Body
Mick! I am getting just like Hector here by having to explain something
over and over! I guess short memory is the cause for lack of
understanding the whole project. First you have to go back to the 1981
ceiling fan, 1/6th HP capacitor run shaded pole motor problem. A wiring
error by a Chinese assembly worker incorrectly wired the capacitor
reversing switch into the neutral side of the circuit which provided a
total isolation of charge while the switch was in transition from
forward operation to reverse operation. Reversing switch would
explode. This was my first encounter with the phenomenon which I
researched and determined that it was a Magneto-Electric effect or
better put, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect as we now know it. In
Physics we have always been taught that energy cannot be destroyed but
can change forms as we clearly see by simple experiment. With this
knowledge tucked back in the memory bank, I had the occasion to
encounter this phenomenon again in around 1984. A wealthy widow had
remodeled her expansive Highland Park home (Dallas) and I had installed
a projection TV system into her den. MS. Sharp called and said she
had a Poltergeist in her den. When I arrived she served tea and told me
to sit there and wait a few minutes. The TV screen and projector both
started descending from the ceiling then reversed and went back up.
Both these motors were shaded pole, capacitor run design so that
switching via wall switch could reverse operation, either up or down
against limit switches. Here is the Somfy motor example so you
understand how they operate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMHEJ2iIu14&feature=youtu.be When I went
into attic to examine the motorized units the phenomenon occurred again.
Sure enough the screen and projector descended half way down then
reversed and retracted. Over my head was a powered turbo ventilator
attic fan of shaded pole design which took off ZIIIIINNNNG , super fast
acceleration up to a speed about 10X design speed but one big problem
was that it took off backwards! The turbine took several minutes to
coast down to a stop. A visit downstairs found that a small appliance
like a counter top blender in the kitchen (shaded pole motor) would take
off spinning backwards then stop. The only connection that all these
motor had when sitting in a turned off state was a connection to the
neutral buss. Interesting fact was that with the very small size motor
windings and sudden fantastic acceleration up to very high speed
(backwards) did no damage to the motors. I did an inspection to the
mains breakers and house wiring including the service cabelling and
earth ground at the mains panel. All was up to Dallas Code. While
walking in side yard, I found a brand new installation of a 5 ton A/C
Condensing unit. in addition to the older 5 ton unit. Both units were
earth bonded via the Required (Highland Park Code) 10 ft. ground rod at
the units. Both units were 5 Ton, 230VAC single phase. While I was
looking at the A/C units , the new one tried to start against a locked
rotor condition. From contactor closure to WHUUUUUMP, EMP shot which
you could feel the brissance in the ground took about 1/2 second. This
was the source of the EMP event which caused the neutral buss to carry
this very unusual form of energy. The A/C guys came out and replaced
the compressor and rectified the situation but I came away with a better
understanding a very common phenomenon that most do not take time to
fully understand nor appreciate the implications. By studing the
ongoing research of the natural occurrence of this EMP phenomenon from
Solar magnetic storms Magnetic Annihilation -Reconnect which have been
duplicated in Labs gathering better understanding of phenomenon. I
elected to bench top duplicate the situation which I had observed back
in 1984 at the Sharp residence. Since I was doing HVAC, Electrical and
Electronics Contracting, I had many compressors at my disposal just like
the one in the Carrier A/C unit. By hydraulic locking the compressor
via filling with oil and pinching off the suction and discharge lines
you have a fully locked up sealed unit See:
This unit utilizes a 40mfd start cap and a 5mfd run cap controlled by
current relay. When energized via 2 pole,230VAC, starter contactor,
both the start and run windings are energized. When the Over current
relay senses the locked rotor current of 84 amps ( motor in magnetic
saturation) the circuit is opened leaving the stored energy in total
isolation with no ground reference. A NECESSARY CONDITION TO GET THE
MAGNETIC FLUX ANNIHILATION-Re-CONNECT PHENOMENON or EMP. This
experiment is something anyone can duplicate and observe the phenomenon
for yourself. The reversible ceiling fan is the simplest and easiest
and less expensive to replicate. Most current available reversible fans
utilize the electrical capacitor relocation via toggle switch to reverse
rotation. All you have to do is open up circuit and re-wire the cap so
that you have a momentary loss of ground reference (neutral) while the
reversing switch is in transit. Reverse it several times and you will
explode switch! Now Mick, what do you not understand?? I was just
too curious to let this go by without finding an answer. Just remember
the Axiom, Energy cannot be destroyed but it can change forms.
