a disk shape.
>
> 15. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said first member has a conical 
> shape.
>
> 16. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said first member has a spherical 
> shape.
>
> 17. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein said first member has a 
> hemispherical shape.
>
> 18. The diffuser of claim 1 wherein movement of said first material 
> against said surface disturbances generates shock waves at one or more 
> discrete frequencies.
>
> 19. A method of diffusing a first material with a second material, 
> comprising the steps of:
>
> inputting said first material from a first inlet into a channel formed 
> between a first member and a first side of a second member, wherein a 
> substantially continuous flow path is provided from said first inlet 
> to said channel throughout said method of diffusing;
>
> inputting said second material through a second side of said second 
> member into said channel, wherein at least one of said first and 
> second members include surface disturbances facing said channel; and
>
> moving said first material relative to said surface disturbances to 
> cause said first and second materials to be compressed and 
> decompressed resulting in cavitation of said first material within 
> said channel to diffuse said second material into said first material.
>
> 20. The method of claim 19 wherein both of said first and second 
> members include surface disturbances facing said channel.
>
> 21. The method of claim 19 wherein at least one of said first and 
> second members includes a surface with impressions formed therein.
>
> 22. The method of claim 19 wherein at least one of said first and 
> second members includes a surface with boreholes formed therein.
>
> 23. The method of claim 19 wherein at least one of said first and 
> second members includes a surface with said surface disturbances 
> positioned in an array to compress and decompress said first material 
> at a known frequency.
>
> 24. The method of claim 19 wherein at least one of said first and 
> second members includes a surface with surface disturbances positioned 
> in a plurality of arrays to compress and decompress said first 
> material at respective discrete frequencies.
>
> 25. A diffuser comprising:
>
> a first member having a surface incorporating surface disturbances;
>
> a second member having a first surface incorporating surface 
> disturbances positioned relative to said first member to form a 
> channel thorough which a first material flows between said respective 
> member surfaces, said second member further having orifices;
>
> a first inlet means to introduce said first material into said 
> channel, said diffuser configured such that a substantially continuous 
> flow path is provided from said first inlet to said channel throughout 
> operation thereof;
>
> a second inlet means to introduce a second material into a second 
> surface of said second member such that said second material is input 
> through said orifices into said channel to mix with said first 
> material; and
>
> a motor to move one of said first and second members relative to the 
> other to create cavitation in said first material while said first 
> material is within the channel to diffuse said second material into 
> said first material.
>
> 26. The method of claim 19 wherein said first material is a liquid and 
> said second material is a gas.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /Description/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
>
> Not Applicable
>
> STATEMENT OF FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
>
> Not Applicable
>
> BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
>
> 1. Technical Field
>
> This invention relates in general to diffusers and, more particularly, 
> to a method and apparatus for diffusing or emulsifying a gas or liquid 
> into a material.
>
> 2. Description of the Related Art
>
> In many applications, it is necessary to diffuse or emulsify one 
> material--gas or liquid--within a second material. Emulsification is a 
> subset of the process of diffusion wherein small globules of one 
> liquid are suspended in a second liquid with which the first will not 
> mix, such as oil into vinegar. One important application of the 
> diffusion process is in wastewater treatment. Many municipalities 
> aerate their wastewater as part of the treatment process in order to 
> stimulate biological degradation of organic matter. The rate of 
> biological digestion of organic matter is very dependent upon the 
> amount of oxygen in the wastewater, since the oxygen is necessary to 
> sustain the life of the microorganisms which consume the organic 
> matter. Additionally, oxygen is able to remove some compounds, such as 
> iron, magnesium and carbon dioxide.
>
> There are several methods of oxygenating water. First, turbine 
> aeration systems release air near the rotating blades of an impeller 
> which mixes the air or oxygen with the water. Second, water can be 
> sprayed into the air to increase its oxygen content. Third, a system 
> produced by AQUATEX injects air or oxygen into the water and subjects 
> the water/gas to a large scale vortex. Tests on the AQUATEX device 
> have shown an improvement to 200% dissolved oxygen (approximately 20 
> ppm (parts per million)) under ideal conditions. Naturally occurring 
> levels of oxygen in water are approximately 10 ppm maximum, which is 
> considered to be a level of 100% dissolved oxygen. Thus, the AQUATEX 
> device doubles the oxygen content of the water. The increased 
> oxygenation levels last only minutes prior to reverting back to 100% 
> dissolved oxygen levels.
>
> Greater oxygenation levels, and longer persistence of the increased 
> oxygen levels, could provide significant benefits in treating 
> wastewater. Importantly, the efficiency of the organic digestion would 
> be increased and the amount of time need for biological remediation 
> would decrease, improving on the capacity of wastewater treatment 
> facilities.
>
> Accordingly, a need has arisen for a diffusing mechanism capable of 
> diffusing high levels of one or more materials into another material.
>
> BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
>
> In the present invention, a diffuser comprises a first member having a 
> surface incorporating surface disturbances and a second member 
> positioned relative to the first diffusing member to form a channel 
> through which a first material and a second material may flow. The 
> first material is driven relative to the surface disturbances to 
> create cavitation in the first material in order to diffuse the second 
> material into the first material.
>
> The present invention provides significant advantages over the prior 
> art. First, the micro-cavitations generated by the device allow 
> diffusion to occur at a molecular level, increasing the amount of 
> infusion material which will be held by the host material and the 
> persistence of the diffusion. Second, the micro-cavitations and shock 
> waves can be produced by a relatively simple mechanical device. Third, 
> the frequency or frequencies of the shock wave produced by the device 
> can be used in many applications, either to break down complex 
> structures or to aid in combining structures. Fourth, the cavitations 
> and shock waves can be produced uniformly throughout a material for 
> consistent diffusion.
>
> BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
>
> For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the 
> advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following 
> descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in 
> which:
>
> FIGS. 1 and 1a illustrate a partially cross sectional, partially block 
> diagram of a first embodiment of a diffuser;
>
> FIGS. 2a, 2b and 2c illustrate the diffusion process internal to the 
> diffuser;
>
> FIG. 3 illustrates an exploded view of the rotor and stator of the 
> diffuser;
>
> FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the stator;
>
> FIG. 5a illustrates a cross-section view of the rotor-stator assembly 
> in a second embodiment of the invention;
>
> FIG. 5b illustrates a top view of the rotor in the second embodiment 
> of the invention;
>
> FIG. 6 illustrates a cut-away view of a third embodiment of the 
> invention;
>
> FIGS. 7a through 7h illustrate alternative embodiments for generating 
> the diffusion; and
>
> FIGS. 8a and 8b illustrate another alternative embodiment of the 
> invention.
>
> DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
>
> The present invention is best understood in relation to FIGS. 1-8 of 
> the drawings, like numerals being used for like elements of the 
> various drawings.
>
> FIGS. 1 and 1a illustrate a partially block diagram, partially 
> cross-sectional view first embodiment of a device 10 capable of 
> diffusing or emulsifying one or two gaseous or liquid materials 
> (hereinafter the "infusion materials") into another gaseous or liquid 
> material (hereinafter the "host material"). The host material may be a 
> normally solid material which is heated or otherwise processed to be 
> in a liquid or gaseous state during the diffusion/emulsification process.
>
> A rotor 12 comprises a hollow cylinder, generally closed at both ends. 
> Shaft 14 and inlet 16 are coupled to the ends of the rotor 12. A first 
> infusion material can pass through inlet 16 into the interior of rotor 
> 12. Shaft 14 is coupled to a motor 18, which rotates the rotor at a 
> desired speed. The rotor 12 has a plurality of openings 22 formed 
> therethrough, shown in greater detail in FIG. 1a. In the preferred 
> embodiment, the openings 22 each have a narrow orifice 24 and a larger 
> borehole 26. The sidewalls 28 of the boreholes 26 can assume various 
> shapes including straight (as shown in FIG. 4), angled (as shown in 
> FIG. 1) or curved.
>
> A stator 30 encompasses the rotor 12, leaving a channel 32 between the 
> rotor and the stator through which the host material may flow. The 
> stator 30 also has openings 22 formed about its circumference. A 
> housing 34 surrounds the stator 30 and inlet 36 passes a second 
> infusion material to an area 35 between the stator 30 and the housing 
> 34. The host material passes through inlet 37 into the channel 32. 
> Seals 38 are formed between the shafts 14 and 16 and the housing 34. 
> An outlet 40 passes the host material from the channel 32 to a pump 
> 42, where it exits via pump outlet 44. The pump may also be driven by 
> motor 18 or by an auxiliary source.
>
> In operation, the diffusion device receives the host material through 
> inlet 37. In the preferred embodiment, pump 42 draws the host material 
> on the pump's suction side in order to allow the host material to pass 
> through the channel at low pressures. The first and second infusion 
> materials are introduced to the host material through openings 22. The 
> infusion materials may be pressurized at their source to prevent the 
> host material from passing through openings 22.
