Body
The communist took over newzeland and put our nuclear battle ships out
.they did it Thu a socialism platform .the people who ran in the elections
actually when to Moscow for training on how to do it .now there in a trap
on a short leash .unless they can break it .
On Sunday, October 21, 2018, James Glinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds like you guys need a way out .we put the Brits out but had to use
> snipers it worked well .now we got them interfering with our elections .I
> hope trump shows the world what they did to us .no wonder they out lawyed
> guns there .be like Ireland and put them out ..if you don't it will only
> get worse .absolute power corrupts absolutely .
>
> On Sunday, October 21, 2018, george gray [email protected]
> [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Gerry and Smokey,
>>
>> As Australians you will find this interesting. I've attached a document
>> but in case it doesn't work this is a copy and paste.
>>
>> George
>>
>> -
>>
>> -
>>
>>
>>
>> Home <http://concit.org/> » Corruption
>> <http://concit.org/category/corruption/> » TREACHERY—How Socialists
>> stole Australia from the people
>>
>> Corruption <http://concit.org/category/corruption/>General Interest
>> <http://concit.org/category/general-interest/>Law and Constitution
>> <http://concit.org/category/constitution/>On Australia
>> <http://concit.org/category/being-an-aussie/>
>> TREACHERY—How Socialists stole Australia from the people
>>
>> by concit admin <http://concit.org/author/conboss/>|Published May 27,
>> 2018 <http://concit.org/2018/05/27/>
>>
>> AddThis Sharing Buttons
>>
>> Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to
>> More8.1K
>>
>>
>> <http://concit.org/treachery-how-socialists-stole-australia-from-the-people/treachery-sm/>
>>
>> If only the attack on our Sovereignty came from another country, we could
>> deal with it as a nation. Unfortunately we have been white-anted by
>> successive Communist and Socialist leaders that have sought to follow
>> agendas that are at odds with the interests of the people of Australia.
>>
>> This is a lengthy article that will cover our sovereignty and how
>> successive leaders have stolen Australia and its assets from the people of
>> Australia and undermined the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The latter
>> is has a criminal charge—it is called “treachery” according to the Crimes
>> Act 24AA and comes with a
>>
>> Life Sentence. Charges of treason can and need to be laid against those
>> Prime Ministers and Premiers for their part of this theft.
>> *From Colony to Global recognition*
>>
>> “Many people incorrectly assume that Australia became a fully independent
>> and sovereign nation on January 1st 1901 with Federation. Actually,
>> Australia was created as a “self governing colony” under section 8 of the
>> Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, an Act of British
>> Parliament that contains the entire Constitution of Australia under its 9
>> th section.
>>
>> After Federation, in fact, the constitutional position of the
>> Commonwealth of Australia was just the same as it had been for the
>> individual colonies prior to Federation. At least to begin, the
>> Commonwealth of Australia was an amalgamation and a trade pact rather than
>> a declaration of sovereignty.
>>
>> The Constitution did provide the Commonwealth with the powers associated
>> with a sovereign state, but the United Kingdom still retained the power to
>> make laws for Australia and to overturn laws made by the Australian
>> Parliament. It used them too and was, to begin, very active in engaging in
>> foreign affairs on behalf of Australia. For many years, for instance,
>> Australia was represented by the United Kingdom as part of the British
>> Empire at international conferences.
>>
>> The Constitution also provided that the British monarch be represented in
>> Australia by a Governor-General who was originally appointed on the advice
>> of the British, not the Australian, government. The early Governor Generals
>> were agents for the British government and were usually members of the
>> British aristocracy.
>>
>> The Commonwealth of Australia became more independent in the aftermath of
>> the Great War, a war in which Australia suffered 60,000 casualties fighting
>> for the British Imperial forces. In 1919, under Prime Minister Billy
>> Hughes, Australia demanded and was reluctantly offered a place at the table
>> at the Paris Peace Conference.
>>
>> The 1919 Treaty of Versailles was, indeed, the first time Australia had
>> ever signed an international treaty. In negotiations, Hughes demanded and
>> gained Australian representation in the League of Nations and significant
>> reparations from Germany.
