Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

https://www.space.com/29903-sun-xray-light-nasa-nustar-image.html

On 11/28/2018 12:32 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> *TEOTWAWKI* is an acronym for *T*he *E*nd *O*f *T*he *W*orld *A*s *W*e 
> *K*now *I*t. TEOTWAKI describes any event that plunges an organized 
> society into a new order of survival and self-sufficiency.   See: 
> attachment.
>
> On 11/28/2018 12:04 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Yeeeeeaaaaaah.    I agree for I am serious about the conductive  
>> dielectric. Still studying the Felici Hydrogen dielectric 
>> Electrostatic Generator.   Amazing, for we have a lot to learn.
>>
>> On 11/28/2018 10:06 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Norman
>>>
>>> Crossing the carpet in your bunny slippers, only to get the shock of 
>>> your life, touching the door knob?
>>> The dielectric, when not moisture sodden, and conductive, becomes 
>>> alive, as it dries, and rubs against other dielectrics.
>>> Lets start saving examples of the phenomenon, we observe.
>>> Cheers Warren
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 6:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>     [EVGRAY]
>>>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Ole, this is all so correct. I have lived and learned just
>>>     enough to be dangerous.  Lol  When I first hand witness an
>>>     anomalous event in electrical applications, my response is
>>>     curiosity instead of writing it off as most folks do. A thought
>>>     that has been popping up in my mind is the definition of
>>>     reciprocal, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reciprocal where
>>>     in conventional theory we have copper or other metals as
>>>     conductors where as in the opposite (negative energy) the
>>>     dielectric is the conductor and the metals become the
>>>     dielectric.  Maybe we are looking in the wrong places for our
>>>     solution. Just a thought.   Bearden told me once to think
>>>     opposite.   BTW, Joel & I made a trip to Atlanta, GA in spring
>>>     of 1995 to demonstrate our MRA device to the Procurement Officer
>>>     of IBM Corp. and two of his EE engineering. They were blown away
>>>     with what they saw and we were told that IBM had a blank check
>>>     for our technology if we could successfully get a Patent. Dr.
>>>     Bass, Hughes Aircraft was our Patent Attorney.  On return trip
>>>     back to Dallas we stopped at Tom Beardens place in Huntsville,
>>>     AL and gave him a working MRA device at which time he totally
>>>     explained his MEG device for which he was assembling a team to
>>>     do the Patent.  Bearden fully explained all that Floyd Sweet had
>>>     divulged regarding the Negative Energy and the incompatibility
>>>     in our frame of reference. Thoughts?    Norm
>>>
>>>     On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected]
>>>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi Norman,
>>>>
>>>>     Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional
>>>>     theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is
>>>>     Something' document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>>>
>>>>     Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt:
>>>>     http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. There's no need for
>>>>     displacement current to explain electromagnetism. Just treat
>>>>     capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd sweet explains that
>>>>     every signal takes time to move between two separate points
>>>>     which prevents the instant propagation of displacement current.
>>>>     Ivor Catt describes capacitors as transmission lines
>>>>     (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal
>>>>     enters the capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points)
>>>>     and must travel to the edges of the foils making capacitors
>>>>     rolled up or stacked transmission lines with the laws governing
>>>>     transmission lines. Catt is or was controversial when
>>>>     introducing a third theory of transmission lines. The theory
>>>>     describing what happens the most accurate way must be the best
>>>>     one no matter if the old theoreticians like Newton Maxwell or
>>>>     Einstein are treated like gods in scientific circles. Engineers
>>>>     may have personal experience of the phenomena happening when
>>>>     designing devices and thus use whatever theory that can explain
>>>>     the observations no matter what is written in old books. I
>>>>     think this is also why Tesla laughed at the theoreticians
>>>>     because he had his own experiences to draw from while the
>>>>     theoreticians made thought experiments that didn't fit the
>>>>     actual observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want to
>>>>     progress and this even if having to change or discard
>>>>     established theory. This is what the scientific method is
>>>>     about. Don't be religious about scientific theories (or even
>>>>     about gods). Go for truth.
>>>>
>>>>     Regards
>>>>     Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>>     See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they
>>>>     did not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of
>>>>     energy being produced.
>>>>
>>>>     On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>>>     [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>         Hi Norman,
>>>>>
>>>>>         I like that. Go for how nature works even if not
>>>>>         conventional. The natural laws written in books are made
>>>>>         by humans. Science is about explaining them the right way
>>>>>         even though some scientists don't do it that way unless
>>>>>         specific paid to do it the intended way. According to
>>>>>         transmission line theory the energy is running in the
>>>>>         space between the wires. At least this holds for good
>>>>>         conductors. Even good metallic conductors like silver have
>>>>>         resistance which dissipates the energy. Superconductors
>>>>>         don't have this problem but still have some max level
>>>>>         where they can guide the energy. Where the fields meet the
>>>>>         surface of the conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the
>>>>>         surface of the conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the
>>>>>         fields to be superconductive.
>>>>>
>>>>>         T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at
>>>>>         extremely small distances are extremely great. Or for
>>>>>         fields at extremely thin wires the field intensity is
>>>>>         extremely high which can ionize the air or dielectric to
>>>>>         be able to move the energy. Plasma is also a very good
>>>>>         conductor that can have even negative resistance
>>>>>         characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes out
>>>>>         energy from the molecules that are hit by charged
>>>>>         particles making even more ions and charged particles.
>>>>>
>>>>>         I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted
>>>>>         wires. He knew about transmission line theory according to
>>>>>         his document 'Nothing is Something' where he refers to
>>>>>         Ivor Catt and W.J. Hooper. His device was also claimed to
>>>>>         possess antigravity just like the device of Alexy
>>>>>         Chekurov. A valid theory must be able to explain such
>>>>>         phenomena.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Regards
>>>>>         Ole
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         ---In [email protected]
>>>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>, <nwootan@...>
>>>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>
>>>>>         Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>>>         precisely what
>>>>>         is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is
>>>>>         totally inverse to
>>>>>         our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All
>>>>>         of the
>>>>>         conventional electric theory goes out the window when
>>>>>         dealing with a
>>>>>         totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with
>>>>>         our often
>>>>>         observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and
>>>>>         voltages carried over
>>>>>         very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the
>>>>>         event.  This is not
>>>>>         your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>>>
>>>>>             On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>             <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>             > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>>>
>>>