>
> The embodiment shown in FIG. 1 has separate inlets for 16 and 36 for 
> the diffusion materials. This arrangement allows two different 
> infusion materials to be introduced to the host material. 
> Alternatively, a single infusion material could be introduced into 
> both inlets.
>
> In tests, the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 has demonstrated high levels 
> of diffusion of the infusion material(s) into the host material. Tests 
> using oxygen as the infusion material and water as the host material 
> have resulted in levels of 400% dissolved oxygen in the water, with 
> the increased oxygen levels lasting for days.
>
> The reason for the high efficiency and persistence of the diffusion is 
> believed to be the result of micro-cavitation, which is described in 
> connection with FIGS. 2a-c. Whenever a material flows over a smooth 
> surface, a rather laminar flow is established with a thin boundary 
> layer that is stationary or moving very slowly because of the surface 
> tension between the moving fluid and the stationary surface. The 
> openings 22, however, disrupt the laminar flow and can cause 
> compression and decompression of the material. If the pressure during 
> the decompression cycle is low enough, voids (cavitation bubbles) will 
> form in the material. The cavitation bubbles generate a rotary flow 
> pattern 46, like a tornado, because the localized area of low pressure 
> draws the host material and the infusion material, as shown in FIG. 
> 2a. When the cavitation bubbles implode, extremely high pressures 
> result. As two aligned openings pass one another, a succusion (shock 
> wave) occurs, generating significant energy. The energy associated 
> with cavitation and succussion mixes the infusion material and the 
> host material to an extremely high degree, perhaps at the molecular 
> level.
>
> The tangential velocity of the rotor 12 and the number of openings 
> that pass each other per rotation dictate the frequency at which the 
> device operates. It has been found that operation in the ultrasonic 
> frequency can be beneficial in many applications. It is believed that 
> operating the device in the ultrasonic region of frequencies provides 
> the maximum succussion shock energy to shift the bonding angle of the 
> fluid molecule, which enables it to transport additional infusion 
> materials which it would not normally be able to retain. The frequency 
> at which the diffuser operates appears to affect the degree of 
> diffusion, leading to much longer persistence of the infusion material 
> in the host material.
>
> In some applications, a particular frequency or frequencies may be 
> desired to break down certain complex molecules, such as in the case 
> of water purification. In this application, multiple frequencies of 
> succussion can be used to break complex structures, such as VOCs 
> (volatile organic compounds), into smaller sub-structures. Ozone can 
> be used as one of the infusion materials to oxidize the sub-structures 
> at a high efficiency.
>
> Other sonochemistry applications can be performed with the device 10. 
> In general, sonochemistry uses ultrasound to assist chemical 
> reactions. Typically, the ultrasound is generated using a 
> piezoelectric or other electro-acoustical device. A problem associated 
> with electro-acoustical transducers is that the sound waves do not 
> provide uniform sound waves throughout the material; rather, the 
> desired cavitation is localized around the device itself. The present 
> invention allows the ultrasonic waves to be produced throughout a 
> material using a simple mechanical device.
>
> FIG. 3 illustrates an exploded view of an embodiment of the rotor 12 
> and stator 30 where multiple frequencies may be obtained at a single 
> rotational velocity. In FIG. 3, three circular arrays of openings 50 
> (shown individually as arrays 50a, 50b, and 50c) of openings 22 are 
> disposed circumferentially about the rotor 12. Each ring has a 
> different number of openings evenly spaced about its circumference. In 
> similar fashion, the stator 30 would have three circular arrays of 
> openings 52 (shown individually as arrays 52a, 52b, and 52c). To 
> ensure that only one pair of openings between corresponding arrays 
> will be coincident at any one time, the number of openings 22 in a 
> given array 52 on the stator 30 can be one more (or less) than the 
> number of openings 22 in the corresponding array 50 of the rotor 12. 
> Thus, for example, if array 50a had twenty openings evenly spaced 
> around the circumference of rotor 12, array 52 could have 21 openings 
> spaced evenly around the circumference of stator 30.
>
> As the rotor 12 of FIG. 3 rotates relative to stator 30, each array 
> will create succussions at a different frequency. By properly choosing 
> different frequencies, a sum and difference interference pattern will 
> result, creating a wide spectrum of frequencies. This spectrum of 
> frequencies can be beneficial in many applications where unknown 
> impurities in a host liquid need to be broken down and oxidized.
>
> FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional side view of an embodiment of a 
> stator 30. For smaller diameter stators, it may be difficult to form 
> the borehole 26 on the inside of stator 30. The embodiment of FIG. 4 
> uses an inner sleeve 54 and an outer sleeve 56. The boreholes 26 can 
> be drilled, from the outside, of the inner sleeve 54. For each 
> borehole 26 on the inner sleeve 54, a corresponding aligned orifice 24 
> is drilled on the outer sleeve 56. The inner sleeve 54 is then placed 
> in, and secured to, the outer sleeve 56 to form the stator 30. Other 
> methods, such as casting, could also be used to form the stator 30.
>
> FIGS. 5a-b and 6 illustrate alternative embodiments of the diffuser 
> 10. Where appropriate, reference numerals from FIG. 1 are repeated in 
> these figures.
>
> FIG. 5a illustrates an cross-sectional side view of an embodiment 
> where the rotor 12 and stator 30 are disk shaped. FIG. 5b illustrates 
> a top view of the disk shaped rotor 12. The stator 30 is formed above 
> and below the rotor 12. Both the stator 12 and rotor 30 have a 
> plurality of openings of the type described in connection with FIG. 1, 
> which pass by each other as the rotor 12 is driven by the motor. As 
> before, for each array 52, the stator 30 may have one opening more or 
> less than the corresponding array 50 in rotor 12 in order to prevent 
> simultaneous succussion at two openings within an array, The openings 
> 22 can be of the same shape as shown in FIG. 1. A hollow shaft serves 
> as the inlet 16 to the interior of the disk shaped rotor for the first 
> infusion material. Similarly, an area 35 between the stator 30 and the 
> housing 34 receives the second infusion material. As the host material 
> flows in the channel 32 between the rotor 12 and the stator 30, it is 
> subjected to the vortex generation at the openings 22, thereby causing 
> a diffusion of the first and second materials with the host material. 
> The infused host material passes to outlets 40.
>
> FIG. 5b illustrates a top view of the rotor 12. As can be seen, a 
> plurality of openings forms concentric arrays of openings on the rotor 
> 12. Each array can, if desired, generate secussions at different 
> frequencies. In the preferred embodiment, openings 22 would be formed 
> on the top and bottom of the rotor 12. Corresponding openings would be 
> formed above and below these openings on the stator 30.
>
> FIG. 6 illustrates a cut away view of an embodiment of the invention 
> where the rotor 12 has a conical shape. Both the stator 12 and rotor 
> 30 have a plurality of openings of the type described in connection 
> with FIG. 1, which pass by each other as the rotor 12 is driven by the 
> motor. In addition to the openings around the circumference of the 
> rotor 12, there could also be openings at the bottom of the conical 
> shape, with corresponding openings in the portion of the stator 30 at 
> the bottom. As before, for each array, the stator 30 may have one 
> opening more or less than the rotor 12 in order to prevent 
> simultaneous succussion at two openings 22 on the same array. A hollow 
> shaft serves as the inlet 16 to the interior of the disk shaped rotor 
> for the first infusion material. Similarly, an area 35 between the 
> stator 30 and the housing 34 receives the second infusion material. As 
> the host material flows between the rotor 12 and the stator 30, it is 
> subjected to the vortex generation at the openings 22, thereby causing 
> a diffusion of the first and second materials with the host material. 
> The infused host material passes to outlets 40.
>
> In the embodiments of FIGS. 5a-b and 6, because the arrays of openings 
> 22 can be formed at increasing diameters, generation of multiple 
> frequencies may be facilitated. It should be noted that any number of 
> shapes could be used, including hemispherical and spherical shapes to 
> realize the rotor 12 and stator 30.
>
> The diffuser described herein can be used in a number of applications. 
> Optimal opening size (for both the orifice 24 and borehole 26), width 
> of channel 32, rotational speed and rotor/stator diameters may be 
> dependent upon the application of the device.
>
> As described above, the diffuser 10 may be used for water aeration. In 
> this embodiment air or oxygen is used as both the first and second 
> infusion materials. The air/oxygen is diffused into the wastewater (or 
> other water needing aeration) as described in connection with FIG. 1. 
> It has been found that the diffuser can increase the oxygenation to 
> approximately 400% dissolved oxygen, with greater concentrations 
> expected as parameters are optimized for this application. In tests 
> which circulated approximately twenty five gallons of municipal water 
> at ambient temperatures (initially having a reading of 84.4% dissolved 
> oxygen) through the device for five minutes to achieve 390% dissolved 
> oxygen content, the enhanced concentration of oxygen levels remained 
> above 300% dissolved oxygen for a period of four hours and above 200% 
> dissolved oxygen for over 19 hours. After three days, the dissolved 
> oxygen content remained above 134%. In these tests, frequencies of 169 
> kHz were used. The sizes of the openings were 0.030 inches for the 
> orifice 24 and 0.25 inches for the borehole (with the boreholes 26 on 
> the rotor having sloped sides). Cooler temperatures could 
> significantly increase the oxygenation levels and the persistence.