>>
>> *Significance*
>>
>> This was the first political treaty signed by Australian officials, and
>> the first negotiated with direct participation by Australian government
>> delegates. This was a major step in the recognition of Australia as an
>> independent entity in international law.
>>
>> At the time, treaties were regarded as either ‘political’ (mainly
>> concerning relations between governments) or ‘commercial’ (mostly
>> concerning the treatment of private persons or interests, particularly as
>> regards business). Prior to 1919 the Australian Government was frequently
>> not even consulted regarding political treaties, which were signed by
>> Britain for its Dominions.
>>
>> With the other three British Dominions, Australia was among the 32
>> signatories of the Treaty, and a founding member of the League of Nations
>> it established. This newly defined status is indicated in the list of
>> nations on page 18 of the Treaty, where the names of Australia, Canada, New
>> Zealand and South Africa are indented under the ‘British Empire’. The
>> Treaty recognised a new status for these nations among all the colonies of
>> Great Britain, as only fully self-governing nations could be members of the
>> League of Nations. The League of Nations became the precursor of the United
>> Nations to which Australia became a signatory in 1945.
>>
>> Australia gained further nationhood in 1927 with the British Parliament
>> legislating into effect *the Balfour Declaration,* which had been made
>> at a British Imperial Conference in 1926. Britain and dominion leaders
>> agreed that all dominions should have their own realms with a shared Crown.
>> Interestingly, it did not provide for a separate title Queen of Australia
>> and, indeed, up until 1953, she had the same title in Australia as she did
>> in Britain, which was *“Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the
>> United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”.*
>>
>> *The Statute of Westminster* was passed by British Parliament in 1931,
>> which prevented the British Parliament to make laws for its dominions
>> except where it was required by that dominion’s own laws. Australia used
>> this avenue to pass laws several times over the course of the 20th Century,
>> mainly to acquire external territories.
>>
>> Though it had achieved some legislative equality to Britain, Australia
>> still submitted to British command of its armed forces. Matters finally
>> came to head in mid-February 1942, when Curtin asked for Australia’s
>> experienced 6th and 7th Divisions to return from Africa to defend Australia
>> in the South Pacific. Churchill instead demanded they be sent to Burma to
>> defend British interests there. Finally, after a furious flurry of cables
>> in the dead of night, Curtin managed to get the Australian troops to steam
>> back to Perth. Australia’s military now finally answered to Australian,
>> rather than British, leadership.
>> Australia becomes a world player
>>
>> Labor’s instigation of Australia as a founding member of the United
>> Nations was significant. Under Labor’s Prime Minister John Curtin,
>> Australia became a founding member of the United Nations and also the
>> International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the General Agreement on
>> Tariffs and Trade.
>>
>> Then Labor PM Ben Chifley’s External Affairs Minister, Herbert Evatt
>> played a crucial role in the creation of the United Nations, and famously
>> chaired the UN General Assembly in 1948-49. He presided over the adoption
>> and proclamation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”(1)
>>
>> Evatt was a Communist who later became leader of the Australia Labor
>> Party. His founding influence in the United Nations cemented the
>> relationship between the Australian Labor Party’s successive Prime
>> Ministers and the U.N.
>> GLOBALISATION is a UN Construct
>>
>> Gough Whitlam in 1975 signed the disastrous Lima Declaration that lead to
>> the economic practice now known as “globalisation”.
>>
>>
>> <http://concit.org/treachery-how-socialists-stole-australia-from-the-people/australia-act/>
>>
>>
>>
>> The basic reasoning behind the Lima Declaration was that the plight of
>> the Third World was a direct result of the rapacious policies of the
>> advanced industrial nations — Australia listed as one of these. The only
>> way to rectify the situation was to transfer industrial resources from the
>> advanced to the Third World, then to provide markets for Third World
>> exports by buying products once produced locally.
