Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

Yeeeeeaaaaaah.    I agree for I am serious about the conductive 
dielectric. Still studying the Felici Hydrogen dielectric Electrostatic 
Generator.   Amazing, for we have a lot to learn.

On 11/28/2018 10:06 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Norman
>
> Crossing the carpet in your bunny slippers, only to get the shock of 
> your life, touching the door knob?
> The dielectric, when not moisture sodden, and conductive, becomes 
> alive, as it dries, and rubs against other dielectrics.
> Lets start saving examples of the phenomenon, we observe.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 6:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Ole, this is all so correct. I have lived and learned just enough
>     to be dangerous. Lol  When I first hand witness an anomalous event
>     in electrical applications, my response is curiosity instead of
>     writing it off as most folks do. A thought that has been popping
>     up in my mind is the definition of reciprocal,
>     https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reciprocal where in conventional
>     theory we have copper or other metals as conductors where as in
>     the opposite (negative energy) the dielectric is the conductor and
>     the metals become the dielectric.  Maybe we are looking in the
>     wrong places for our solution.  Just a thought.   Bearden told me
>     once to think opposite.   BTW, Joel & I made a trip to Atlanta, GA
>     in spring of 1995 to demonstrate our MRA device to the Procurement
>     Officer of IBM Corp. and two of his EE engineering. They were
>     blown away with what they saw and we were told that IBM had a
>     blank check for our technology if we could successfully get a
>     Patent. Dr. Bass, Hughes Aircraft was our Patent Attorney.  On
>     return trip back to Dallas we stopped at Tom Beardens place in
>     Huntsville, AL and gave him a working MRA device at which time he
>     totally explained his MEG device for which he was assembling a
>     team to do the Patent.  Bearden fully explained all that Floyd
>     Sweet had divulged regarding the Negative Energy and the
>     incompatibility in our frame of reference. Thoughts?    Norm
>
>     On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Norman,
>>
>>     Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional
>>     theory. Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is
>>     Something' document: http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>>
>>     Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm.
>>     There's no need for displacement current to explain
>>     electromagnetism. Just treat capacitors as transmission lines.
>>     Floyd sweet explains that every signal takes time to move between
>>     two separate points which prevents the instant propagation of
>>     displacement current. Ivor Catt describes capacitors as
>>     transmission lines
>>     (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal enters
>>     the capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points) and must
>>     travel to the edges of the foils making capacitors rolled up or
>>     stacked transmission lines with the laws governing transmission
>>     lines. Catt is or was controversial when introducing a third
>>     theory of transmission lines. The theory describing what happens
>>     the most accurate way must be the best one no matter if the old
>>     theoreticians like Newton Maxwell or Einstein are treated like
>>     gods in scientific circles. Engineers may have personal
>>     experience of the phenomena happening when designing devices and
>>     thus use whatever theory that can explain the observations no
>>     matter what is written in old books. I think this is also why
>>     Tesla laughed at the theoreticians because he had his own
>>     experiences to draw from while the theoreticians made thought
>>     experiments that didn't fit the actual observations. We must
>>     learn and get wiser if we want to progress and this even if
>>     having to change or discard established theory. This is what the
>>     scientific method is about. Don't be religious about scientific
>>     theories (or even about gods). Go for truth.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Ole
>>
>>
>>
>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>
>>     See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they
>>     did not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of
>>     energy being produced.
>>
>>     On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>     [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>>         Hi Norman,
>>>
>>>         I like that. Go for how nature works even if not
>>>         conventional. The natural laws written in books are made by
>>>         humans. Science is about explaining them the right way even
>>>         though some scientists don't do it that way unless specific
>>>         paid to do it the intended way. According to transmission
>>>         line theory the energy is running in the space between the
>>>         wires. At least this holds for good conductors. Even good
>>>         metallic conductors like silver have resistance which
>>>         dissipates the energy. Superconductors don't have this
>>>         problem but still have some max level where they can guide
>>>         the energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>>         conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of the
>>>         conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields to be
>>>         superconductive.
>>>
>>>         T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at
>>>         extremely small distances are extremely great. Or for fields
>>>         at extremely thin wires the field intensity is extremely
>>>         high which can ionize the air or dielectric to be able to
>>>         move the energy. Plasma is also a very good conductor that
>>>         can have even negative resistance characteristics from
>>>         impact ionization. Thus it takes out energy from the
>>>         molecules that are hit by charged particles making even more
>>>         ions and charged particles.
>>>
>>>         I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted
>>>         wires. He knew about transmission line theory according to
>>>         his document 'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor
>>>         Catt and W.J. Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess
>>>         antigravity just like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid
>>>         theory must be able to explain such phenomena.
>>>
>>>         Regards
>>>         Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         ---In [email protected]
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]>, <nwootan@...>
>>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>>         Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is
>>>         precisely what
>>>         is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>>         inverse to
>>>         our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All
>>>         of the
>>>         conventional electric theory goes out the window when
>>>         dealing with a
>>>         totally inverted Magneto-Electric event. It all fits with
>>>         our often
>>>         observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>>         carried over
>>>         very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event. 
>>>         This is not
>>>         your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>>
>>>             On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>             <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>             > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>>
>