>
> Also for the treatment of wastewater, or for bio-remediation of other 
> toxic materials, oxygen could be used as one of the infusion materials 
> and ozone could be used as the other infusion material. In this case, 
> the ozone would be used to oxidize hazardous structures in the host 
> material, such as VOCs and dangerous microorganism. Further, as 
> described above, a set of frequencies (as determined by the arrays of 
> openings in the rotor 12 and stator 30) could be used to provide an 
> destructive interference pattern which would break down many of the 
> complex structures into smaller substructures. Alternatively, if the 
> treatment was directed towards oxidation of a single known hazardous 
> substance, it would be possible to use a single frequency which was 
> known to successfully break down the structure. Conversely, a set of 
> frequencies which result in a constructive interference pattern could 
> be used to combine two or more compounds into a more complex and 
> highly structured substance.
>
> For producing potable water, ozone could be used as the first and 
> second infusion material to break down and oxidize contaminants.
>
> While the operation of the diffuser 10 has been discussed in 
> connection with large applications, such as municipal wastewater 
> remediation, it could also be used in household applications, such as 
> drinking water purifiers, swimming pools and aquariums.
>
> The diffuser could also be used for other applications where diffusion 
> of a gas or liquid into another liquid changes the characteristics of 
> the host material. Examples of such applications would include the 
> homogenization of milk or the hydrogenation of oils. Other 
> applications could include higher efficiencies in mixing fuel and 
> gases/liquids resulting in higher fuel economy.
>
> FIGS. 7a-b illustrate alternative embodiments for the rotor 12 and 
> stator 30. In FIG. 7a, the "stator" 30 also rotates; in this case, the 
> frequency of the successions will be dependent upon the relative 
> rotational speed between the rotor 12 and stator 30. In FIG. 7b, one 
> of either the rotor 12 or stator 30 does not pass an infusion material 
> through the component (in FIG. 7b only the rotor passes an infusion 
> material); the component which does not pass an infusion material has 
> its openings 22 replaced by cavities 58 to produce the turbulence. The 
> cavities 58 could be shaped similarly to the boreholes 26 without the 
> accompanying orifices 24.
>
> In FIG. 7c, the orifice 24 through which the infusion material is 
> passed through the rotor 12 or stator 30 is positioned next to the 
> borehole 26, rather than in the borehole 26 as in previous 
> embodiments. It should be noted that the primary purpose of the 
> borehole 26 is to disrupt the laminar flow of the host material along 
> the surface of the rotor 12 and stator 30. The compression and 
> rarefaction (decompression) of the host material causes the 
> micro-cavitation, which provides the high degree of diffusion produced 
> by the device. During decompression, voids (cavitation bubbles) are 
> produced in the host material. The cavitation bubbles grow and 
> contract (or implode) subject to the stresses induced by the 
> frequencies of the succussions. Implosions of cavitation bubbles 
> produce the energy which contribute to the high degree of diffusion of 
> the infusion materials into the host material as it passes through the 
> channel 32. Thus, so long as the infusion materials and the host 
> material are mixed at the point where the cavitation and resultant 
> shock waves are occurring, the diffusion described above will result.
>
> FIG. 7d illustrates an embodiment where the initial mixing of the host 
> material and one or more infusion materials is performed outside of 
> channel 32. In this embodiment a Venturi diffuser 60 (or other device) 
> is used to perform the initial mixing of the infusion material(s) and 
> the host material. The mixture is input into the channel 32 between 
> the rotor 12 and stator 30, wherein undergoes the 
> compression/rarefaction cycles discussed above, which cause cavitation 
> in the mixture, and is subjected to the frequency of the shock waves.
>
> Further, the generation of the cavitation and shock waves could be 
> performed using structures which differ from the boreholes 26 shown in 
> the embodiments above. As stated above, the boreholes 26 are surface 
> disturbances which impede the laminar flow of the host material along 
> the sidewalls of the channel 32. In FIG. 7e, a protrusion, such as 
> bump 62 could be used as a surface disturbance in place of or in 
> conjunction with the boreholes 26. Shapes other than rounded shapes 
> could also be used. As shown in FIG. 7f, grooves (or ridges) 64 could 
> be formed in the rotor 12 and/or stator 30 to generate the cavitation 
> and shock waves.
>
> As stated above, not all applications require, or benefit from, the 
> generation of shock waves at a particular frequency. Therefore, the 
> rotor 12 or stator 30 could have the boreholes 26 (or other surface 
> disturbances) arranged such that a white noise was produced, rather 
> than a particular frequency. The structures used to create the 
> cavitation need not be uniform; a sufficiently rough surface be formed 
> on the rotor 12 or stator 30 will cause the cavitation. Additionally, 
> as shown in FIG. 7g, it may not be necessary for both the surface of 
> the rotor 12 and the surface of the stator 30 to create the 
> cavitation; however, in most cases, operation of the device 10 will be 
> more efficient if both surfaces are used.
>
> FIG. 7h illustrates a embodiment where the movement which causes the 
> cavitation is provided by the host material (optionally with entrained 
> infused material) rather than by relative motion of the rotor 12 and 
> stator 30. In the embodiment of FIG. 7h, the channel 32 is formed 
> between two walls 66 which are static relative to one another, one or 
> both of which have surface disturbances facing the channel 32. The 
> host material is driven through the channel at high speed using a pump 
> or other device for creating a high speed flow. One or more infusion 
> materials are input into the channel, either through orifices 24 or by 
> mixing the host material with the infusion materials external to the 
> channel. The high speed of the host material relative to the walls 66 
> causes the micro-cavitation and succussions described above.
>
> As an example, one or more of the walls 66 could be a fine mesh, 
> through which the infusion material(s) flows to mix with the host 
> material in the channel 32. The surface disturbances in the mesh would 
> cause micro-cavitations and succussions as the host material flows 
> over the mesh at high speed. The frequency of the succussions would 
> depend upon the resolution of the mesh and the speed of the host 
> material. Once again, the infusion materials would diffuse into the 
> host material at the molecular level at the micro-cavitation sites.
>
> FIGS. 8a and 8b illustrate another embodiment, where a rotating member 
> 70 is disposed within a conduit 72 and rotated by motor 73. The host 
> material and infusion material(s) are mixed in the conduit 72 upstream 
> from the rotating member 70 using a Venturi diffuser 74 or other 
> device. The rotating member could be, for example, propeller or auger 
> shaped. On the surface of the rotating member 70 has one or more 
> surface disturbances 76, such that the rotation of the rotating member 
> 70 creates the microcavitation discussed above, thereby causing a high 
> degree of diffusion between the materials. The shape of the propeller 
> blades and pattern of the surface disturbances 76 thereon could create 
> the cavitation and succussion at a desired frequency for purposes 
> described above. Further, the shape of the rotating device could draw 
> the materials through the conduit.
>
> The present invention provides significant advantages over the prior 
> art. First, the micro-cavitations generated by the device allow 
> diffusion to occur at a molecular level, increasing the amount of 
> infusion material which will be held by the host material and the 
> persistence of the diffusion. Second, the micro-cavitations and shock 
> waves can be produced by a relatively simple mechanical device. Third, 
> the frequency or frequencies of the shock wave produced by the device 
> can be used in many applications, either to break down complex 
> structures or to aid in combining structures. Fourth, the cavitations 
> and shock waves can be produced uniformly throughout a material for 
> consistent diffusion.
>
> Although the Detailed Description of the invention has been directed 
> to certain exemplary embodiments, various modifications of these 
> embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, will be suggested to 
> those skilled in the art. The invention encompasses any modifications 
> or alternative embodiments that fall within the scope of the Claims.
>
> On 12/11/2018 9:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Hector, here is a shinning example of how folks will rip you off and 
>> take credit for your hard work.ï¿½ Tony Wood (RIP, passed away in 2012) 
>> after telling Revalesio Corp that he was brains behind the 
>> Sonodiffusor Patent.
>>
>> ï¿½Sonodiffuserï¿½
>>
>> By:Norman Langston Wootan
>>
>> 9/24/2012
>>
>> The purpose of this document is to present the Honest to ï¿½GODï¿½ truth 
>> behind the research, conception, development and disposition of the 
>> ï¿½Sonodiffuserï¿½ aka, shown on the below Patent as 
>> ï¿½Diffuser/emulsifierï¿½. I being a Master Mason 32^nd degree, a 
>> decorated 30 year military veteran and a Research Scientist that is 
>> widely known as a ï¿½no bullshitï¿½ sort of guy, do hereby give the 
>> following account of the above subject.Please note on the Patent 
>> shown below, the Inventor!