>>
>> *The following are the MAIN recommendations of the Lima Declaration:*
>>
>> (*35) “That special attention should be given to the least developed
>> countries, which should **enjoy a net transfer of resources from the
>> developed countries in the form of technical and financial resources as
>> well as capital goods**, to enable the least developed countries in
>> conformity with the policies and plans for development, to accelerate their
>> industrialisation.” (REDUCE our industry and farming sectors—treason)*
>>
>> *(43) “That the developing countries should fully and effectively
>> participate in the international decision making process on **international
>> monetary questions** in accordance with the existing and **evolving
>> rules of the competent bodies and share equitably in the benefits resulting
>> therefrom” *(Hawke allowed foreign banking into Australia as a result)
>>
>> *(59) “The developed countries should adopt the following measures:” *
>>
>> *(a) “Progressive elimination or reduction of tariff and non-tariff
>> barriers and other obstacles of trade, …**(take away tariffs, render our
>> manufacturing and farming uncompetitive due to cost of wages )*
>>
>> *(b) “Adoption of trade measures designed to ensure INCREASED exports of
>> manufactured and semi manufactured products including processed
>> agricultural products from the developing to the developed countries” **(
>> import food from overseas, cripple our farming sector)*
>>
>> *(c) “…encourage their industries which are LESS COMPETITIVE
>> internationally to move progressively into more viable lines of production
>> or into other sectors of the economy,…” **(no farm or industry
>> subsidies)*
>>
>> *(d) “Consideration by the developed countries of their policies with
>> respect to processed and semi processed forms of raw materials, taking full
>> account of the interests of the developing countries in increasing their
>> capacities and industrial potentials for processing raw materials which
>> they export” **(don’t process stuff here, send our resources overseas,
>> buy back semi-processed at increased cost.)*
>>
>> *(e) “Increased financial contributions to international organisations
>> and to government or credit institutions in the developing countries…”
>> (underwrite development banks like AIIB and foreign aid contributions )(6)*
>>
>>
>> <http://concit.org/treachery-how-socialists-stole-australia-from-the-people/manufacturing-1-1/>Australian
>> Manufacturing as percentage of GDP.
>>
>> *RESULT:* More than 70% of Australia’s manufacturing capacity and
>> agricultural businesses was destroyed in the ensuing years. In 1970
>> estimates numbered Australian farmers at around 300,000. The Agricultural
>> Census for 2015-1
>> <http://www.abc..net.au/news/rural/2017-07-07/whos-farming-australia-abs-agricultural-census-2015-16/8686750>6
>> found there were only 85,681 agricultural businesses across Australia.
>>
>> Globalisation has literally crippled Australian farming and agricultural
>> sectors as well as the economy. From surplus economies Australia now
>> suffers a massive trade deficit. May 2018’s “Debt Clock” showed the total
>> of Australian debt as $3.5 trillion of which $800 billion is Government
>> Debt.
>>
>> Communist China in the 70’s was considered a third world country. Today
>> it is becoming an economic super power and major beneficiary of this UN
>> wealth redistribution. This week the Chinese Government made the news by
>> threatening Australian exports because it didn’t appreciate the tone of
>> Australia media reports against its rapacious buying up of Australian
>> assets. The Oppressed is now becoming the Oppressor.
>>
>> Last year Australia committed $8.7 million into underpinning the Asian
>> Infrastructure Investment Bank for international development. It is just
>> more of the same United Nations Lima Declaration influencing Australian
>> foreign policy and spending.
>>
>> (The signing of the Lima Agreement by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam,
>> a Fabian Socialist, was nothing short of treason against the Australian
>> people. Benefit for the Australian economy and sovereignty is…ZERO.)
>> Separating Australia from the United Kingdom by title
>>
>> In December 1952, Commonwealth leaders discussed changing to the format
>> of the Queen’s title. Canada wanted it to be less British: “*Elizabeth
>> the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of [Realm] and of Her other realms
>> and territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith*.”
>>
>> Australia, under the devotedly monarchist Prime Minister Robert Menzies,
>> insisted that the United Kingdom also be included in the title. Australia
>> legislated this into Australia law through the *Royal Styles and Titles
>> Act* *1953* and the Queen became known here as the *Queen of the United
>> Kingdom and Australia*.
