Body
Warren! Remember in the movie , Close Encounters of the Third Kind,
when on the Dark Side of the Moon, the radar operator said: We now have
several non-correlated targets? By compound search engines I can bring
Non Correlated info into focus and find interesting items. Yes! The
key is to know what you are looking for by its true nomenclature!
On 11/18/2018 7:35 PM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Norman
>
> Your search engine is on steroids. Wow! Not all search engines are
> created equal.
> Perhaps, it is as Gandolph said" If you know it's real name, you have
> power over it"
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 7:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This last one is your example of a solenoid driven device!
>
> On 11/18/2018 6:32 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0114/ijsrp-p2581.pdf
>>
>> On 11/18/2018 6:20 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEogsEfFXrg
>>>
>>> On 11/18/2018 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.greenoptimistic.com/real-working-magnetic-motor/#.W_FVw-JRc2w
>>>>
>>>> On 11/18/2018 5:51 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-pty-pty_email&hsimp=yhs-pty_email&hspart=pty&p=magnetic+repulsion+motor+fabrication+video#id=3&vid=5997a2a9237c6ddc7bd57c175acbb4cc&action=click
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/17/2018 8:17 PM, Warren Keillor
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Evgray was a while back, I meant some people here, in this
>>>>>> forum, as we speak, building a successful solenoid piston
>>>>>> engine, using Ismael's concept, or was it too tricky
>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 9:08 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EV Gray built a recip engine version of his repulsion
>>>>>> plate principle!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/17/2018 7:52 PM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone tried to duplicate Ismael's coil leap?
>>>>>>> That concept of coil as piston, on a reciprocating engine?
>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 11:04 AM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warren! Lots of thought has to go into how we
>>>>>>> approach designing a ZERO LENZ motor whether it be a
>>>>>>> linear solenoid or a rotary type motor. The solenoid
>>>>>>> type linear thrust driver is easiest to trick into
>>>>>>> the locked rotor DC input that has no back EMF or
>>>>>>> counter emf. see: files I posted on DC motor
>>>>>>> characteristics. If you are going to drive Ray's
>>>>>>> pendelium LENZ free neo generator then we have to
>>>>>>> calculate the moment of inertia needed to drive the
>>>>>>> thrust rod accounting for all inertia and loading
>>>>>>> factors. This will give us the duration and
>>>>>>> magnitude of driving DC pulse. (power supply source
>>>>>>> direct) or (Capacitor source) Timing of pulse such
>>>>>>> as the famous Child on the Swing as per Tesla.
>>>>>>> Wire turns and all the electrical parameters can be
>>>>>>> worked out very easily since we can select a time
>>>>>>> base for the as natural as possible operation of the
>>>>>>> device. How much inductive drag is there with the
>>>>>>> non metal core coil in the neo magnetic gap?? Just
>>>>>>> because he claims no LENZ effect does not mean that
>>>>>>> you generate a current or wattage load free. A lot
>>>>>>> to be learned before jumping into construction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 9:12 PM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK Norm, work out the math, as when I try, I just
>>>>>>>> get TV snow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once we know the size wire, and number of turns, we
>>>>>>>> can build a working model.
>>>>>>>> I can build, but I get confused when left vague
>>>>>>>> instructions, so try to help us out here.
>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 2:46 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warren, Iron, Further thought on this as
>>>>>>>> follows! The solenoid linear motor can be
>>>>>>>> operated just the same as the old Outboard
>>>>>>>> Marine Magnetos that I studied to such detail.
