Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

http://scholarlypages.org/Articles/electronics-and-communication/jec-1-001.php?jid=electronics-and-communication

On 11/29/2018 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> See attached
>
> On 11/29/2018 7:34 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> http://www.fusion.ucla.edu/FNST/Renew_Presentations/Tuesday/5.7-Slough-ReNeW%20Theme%204%20talk.pdf
>>
>> On 11/29/2018 7:02 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Ole, After reading Ivor Catt doc and understanding Alfven waves and 
>>> TEM we can get a better handle on the flux anninilation-reconnect 
>>> phenomenon in a common high amperage switching event arc (plasma). 
>>> See: 
>>> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/plasma-exp/research/MagFieldAnnihilation/index.html
>>>
>>> https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4560
>>>
>>> On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>
>>>> Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional 
>>>> theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is Something' 
>>>> document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>>>
>>>> Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. 
>>>> There's no need for displacement current to explain 
>>>> electromagnetism. Just treat capacitors as transmission lines. 
>>>> Floyd sweet explains that every signal takes time to move between 
>>>> two separate points which prevents the instant propagation of 
>>>> displacement current. Ivor Catt describes capacitors as 
>>>> transmission lines (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). 
>>>> The signal enters the capacitor foils at a single point (or at two 
>>>> points) and must travel to the edges of the foils making capacitors 
>>>> rolled up or stacked transmission lines with the laws governing 
>>>> transmission lines. Catt is or was controversial when introducing a 
>>>> third theory of transmission lines. The theory describing what 
>>>> happens the most accurate way must be the best one no matter if the 
>>>> old theoreticians like Newton Maxwell or Einstein are treated like 
>>>> gods in scientific circles. Engineers may have personal experience 
>>>> of the phenomena happening when designing devices and thus use 
>>>> whatever theory that can explain the observations no matter what is 
>>>> written in old books. I think this is also why Tesla laughed at the 
>>>> theoreticians because he had his own experiences to draw from while 
>>>> the theoreticians made thought experiments that didn't fit the 
>>>> actual observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want to 
>>>> progress and this even if having to change or discard established 
>>>> theory. This is what the scientific method is about. Don't be 
>>>> religious about scientific theories (or even about gods). Go for truth.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>> See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they did 
>>>> not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of energy 
>>>> being produced.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     Hi Norman,
>>>>>
>>>>>     I like that. Go for how nature works even if not conventional.
>>>>>     The natural laws written in books are made by humans. Science
>>>>>     is about explaining them the right way even though some
>>>>>     scientists don't do it that way unless specific paid to do it
>>>>>     the intended way. According to transmission line theory the
>>>>>     energy is running in the space between the wires. At least
>>>>>     this holds for good conductors. Even good metallic conductors
>>>>>     like silver have resistance which dissipates the energy.
>>>>>     Superconductors don't have this problem but still have some
>>>>>     max level where they can guide the energy. Where the fields
>>>>>     meet the surface of the conductor the fields are mirrored.
>>>>>     Thus the surface of the conductor has to be a perfect mirror
>>>>>     of the fields to be superconductive.
>>>>>
>>>>>     T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at
>>>>>     extremely small distances are extremely great. Or for fields
>>>>>     at extremely thin wires the field intensity is extremely high
>>>>>     which can ionize the air or dielectric to be able to move the
>>>>>     energy. Plasma is also a very good conductor that can have
>>>>>     even negative resistance characteristics from impact
>>>>>     ionization. Thus it takes out energy from the molecules that
>>>>>     are hit by charged particles making even more ions and charged
>>>>>     particles.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted
>>>>>     wires. He knew about transmission line theory according to his
>>>>>     document 'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor Catt
>>>>>     and W.J. Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess
>>>>>     antigravity just like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid
>>>>>     theory must be able to explain such phenomena.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Regards
>>>>>     Ole
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>
>>>>>     Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>>>     precisely what
>>>>>     is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>>>>     inverse to
>>>>>     our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All of the
>>>>>     conventional electric theory goes out the window when dealing
>>>>>     with a
>>>>>     totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with our
>>>>>     often
>>>>>     observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>>>>     carried over
>>>>>     very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event. 
>>>>>     This is not
>>>>>     your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>>>
>>>>>         On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>         > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>>>
>>>>