>>
>> Not until Fabian Socialist’s Gough Whitlam’s Labor government came to
>> power in 1972 were moves made to remove all references to the United
>> Kingdom in the Queen’s title. Elizabeth Windsor became styled in this
>> country as *Queen of Australia, w*ith her greater title: Elizabeth the
>> Second, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and
>> Territories, Head of the Commonwealth’.
>> <https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item-sdid-99.html> (1)
>> Separating Australia from the United Kingdom by Act of Parliament
>>
>> In 1986, The Fabian Socialist Labor Prime Minister of Australia, Bob
>> Hawke, asked the British Parliament to pass the *Australia Act*, which
>> effectively terminated the ability of the British Parliament to make laws
>> for Australia or its States, even at their request. It also broke the right
>> of appeal from our Australian courts to the British Privy Council.
>>
>> Changing the Constitution—Constitution Arrangements—according to our
>> Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act requires a public Referendum.
>> There was no public Referendum to make way for the Australia Act.
>>
>> The way Bob Hawke got around this in his Appeal to the British Government
>> was to have each individual state of Australia pass the Australia Act
>> separately, claiming that this constituted a united appeal to the UK
>> Parliament.
>>
>> The Australia Act was simultaneously presented to the UK and to Australia
>> in 1986. These nearly identical Acts were passed by the two parliaments,
>> because of uncertainty as to which of the two had the ultimate authority to
>> do so. The Acts came into effect simultaneously. Assent from the UK was
>> given because of this approach…but it should not have been as the Australia
>> Act was illegal and invalid on more than one account.
>> Why the Australia Act was illegal and treacherous
>>
>> Changes to Constitution Arrangements can’t be done without the consent of
>> the people. There was NO REFERENDUM. Each State knowingly passed the
>> Australia Act instead of putting it to general Referendum. Attempting to
>> pass the Australia Act without going to Referendum went against the Crimes
>> Act 1914 Section 24AA—overthrowing the Commonwealth.
>>
>> Bob Hawke and all the state Premiers conspired against the Australian
>> people in passing the Australia Act though their state Parliaments. Bob
>> Hawke, his labor Premiers Neville Wran, Barrie Unsworth, John Bannon, John
>> Cain, and Brian Burke, as well as Liberal Robin Gray became criminals
>> against Australian people.
>>
>> The Country Party’s (later the National Party) Premier of Queensland, Sir
>> Joh Bjelke-Petersen, did something really interesting. He created prior
>> legislation requiring that any Act that would change the Commonwealth
>> towards a Republic needed to go to a Referendum of the Queensland people.
>> As the passing of the Australia Act through the Queensland Parliament
>> failed to go to referendum, the Australia Act for Queensland was rendered
>> null and void by Petersen’s previous legislation.
>>
>> Hawke actually didn’t have that 100% mandate for the Australia Act in
>> having uniform assent from all the States. Queensland’s requirement for a
>> Referendum rendered Queensland’s Parliamentary assent invalid. This fact
>> was kept from the British Parliament also.
>>
>> *The 1986 Australia Act —the concerning excerpts for ALL Australians: *
>>
>> PREAMBLE: *An Act to bring **constitutional arrangements** affecting the
>> Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the
>> Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation.*
>>
>> (All Constitutional arrangements must be brought before the people
>> according to our Constitution in the form of a Referendum. This was not
>> done—therefore the Australia Act was simply illegal.)
>>
>> *2*. *(1) It is hereby declared and enacted that the legislative powers
>> of the Parliament of each State include **full power to make laws** for
>> the peace, order and good government of that State that have
>> extra-territorial operation.*
>>
>> (Gives full power back to the States which undermines the
>> Commonwealth—making this is repugnant to the Commonwealth Constitutional
>> Act, INVALID, ILLEGAL—and a Act of Treachery by Hawke and the Premiers).
