Re: Neutral Spike Re: [EVGRAY] Vehicle audio - Wikipedia

Body

Ole, this is all so correct. I have lived and learned just enough to be 
dangerous.  Lol  When I first hand witness an anomalous event in 
electrical applications, my response is curiosity instead of writing it 
off as most folks do. A thought that has been popping up in my mind is 
the definition of reciprocal, 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reciprocal  where in conventional 
theory we have copper or other metals as conductors where as in the 
opposite (negative energy) the dielectric is the conductor and the 
metals become the dielectric.  Maybe we are looking in the wrong places 
for our solution.  Just a thought. Bearden told me once to think 
opposite.   BTW, Joel & I made a trip to Atlanta, GA in spring of 1995 
to demonstrate our MRA device to the Procurement Officer of IBM Corp. 
and two of his EE engineering. They were blown away with what they saw 
and we were told that IBM had a blank check for our technology if we 
could successfully get a Patent. Dr. Bass, Hughes Aircraft was our 
Patent Attorney.  On return trip back to Dallas we stopped at Tom 
Beardens place in Huntsville, AL and gave him a working MRA device at 
which time he totally explained his MEG device for which he was 
assembling a team to do the Patent.  Bearden fully explained all that 
Floyd Sweet had divulged regarding the Negative Energy and the 
incompatibility in our frame of reference. Thoughts?    Norm

On 11/27/2018 7:47 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> Sweet refers to Ivor Catt's theory instead of the conventional theory. 
> Here is a searchable version of the 'Nothing is Something' document: 
> http://jnaudin.free.fr/vta/.
>
> Electromagnetism I by Ivor Catt: http://www.ivorcatt.com/em.htm. 
> There's no need for displacement current to explain electromagnetism. 
> Just treat capacitors as transmission lines. Floyd sweet explains that 
> every signal takes time to move between two separate points which 
> prevents the instant propagation of displacement current. Ivor Catt 
> describes capacitors as transmission lines 
> (http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrwiworld78dec1.htm). The signal enters the 
> capacitor foils at a single point (or at two points) and must travel 
> to the edges of the foils making capacitors rolled up or stacked 
> transmission lines with the laws governing transmission lines. Catt is 
> or was controversial when introducing a third theory of transmission 
> lines. The theory describing what happens the most accurate way must 
> be the best one no matter if the old theoreticians like Newton Maxwell 
> or Einstein are treated like gods in scientific circles. Engineers may 
> have personal experience of the phenomena happening when designing 
> devices and thus use whatever theory that can explain the observations 
> no matter what is written in old books. I think this is also why Tesla 
> laughed at the theoreticians because he had his own experiences to 
> draw from while the theoreticians made thought experiments that didn't 
> fit the actual observations. We must learn and get wiser if we want to 
> progress and this even if having to change or discard established 
> theory. This is what the scientific method is about. Don't be 
> religious about scientific theories (or even about gods). Go for truth.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>
> See attachments.   Ole, Sweet & Bearden both admitted that they did 
> not know how to capture and utilize the strange form of energy being 
> produced.
>
> On 11/27/2018 7:27 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>>     Hi Norman,
>>
>>     I like that. Go for how nature works even if not conventional.
>>     The natural laws written in books are made by humans. Science is
>>     about explaining them the right way even though some scientists
>>     don't do it that way unless specific paid to do it the intended
>>     way. According to transmission line theory the energy is running
>>     in the space between the wires. At least this holds for good
>>     conductors. Even good metallic conductors like silver have
>>     resistance which dissipates the energy. Superconductors don't
>>     have this problem but still have some max level where they can
>>     guide the energy. Where the fields meet the surface of the
>>     conductor the fields are mirrored. Thus the surface of the
>>     conductor has to be a perfect mirror of the fields to be
>>     superconductive.
>>
>>     T.J.J. See formulated it something like the forces at extremely
>>     small distances are extremely great. Or for fields at extremely
>>     thin wires the field intensity is extremely high which can ionize
>>     the air or dielectric to be able to move the energy. Plasma is
>>     also a very good conductor that can have even negative resistance
>>     characteristics from impact ionization. Thus it takes out energy
>>     from the molecules that are hit by charged particles making even
>>     more ions and charged particles.
>>
>>     I would like to see a replication of Floyd Sweets frosted wires.
>>     He knew about transmission line theory according to his document
>>     'Nothing is Something' where he refers to Ivor Catt and W.J.
>>     Hooper. His device was also claimed to possess antigravity just
>>     like the device of Alexy Chekurov. A valid theory must be able to
>>     explain such phenomena.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Ole
>>
>>
>>
>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>     <nwootan@...> <mailto:nwootan@...> wrote :
>>
>>     Ole, your quote,( a very penetrating magnetic field) is precisely
>>     what
>>     is described as the Magneto-Electric effect which is totally
>>     inverse to
>>     our conventional Electro-magnetic theory and practice. All of the
>>     conventional electric theory goes out the window when dealing with a
>>     totally inverted Magneto-Electric event.  It all fits with our often
>>     observed anomalies such as tremendous currents and voltages
>>     carried over
>>     very small conductors doing fantastic damage in the event.  This
>>     is not
>>     your Dads Oldsmobile.
>>
>>         On 11/27/2018 4:15 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>         <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>         > a very penetrating magnetic field. 
>>
>