>>
>> <http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html><http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html><http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm><http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm><http://www.uspto.gov/patft/help/help.htm>
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://ebiz1.uspto.gov/vision-service/ShoppingCart_P/ShowShoppingCart?backUrl1=http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&S1=6386751.PN.&OS=PN/6386751&backLabel1=Back%20to%20Document:%206386751><http://ebiz1.uspto.gov/vision-service/ShoppingCart_P/AddToShoppingCart?docNumber=6386751&backUrl1=http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&S1=6386751.PN.&OS=PN/6386751&backLabel1=Back%20to%20Document:%206386751>
>>
>>
>> <http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=06386751&homeurl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&S1=6386751.PN.&OS=PN/6386751&RS=PN/6386751&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page>
>>
>>
>> 	
>>
>> ( 1of1)
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> United States Patent
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 6,386,751
>>
>> Wootan , et al.
>>
>> 	
>>
>> May 14, 2002
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Diffuser/emulsifier
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>> A diffuser for incorporating one or more infusion materials into a 
>> host material. The diffuser includes a rotor 12 and stator 30 
>> rotating relative to one another. The infusion materials are drawn 
>> through openings in the rotor and stator. During movement of the 
>> rotor, the openings cause cavitation of the host material in the 
>> channel 32 resulting in diffusion of the infusion materials through 
>> the openings and into the host material. The opening patterns in the 
>> rotor and stator can be designed to operate at a single frequency or 
>> a multiple frequencies. The frequencies of operation may affect 
>> bonding between the infusion materials and the host material and may 
>> also be effective in breakdown of complex molecular structures.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Inventors:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> Wootan; Norman L.(Dallas, TX), Wood; Anthony B. (Dallas, TX)
>>
>> Assignee:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> Diffusion Dynamics, Inc.(
>>
>> Appl. No.:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 08/957,530
>>
>> Filed:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> October 24, 1997
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Current U.S. Class:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 366/170.3; 366/171.1; 366/172.1; 366/181.7; 366/305
>>
>> Current International Class:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> B01F 7/00ï¿½(20060101); B01F 3/08ï¿½(20060101); B01F 3/04ï¿½(20060101)
>>
>> Field of Search:
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 366/169.1,168.1,170.3,171.1,172.1,176.1,181.4,181.7,305,348,174.1
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Back in 1979, I was employed as Director of Research and Development 
>> for a large domestic energy company. My job was to find new and 
>> exciting energy technologies that could be developed and employed in 
>> the average home in order to improve efficiency and lower cost of 
>> maintaining the living environment at the desired comfort level. It 
>> was during this exhaustive search that I happened to find the 
>> domestic oil heating system Patented by Frenette, Patent #4143639 
>> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4143639>. 
>> This device ï¿½tweakedï¿½ my interest for the heat output showed an 
>> ï¿½anomalyï¿½ as to Btu output vs. energy input! After studying this 
>> Patent, I began a search of all patents that used shearing or 
>> succusion to produce heating action.My first find was the Perkins 
>> Rotor, Patent #4424797 
>> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4424797>.Next 
>> came the Schaefer Patent#3791349 
>> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F3791349>, 
>> which used the water hammer effect of succession to achieve the 
>> ability to produce instant steam from a rotary device. Now I was on a 
>> ï¿½hotï¿½ trail of devices that did indeed produce an anomalous output.My 
>> next find was very interesting for it has shown that a former 
>> employer for Schaefer, James Griggs patented a competitive device as 
>> the hydro sonic pump, Patent #5188090. This device, with help from 
>> several Energy Publications eventually was tested by NASA Engineers 
>> and was definitely shown as an over unity device,ie. Outputting more 
>> energy in the form of Btuï¿½s than the input energy in kWh electrical. 
>> A court fight ensued between Perkins and Griggs because of the 
>> similarities between the two devices and eventually Perkins won out 
>> at the Patent Office due to ï¿½prior artï¿½.
>>
>> After moving to Dallas, in 1994, I built my version of the Perkins 
>> Rotor and was determined to discover how such a device could possibly 
>> violate the ï¿½Law of Conservation of Energyï¿½.My prototype (still have 
>> it) is very unique in that the outer cylindrical section housing the 
>> rotor is made of clear silica glass so as to be able to see what type 
>> of action is taking place between the rotating rotor and the glass 
>> cylinder. With water flowing through the operating device, I bathed 
>> the frothy looking water (what you see in your blender when set on 
>> puree) with coherent light LASER, HeNe and at the same time used a 
>> high speed strobe tach to ï¿½stop actionï¿½ the rotor which was turning 
>> at 3000 RPM. To my amazement I saw literally millions of micro 
>> tornadoes arranged in pairs with the open end of one attached to the 
>> rotor and the other open end connected to the fixed glass with the 
>> vortex cones joined at the center. Just as if you put two ice cream 
>> cones together at the tips.Ok! Now I knew that the anomalous effects 
>> are now caused by micro cavitation the same as seen on boat 
>> propellers in water. This cavitation is highly destructive to metals 
>> if allowed to persist.A micro cavitation is a vortex that ï¿½implodesï¿½ 
>> with pressures approaching infinity at the tip of the cone.This is 
>> proven by the fact that the pressure is so extreme that water is 
>> split into atomic oxygen and atomic hydrogen and a combustion process 
>> occurs at a very tiny level so as to emit photons in the UV and blue 
>> light spectrum.The attendant heat produced at this micro level is the 
>> cause of rapid metal erosion and collectively causes the entire 
>> device to exhibit over unity operational characteristics as found by 
>> NASA investigation.
>>
>> I was doing some experimental work in a local water plant in which 
>> oxygen was being added to water so as to bring it up to 100% 
>> saturation which is beneficial to human consumption. Their method was 
>> to use an eductor type of diffuser in the water flow to infuse oxygen 
>> into the water.I experimented with my version of the Perkins Rotor 
>> and found that when I drilled the proper patterns of vortex 
>> generating holes in the rotor and stator housings that indeed higher 
>> level of oxygen was being infused into the water.
>>
>> At this time several employees of Texas Instruments, including 
>> Anthony Wood had been visiting the water plant for they used the 
>> oxygenated water daily.When Tony Wood saw the experiment he was 
>> immediately intrigued by the possibilities of this technology. Before 
>> Tony Woods saw my device running, he had no clue about 
>> ï¿½sonochemistryï¿½. He was retiring (forced by staff reduction) and 
>> wanted to invest some of his retirement funds into something of 
>> promise.Thus he wanted to fund the machining cost of a whole new 
>> rotary device, larger but with same design features.I designed all 
>> the parts and gave the shop drawings to a machinist in the immediate 
>> neighborhood.About a week later everything was finished at a cost of 
>> $6,800 and I proceeded to assemble the new prototype.On our first 
>> runs of the new prototype we saw very high levels of infused oxygen 
>> which was very persistent for it remained combined in the water for 
>> days. We are talking about 200% oxygen levels.Immediately Tony Wood 
>> wanted to organize a new LLC Corp. and bring in several investors to 
>> provide the needed funds to develop this technology into a viable 
>> product.Ann Wilson joined our new company which became ï¿½Life 
>> Affirming Technologiesï¿½.An attorney was brought on board from Austin 
>> who drew up the legal documents while Tony and I were setting up a 
>> lab to do the necessary documentation and begin the technical 
>> description and drawings needed for Patent application. When I had 
>> completed all the drawings and did the complete technical explanation 
>> as to how the device actually worked with the various embodiments 
>> needed by the Patent attorney, the process was initiated.
>>
>> At a morning coffee, business meeting at Law and Coffee, a local 
>> establishment, we were over heard by a customer by the name of Bobby 
>> Burris as I told Tony Wood about the Robert Golka, Leadville Tesla 
>> Coil which was owned by Ken Hawkins down in San Antonia.Bobby Burris 
>> said he knew all about Tesla and his famous coils and was interested 
>> in buying the big Leadville Coil.Tony Wood and Ann Wilson brought 
>> Bobby Burris on board the new corp with an investment of $80,000.When 
>> the Corp. Structure was set up, Tony wood had a 25% share interest, 
>> Ann Wilson had a 26% share interest and Bobby Burris had a 25% share 
>> interest.I had no money so my intellectual property and developmental 
>> work comprised my 24% share interest.I still have the original Corp 
>> documents with shares in ï¿½Life Affirming Technologiesï¿½. All necessary 
>> shareholder meetings and other legal requirements were met on a 
>> monthly basis.
>>
>> I had been told by a ï¿½back doorï¿½ source to watch Tony Wood when it 
>> came to Patent work for he had ï¿½weaseledï¿½ his way into numerous TI 
>> Patents by being on the ï¿½team ï¿½to develop new technology.When the 
>> Patent attorney delivered the final draft of the Patent application, 
>> Tony Wood had pulled the ï¿½sleight of handï¿½ that I suspected. When 
>> more than one inventor is shown on a patent, alphabet order comes 
>> into play. Since Wood comes before Wootan alphabetically, he was 
>> shown as first inventor.ï¿½No wayï¿½ was I going to allow that!Ann Wilson 
>> was witness to the fact that I buried the head of a ball peened 
>> hammer into a lab table top and told Tony Woods that would be his 
>> ï¿½headï¿½ if he did not immediately change the order of the inventors. 
