Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

See attached

On 11/29/2018 7:34 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://www.fusion.ucla.edu/FNST/Renew_Presentations/Tuesday/5.7-Slough-ReNeW%20Theme%204%20talk.pdf
>
> On 11/29/2018 7:02 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Ole, After reading Ivor Catt doc and understanding Alfven waves and 
>> TEM we can get a better handle on the flux anninilation-reconnect 
>> phenomenon in a common high amperage switching event arc (plasma). 
>> See: 
>> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/plasma-exp/research/MagFieldAnnihilation/index.html
>>
>> https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4560
>>
>> On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional 
>>> theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is Something' 
>>> document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>>
>>> Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. 
>>> There's no need for displacement current to explain 
>>> electromagnetism. Just treat capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd 
>>> sweet explains that every signal takes time to move between two 
>>> separate points which prevents the instant propagation of 
>>> displacement current. Ivor Catt describes capacitors as transmission 
>>> lines (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal 
>>> enters the capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points) and 
>>> must travel to the edges of the foils making capacitors rolled up or 
>>> stacked transmission lines with the laws governing transmission 
>>> lines. Catt is or was controversial when introducing a third theory 
>>> of transmission lines. The theory describing what happens the most 
>>> accurate way must be the best one no matter if the old theoreticians 
>>> like Newton Maxwell or Einstein are treated like gods in scientific 
>>> circles. Engineers may have personal experience of the phenomena 
>>> happening when designing devices and thus use whatever theory that 
>>> can explain the observations no matter what is written in old books. 
>>> I think this is also why Tesla laughed at the theoreticians because 
>>> he had his own experiences to draw from while the theoreticians made 
>>> thought experiments that didn't fit the actual observations. We must 
>>> learn and get wiser if we want to progress and this even if having 
>>> to change or discard established theory. This is what the scientific 
>>> method is about. Don't be religious about scientific theories (or 
>>> even about gods). Go for truth.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>> See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they did 
>>> not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of energy being 
>>> produced.
>>>
>>> On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>     Hi Norman,
>>>>
>>>>     I like that. Go for how nature works even if not conventional.
>>>>     The natural laws written in books are made by humans. Science
>>>>     is about explaining them the right way even though some
>>>>     scientists don't do it that way unless specific paid to do it
>>>>     the intended way. According to transmission line theory the
>>>>     energy is running in the space between the wires. At least this
>>>>     holds for good conductors. Even good metallic conductors like
>>>>     silver have resistance which dissipates the energy.
>>>>     Superconductors don't have this problem but still have some max
>>>>     level where they can guide the energy. Where the fields meet
>>>>     the surface of the conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the
>>>>     surface of the conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the
>>>>     fields to be superconductive.
>>>>
>>>>     T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at extremely
>>>>     small distances are extremely great. Or for fields at extremely
>>>>     thin wires the field intensity is extremely high which can
>>>>     ionize the air or dielectric to be able to move the energy.
>>>>     Plasma is also a very good conductor that can have even
>>>>     negative resistance characteristics from impact ionization.
>>>>     Thus it takes out energy from the molecules that are hit by
>>>>     charged particles making even more ions and charged particles.
>>>>
>>>>     I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted
>>>>     wires. He knew about transmission line theory according to his
>>>>     document 'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor Catt
>>>>     and W.J. Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess
>>>>     antigravity just like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid
>>>>     theory must be able to explain such phenomena.
>>>>
>>>>     Regards
>>>>     Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>>     Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>>     precisely what
>>>>     is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>>>     inverse to
>>>>     our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All of the
>>>>     conventional electric theory goes out the window when dealing
>>>>     with a
>>>>     totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with our
>>>>     often
>>>>     observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>>>     carried over
>>>>     very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event. 
>>>>     This is not
>>>>     your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>>
>>>>         On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>         > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>>
>>>