Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

http://www.fusion.ucla.edu/FNST/Renew_Presentations/Tuesday/5.7-Slough-ReNeW%20Theme%204%20talk.pdf

On 11/29/2018 7:02 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Ole, After reading Ivor Catt doc and understanding Alfven waves and 
> TEM we can get a better handle on the flux anninilation-reconnect 
> phenomenon in a common high amperage switching event arc (plasma). 
> See: 
> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/plasma-exp/research/MagFieldAnnihilation/index.html
>
> https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4560
>
> On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Hi Norman,
>>
>> Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional 
>> theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is Something' 
>> document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>
>> Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. 
>> There's no need for displacement current to explain electromagnetism. 
>> Just treat capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd sweet explains 
>> that every signal takes time to move between two separate points 
>> which prevents the instant propagation of displacement current. Ivor 
>> Catt describes capacitors as transmission lines 
>> (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal enters the 
>> capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points) and must travel 
>> to the edges of the foils making capacitors rolled up or stacked 
>> transmission lines with the laws governing transmission lines. Catt 
>> is or was controversial when introducing a third theory of 
>> transmission lines. The theory describing what happens the most 
>> accurate way must be the best one no matter if the old theoreticians 
>> like Newton Maxwell or Einstein are treated like gods in scientific 
>> circles. Engineers may have personal experience of the phenomena 
>> happening when designing devices and thus use whatever theory that 
>> can explain the observations no matter what is written in old books. 
>> I think this is also why Tesla laughed at the theoreticians because 
>> he had his own experiences to draw from while the theoreticians made 
>> thought experiments that didn't fit the actual observations. We must 
>> learn and get wiser if we want to progress and this even if having to 
>> change or discard established theory. This is what the scientific 
>> method is about. Don't be religious about scientific theories (or 
>> even about gods). Go for truth.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ole
>>
>>
>>
>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>
>> See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they did 
>> not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of energy being 
>> produced.
>>
>> On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>>     Hi Norman,
>>>
>>>     I like that. Go for how nature works even if not conventional.
>>>     The natural laws written in books are made by humans. Science is
>>>     about explaining them the right way even though some scientists
>>>     don't do it that way unless specific paid to do it the intended
>>>     way. According to transmission line theory the energy is running
>>>     in the space between the wires. At least this holds for good
>>>     conductors. Even good metallic conductors like silver have
>>>     resistance which dissipates the energy. Superconductors don't
>>>     have this problem but still have some max level where they can
>>>     guide the energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>>     conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of the
>>>     conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields to be
>>>     superconductive.
>>>
>>>     T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at extremely
>>>     small distances are extremely great. Or for fields at extremely
>>>     thin wires the field intensity is extremely high which can
>>>     ionize the air or dielectric to be able to move the energy.
>>>     Plasma is also a very good conductor that can have even negative
>>>     resistance characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes
>>>     out energy from the molecules that are hit by charged particles
>>>     making even more ions and charged particles.
>>>
>>>     I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted wires.
>>>     He knew about transmission line theory according to his document
>>>     'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor Catt and W.J.
>>>     Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess antigravity just
>>>     like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid theory must be able
>>>     to explain such phenomena.
>>>
>>>     Regards
>>>     Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>>     Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>     precisely what
>>>     is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>>     inverse to
>>>     our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All of the
>>>     conventional electric theory goes out the window when dealing
>>>     with a
>>>     totally inverted Magneto-Electric event. It all fits with our often
>>>     observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>>     carried over
>>>     very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event.  This
>>>     is not
>>>     your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>
>>>         On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>         > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>
>>