>>
>> *5. Sections 2 and 3 (2) above— (a) **are subject to the Commonwealth of
>> Australia Constitution Act** and to the Constitution of the
>> Commonwealth; and (b) do not operate so as to give any force or effect to a
>> provision of an Act of the Parliament of a State that would repeal, amend
>> or** be repugnant to this Act, the Commonwealth of Australia
>> Constitution Act, the Constitution of the Commonwealth** or the Statute
>> of Westminster 1931 as amended and in force from time to time.*
>>
>> (Disbanding the Commonwealth and giving full powers back to the States IS
>> REPUGNANT to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. In its own
>> wording the Australia Act rendered the Act invalid)
>>
>> *7:2 **Her Majesty’s representative in each State shall be the Governor**.
>> (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, all powers and functions of
>> Her Majesty in respect of a State **are exercisable only by the Governor
>> of the State**. (3)*
>>
>> (The Catch 22—The Queens Representative is the Governor and once he’s
>> signed the bill she can’t do anything about it.. This stops the Queen
>> appealing any Act of Parliament…also against Section 59 of our
>> Constitution.)
>>
>> *8. An Act of the Parliament of a State that has been assented to by the
>> Governor of the State shall not, after the commencement of this Act, **be
>> subject to disallowance by Her Majesty**, nor shall its operation be
>> suspended pending the signification of Her Majesty’s pleasure thereon.*
>>
>> (Stops the Queen negating any laws and against the Australian
>> Constitution. Under section 59 of the Constitution, she has the power to
>> disallow any Australian law within a year of its enactment on appeal from
>> the Australian People.)
>>
>> *10. After the commencement of this Act Her Majesty’s Government in the
>> United Kingdom shall have **no responsibility for the government of any
>> State**.*
>>
>> (Takes away all legislative power from the UK.)
>>
>> 11…*no appeal to Her Majesty in Council lies or shall be brought*,
>> whether by leave or special leave of any court or of Her Majesty in Council
>> or otherwise, and whether by virtue of any Act of Australia Act 1986 Page 6
>> of 9 4 Australia No. , 1985 the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the Royal
>> Prerogative or otherwise, from or in respect of any decision of an
>> Australian court.
>>
>> (Stops our Courts appealing to the UK to overturn any laws made by the
>> States.)
>>
>> READ IN FULL HERE: https://www.foundingdocs.gov.a
>> u/resources/transcripts/cth17_doc_1986.pdf
>> <https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth17_doc_1986.pdf>
>>
>> All Constitutional Arrangements must be subject to a referendum. The
>> Australia Act by its own wording in Section 5 was rendered invalid and
>> illegal. The Will of the People was ignored and Democracy was undermined by
>> the 1986 Australia Act and then the High Court did this.
>>
>> The High Court in Sue v Hill was an Australian court case decided in the
>> High Court of Australia on 23 June 1999. It concerned a dispute over the
>> apparent return of a candidate, Heather Hill, to the Australian Senate in
>> the 1998 federal election. Heather Hill was a dual citizen of The United
>> Kingdom. The High Court found that, at least for the purposes of section
>> 44(i), the United Kingdom is a foreign power to Australia.
>>
>> The Precedent was set, the United Kingdom according to the High Court was
>> now “a foreign power” as a result of the Australia Act and in accordance
>> with section 44 of the Constitution.
>>
>> But the deception didn’t end there. The Australia Act divided our nation
>> back into States. Why did they do this? Our rights and liberties were well
>> entrenched. There was no need for it.
>>
>> Labor PM Bob Hawke, in an address to the Fabian Society in 1947 talked
>> about a Socialist agenda to Nationalise Banking. Which couldn’t happen
>> because of the Australian Constitution—Section 92. He said it required
>> “rethinking of our approach”. (9)
>>
>> Constitution Section 92—” trade, commerce, and intercourse among the
>> States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be
>> absolutely free”. The Fabian Socialists could not interfere with trade and
>> commerce with the way our Constitution stood. The plans to undermine our
>> Constitution didn’t start in 1986, it started back in the 40s.
