Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

Ole, After reading Ivor Catt doc and understanding Alfven waves and TEM 
we can get a better handle on the flux anninilation-reconnect phenomenon 
in a common high amperage switching event arc (plasma). See: 
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/plasma-exp/research/MagFieldAnnihilation/index.html

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4560

On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional theory. 
> Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is Something' document: 
> http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>
> Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. 
> There's no need for displacement current to explain electromagnetism. 
> Just treat capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd sweet explains that 
> every signal takes time to move between two separate points which 
> prevents the instant propagation of displacement current. Ivor Catt 
> describes capacitors as transmission lines 
> (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal enters the 
> capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points) and must travel 
> to the edges of the foils making capacitors rolled up or stacked 
> transmission lines with the laws governing transmission lines. Catt is 
> or was controversial when introducing a third theory of transmission 
> lines. The theory describing what happens the most accurate way must 
> be the best one no matter if the old theoreticians like Newton Maxwell 
> or Einstein are treated like gods in scientific circles. Engineers may 
> have personal experience of the phenomena happening when designing 
> devices and thus use whatever theory that can explain the observations 
> no matter what is written in old books. I think this is also why Tesla 
> laughed at the theoreticians because he had his own experiences to 
> draw from while the theoreticians made thought experiments that didn't 
> fit the actual observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want to 
> progress and this even if having to change or discard established 
> theory. This is what the scientific method is about. Don't be 
> religious about scientific theories (or even about gods). Go for truth.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>
> See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they did 
> not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of energy being 
> produced.
>
> On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>>     Hi Norman,
>>
>>     I like that. Go for how nature works even if not conventional.
>>     The natural laws written in books are made by humans. Science is
>>     about explaining them the right way even though some scientists
>>     don't do it that way unless specific paid to do it the intended
>>     way. According to transmission line theory the energy is running
>>     in the space between the wires. At least this holds for good
>>     conductors. Even good metallic conductors like silver have
>>     resistance which dissipates the energy. Superconductors don't
>>     have this problem but still have some max level where they can
>>     guide the energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>     conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of the
>>     conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields to be
>>     superconductive.
>>
>>     T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at extremely
>>     small distances are extremely great. Or for fields at extremely
>>     thin wires the field intensity is extremely high which can ionize
>>     the air or dielectric to be able to move the energy. Plasma is
>>     also a very good conductor that can have even negative resistance
>>     characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes out energy
>>     from the molecules that are hit by charged particles making even
>>     more ions and charged particles.
>>
>>     I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted wires.
>>     He knew about transmission line theory according to his document
>>     'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor Catt and W.J.
>>     Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess antigravity just
>>     like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid theory must be able to
>>     explain such phenomena.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Ole
>>
>>
>>
>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>
>>     Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is precisely
>>     what
>>     is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>     inverse to
>>     our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All of the
>>     conventional electric theory goes out the window when dealing with a
>>     totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with our often
>>     observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>     carried over
>>     very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event.  This
>>     is not
>>     your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>
>>         On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>         > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>
>