Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

*TEOTWAWKI* is an acronym for *T*he *E*nd *O*f *T*he *W*orld *A*s *W*e 
*K*now *I*t. TEOTWAKI describes any event that plunges an organized 
society into a new order of survival and self-sufficiency.   See: 
attachment.

On 11/28/2018 12:04 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Yeeeeeaaaaaah.    I agree for I am serious about the conductive  
> dielectric. Still studying the Felici Hydrogen dielectric 
> Electrostatic Generator.   Amazing, for we have a lot to learn.
>
> On 11/28/2018 10:06 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>> Norman
>>
>> Crossing the carpet in your bunny slippers, only to get the shock of 
>> your life, touching the door knob?
>> The dielectric, when not moisture sodden, and conductive, becomes 
>> alive, as it dries, and rubs against other dielectrics.
>> Lets start saving examples of the phenomenon, we observe.
>> Cheers Warren
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>     On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 6:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>     [EVGRAY]
>>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     Ole, this is all so correct. I have lived and learned just enough
>>     to be dangerous.  Lol  When I first hand witness an anomalous
>>     event in electrical applications, my response is curiosity
>>     instead of writing it off as most folks do. A thought that has
>>     been popping up in my mind is the definition of reciprocal,
>>     https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reciprocal where in
>>     conventional theory we have copper or other metals as conductors
>>     where as in the opposite (negative energy) the dielectric is the
>>     conductor and the metals become the dielectric. Maybe we are
>>     looking in the wrong places for our solution.  Just a thought.
>>     Bearden told me once to think opposite.   BTW, Joel & I made a
>>     trip to Atlanta, GA in spring of 1995 to demonstrate our MRA
>>     device to the Procurement Officer of IBM Corp. and two of his EE
>>     engineering. They were blown away with what they saw and we were
>>     told that IBM had a blank check for our technology if we could
>>     successfully get a Patent. Dr. Bass, Hughes Aircraft was our
>>     Patent Attorney.  On return trip back to Dallas we stopped at Tom
>>     Beardens place in Huntsville, AL and gave him a working MRA
>>     device at which time he totally explained his MEG device for
>>     which he was assembling a team to do the Patent.  Bearden fully
>>     explained all that Floyd Sweet had divulged regarding the
>>     Negative Energy and the incompatibility in our frame of
>>     reference. Thoughts?    Norm
>>
>>     On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Norman,
>>>
>>>     Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional
>>>     theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is
>>>     Something' document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>>
>>>     Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm.
>>>     There's no need for displacement current to explain
>>>     electromagnetism. Just treat capacitors as transmission lines.
>>>     Floyd sweet explains that every signal takes time to move
>>>     between two separate points which prevents the instant
>>>     propagation of displacement current. Ivor Catt describes
>>>     capacitors as transmission lines
>>>     (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal
>>>     enters the capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points)
>>>     and must travel to the edges of the foils making capacitors
>>>     rolled up or stacked transmission lines with the laws governing
>>>     transmission lines. Catt is or was controversial when
>>>     introducing a third theory of transmission lines. The theory
>>>     describing what happens the most accurate way must be the best
>>>     one no matter if the old theoreticians like Newton Maxwell or
>>>     Einstein are treated like gods in scientific circles. Engineers
>>>     may have personal experience of the phenomena happening when
>>>     designing devices and thus use whatever theory that can explain
>>>     the observations no matter what is written in old books. I think
>>>     this is also why Tesla laughed at the theoreticians because he
>>>     had his own experiences to draw from while the theoreticians
>>>     made thought experiments that didn't fit the actual
>>>     observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want to progress
>>>     and this even if having to change or discard established theory.
>>>     This is what the scientific method is about. Don't be religious
>>>     about scientific theories (or even about gods). Go for truth.
>>>
>>>     Regards
>>>     Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>>     See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they
>>>     did not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of
>>>     energy being produced.
>>>
>>>     On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>>     [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>>         Hi Norman,
>>>>
>>>>         I like that. Go for how nature works even if not
>>>>         conventional. The natural laws written in books are made by
>>>>         humans. Science is about explaining them the right way even
>>>>         though some scientists don't do it that way unless specific
>>>>         paid to do it the intended way. According to transmission
>>>>         line theory the energy is running in the space between the
>>>>         wires. At least this holds for good conductors. Even good
>>>>         metallic conductors like silver have resistance which
>>>>         dissipates the energy. Superconductors don't have this
>>>>         problem but still have some max level where they can guide
>>>>         the energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>>>         conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of the
>>>>         conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields to be
>>>>         superconductive.
>>>>
>>>>         T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at
>>>>         extremely small distances are extremely great. Or for
>>>>         fields at extremely thin wires the field intensity is
>>>>         extremely high which can ionize the air or dielectric to be
>>>>         able to move the energy. Plasma is also a very good
>>>>         conductor that can have even negative resistance
>>>>         characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes out
>>>>         energy from the molecules that are hit by charged particles
>>>>         making even more ions and charged particles.
>>>>
>>>>         I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted
>>>>         wires. He knew about transmission line theory according to
>>>>         his document 'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor
>>>>         Catt and W.J. Hooper. His device was also claimed to
>>>>         possess antigravity just like the device of Alexy Chekurov.
>>>>         A valid theory must be able to explain such phenomena.
>>>>
>>>>         Regards
>>>>         Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         ---In [email protected]
>>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>, <nwootan@...>
>>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>>         Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>>         precisely what
>>>>         is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is
>>>>         totally inverse to
>>>>         our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All
>>>>         of the
>>>>         conventional electric theory goes out the window when
>>>>         dealing with a
>>>>         totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with
>>>>         our often
>>>>         observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>>>         carried over
>>>>         very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event. 
>>>>         This is not
>>>>         your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>>
>>>>             On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>             <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>             > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>>
>>