Re: Transverter

Body

Sorry Ole, I was actually addressing Sven's work,  with his inverter drive.Sorry Sven, I have made the error twice now. I certainly hope it is not a touch of senile dementia, on my part. Non the less, I am interested in your progress Sven,  with Hector's Rotoverter, as it is a most practical idea, if it can be made to work.My apologies, and CheersWARRENom Yahoo Mail on Android
 
 
  On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 9:13 AM, Warren Keillor<[email protected]> wrote:   OleHow are you doing with you Transverter experiments?The last time we heard, you had success with an adjustable inverter you had made, I believe?The beauty of the transverter concept is that there are no moving parts, and no capacitor switching to start up.It remains the big mystery, just how it compares with the 1.614, or 1.618 experiments using the rotoverter. How can it not be more efficient?
Further, it might have the ability to just be switched on, or off, with nothing additional needed, if you have a fixed load of some kind.This might make it practical for some applications, to run with out attention, unlike the rotoverter, which, as you know, must be adjusted, at start up.I know robots can take up the tedious work, like an Arduino, but keeping it simple is a commendable goal.How are you doing with these investigations of yours?Cheers Warren
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android