Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

I acquired the display piece from Stanford University Physics Dept. 
Linear Accelerator Lab, (SLAC) which was a Van de Graff 6 ft tall with 
chrome dome, rubber belt and all. I donated it to the Tesla Museum at 
Colorado Springs. I built all sorts of influence machines, Whinshurst, 
Holtz etc. Lot of fun experimenting with them. I never bought the theory 
of how they worked from High School Science Class.  Lots more going on 
here.  L>ol

On 11/28/2018 1:15 PM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norman
>
> I made a Van De Graaff generator about five feet high with an 18" 
> steel ball on top.
> It was steel because at that time I was able to form, and weld steel 
> very easily, as opposed to some other metals. I spun the steel in 
> hemispheres, on the lathe over a laminated wood form, then weld the 
> two halves together, after detailing the method of attachment to the 
> plastic column. I curved the hole in a gentle radius into the inside 
> of tje sphere, having no sharp edges.
> Surprisingly, this Van De Graaff worked rather well, reliably giving a 
> 14" spark every few seconds.
> I drove it with a dc shunt wound Bodine motor of 1/10 hp
> It just ran a rubber belt between pulleys with wire brushes at either 
> end of the belt. That seems to be the entire load of the motor, under 
> all conditions.
> Cheers Warren
> .
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 1:04 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Yeeeeeaaaaaah.    I agree for I am serious about the conductive 
>     dielectric. Still studying the Felici Hydrogen dielectric
>     Electrostatic Generator. Amazing, for we have a lot to learn.
>
>     On 11/28/2018 10:06 AM, Warren Keillor
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Norman
>>
>>     Crossing the carpet in your bunny slippers, only to get the shock
>>     of your life, touching the door knob?
>>     The dielectric, when not moisture sodden, and conductive, becomes
>>     alive, as it dries, and rubs against other dielectrics.
>>     Lets start saving examples of the phenomenon, we observe.
>>     Cheers Warren
>>     Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>     <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>         On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 6:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>         Ole, this is all so correct. I have lived and learned just
>>         enough to be dangerous.  Lol When I first hand witness an
>>         anomalous event in electrical applications, my response is
>>         curiosity instead of writing it off as most folks do. A
>>         thought that has been popping up in my mind is the definition
>>         of reciprocal, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reciprocal
>>         where in conventional theory we have copper or other metals
>>         as conductors where as in the opposite (negative energy) the
>>         dielectric is the conductor and the metals become the
>>         dielectric. Maybe we are looking in the wrong places for our
>>         solution. Just a thought. Bearden told me once to think
>>         opposite. BTW, Joel & I made a trip to Atlanta, GA in spring
>>         of 1995 to demonstrate our MRA device to the Procurement
>>         Officer of IBM Corp. and two of his EE engineering. They were
>>         blown away with what they saw and we were told that IBM had a
>>         blank check for our technology if we could successfully get a
>>         Patent. Dr. Bass, Hughes Aircraft was our Patent Attorney. 
>>         On return trip back to Dallas we stopped at Tom Beardens
>>         place in Huntsville, AL and gave him a working MRA device at
>>         which time he totally explained his MEG device for which he
>>         was assembling a team to do the Patent.  Bearden fully
>>         explained all that Floyd Sweet had divulged regarding the
>>         Negative Energy and the incompatibility in our frame of
>>         reference. Thoughts?    Norm
>>
>>         On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hi Norman,
>>>
>>>         Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the
>>>         conventional theory. Here is a searchable version of the
>>>         'Nothing is Something' document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>>
>>>         Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt:
>>>         http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. There's no need for
>>>         displacement current to explain electromagnetism. Just treat
>>>         capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd sweet explains that
>>>         every signal takes time to move between two separate points
>>>         which prevents the instant propagation of displacement
>>>         current. Ivor Catt describes capacitors as transmission
>>>         lines (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The
>>>         signal enters the capacitor foils at a single point (or at
>>>         two points) and must travel to the edges of the foils making
>>>         capacitors rolled up or stacked transmission lines with the
>>>         laws governing transmission lines. Catt is or was
>>>         controversial when introducing a third theory of
>>>         transmission lines. The theory describing what happens the
>>>         most accurate way must be the best one no matter if the old
>>>         theoreticians like Newton Maxwell or Einstein are treated
>>>         like gods in scientific circles. Engineers may have personal
>>>         experience of the phenomena happening when designing devices
>>>         and thus use whatever theory that can explain the
>>>         observations no matter what is written in old books. I think
>>>         this is also why Tesla laughed at the theoreticians because
>>>         he had his own experiences to draw from while the
>>>         theoreticians made thought experiments that didn't fit the
>>>         actual observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want
>>>         to progress and this even if having to change or discard
>>>         established theory. This is what the scientific method is
>>>         about. Don't be religious about scientific theories (or even
>>>         about gods). Go for truth.
>>>
>>>         Regards
>>>         Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         ---In [email protected]
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>, <nwootan@...>
>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>>         See attachments. Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that
>>>         they did not know how to capture and utilize the strange
>>>         form of energy being produced.
>>>
>>>         On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>>         [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>>             Hi Norman,
>>>>
>>>>             I like that. Go for how nature works even if not
>>>>             conventional. The natural laws written in books are
>>>>             made by humans. Science is about explaining them the
>>>>             right way even though some scientists don't do it that
>>>>             way unless specific paid to do it the intended way.
>>>>             According to transmission line theory the energy is
>>>>             running in the space between the wires. At least this
>>>>             holds for good conductors. Even good metallic
>>>>             conductors like silver have resistance which dissipates
>>>>             the energy. Superconductors don't have this problem but
>>>>             still have some max level where they can guide the
>>>>             energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>>>             conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of
>>>>             the conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields
>>>>             to be superconductive.
>>>>
>>>>             T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at
>>>>             extremely small distances are extremely great. Or for
>>>>             fields at extremely thin wires the field intensity is
>>>>             extremely high which can ionize the air or dielectric
>>>>             to be able to move the energy. Plasma is also a very
>>>>             good conductor that can have even negative resistance
>>>>             characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes
>>>>             out energy from the molecules that are hit by charged
>>>>             particles making even more ions and charged particles.
>>>>
>>>>             I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets
>>>>             frosted wires. He knew about transmission line theory
>>>>             according to his document 'Nothing is Something' where
>>>>             he refers to Ivor Catt and W.J. Hooper. His device was
>>>>             also claimed to possess antigravity just like the
>>>>             device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid theory must be able
>>>>             to explain such phenomena.
>>>>
>>>>             Regards
>>>>             Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             ---In [email protected]
>>>>             <mailto:[email protected]>, <nwootan@...>
>>>>             <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>>             Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>>             precisely what
>>>>             is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is
>>>>             totally inverse to
>>>>             our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice.
>>>>             All of the
>>>>             conventional electric theory goes out the window when
>>>>             dealing with a
>>>>             totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits
>>>>             with our often
>>>>             observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and
>>>>             voltages carried over
>>>>             very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the
>>>>             event.  This is not
>>>>             your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>>
>>>>                 On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>                 <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>                 > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>>
>