Re: [EVGRAY] Neutral spike

Database ID: 110318
2018-11-05T05:07:47-06:00
Norman Wootan <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Please understand that in the US there are approximately 400,000 
Baptisms performed annually. In most cases there is water and an audio 
system involved. There are a lot of electrocutions that we never hear of 
as quoted here:

This type of death happens annually. Therefore, sound operators should 
be aware of potential electrical hazards associated with sound 
reinforcement systems. We have a responsibility for producing quality 
sound but also doing so in a safe environment.

/Disclaimer: "Please note this article is meant to discuss safety issues 
with baptismal amplification. In no way is it meant to claim cause of or 
accuse those involved in any negligence."/

/See: https://www.behindthemixer.com/baptismal-amplification-and-safety//

/I have heard of three such cases while living in Texas.  The last was 
the Waco Pastor and I find the Court explanation rather lacking in that 
a damaged Calrod water heater was to blame. You cannot sue in Court if 
the Pastors' own amplifier was to blame so you search for a supposed 
responsible party.  I don't know, I just read the news and form my own 
opinion!/

/https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Family-settles-lawsuit-in-electrocution-death-of-1881419.php
/


On 11/4/2018 12:21 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> I really hope that was an accident and not a prank, how awful!
>
> Assuming that was a class AB if push pull as most of the old tube Push 
> Pull PA amps were biased AB instead of solid class A due to heat 
> dissipation. Single ended up until the push pull current buffer 
> because this section requires a phase inverter tube to make it push pull.
>
> Unlikely it still worked with a shorted plate supply cap, probably had 
> not been tested in awhile or shorted at the moment.
>
> What a horrible spectacle for a baptism, hope the child was not harmed.
>
>
> On 11/4/2018 5:50 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Mick!  Your comment about some people dying from pranks!  True Story! 
>> Back in the early 80s a pastor at a Duncanville Church (suburb of 
>> Dallas) was preforming a live Baptism at his church on a typical 
>> Sunday morning!  His audio amp was the old vintage single end class A 
>> push-pull tube amp.  As he descended into the Baptism pool in front 
>> of congregation and flipped on the hand held mic switch has was 
>> instantly fried by 450VDC plate voltage on chassis ground.  Coroners 
>> report showed that an electrolytic cap in the HVDC plate power supply 
>> had gone to ground in effect energizing chassis at the 450VDC 
>> potential. All those vintage amps had the old two pin 120VAC plugs 
>> before the 3 pin safety grounds we now have.
>>
>> http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/funwithtubes/Amp-Power_Supply.html
>>
>> Having gone through DeVry Electronics back in 1953, I totally 
>> understood the lethality of such an event!
>>
>>
>> On 11/3/2018 7:55 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> The interconnects used for home audio should be illegal for bad 
>>> sound, but even a properly designed mic cable with an XLR on each 
>>> end with a hot a cold and a shield one will notice only on female 
>>> side the shield connects to the chassis of the connector.  It is a 
>>> single shield run on #1 to both sides though as the connections are 
>>> designed balanced for just the reason you mentioned.
>>>
>>> XLR's are the best connector for long run connections but I make my 
>>> own cable with silver plated aircraft cable with teflon insulation, 
>>> a pain to work with but sound is great.
>>>
>>> For short single ended runs the RCA end sucks and it should have 
>>> been BNC or the extra small microwave connectors that look like mini 
>>> BNC's  If one removes the RCA connectors and replaces with BNC and 
>>> high quality aircraft cable and the rest of the gear is good enough 
>>> one will notice the difference.  Networking cable Cat 5 or 6 can 
>>> also sound great as speaker cable.
>>>