>> All of this technology was mine from the very start and Tony Wood was 
>> the facilitator of the funding and the instigator of the Corp. Structure.
>>
>> During the numerous test and demonstrations we achieved oxygen levels 
>> as high as 600%.We set up a hydroponic experiment to show places like 
>> Epcott Center, Disney World that plants can be grown hydroponically 
>> without having to drain them down for root exposure to oxygen.Our 
>> plants being fed oxygenated water showed remarkable vitality and 
>> growth when compared to a control identical plant set.
>>
>> We oxygenated hot tub water (105 degree) with high levels of oxygen 
>> to be used by sport therapy.When you sat in the hot tub of diffused 
>> oxygenated water it felt like you were in alkseltser water for it 
>> ï¿½tingled ï¿½as the pores opened and the oxygen was absorbed into the skin.
>>
>> We built several units to be used at sewage lift stations so as to 
>> eliminate the odor of an aerobic to an anaerobic condition.We proved 
>> that high levels of oxygen could accelerate the digestion rate and 
>> colony growth in municipal waste treatment facilities.We experimented 
>> successfully with ground water remediation in contaminated wells.We 
>> also demonstrated the ability to break complex molecular structures 
>> (VOC) by the diffusion of ozone into water vs. oxygen.We demonstrated 
>> the sonodiffuser as aï¿½spargerï¿½ by diffusing nitrogen into the water 
>> which stripped out all oxygen. This process is valuable in the growth 
>> of algae for oxygen is an algae killer. Algae grows in the presence 
>> of light, water and CO2. Which makes it an aerobic process.
>>
>> http://www.patentbuddy.com/Inventor/Wood-Anthony-B/7170971
>>
>> http://www.google.com/patents/US20110075507
>>
>> http://www.google.td/patents/US8349191
>>
>> After I sold my ï¿½Intellectual Propertyï¿½ right to Revalesio Corp, Tony 
>> Wood went ï¿½nutsï¿½ filling other patents based on my original ideas.
>>
>> Revalesio Corp, ï¿½left on the tableï¿½ my latest version of a ï¿½Super 
>> Diffusorï¿½ which Jim Warren & I were going to Patent for use in our 
>> CO2 sequestration system as a ï¿½sparger for harmful oxygen by use of 
>> nitrogen.
>>
>> On 12/11/2018 8:59 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Our need for super high temp ceramic for the IVR hydrogen reactor 
>>> led to the working relationship with Southern Illinois university. 
>>> (SIUC)
>>>
>>> */Composite Innovations Corporation (CIC), /*Woodland Hills, 
>>> California, and the *Center for Advanced Friction Studies (CAFS)* at 
>>> *Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC)*, are pleased to 
>>> announce the expansion of the scope of their current collaboration 
>>> to develop 3600^o F Leading Edge Materials for DARPAï¿½s FALCON 
>>> Hypersonic Vehicle Program.Consistent with the goals and focus of 
>>> this unique interdisciplinary effort, *CIC/CAFS/SIUC *have entered 
>>> into a */Strategic Alliance Agreement/* to collaborate in the 
>>> development, application and commercialization, through licensing, 
>>> of application specific, architectural combinations of design, 
>>> construction, materials, fabrication, and process variables to meet 
>>> identified operational component needs using proprietary 
>>> CIC/CAFS/SIUC Hybrid Composite Systems technology, know-how and 
>>> intellectual property.
>>>
>>> Initially, four product areas will be pursued; 1) Zero to Low 
>>> Erosion Materials for Propulsion Systems, 2) High Purity Composite 
>>> Components for Semiconductor Hot Zone Applications, 3) the 
>>> development of a Hybrid Composite Reactor for Hydrogen Production 
>>> and, 4) the Commercialization of a New, ï¿½Hybrid Metal-Ceramic-Carbon 
>>> (HMCC)ï¿½ Composite Friction Material that has demonstrated break 
>>> through performance improvements.
>>>
>>> CAFS/SIUC has evaluated its new proprietary HMCC compared to 
>>> commercially available Carbon-Carbon (C-C) friction materials which 
>>> has been the high performance standard for aircraft, formula 1 and 
>>> other high energy friction applications for more than thirty (30) 
>>> years.HMCC performance improvements over C-C are summarized below.
>>>
>>> ï¿½Wet Friction Coefficient -_>_ 50% Higher
>>>
>>> oReduction of Average Landing vs. Taxi Friction Coefficient by 
>>> approx. 30%.Differences Between Taxi and Landing Operations were 
>>> Practically Eliminated
>>>
>>> ï¿½Wear ï¿½ Average Landing vs. Taxi Wear Reduction of 30% - 35% for All 
>>> Energy Loading Conditions
>>>
>>> ï¿½Oxidation ï¿½ Microstructural Analyses Reveal negligible Measurable 
>>> Loss of the Carbon Fiber / Matrix Structural Core of the Hybrid HMCC 
>>> System
>>>
>>> Recognizing the importance of this new composite material system 
>>> CAFS/SIUC and CIC will facilitate the commercialization of HMCC 
>>> friction materials through the development partnering relationships 
>>> with recognized friction material manufacturers to facilitate; 
>>> introduction of Product(s) with technical and economic benefits.As 
>>> the commercial and industrial markets are large and varied, the need 
>>> exists to tailor each end-use considering specific application 
>>> operational, manufacturing, economic, etc. requirements.
>>>
>>> As such, CIC/CAFS/SIUC will work with individual Teaming Partners 
>>> _to optimize_ a three phase commercialization program as exemplified 
>>> by :
>>>
>>> 1.Phase 1 - Engineering Prototype(15ï¿½ Dia), Material Property and 
>>> Dynamometer Testing Confirmation(6 ï¿½ 9 Mo)
>>>
>>> 2.Phase 2 ï¿½ Application Specific Product Optimization to Meet 
>>> Partner Identified Operational Production Needs (9ï¿½ 12 Mo)
>>>
>>> 3.Phase 3 ï¿½ Manufacturing Scale-Up and Production (12 - 18 
>>> Mo).Depending on individual partner product optimization 
>>> requirements, market goals and desired timing, Phase 3 timing can be 
>>> overlapped with Phase 2 or at any time thereafter.
>>>
>>> In addition, CIC/CAFS/SIUC will provide partner desired support for 
>>> each application specific component (Product) development
>>>
>>> ï¿½Focused Computational System Analysis vs. ASTM Standards with 
>>> Sub-Scale System Component Validation and System Optimization to 
>>> Meet Application Specific Operational Needs.
>>>
>>> ï¿½Fail-Safe, Automated Semiconductor (LPCVD) Type Process Control, 
>>> complete with Real-Time Off-Gas Mass Spectrometer Analysis with 
>>> Feed-Back Control to Assure Deposition Product Stoichiometry and 
>>> Microstructural Control.Typical Product Yield _>_ 95%.Operator 
>>> Interface to Provide On/Off, Load / Un-Load, Maintenance and 
>>> Cleaning Support Only!
>>>
>>> ï¿½Reduced Fabrication, Process and Machining Time ï¿½ Current 
>>> Production Lot Manufacturing Cycle Forecast _<_ Five (5) Days
>>>
>>> For additional information regarding the CIC/CAFS/SIUC Hybrid 
>>> Composite Systems Technology capabilities for the above described, 
>>> or other applications, please contact either: Jim Warren, President, 
>>> Composite Innovations Corporation; (818) 884-0144; e-mail: 
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or Dr. Peter 
>>> Filip, Director CAFS; (618) 453-7932; e-mail: [email protected].
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2018 8:33 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When Looking back into the 20 plus years of files, documentation, 
>>>> e-mail and Keely Net BBS dialog files,it would be a crying shame 
>>>> for all of this valuable and informative data to be lost.ï¿½ I have 
>>>> decided to post, incrementally a lot of information onto this group 
>>>> site for your research use if you choose.ï¿½ In retrospect, I have 
>>>> realized that many folks out there have stolen ideas, Patents etc. 
>>>> from those of us that have given information freely as did Tesla 
>>>> and even Hector.ï¿½ I have always tried to share knowledge for the 
>>>> benefit of all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Norman L. Wootan
>>>>
>>>> 13723 Lynndale Loop
>>>>
>>>> Abbeville, LA 70510
>>>>
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> (214)907-0010
>>>>
>>>> Time line development of Technologies related to ï¿½VESï¿½ Green Energy 
>>>> Systems
>>>>
>>>> The ï¿½Implosion Vortex Reactorï¿½ (IVR) was the starting block of 
>>>> technology for the VES program.
>>>>
>>>> Due to my visit with Jim, in his home in CA. in thesummer of 2001 
>>>> searching for an ï¿½ultra high temp.ï¿½ ceramic material, his intense 
>>>> interest was ï¿½tweakedï¿½ in this technology!