>>>>>>>> What made them so efficient was the three pole
>>>>>>>> coil stator which received a forward going
>>>>>>>> current in primary windings , magnets passing
>>>>>>>> 1st and 2nd pole pieces before top dead center
>>>>>>>> which charged up the condenser when current
>>>>>>>> reached peak. When breaker points opened the
>>>>>>>> rotating magnets were passing the 2nd and 3rd
>>>>>>>> pole pieces inducing a reverse polarity current
>>>>>>>> in the primary windings and the discharge
>>>>>>>> current from the condenser was in phase which
>>>>>>>> accelerated the magnetic flux reversal. On a
>>>>>>>> scope the primary current represented an
>>>>>>>> instantaneous straight down line (nano second
>>>>>>>> response). This was accomplished due to the
>>>>>>>> fact that the .026mfd condenser was a perfect
>>>>>>>> L_C match with the coil impedance. (Ultra high
>>>>>>>> Q) . It is important to incorporate this
>>>>>>>> magneto electric effect into the switching
>>>>>>>> design of the solenoid linear motor. See, there
>>>>>>>> is a L-C high Q relationship here. I just
>>>>>>>> threw out the 60 HZ time base but for design
>>>>>>>> simplicity, any switching frequency can be
>>>>>>>> selected. Just as the Tesla mechanical
>>>>>>>> oscillators worked at a relative low frequency!
>>>>>>>> Just as pointed out, we are making a Tesla
>>>>>>>> Oscillator which is driven by DC . Thoughts???
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 9:58 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Norm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The mechanical contraptions that I have out
>>>>>>>>> lined, should be very suitable for applying
>>>>>>>>> mechanical switches, timed to the stroke.
>>>>>>>>> I like the fact nothing can be hidden to view,
>>>>>>>>> happening in a mysterious
>>>>>>>>> "Black box"as even discrete components in a
>>>>>>>>> circuit can be confusing.
>>>>>>>>> It would be so great to hear your further
>>>>>>>>> thoughts on this subject.
>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 9:13 AM, Norman
>>>>>>>>> Wootan [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mick, Ole, Kone etal! I have been
>>>>>>>>> thinking a lot about my Locked Rotor
>>>>>>>>> experiments and did a lot of reading to
>>>>>>>>> come up with a fool proof Lenz free motor
>>>>>>>>> / generator combination which is so easy
>>>>>>>>> to build and proof test! First of all you
>>>>>>>>> should read what we know as facts! See the
>>>>>>>>> following articles:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.motioncontroltips.com/faq-what-are-dc-shunt-motors-and-where-are-they-used/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.machineryspaces.com/direct-current-motors.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.quora.com/What-will-happen-if-the-back-EMF-of-a-DC-motor-vanishes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-FPcKgwSzs&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3TFALmHtMw&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/A_DC_shunt_motor_is_running_at_light_load_what_happens_if_the_field_winding_gets_opened
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kone loves to play with the very powerful
>>>>>>>>> Neos as found at K&G Magnetics and shown
>>>>>>>>> in the video of the Ray's LENZ free
>>>>>>>>> generator. What I will propose is very
>>>>>>>>> simple application of DC motor principles
>>>>>>>>> as read from the cited references. First
>>>>>>>>> you make your LENZ free motor which is in
>>>>>>>>> reality a LINEAR MOTOR (Solenoid) which
>>>>>>>>> will give the necessary stroke length to
>>>>>>>>> drive the LINEAR generator (Coil
>>>>>>>>> oscillating within the drag free, LENZ
>>>>>>>>> free area of the Neo magnets). Stroke of
>>>>>>>>> the solenoid is controlled by Hall sensor
>>>>>>>>> and IGBT drive switch to give an excursion
>>>>>>>>> rate (stroke) at a frequency of 60 HZ. By
>>>>>>>>> using a DC pulse to drive the solenoid
>>>>>>>>> coil it is tricked into being in LOCKED
>>>>>>>>> ROTOR condition, thus no LENZ effect. Has
>>>>>>>>> the light come on yet?? We know that
>>>>>>>>> Ray's generator puts out a sine wave
>>>>>>>>> output (AC) with no LENZ drag. Following
>>>>>>>>> the DC motor principles as applied to the
>>>>>>>>> solenoid driver, you have a motor that is
>>>>>>>>> LENZ free also. The combo should give an
>>>>>>>>> Over-unity output. Now the tricky part!