>>> The story gets worse though as the old tube guitar amp had a switch 
>>> that would toggle chassis ground between either connector on the 
>>> power connection for the purpose of preventing ground loops when 
>>> some live show venue had the outlets wired with hot and neutral 
>>> reversed.  Well when that guitarist also happens to be a vocalist 
>>> and touched a mic stand with the ground switched wrong it was not 
>>> pretty if the shield was run to both chassis of the connectors.  
>>> This was an old soundman trick to get back at the rude ego asshole 
>>> guitar players using the special fully grounded mic cable.  I am 
>>> sure some people died from this prank where 220 was used.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/3/2018 4:46 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mick!  Just had to laugh at your remark about floating grounds in 
>>>> the recording studio!  Ha! Ha!  Way back when I was learning about 
>>>> fine audio, I ran a shielded line level audio cable to hook two 
>>>> sound systems together, about 100 ft run.  When I turned on the 
>>>> systems and selected line in on the 2nd system, I had the prettiest 
>>>> motor boat you ever heard!  Lol Yep! I had grounded both ends of a 
>>>> shielded cable and got a good example of a ground loop!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/3/2018 4:54 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I love Mr Calrsons lab, I could happily live there for quite 
>>>>> awhile with all that awesome vintage gear.  I have seen isolation 
>>>>> transformers wired like that and it's so insane but I am used to 
>>>>> testing all the grounding points.  When building a recording 
>>>>> studio we have to float all the grounds so they are single point 
>>>>> at the service panel and not looped anywhere else.  Often they are 
>>>>> lifted at the outlet j-box due to the lack of control in a 
>>>>> prewired building.  Ironically we also used to use autoformers for 
>>>>> all of the light dimmers to prevent noise, so we often referred to 
>>>>> the variacs as light dimmers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I still don't completely trust a scope on an isolation transformer 
>>>>> even if the ground is properly isolated/ lifted due to the 
>>>>> somewhat rare magnetic emp events we are talking about like when I 
>>>>> kicked off all my ground faults in the house through one.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/3/2018 2:03 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mick! Here is a helpful video regarding scopes and isolation 
>>>>>> transformers on the test bench!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBsQ3sZ45Fk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaELqAo4kkQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/3/2018 12:36 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the nudge in the right direction.  Now the process 
>>>>>>> demands repeating with a totally isolated battery source 
>>>>>>> configured the same way.   Funny how I was concentrating on 
>>>>>>> isolating and connecting saturated inductive charge without the 
>>>>>>> first magnetic variable taken into account.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had no problem creating the event with my grid power 
>>>>>>> source and even warned Sven that an isolation transformer will 
>>>>>>> not always protect his scope when messing around with this 
>>>>>>> energy. My scope probe sitting on a bench shot me in the leg 
>>>>>>> when I walked by when performing the experiments from my bench 
>>>>>>> supply.  The bench supply has an isolation transformer of sorts. 
>>>>>>> Being it is torroidal there is more inter-winding capacitive 
>>>>>>> coupling and mutual inductance than with the proper EI 
>>>>>>> transformer though there is at least the electrostatic shield 
>>>>>>> and galvanic isolation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for that reference. the Brit guy was funny, although I'm 
>>>>>>> very familiar with iso transformers in audio work used for 
>>>>>>> galvanic isolation and balancing to eliminate common mode noise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/3/2018 4:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mick!     Your DUH reference is funny!   To understand 