On 11/19/2018 10:04 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> So why did you first notice this even at a clients, shorted start cap
> or seized bearing? Interesting I have noticed a ground rod near
> pool equipment with GFI but rarely have seen or can recall one next to
> a heat pump or AC unit and 10 feet ground rod damn that's deeper than
> a dirt nap. At 60hz the capacitive coupling is negligible.
>
> Unless I am misunderstanding something the L1-L2 at the supply side...
> coupling to earth would still be at the transformer to center tap
> neutral back at the pole then the neutral is ground bonded at the
> service. Since it is on the sink side of the transformer from the
> utility there is a direct path to ground through a certain
> impedance,reactance and reluctance whatever importance that plays into
> the event.
>
> On 11/19/2018 4:44 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Locked means exactly what the term expresses! No rotor motion
>> relative to stator! On the early 5 Ton A/C units they were service
>> wired with a 3 conductor wip from service disconnect to A/C unit! You
>> had L-1 & L-2 230VAC (hots) and a green earth bonding wire to motor
>> and chasis frame. In addition, you had a10 ft. ground stake into
>> earth ground to bond this outdoor installation for safety reasons.
>> When over-current relay (84 amps) drops out starter contactor there
>> is NO GROUND PATH to discipate the charge, both magbetic flux
>> sayuration (Inductive power) and the two charged capacitors in the
>> circuit. This energy is in an isolated state due to insulation in the
>> motor windings and capacitors. Ole will jump in here and say there
>> is capacitive coupling between motor frame and isolated capacitance
>> and magnetic flux at saturation. I built and did the test on this
>> phenomenon after I saw it in real life in a clients back yard. Easy
>> to duplicate! The reversible ceiling fan trick can be done by anyone
>> by just changing the wiring on the reversing capacitor in-order to
>> float neutral while the reversing switch is in transition. Simple!
>> ( BOOM)!!
>>
>> On 11/18/2018 11:15 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> How did you run the motor in locked mode, by preventing the start
>>> cap from energizing?
>>>
>>> When you experimented with the energy from this motor where did you
>>> extract the differential, from the green wire running back to the
>>> service panel or another grounding rod and from the motor frame
>>> where the ground bonding clip usually is or somewhere else?
>>>
>>> Assuming frame on your dual winding induction motor was isolated
>>> sink side from the stator windings by their insulation as you
>>> mentioned earlier there was no neutral and on the source side by the
>>> center tap in the pole pig?
>>>
>>> Not sure why I was thinking locked was synchronous mode as we
>>> discussed earlier the concept of Mag Transmitter is to saturate the
>>> core and release, or as Hector likes to say switch off to turn on.
>>> Some major issues going on here, head on backwards.
>>>
>>> So impedance does opposite of a LC tank and dropped like a series LC
>>> hmmm...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mick
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/18/2018 3:44 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! Ole for the explanation! Rotation is required inorder for
>>>> counter emf to be generated. In stalled rotor or locked rotor
>>>> conditions, the current through the windings is only limited by R =
>>>> resitance. My dual winding 5 HP motor in locked rotor had a
>>>> combined current draw of 84 amps @ 230VAC input. When you look at
>>>> the BH curve on a scope you see the magnetic flux build to
>>>> saturation at which point the impedance is = to Zero ( air value)
>>>> with R being the only limiting factor. (Ole). I used the dual
>>>> winding motor for it has a starting cap value of 40mfd and a run
>>>> cap with a value of 5 mfd, both of which are in circuit when
>>>> current limiting relay drops circuit open yielding the Neutral
>>>> Spike form ground. Magneto Electric effect. For it to work, the
>>>> caps and motor windings have to be isolated from neutral and earth
>>>> ground reference. the iron motor frame is earth bonded.