>>>>
>>>> I digress here:In 1980, I was developing the methodology for making 
>>>> hydrogen gas from basic carbon and water in a unique type of 
>>>> reactor vessel. In 1994, I machined and assembled the first 
>>>> prototype 304 stainless ï¿½Implosion Vortex Reactorï¿½.Was not able to 
>>>> arouse any interest in the technology here in the US.An Investor 
>>>> Group in Berlin GE invited Me in 2001 to fly to Berlin and do a 
>>>> formal presentation of the technology at which time the Patent 
>>>> process was begun and funding for the project was set up. I went to 
>>>> Carson City NV. And set up the necessary Wells Fargo account and 
>>>> Incorporation for the funding to proceed.A 5200 sq. ft. Research 
>>>> lab was constructed on my 52 acre farm at Hubbard, TX for the 
>>>> purpose of prototype development.I was in weekly contact with Jim 
>>>> due to his interest in the Project.In 2005, the Project was funded 
>>>> ($1.5 million) by GAZPROM, Russia being represented by Her 
>>>> Deitsmar.My prototype development was funded at the $250,000 level. 
>>>> While I was machining out the two prototypes (one from 6061 
>>>> aluminum to develop the CAD specs and drawings, and the second 
>>>> working, ï¿½proof of concept reactorï¿½ from 310 stainless steel) Jim 
>>>> asked me to assist him in the construction of a Vapor Infusion 
>>>> Furnace at Carbondale, IL so that he could produce a needed 
>>>> densified ceramic reactor unit!I have provided you in previous 
>>>> documentation the background info on this Program at SICU. In which 
>>>> we had a working agreement with the University. In the spring of 
>>>> 2006, at the ï¿½Proof of conceptï¿½ test of stainless IVR attended by 6 
>>>> Engineers and Investor representatives from Europe it was learned 
>>>> that John MacAllen Funding and Project coordinator has 
>>>> misappropriated $1.2 million of the Project funds. He had moved to 
>>>> the US from Berlin, GE and purchased a home and yacht in Florida of 
>>>> which we had a satellite photo of home and boat in the 
>>>> slip.GAZPROM, Russia took legal action against MacAllen and took 
>>>> possession of both prototypes and Patent Rights.See: both Euro and 
>>>> U.S. Patents.In the spring of 2006, Jim and I agreed to pursue the 
>>>> IVR technology using the JEP Patent Process to Patent around my 
>>>> basic patents. Jim had the technology to produce the required 
>>>> densified ceramics so as to operate the IVR at the optimum thermal 
>>>> environment. It was our intention to build out our version of the 
>>>> ï¿½Implosion Vortex Reactorï¿½ at the envisioned Victorville, CA Lab 
>>>> Complex when the project was adequately funded. To that end, Jim 
>>>> was working his heart out!Since I designed the IVR and wrote the 
>>>> Patents, I left a lot of the ï¿½technologyï¿½ undisclosed so as to have 
>>>> the latitude for the JEP Patent Process which Jim wanted to do with 
>>>> our Patent Attorney.Jim gave me the big ï¿½atta boyï¿½ for having the 
>>>> forsight and thinking ahead!I have a complete historical book of 
>>>> the whole Project with all the Contact Letters with both US 
>>>> Government and Industrial Investors.I hand delivered a complete set 
>>>> of these documents to the George Bush Western Whitehouse at 
>>>> Crawford, TX for our President to review.The same docs were 
>>>> provided to DOE, Newt Gingrich and Senator Byrd of WVA.This will 
>>>> give you a great deal of insight into the IVR portion of our ï¿½VESï¿½ 
>>>> Program!
>>>>
>>>> Next!The ï¿½Implosion Vortex Turbineï¿½ our ï¿½Prime Moverï¿½(my vastly 
>>>> improved Tesla Turbine)
>>>>
>>>> To be continued in next message:
>>>>
>>>> Time line development of Technologies related to ï¿½VESï¿½ Green Energy 
>>>> Systems
>>>>
>>>> This is the second Technology for the ï¿½VESï¿½ Project:The Implosion 
>>>> Vortex Turbine.
>>>>
>>>> Since back in the early 70ï¿½s I have been an ï¿½avidï¿½ Researcher in 
>>>> the Technology of Nikola Tesla.I have everything that has ever been 
>>>> written by or about this ï¿½geniusï¿½.Of very special interest was his 
>>>> Boundary Layer Turbine which he patented in 1913.After doing 
>>>> extensive research into this very efficient turbine unit I quickly 
>>>> came to the conclusion that all that were writing about or 
>>>> researching this device did not fully understand just how it worked 
>>>> for Tesla was very ï¿½shrewdï¿½ in writing his patents and never 
>>>> divulged all of the technology!I went to the very ï¿½topï¿½ internet 
>>>> sites and publications regarding the subject turbine and found that 
>>>> no one had a ï¿½clueï¿½ as to how it really was intended to work at the 
>>>> ï¿½super high thermal conversionï¿½ figures.Bendix Corp. tested a 500HP 
>>>> version of this turbine being operated on steam and was astounded 
>>>> with the results. This turbine was abandoned early due to the lack 
>>>> of the proper metallurgy needed in the runners (disk) which had the 
>>>> needed stress modulus.Due to my background and Degree in the 
>>>> Aeronautical Discipline I fully understood just how the Boundary 
>>>> Layer Effect was utilized by Tesla to achieve the phenomenal 
>>>> thermal efficiency. In 1994, same shop that I machined the IVR 
>>>> unit; I built a museum quality Tesla Turbine to demonstrate the 
>>>> technology.I filed with the US Patent office the Patent Disclosure 
>>>> of a new very unique new hub design that eliminated all the 
>>>> labyrinth seal design of Tesla and booster the operational 
>>>> efficiency and simplified the construction of said turbine.At the 
>>>> International Tesla Conference, Colorado Springs, 1995, I donated 
>>>> this Tesla Turbine along with the Patent Disclosure to the museum 
>>>> and it went on display and was demonstrated to all museum visitors.
>>>>
>>>> After Jim and I addressed the IVR under ï¿½VESï¿½ his next question was 
>>>> ï¿½Norm, how are we going to utilize the thermal output of the IVR 
>>>> for power generationï¿½?My answer, Tesla Boundary Layer Turbine, to 
>>>> which Jim said, ï¿½Please educate me for I have not heard of this 
>>>> beforeï¿½.I sent to Jim all the documentation and drawings along with 
>>>> stress analytical formulas for the high speed disk utilized in the 
>>>> turbine.Since this turbine operates at such high speeds, Jim 
>>>> quickly showed me the stress calculations for runners (disk) that 
>>>> he would produce in carbon/carbon composite that would successfully 
>>>> operate in the required environment and would be impervious to 
>>>> erosion and could be surface finished at the micron level.I laid 
>>>> out in ï¿½Flow blockï¿½ diagrams, the operation of the Boundary layer 
>>>> Turbine utilizing a high density refrigerant that had the 
>>>> operational characteristics we needed for a low pressure, low 
>>>> temperature very efficient turbine.To achieve the ï¿½off the chartsï¿½ 
>>>> thermal efficiency, advanced Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) 
>>>> Industrial Heat pumping technology will be incorporated into the 
>>>> System. We are able to achieve a very conservative COP of 20:1 
>>>> Energy in vs. thermal output.This is totally achievable in the 
>>>> modern Heat pump Technology!(MVR) Heat Pump technology will be 
>>>> address in next segment. Our system is a huge shift from the 
>>>> current steam turbines which all operate at very high pressures and 
>>>> very high temperatures so as to maximize the extraction or 
>>>> conversion of thermal energy into mechanical energy to drive the 
>>>> generators (really alternators).ï¿½Carnotï¿½ cycleï¿½ or method of 
>>>> calculating system thermal efficiency. Our System operates at 
>>>> relatively low pressures and temperatures vastly simplifying 
>>>> design, fabrication and operation and practically eliminates most 
>>>> maintenance requirements. Both Jim and I have all the documentation 
>>>> of this System in our files!This is a unique System approach to be 
>>>> prototyped and Patent Apply for at the Victorville Facility.
>>>>
>>>> No one has put together the ï¿½blocksï¿½ for such a System that has 
>>>> such very high performance and efficiency.
>>>>
>>>> Next segment: MVR
>>>>
>>>> This segment will address (MVR) Mechanical Vapor Recompression 
>>>> utilized in Advanced Industrial Heat Pumping Technology.Back in 
>>>> 1980 I was employed as Director of Research & Development for a 
>>>> very large Corp. at Ashville.NC with prime interest in domestic 
>>>> heat utilization and heat re-claim technology.I explored all facets 
>>>> of heating and cooling technology including the various thermal 
>>>> storage systems like the Zeolite Modular System which BTW has the 
>>>> absolute highest storage density of all known Systems. Home heating 
>>>> systems such as Frenetti System that used cavitation in oil to 
>>>> produce COPs greater than1:1.This phenomenon was later verified by 
>>>> NASA and Perkins (Roswell, GA) was recognized by the US Parent 
>>>> Office as Inventor of such an over unity device.It was previously 
>>>> thought that a COP of greater than 1:1 was impossible!NASA was 
>>>> right for I built a device based on the Perkins Rotor and found the 
>>>> secret behind the high COP which is micro cavitation which 
>>>> disassociates the water molecule at the microscopic level in the 
>>>> billions of shear vortices after which there is a re-combination 
>>>> (micro implosion) which emits heat and a near UV blue wave length 
>>>> light photon emission.Attached is my Patent of this technology 
>>>> known as the ï¿½Sono Diffuserï¿½.Jim was excited to learn of this 
>>>> device or technology for we need it later in the Photo Bioreactor 
>>>> system to act as a sparger of oxygen from the growth media for 
>>>> algae production. Oxygen is a ï¿½killerï¿½ of algae since we have to 
>>>> maintain septic or anaerobic condition.