>>>>>>>> Isolation, best to study and understand the Isolation 
>>>>>>>> Transformer.   The super high quality ones are built to 
>>>>>>>> eliminate noise and DC components that effect sensitive 
>>>>>>>> instruments like EEG and EKG instruments. This will give you an 
>>>>>>>> idea as to construction and purpose::
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolation_transformer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A little tutorial as to how they work!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfzy5IQMzyc&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14kPQif9P7c&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://toroid.com/Products/Medical-Isolation-Transformers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 230VAC, 5 HP locked rotor experiment was an example of 
>>>>>>>> electrically isolated electrical circuitry when mains contactor 
>>>>>>>> was opened since there was no neutral involve. There is 
>>>>>>>> magnetic and capacitive coup[ling only The dielectric 
>>>>>>>> insulation was not compromised therefore no electrical 
>>>>>>>> connection.  The Chinese motor experiment was isolated, 
>>>>>>>> (electrically) when the reversing action was in transient. 
>>>>>>>> (Floating neutral) since there is a line neutral in the 120VAC 
>>>>>>>> input.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/2/2018 2:44 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since you have performed mass research on this event would you 
>>>>>>>>> concur
>>>>>>>>> with my long distance observation that the event is not only 
>>>>>>>>> due to
>>>>>>>>> charge isolation but inclusive of a magnetic connection from 
>>>>>>>>> source in
>>>>>>>>> addition to the saturated and lifted inductive load?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your bell buzzer and bell transformer acting as an isolation 
>>>>>>>>> transformer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both motor experiments, the small Emerson type and the HVAC 
>>>>>>>>> unit with
>>>>>>>>> only two hot's no neutral, must have been powered by an isolation
>>>>>>>>> transformer of some type also such as the utility step down 
>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>> neighborhood or dedicated delta or wye for commercial or even 
>>>>>>>>> acted as
>>>>>>>>> such from the dual windings of the HVAC motor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you reliably produced the NS from any type of isolated 
>>>>>>>>> battery
>>>>>>>>> system, or in all such cases was there a magnetic connection 
>>>>>>>>> to an earth
>>>>>>>>> bonding in another spot?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My thoughts being one side of a transformer acting as a source is
>>>>>>>>> grounded and the secondary side isolated so that the only 
>>>>>>>>> conceivable
>>>>>>>>> ground bonding on the sink might be considered as magnetic 
>>>>>>>>> aside from
>>>>>>>>> the bonded motor frame or what not producing the reconnection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I may be pissing up a rope notwithstanding the NS seems to be 
>>>>>>>>> predicated
>>>>>>>>> on a B field connection somewhere in the source feed though 
>>>>>>>>> the neutral
>>>>>>>>> is isolated electrically.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps this is a simple "Duh" to you that you had already 
>>>>>>>>> figured out
>>>>>>>>> assuming everyone else at least this smart.  Either way it 
>>>>>>>>> does create
>>>>>>>>> an interesting position in which to view 3 phase and 
>>>>>>>>> transformers with
>>>>>>>>> an extra resonant winding.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By the way, ironic your implication that the large medical 
>>>>>>>>> isolation
>>>>>>>>> transformers create a heretofore unknown vector of extreme danger.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 30178 invoked by uid 102); 5 Nov 2018 11:07:48 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.224.240) by m8.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2018 11:07:48 -0000