>>>> Cancellation of energy in isolation will create an EMP earth ground
>>>> response. This goes back to Page 25 of CSN by Tesla himself.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/17/2018 5:12 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Locked rotor is when the rotor is prevented from rotating. This is
>>>>> also known as stalled rotor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Synchronous speed is when the rotor follows the rotating magnetic
>>>>> wave(s) of the stator. In an induction motor (asynchronous motor)
>>>>> this means no power transmission between the rotor and the stator.
>>>>> The motor is then working neither as motor or generator.
>>>>>
>>>>> Slip is the ratio between the rotor speed and the rotating field
>>>>> speed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Ole
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am slowly digesting this but I think my concept of locked rotor
>>>>> was/is in error. Always thought this was when the rotor is locked
>>>>> to the rotational field from stator with least amount of slip,
>>>>> seems like I am reading now it is most amount of slip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide what locked rotor means to you and any additional
>>>>> information of what you think may be occurring beyond the everyday
>>>>> accepted definition?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mick
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/16/2018 5:55 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mick, Ole, Kone etal! I have been thinking a lot about my
>>>>>> Locked Rotor experiments and did a lot of reading to come up
>>>>>> with a fool proof Lenz free motor / generator combination
>>>>>> which is so easy to build and proof test! First of all you
>>>>>> should read what we know as facts! See the following articles:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.motioncontroltips.com/faq-what-are-dc-shunt-motors-and-where-are-they-used/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.machineryspaces.com/direct-current-motors.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.quora.com/What-will-happen-if-the-back-EMF-of-a-DC-motor-vanishes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-FPcKgwSzs&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3TFALmHtMw&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/A_DC_shunt_motor_is_running_at_light_load_what_happens_if_the_field_winding_gets_opened
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kone loves to play with the very powerful Neos as found at
>>>>>> K&G Magnetics and shown in the video of the Ray's LENZ free
>>>>>> generator. What I will propose is very simple application of
>>>>>> DC motor principles as read from the cited references. First
>>>>>> you make your LENZ free motor which is in reality a LINEAR
>>>>>> MOTOR (Solenoid) which will give the necessary stroke length
>>>>>> to drive the LINEAR generator (Coil oscillating within the
>>>>>> drag free, LENZ free area of the Neo magnets). Stroke of
>>>>>> the solenoid is controlled by Hall sensor and IGBT drive
>>>>>> switch to give an excursion rate (stroke) at a frequency of
>>>>>> 60 HZ. By using a DC pulse to drive the solenoid coil it is
>>>>>> tricked into being in LOCKED ROTOR condition, thus no LENZ
>>>>>> effect. Has the light come on yet?? We know that Ray's
>>>>>> generator puts out a sine wave output (AC) with no LENZ
>>>>>> drag. Following the DC motor principles as applied to the
>>>>>> solenoid driver, you have a motor that is LENZ free also. The
>>>>>> combo should give an Over-unity output. Now the tricky part!
>>>>>> We know as Ole will agree in that when you switch the
>>>>>> solenoid power to off state as magnetic flux is building
>>>>>> toward saturation there will be a huge voltage spike (Neutral
>>>>>> Spike) which we have to capture and not send to ground as
>>>>>> ordinary practice in solid state switch design (snubber
>>>>>> diodes) The capture of the SPIKE energy (HV) which occurs
>>>>>> naturally will be the over-unity factor here! Interesting
>>>>>> concept! Think about it! Norm Mick! (accumulator HV caps)!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 6:23 AM, Mick mkjekyll@...