>>>>
>>>> When high efficiency scroll compressors came on the scene I jumped 
>>>> into the design of MVR heat re-claim Systems that I started 
>>>> prototyping on my farm for a ï¿½stand aloneï¿½ home power system that 
>>>> also produced ï¿½pure waterï¿½ all from the ï¿½ambientï¿½.The total System 
>>>> utilized the Vortex turbine (prime mover) for power generation and 
>>>> used the heat pumped refrigerant as the operating media. (Same 
>>>> block flow diagram that I gave Jim for our ï¿½VESï¿½ System). Heat 
>>>> scavenging was from my advanced solar panels (to be Patented) no 
>>>> one has anything like this for its principles of operation are 
>>>> unknown by others.Gray water and ï¿½heat of condensationï¿½ during the 
>>>> production of water from the air rounded out the heat sought in the 
>>>> process. All of these things work like a ï¿½charmï¿½ but are not 
>>>> currently being utilized.What a shame.When Jim told me that the 
>>>> state of CA had passed legislation that would end the vast cooling 
>>>> tower thermal and vapor emissions, I proposed that we apply the 
>>>> advanced heat pumping capability of our System to produce pure 
>>>> water for recycle back into the power plants plus scavenge the heat 
>>>> of condensation and sensible heat to go back into the process and 
>>>> drive our Implosion Vortex turbine (advanced Tesla turbine) as a 
>>>> prime mover driving an alternator to augment the power production 
>>>> of the central plant or provide power for auxiliary plant loads. 
>>>> The overall efficiency of the power plant system would be increased 
>>>> by an additional 50 % by capturing the energy being ï¿½blown offï¿½ to 
>>>> the atmosphere in outdated cooling towers.There is also an 
>>>> environmental concern due to hot water discharge into streams 
>>>> etc.All of this we can fix!You will find all of this information in 
>>>> Jimï¿½s files for as he incorporated it into the ï¿½VESï¿½ System he 
>>>> would e-mail all the docs for my review and comment or additions. 
>>>> Jim and I were ï¿½totallyï¿½ on the same page of music!Diffuser patent 
>>>> attached!
>>>>
>>>> Next: we address the Photo Bioreactor Modular System
>>>>
>>>> This segment #4 will pertain to the Photo Bioreactor Modular System 
>>>> incorporated into the ï¿½VESï¿½for carbon remediation.
>>>>
>>>> Back in early 2005, Both Jim and I started addressing the 
>>>> remediation of the CO2 output from the ï¿½Implosion Vortex Reactorï¿½ 
>>>> whose sole output product is CO2 and H2 gas.There were several 
>>>> options regarding the CO2 output including deep underground storage 
>>>> in high pressure wells.Just what the Andreas Fault line needs in 
>>>> CA.Jim contacted several University Researchers and obtained lots 
>>>> of information regarding their solar fences and systems.I told Jim 
>>>> about my idea of using LED light panels, powered by low voltage DC 
>>>> which do not heat the growth media and can be run 24 hours a day 
>>>> vs. the solar fence units that are limited to sun light 
>>>> availability. Now we get into an interesting area regarding bio 
>>>> growth.Mid 90ï¿½s I became a ï¿½fanï¿½ of Philip S. Callahan, Ph.D. who 
>>>> wrote several fantastic books about this very subject.Careful study 
>>>> revealed several factors that University Researchers do not know or 
>>>> understand.Ever wonder why most plant foliage appears green to the 
>>>> human eye? You say it is the chlorophyll, the chemical media for 
>>>> photosynthesis where sun light energy combines the H2O and Carbon 
>>>> to make the hydrocarbon molecules for cell growth!Now consider, 
>>>> after careful study you will find that the ï¿½green wavelengthï¿½ in 
>>>> the solar spectrum (500nm) that is most absorbed and used in the 
>>>> photo process.Now if the leaves are absorbing the ï¿½greenï¿½ 
>>>> wavelength, why do the leaves appear green to our eyes?Most algae 
>>>> species are green, in fresh water, salt water algae is red, ï¿½red 
>>>> bloomï¿½ or ï¿½red tideï¿½ as you have seen when the water is depleted of 
>>>> oxygen and anaerobic condition occurs.Now with this in mind I told 
>>>> Jim that we would gather empirical data regarding the optimum light 
>>>> wavelength needed for a particular algae species. To maximize 
>>>> growth rate and reduce power input in the light panels.Optimize 
>>>> everything!With the algae species selected based on our desired 
>>>> output (lipid % vs. protein).The higher lipid output, the more 
>>>> biodiesel you get per ton of CO2 remediated!Now we can order the 
>>>> LEDs from China sources customized to go in our Lucite panel 
>>>> arrays.Jim designed these modules around the Sea land Container 
>>>> like Module and has a clever and practical layout of the 
>>>> footprint.I built several of these laminated clear Lucite panels 
>>>> and did several LED patterns that would bathe the passing fluid 
>>>> media containing the algae with the optimum lumens per sq. cm and 
>>>> fluid path depth.Jim did all the power calculations and flow rates 
>>>> to optimize the algae growth over a 24 hour period. He was 
>>>> calculating the time needed for algae species growth doubling in 
>>>> density based on flow rates, channel depths, light input and 
>>>> nutrient feed (CO2 and other minerals).Now if Elaine wondered what 
>>>> Jim did, I would say he was a busy fellow!In the algae growth cycle 
>>>> there is an accumulation of ï¿½poisonous oxygenï¿½ for when the CO2 is 
>>>> broken down in the growth process oxygen is a byproduct.If allowed 
>>>> to build up you inter into a condition of losing your anaerobic 
>>>> state and growth stops.Now enter my Sono Diffuser Patent that Jim 
>>>> just loved for it is very useful in sparging out oxygen using 
>>>> nitrogen.Now I have to digress again to tell you how the Sono 
>>>> Diffuser came into existence.
>>>>
>>>> In 1980, as stated before, I was looking at unusual heating 
>>>> technology and stumbled over several cavitation based Systems.My 
>>>> curiosity as to how these units achieved such high COP values 
>>>> caused me to build (1994) a Perkins Rotor of special design for the 
>>>> outer cylindrical section was clear glass so I could observe the 
>>>> fluid as it flowed over the spinning rotor and found the 
>>>> microscopic vortices in the billions! When viewed in regular light 
>>>> the water was almost white like froth.When bathed in HeNe laser 
>>>> light (coherent light) the picture changed and when illuminated 
>>>> with a very high speed strobe light I could ï¿½stop actionï¿½ and see 
>>>> the fantastic number of micro tornadoes in the water. In darkness 
>>>> the water would glow blue/ UV because of the almost infinite 
>>>> overpressures in the vortex which broke the hydrogen/oxygen bond 
>>>> momentarily with a re-combination detonation which yielded the blue 
>>>> light photon and resulting heat.Thus I found the secret behind the 
>>>> COP yield of cavitation Systems which is greater than 1:1.On the 
>>>> Perkins Rotor, NASA was documenting a COP of 1.3:1 which made them 
>>>> think that the definition of a ï¿½calorie ï¿½was wrong!I built several 
>>>> Diffusers and found that I could ï¿½imprintï¿½ oxygen into water at the 
>>>> 600% level and it was persistent! Did not come out of solution!I 
>>>> did all kinds of research with highly oxygenated water to include 
>>>> ground water remediation (contaminated wells), destroying VOX, 
>>>> accelerating plant growth And doing hydroponic growing and not have 
>>>> to drain down the root structure so it would be exposed to air for 
>>>> oxygen absorption.The water contained super high levels of 
>>>> oxygen.This phenomenon is well known in very cold running water 
>>>> falls where fish will die from what is known as ï¿½bleeding gillï¿½ 
>>>> disease because the high oxygen levels in cold water will go over 
>>>> 125% and the oxygen partial pressure ruptures the capillaries in 
>>>> the fish gill.After Investors and numerous Corp. Reorganizations 
>>>> etc. I sold my rights to the Diffuser or Sono Diffuser.When I sold 
>>>> my Patent I asked if they would be interested in the next better 
>>>> ï¿½mouse trapï¿½ but they declined to buy!Now Jim and I had the ï¿½Super 
>>>> Sono Diffuserï¿½ which is so radically different it will not infringe 
>>>> on the original Patent.I call that ï¿½thinking outside of the boxï¿½ 
>>>> LOL I still have the technical drawings and Jim looked forward to 
>>>> incorporating it into our System.I am an accomplished machinist 
>>>> along with all other technical disciplines for I have spent a full 
>>>> life in the very highest levels of technology.You are kind of 
>>>> exposed to such things when you have a Military Research and 
>>>> Development background at the DOD, Level.Day to day I interfaced 
>>>> with: BRL (Ballistics Research Labs), LWL (Land Warfare Labs), 
>>>> Chemical Coatings Labs, Laser Research labs, FLIR, (Forward Looking 
>>>> Infrared Imaging) Labsï¿½night visionï¿½ was a fixed wing and 
>>>> helicopter Aviator and did Flight Standardization for the Army 
>>>> Material Command.What fun I had and am happy to be ï¿½retiredï¿½. When 
>>>> I retired to Dallas I have spent the last 32 years working as an 
>>>> Electrical and Electronics Contractor and had my Research farm down 
>>>> in Hubbard, TXï¿½Battle Creek Farmsï¿½.
