Body
Norm,
OK now I can see another reason why you like page 25 so much.
Light can be captured and stored in a bottle of sorts with phase
conjugate mirrors, how long is debatable and very expensive to find out
but the time constant compared to wavelength is as molasses . Funny
that I almost added at the end of my last post many years from now if
sapiens are still here and have not degenerated and continued to mature
technically, the light perhaps from a high power flashlight now will be
somehow turned into sizable power.
But you're right this gets into theoretical quantum tunneling stuff that
if in existence is probably at the lowest story of a NORAD equivalent or
some such.
Or ask Hector he claims he can slow down light so may have thought of a
way to capture the event directly by slowing it down and suctioning off
the heat, rf or mag flux.
So I guess if we cannot capture it directly then we can only achieve
practical use by way of some indirect action caused by interference such
as how radioactive isotopes may function from this black hole spewage.
Interesting how the high energy isotopes are so dense...
On 11/21/2018 6:53 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Mick! First of all I did not explore the Hyde type device far enough
> to glean any power gain from it. I just observed that it was sort of
> an electron pump using positive displacement like operation. When the
> capacitance value would go down the electrons flowed past the diodes
> at higher potential. My unit only varied by a value of about 20ufd
> turning at around 1,000 RPM. Real low freq. Your second question
> require me to say Houston, We have a problem. No one yet has been able
> to capture an EMP event and store it in any kind of capacitor. I
> started a folder on the EVGRAY TWO site titled Ferroresonance Capture.
> It was under Norm's Research. I wanted to determine if this event can
> be captured since it happens so fast and at ultra high frequencies
> which I believe as in the Superlight doc. is above cosmic ray
> frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum. Just how do you propose
> to capture an A/C (really super high RF) pulse without first
> rectifying it to a DC component????? I do not know of any device that
> can capture and store ultra, ultra high freq RF. Can you capture
> light frequencies and store them in a bottle??? You are attempting to
> store something a million times higher in freq than light.
>
> See:
>
> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
>
> *By: Dr. John Mileweski***
>
> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
>
> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**.
> There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and
> opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and
> left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not
> light? *
>
> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all
> things except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity in light as
> well ! *
>
> *I will now explain and give you more detail. *
>
> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by
> science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of
> years. It has been given different names by different cultures for
> thousands of years. *
>
> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy,
> Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum
> Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception
> know it is real. *
>
> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when
> James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm>
> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was
> invented by Nikola Tesla
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical
> physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves.
> When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio
> waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light,
> radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains
> 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that
> comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second solution"**was
> ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and
> were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1)
> because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed
> and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and
> it is SuperLight. *
>
> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford
> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What
> does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
>
> *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the
> first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows:
> Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point
> source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward
> infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a
> large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees
> to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
>
> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite
> structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point
> source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation
> is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical
> component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the
> equations are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight"
> travels at the speed of light squared !** 10^20 meters per second,
> or 10 billion times faster than light
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
>
> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding,
> shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher energy density. *
>
> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come
> we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"
> Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8
> nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes
> through everything as though the substance was nearly completely
> transparent (like glass). *
>
> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like
> x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative
> size, will be given later. *
>
> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
>
> *It comes out of black holes !***
>
> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the
> analogy for SuperLight. *
>
> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric
> monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an
> electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or
> absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is
> converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the
> opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
>
> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an
> electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its
> energy in the form of light. *
>
> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot
> matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain
> magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small,
> extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering
> their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight.
> So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of
> SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces
> of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity
> of light and it therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
>
> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy
> in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of
> galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are
> literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an
> "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
>
> On 11/21/2018 5:44 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> I think of the heart as an implosion biased pump also.
>>
>> Great stuff on the parametric pumps, so a variometer in theory could be
>> used in the same manner for flux pumping hmmm...
>>
>> I have to study the Hyde unit further. When I first saw the concept
>> used in the super high output electrostatic machines my main thought was
>> it's a good way to begin to be able to use transfomers and pictured the
>> voltage change like a cap divider but did not understand how the gain in
>> coulombs would take place so thanks for the PDF's.
>>
>> Did you measure a power gain when using this device.
>>
>> Experimenting with the neutral spike, were you able to store in a cap
>> bank and if so did you notice a temp change one way or another with the
>> caps?
>>
>> On 11/21/2018 2:24 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>> > Hyde Device
>>
>