>>>>>> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ole,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had caps charge much faster in an LC tank than
>>>>>>> otherwise, but it could also have to do with noise in the
>>>>>>> core material as I was no using an air inductor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 1:19 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>>>>>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Mick,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "If a reactive LC tank capacitor is then disconnected from
>>>>>>>> the reactive source then discharged to a resistive load
>>>>>>>> then reconnected energized back to the standing wave
>>>>>>>> modality recharged disconnected discharged etc. If the
>>>>>>>> reactive energy is harvested in this manner are you
>>>>>>>> claiming the same losses will occur as power factor
>>>>>>>> correcting the reactive back into real power?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes that's correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Common power factor correction in AC is for eliminating the
>>>>>>>> reactive power that doesn't do any work but just heats the
>>>>>>>> wires between the power plant and the reactive load. This
>>>>>>>> is expensive for the owners of the power transmission lines
>>>>>>>> and thus should be avoided. First storing the energy in a
>>>>>>>> capacitor (or inductor or battery) and then dumping it to
>>>>>>>> an active load will still make the power go in just one
>>>>>>>> direction even though it happens in pulses. The energy is
>>>>>>>> then moving from the source to the load. Reactive power has
>>>>>>>> the energy moving to and from the load and power source.
>>>>>>>> The power moving between the capacitor and inductor in an
>>>>>>>> LC-tank is pure reactive except for the loss because of the
>>>>>>>> parasitic resistance in the components and wires.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---In [email protected]
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>, <mkjekyll@...>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ole,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Disregarding the issue at hand with the patent terminology
>>>>>>>> and not concerning ourselves with the patent just a very
>>>>>>>> high Q tank.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If a reactive LC tank capacitor is then disconnected from
>>>>>>>> the reactive source then discharged to a resistive load
>>>>>>>> then reconnected energized back to the standing wave
>>>>>>>> modality recharged disconnected discharged etc. If the
>>>>>>>> reactive energy is harvested in this manner are you
>>>>>>>> claiming the same losses will occur as power factor
>>>>>>>> correcting the reactive back into real power?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/15/2018 5:36 PM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...>
>>>>>>>> [EVGRAY] wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have only read to the following paragraph cited
>>>>>>>>> below. I wonder if the applicant knows about what he
>>>>>>>>> is writing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Citing paragraph 106 of the patent application
>>>>>>>>> (https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/7d/29/f7b4bd0194992d/US20070296373A1.pdf):
>>>>>>>>> "[0106] There is voltage across the inductor connected
>>>>>>>>> in series to the capacitor and there is voltage across
>>>>>>>>> the inductor connected in parallel to the capacitor.
>>>>>>>>> Since Power=voltage×current, a single power input
>>>>>>>>> produces two branches of electromagnetic power output,
>>>>>>>>> increasing the power output. In the alternative, the
>>>>>>>>> present disclosure may have one electromagnetic power
>>>>>>>>> output with less energy input."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It isn't as simple as this. If using an oscilloscope
>>>>>>>>> for measuring the current and voltage it will show
>>>>>>>>> some phase displacement between the current and
>>>>>>>>> voltage which means reactive power. Look at the
>>>>>>>>> following small videos to see how one can be misled if
>>>>>>>>> not knowing how the phase between the current and
>>>>>>>>> voltage is: Only the the resistive part consumes
>>>>>>>>> (transforms) energy like R in figure 8.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 0:42
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEZMCCBV3U>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Overunity Device Cop 2,5 ? explanation part 3.
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEZMCCBV3U>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 9.5K views5 years ago
>>>>>>>>> 1:01
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jamj3-2w0eE>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Overunity Device Cop 2,5 ? explanation part 2.
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jamj3-2w0eE>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 10K views5 years ago
>>>>>>>>
>