>>>>
>>>> You asked about technologies that Jim and I discussed and he 
>>>> deferred till we had the ï¿½VESï¿½ technology off the ground so to 
>>>> speak!There are several things that Jim was aware of that I want to 
>>>> develop in the future or put to Patent before I get too old.Rather 
>>>> ï¿½interestingï¿½!ï¿½ï¿½ James Warren passed 2012!ï¿½ (RIP)ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Literally 
>>>> hundreds of very interesting files to be posted. Norm
>>>>
>
References

<[email protected]>
<CY1PR14MB0583266999C719033C9F877BD0A60@CY1PR14MB0583.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Headers

Return-Path	<[email protected]>
X-Sender	[email protected]
X-Apparently-To	[email protected]
X-Received	(qmail 27578 invoked by uid 102); 11 Dec 2018 22:31:32 -0000
X-Received	from unknown (HELO mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.196.227.14) by m4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2018 22:31:32 -0000
X-Received	(qmail 15776 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2018 22:31:31 -0000
X-Received	from unknown (HELO mta4004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.218.140.75) by mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2018 22:31:31 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path	<[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF	none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG	DptYvwEWLDuaE..EgeB3XIJV5MukL_LSK2WyW7zuzfb0wcXO mMtK54t6C09zH6sTcz9MmswrADXqT2Fcs_3pm7pzuyltqSyZPBIzxnxhP_ws vfz6CqzWLziZVQlAOuU2x_QB_hymw5TSD5WQf007l64ekyU1MW11yhpZjfB4 7rgVvDTwmeqezPOJ7m85pnzXzCj77IMjlSqYRxUbQniAGWAKyldQnt0SSqK_ w4luFWt6EKzlYz8.aylpttmILxXnktrqwJML5CeBZyTaqCeCpJpUYunKns.X y4ve2838fyJmunoCqws26NnGLc1.qjjv.3x2bla6heOGh4MgvQ93Vn7F2hSl mzy6nEAJjFhMxl0tWyNmSyKp3q8ABp1GI92_qVHuo_pGLCSim4hWtzu.OkZh M7OwCPIVfWLE71FIEdd6055XnpYBZ8kFxjKi7eBcldzINUV5MfixpKl5Ie.E c9zsOsbXsSgyiNSbeLIrTOele694mg6ijdYfTZ28Kh5qI35RHvK2LEvaLVdT wloKiCh9XcMDRNSlSdFERRlJ6c0nCgRJ1.nPAdCX0qj_Ani9PnLCl3h.oJZo nxDZio9fv7IwTId37X2v07lzhz9hRHJzBSITevg5Pw.hEUvGWiMx9fELh4Ap _pewHzQ6qS_d8eav3LOyrYMnnMJ1LtwKr90W1QNwxCz95PdDb8.d4XwZzaYT lCjyprIKKC8E_AtwHQvxkc.3LfYqSgVjFGhpebtw2bdcaXRpIMmiHdg8b0uZ .xdLUSOIYappesUt88TlcyxwhjeYzrUZl7qEA8n2do2OnyyxV9a0A4QFbfe_ diFcRqrYyOx_YuAalTx1SoQUkg0ykNcfmlvB0Ycc7zHd_X0qWPytqXcJEa1x uXtCUcMEikfPXWrYJv2yj4Rag.KAwoCOdj7Apdqq.MEdpH1PYwjbYCaEROxb Tk5wlxeyj5klnIYjoPSMd3KMWgLYhv3816RvMma6MvzfQefoaIu89.0uhABm GvKzgH9kYABT_YH08uPI6WUEBOR5VXJSougKF5lK2dy2LE.ndsNeagfWxGl3 5VYseI4IISlYNOeaqpoVkMORNf9dy09.ktgkNsaakgT9D45IgqOCF8jMN0d5 lfmWr5_VjLHLMaSZEkEMwvfhhpRRDB2W2rh9fUGlI2z2LwWsv3bGDvuzR4.O sGNFdT1E3SBMWPAh_s26PmrOVoRj3Ja0H0SJsgBaJc9e.rxNgXKjGJb58luO 5_ZzWXx1wK_LrmhYxDp97M1QufqBD8AKxGQOcsDjWD7lV54K0z6TkQd37uoP ve0NXGLrZs1qe_dIxseDSbL01QNZEXQF
Authentication-Results	mta4004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=att.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=att.net; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received	from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic308-14.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.187.37) by mta4004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:31:30 +0000
X-YMail-OSG	Lhd2RQMVM1nE6XEWHepFuJ9VIwIc3fiz6i11eFzrAQhwnuBlO_IWTOVDmW_fpOJ _aXxuJGaPaCxavBXv8O7eN7_rv2kDWySWdaHIZoTUe2PpGkOuyJEQdVWOMTZoafnWrHcxd8uK6BY 7BmEPFv6.ADg8dkVGMklaO8wsuTVxX7dx25XrlEFD5o3IORVuz0YMAxF1ZvAU_irM4mv6cteMbrm 3GsB1R1jbE0RYvF.YlQYfKUAlzPlrxjInZedj_R2bR5k4z3n7rBsoQp4PqlXo0OQna.Q.wOtpsq5 tUWf4sOxzxFTWsvVmbFCdVG.PvuwIsiTGrncgivE436lRkL7gPBcIzEeRVwUnvr3KdrxXgy_UYpF 6eh73k0KwNXq4jcrcyTWeKFcUR0ekgEom3Tgc37i3cFiBHIRo4Hsd_MtAv5yLkSgp1e1sUjH4tqh C5qIh0U_tQPHUWgk_VpazaKhRwZfNM6gfCi2SYChaTQQy1AS0RRK3_3p0Eudpi4X5QcoJRtQPsjX vXiQTi8mi3sOYtp0Db5awkcDtiTJlUuv5c7nuuqLNoMI8FoEXhkHiMF_hv8LamYqfHOlVIxTrYki KwOiPbKMzbDnTtmJABX0oVSDLm07phv7ORW1gim_g5rkos.8cXankVowugWSHwNc5qj70GQFWrJT vhjKFzdhuzPW56T2o8tQwueRdr0UMl5MvfEHDiL1XGps_hgNUhbUt8CXwTKzwc.n8pWyTk6mqPq3 noM.pMutKwOF6bMNxFu2TzWkkbzohycToa9oNvhg8iWnHFxRgiJyk36TQf29rPyYvIiBkR_q1PLs l62bsUhColTvN6Vx8n1oCci6j6eIx68omxIQt0nh39C6nL1XAoI.G18LcIMQR_LgcFKbd8KY9oqJ TFgfMLHc5RLGYOp57HPBrVXTbE.mtrt43sOlh2DO0eOookJIEZJumX1eChzIbnXpq8u_lg52x8.u 6kqRCfzkNFQ50IoFYrl9Q76PzzJNsxSBZAqs.18a4kvoHe6iT1tIKhiZFYz8ebBcZBjwrZ1AiJon 1lTak7QJW3i0XLaEnLjcBZwoPT_dmL8AjaBnIGi.lvLTHBfmH7qOteKw-
X-Received	from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:31:30 +0000
X-Received	from ip70-189-27-193.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.5]) ([70.189.27.193]) by smtp407.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID c10868708cf6e00c04f674e7964061c7 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
To	[email protected]
References	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CY1PR14MB0583266999C719033C9F877BD0A60@CY1PR14MB0583.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
Date	Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:31:33 -0600
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<CY1PR14MB0583266999C719033C9F877BD0A60@CY1PR14MB0583.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type	multipart/alternative; boundary="------------986CE40E62A90E7F41F753FB"
Content-Language	en-US
X-Originating-IP	10.218.140.75
Subject	Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Norman Wootan Research Files.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post	member; u=554418533; y=bbJChQ9rOE0oEGk0I8JfmgyVgxmZ77OvFwk5ifSG9nBX9MBtOZ7OhU6j
X-Yahoo-Profile	[email protected]
From	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>