>>>>>>>>> We know as Ole will agree in that when you
>>>>>>>>> switch the solenoid power to off state as
>>>>>>>>> magnetic flux is building toward
>>>>>>>>> saturation there will be a huge voltage
>>>>>>>>> spike (Neutral Spike) which we have to
>>>>>>>>> capture and not send to ground as ordinary
>>>>>>>>> practice in solid state switch design
>>>>>>>>> (snubber diodes) The capture of the SPIKE
>>>>>>>>> energy (HV) which occurs naturally will be
>>>>>>>>> the over-unity factor here! Interesting
>>>>>>>>> concept! Think about it! Norm Mick!
>>>>>>>>> (accumulator HV caps)!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 6:23 AM, Mick
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ole,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have had caps charge much faster in an
>>>>>>>>>> LC tank than otherwise, but it could also
>>>>>>>>>> have to do with noise in the core
>>>>>>>>>> material as I was no using an air inductor.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 1:19 AM,
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mick,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "If a reactive LC tank capacitor is then
>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected from the reactive source
>>>>>>>>>>> then discharged to a resistive load then
>>>>>>>>>>> reconnected energized back to the
>>>>>>>>>>> standing wave modality recharged
>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected discharged etc. If the
>>>>>>>>>>> reactive energy is harvested in this
>>>>>>>>>>> manner are you claiming the same losses
>>>>>>>>>>> will occur as power factor correcting
>>>>>>>>>>> the reactive back into real power?"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes that's correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Common power factor correction in AC is
>>>>>>>>>>> for eliminating the reactive power that
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't do any work but just heats the
>>>>>>>>>>> wires between the power plant and the
>>>>>>>>>>> reactive load. This is expensive for the
>>>>>>>>>>> owners of the power transmission lines
>>>>>>>>>>> and thus should be avoided. First
>>>>>>>>>>> storing the energy in a capacitor (or
>>>>>>>>>>> inductor or battery) and then dumping it
>>>>>>>>>>> to an active load will still make the
>>>>>>>>>>> power go in just one direction even
>>>>>>>>>>> though it happens in pulses. The energy
>>>>>>>>>>> is then moving from the source to the
>>>>>>>>>>> load. Reactive power has the energy
>>>>>>>>>>> moving to and from the load and power
>>>>>>>>>>> source. The power moving between the
>>>>>>>>>>> capacitor and inductor in an LC-tank is
>>>>>>>>>>> pure reactive except for the loss
>>>>>>>>>>> because of the parasitic resistance in
>>>>>>>>>>> the components and wires.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---In [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>>> <mkjekyll@...> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ole,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Disregarding the issue at hand with the
>>>>>>>>>>> patent terminology and not concerning
>>>>>>>>>>> ourselves with the patent just a very
>>>>>>>>>>> high Q tank.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If a reactive LC tank capacitor is then
>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected from the reactive source
>>>>>>>>>>> then discharged to a resistive load then
>>>>>>>>>>> reconnected energized back to the
>>>>>>>>>>> standing wave modality recharged
>>>>>>>>>>> disconnected discharged etc. If the
>>>>>>>>>>> reactive energy is harvested in this
>>>>>>>>>>> manner are you claiming the same losses
>>>>>>>>>>> will occur as power factor correcting
>>>>>>>>>>> the reactive back into real power?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/15/2018 5:36 PM, onielsen@...