X-Received (qmail 11840 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2018 11:07:48 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.194.219) by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2018 11:07:48 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG 20mXce0WLDsHSBh2UUsX9Ag.i6utFYGko4rDagVJ4RyY8_jO blqMdnVctWFw3YIOjnhs_Gw1TTCZECekThYmFgLaJvNjPqAmzd8SY3C4jjbz bcGfSKoH39elJcJ2qpzjyLs0VpqSNTzVHPTC6Ezmw2jhP29AvrrQrVqK8jOv B8NUN8gwiGHhCEV6EUJWzPFj.Bp4qBXwOhsAwNzf_07q7k77apKAAfwIbU.s lO2xbf67.3UhvI9tMRBdYMzt3BbVkgJfDb1leRf8TwOLI4iBD7_szOB.4qOL ec26VddJqsTw4EGgHOhbHUQk2ftqX1QZ.4T60MPr21mYrliUG1cZnL0uQ61D EQAUu8VK1G1MUJ61gzo8znM4DTNSTi1P6gRl9K4qHoj13pQIf7MDrT7oNtXO 5EeXvs7YQUQ44vBj9ZhwLerpXLmeZufrmracMoTMGQ.Tgh1Pf52DtQAS7siM yKSRi58wmrFemOPDKFJjwoq0EXWrwL3Yf3WI3JoOu824OFDD8qWs2XFH2fRW 9qxjovfvI.32M_GS4sm0PakoA5hXXB348YNrWwh8RNuNc.wvsYqJF23zpeh4 MOUzGcLIZEhfGfpjevZZ6llSrFPrC8oaIGW6BaTwg7b37XxVRDNFNK1VCT0M 5nMydt0LJ4niRvoz_TFTNye2DpTIkJXC3APmPcjdNqmkGSvxuC1TDbj2OQBo 4E0s4L_Yo108US8EEW_F9OqKiTmP8V0QNj_ROk79fnwrLLJdf1T6yMtZ40ta NFkJ.hhpqvXgb8uc.paIlXsWFCi5KO72S2TlNgfy7p9PSJcE4dgSJyDP35OC og74Agn1I12bP7gsov4D7bRnaBp4XRaK._CmusAhWRCAi8RefiGLgYo0rCDU W9kgw9FEv8OJ.J_ph6NRbHkfzrSlfiJsNwCwF2G9w42B8DzRY6Npk0o8xTNe aZE9MkODLZi5PRlG4XLixG6cdOY5yD4SwMiw8eLZLklZ7BVLENIQ6p3rYQcU QGtfBGyek_D3V6ljrkVTaxkanVocadp_SUUuf__znGwb6loG.hGL3xPhrcnx lBKN6EwgVDObqYzcXZzLVaB5wpDkmkFk1lcWwdEebAPMdNVGSAyP3q4PYKqc xAJ6ZB3NUbAnEVRO0vlkOCcsV.Y3jpVd3ZEzPbtwJFNWif1zzylT1XAa1Egz UdluQQF15uaShMMCkbqnC8ZfNXGMiUYL6syXu_5ZYV1a9cKNlXTWbyPHwdra St9FTIIHidIqwwpb34m4u.zk51ynrBwdJRZtovmZH_tMFDvoyQE8V3Lclpa0 gPTBAN4QO2spDTtMOfgBHe6BEmWDETSyWm9AKU_gBIEmHQdW5FfzBqK8zEb9 CZQnlpSmmJcbf5AZ03KfAYrDHyRyZoFz2GE6lD7a1JhL74CRViikta9720hI 4Z26cGa1LkYbbv2i5ytQ6a_i2BE5MSnyhyH_Pqe3gtWRs2NVsnpouJSqzgbR TbwdwUh56m2SVunQ51re1uLUKnS88p48NKBTC_mmsINGpVfok6_kp.oO6Kbl ydsI5pG6r4Cgqcs-
Authentication-Results mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=att.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=att.net; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic313-16.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com) (74.6.133.126) by mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:07:48 +0000
X-YMail-OSG zbLihfMVM1nQtzGJVqu5MRe3aPgEYr6jSPvMwDbGPu5sEJWD7jWlnFblpf..Icb YT.Tuh3mBNzMeCH_EATraXgt1mm5MSxGhbUw3yqPdsB5adMg.AzxSiRSa.XiX4VVcnyd3v7K9.dU otdb7twkhun7xqBmxbDdE3sXfl_uL4kzcPpTB4Zy4jetH3u1TdYD1C._wQRtMK5vzDWo9_d62CZf 4andxFiVCvjw79f8yJ9tCxVqbAT1BD95qRUTJzWiLhi1v5citqe.XLQOVyBacBRAT6tMQ.xeQF_e kE7i1jWVNkgvvsEr5_VqBV3vtKK2G3kBpz8Wk46S3mCZFw5KXvR7F0oobss9Ez3Q9bsdnmkEEVhc FasPApV3IGs7rqozXnP4wRh5Dn52ie9RFiZnEVGKVYRzSW3DtoxCPeCp.6PXkbwFtvui030rmWD4 YjxSmJKUMRXHY6k8vnir6Y1WtyZ2cM8NHeNv4sI1UC8DuBNCKdtqG82R1lYmW4ozYzT12bDxSQHR dQyTTlQ5WtEjX6PhhVIYtfpYK20qq2Wj1TzH1wVCWqHx9JcVtGShH0comPRtz5pW3mo5x2qENjqy Mp_ZVhM.AOURZCCWUZ4QXvxv4FVoOSE.EFPXLchsBYaMZnBrfMIUxmy5rwt5YNpVuF5mDIc8ZKIF fSLVPPnRjXTUq1kO3sZ9U._BNsttZBZDxxbKVQoXnuIJVEHTrQ11MrukfJKXwqPtAp02VLmrXBBz CWqvXOVOX5pARdne9pQWPhPrpBycOD4aEnGxU.qx.JGrNgZdYsKZGCfwegTHfTkJePLQkpFB.Suo oN7ety8F4OOxZvs0XJqpLYXdlENjKQYC3kxK6tasmrIR5qB6lwZjiFCc1j21EP2hkEykUciBEPY9 Y_JYX_zU1lJ9Nn5O7CaTqmONPTEfB4n.BCs6RWouRFC3uVDRVqFN7z0Hx3VKhMhbKoBT4Qll9KyY rUO5BkJ8NeRI.c9rLH8zOe63hORBf6PYKfb0dZW0Lqx0BKrf1enwTEVWUryf4ARHg4yhrfj2IsDr ltFu.5A4zEjIoKepGeMOQWQHJINHOIN4QkdMn
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:07:48 +0000
X-Received from ip70-189-27-193.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.5]) ([70.189.27.193]) by smtp420.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 192ae905ec5041c23244c9c64a9bbba3 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
To [email protected]
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2018 05:07:47 -0600
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8F20040D769406EDBC7A05A2"
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP 10.201.194.219
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] Neutral spike
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=554418533; y=m5-4GG7mf8aL0CxKlGMx3RzhJfDrFWnCwA9gGY--Q38xmT84CH85zIj0
X-Yahoo-Profile [email protected]
From Norman Wootan <[email protected]>