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have only read to the following
>>>>>>>>>>>> paragraph cited below. I wonder if
>>>>>>>>>>>> the applicant knows about what he
>>>>>>>>>>>> is writing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Citing paragraph 106 of the patent
>>>>>>>>>>>> application
>>>>>>>>>>>> (https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/7d/29/f7b4bd0194992d/US20070296373A1.pdf):
>>>>>>>>>>>> "[0106] There is voltage across the
>>>>>>>>>>>> inductor connected in series to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> capacitor and there is voltage
>>>>>>>>>>>> across the inductor connected in
>>>>>>>>>>>> parallel to the capacitor. Since
>>>>>>>>>>>> Power=voltage×current, a single
>>>>>>>>>>>> power input produces two branches
>>>>>>>>>>>> of electromagnetic power output,
>>>>>>>>>>>> increasing the power output. In the
>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, the present disclosure
>>>>>>>>>>>> may have one electromagnetic power
>>>>>>>>>>>> output with less energy input."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It isn't as simple as this. If
>>>>>>>>>>>> using an oscilloscope for measuring
>>>>>>>>>>>> the current and voltage it will
>>>>>>>>>>>> show some phase displacement
>>>>>>>>>>>> between the current and voltage
>>>>>>>>>>>> which means reactive power. Look at
>>>>>>>>>>>> the following small videos to see
>>>>>>>>>>>> how one can be misled if not
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowing how the phase between the
>>>>>>>>>>>> current and voltage is: Only the
>>>>>>>>>>>> the resistive part consumes
>>>>>>>>>>>> (transforms) energy like R in figure 8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0:42
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEZMCCBV3U>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Overunity Device Cop 2,5 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation part 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEZMCCBV3U>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.5K views5 years ago
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1:01
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jamj3-2w0eE>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Overunity Device Cop 2,5 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation part 2.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jamj3-2w0eE>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 10K views5 years ago
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1:00
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_E0ck3v40Y>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_E0ck3v40Y>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Overunity Device Cop 2,5 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> part 1. but,
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_E0ck3v40Y>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 8K views5 years ago
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The numbers without the phase shift
>>>>>>>>>>>> looks like overunity which isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> the case when taking into account
>>>>>>>>>>>> the phase shift. Only real power is
>>>>>>>>>>>> useful in doing work. Reactive
>>>>>>>>>>>> power doesn't do work except for
>>>>>>>>>>>> the small active part heating the
>>>>>>>>>>>> the wires and other components
>>>>>>>>>>>> because of their parasitic
>>>>>>>>>>>> resistance. This part caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>> current doing work against the
>>>>>>>>>>>> resistance is active power and not
>>>>>>>>>>>> actually reactive power. This is
>>>>>>>>>>>> why the power distributing
>>>>>>>>>>>> companies may charge costumers for
>>>>>>>>>>>> having high reactive power going
>>>>>>>>>>>> through their cables which heats
>>>>>>>>>>>> the power lines without
>>>>>>>>>>>> transferring active power to their
>>>>>>>>>>>> costumers. It's just pure loss
>>>>>>>>>>>> because the wires have resistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Resistance converts electric power
>>>>>>>>>>>> into heat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just looked at the figures and
>>>>>>>>>>>> found the description to figure 46:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "[0149]FIG. 46 illustrates an
>>>>>>>>>>>> embodiment of the present
>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure that conserves light
>>>>>>>>>>>> bulb energy. In a test conducted,
>>>>>>>>>>>> on Nov. 16, 1998, a light bulb was
>>>>>>>>>>>> installed according to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> schematic disclosed in FIG. 46 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> is still running seven years later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [0150]Since Apparent Power
>>>>>>>>>>>> (VA)=Current (A)×Voltage (V), the
>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations below illustrate
>>>>>>>>>>>> energy conservation for a 60 W
>>>>>>>>>>>> light bulb. The voltage applied at
>>>>>>>>>>>> the power input is 115 V. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> apparent power for the Power Input
>>>>>>>>>>>> Line (Line PIN) is measured at
>>>>>>>>>>>> 126.5 VA. The apparent power
>>>>>>>>>>>> measured for the shed motor fan is
>>>>>>>>>>>> 126.5 VA and the apparent power
>>>>>>>>>>>> measured for the light bulb is 65
>>>>>>>>>>>> VA. Therefore, 126 VA is measured
>>>>>>>>>>>> at the input and a total of 191.5
>>>>>>>>>>>> VA is measured at the output,
>>>>>>>>>>>> indicating an approximately 1.5
>>>>>>>>>>>> gain. Calculations are also shown
>>>>>>>>>>>> for the energy savings for a 75W Bulb."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the apparent power that is
>>>>>>>>>>>> increased. The apparent power is
>>>>>>>>>>>> the vector sum of the real power
>>>>>>>>>>>> and the reactive power which makes
>>>>>>>>>>>> it always greater than or equal to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the real (or active or true) power.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Source with description at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-11/true-reactive-and-apparent-power/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>