>>
>> The Illegal Australia Act prepared the way for those politicians with a
>> Socialist agenda to make Australia a Republic. Once a Republic, the way
>> would be opened to make those changes to the Australian Constitution
>> through the introduction of a new Constitution of the Australian Republic.
>> REFERENDUM: The Australian People vote on becoming a Republic
>>
>> Though initially started by Labor Leader, Paul Keating a Referendum was
>> eventually put to the people to become a Republic and to change the
>> pre-amble to the Constitution in 1999 by Liberal PM, John Howard in his
>> first term in office.
>>
>> Two questions were put to the people in the 1999 Referendum:
>>
>> *Republic question*
>>
>> Electors were asked whether they approved of:
>>
>> *A proposed law: To alter the Constitution to establish the Commonwealth
>> of Australia as a republic with the Queen and Governor-General being
>> replaced by a President appointed by a two-thirds majority of the members
>> of the Commonwealth Parliament.*
>>
>> *Alter the Preamble to the Constitution*
>>
>> Electors were also asked to vote on a second question at the 1999
>> referendum which asked whether they approved of:
>>
>> *A proposed law: To alter the Constitution to insert a preamble.*
>>
>> *The preamble would then have read*
>> *With hope in God, the Commonwealth of Australia is constituted as a
>> democracy with a federal system of government to serve the common good.* *We
>> the Australian people commit ourselves to this Constitution:* *proud
>> that our national unity has been forged by Australians from many
>> ancestries;* *never forgetting the sacrifices of all who defended our
>> country and our liberty in time of war;* *upholding freedom, tolerance,
>> individual dignity and the rule of law;* *honouring Aborigines and
>> Torres Strait Islanders, the nation’s first people, for their deep kinship
>> with their lands and for their ancient and continuing cultures which enrich
>> the life of our country;* *recognising the nation-building contribution
>> of generations of immigrants;* *mindful of our responsibility to protect
>> our unique natural environment;* *supportive of achievement as well as
>> equality of opportunity for all;* *and valuing independence as dearly as
>> the national spirit which binds us together in both adversity and success.*
>>
>> The people voted a resounding NO. Even though this was one of the most
>> highly propagandised YES campaigns by the Australian media.
>>
>> The 1999 Referendum clearly voted to not replace the Queen or The
>> Crown—the people had spoken.
>>
>> The Australia Act at this point should have been scrapped. Instead the
>> successive Fabian Socialist Prime Ministers (Hawke and Keating) turned to
>> Corporations Law and got around the Constitution of the Commonwealth
>> another way.
>> “Stealth Law-making” using Reprints Act 1992.
>>
>> The Queensland Reprints Act 1992 was used by Labor to enable State
>> Parliaments to rewrite Acts, to print and change laws. Introduced by
>> Premier Wayne Goss in Queensland, The Reprints Act of 1992 allowed for
>> changes to be made to legislation without assent. It also allowed for
>> retrospective changes be made to past legislation and changes to mask our
>> Constitution using Reprints. (Watch the video)
>>
>> Providing the changes in the Reprints were detailed, any law could be
>> changed and the onus of discovering the change was on the Courts. So the
>> Government could introduced a change, leave a trail, and by virtue of it
>> being reprinted those changes then became law.
>>
>> The Reprints Act used the power given to the States in The Australia Act
>> to effectively undermine and mask the Australian Constitution using state
>> legislation.
>> Queensland creates an invalid 2001 Constitution
>>
>> In Queensland the Labor Party under *Fabian Socialist* Premier—Peter
>> Beattie—used the power granted to the State though the Australia Act to
>> “modernise” the Queensland Constitution and prepare Queensland for
>> corporate Statehood.
>>
>> Firstly the revisions in the new 2001 Queensland Constitution removed the
>> need for State Government to seek Referendums on all Constitutional
>> changes. (Commonwealth legislation according to the Commonwealth Australian
>> Constitution Act trumps all State legislation at odds with it. The changes
>> to the new 2001 Queensland Constitution by removing referendums made it
>> like The Australia Act 1986—*repugnant to the Commonwealth of Australia
>> Constitution Act* and rendered the new Constitution 2001 invalid. But
>> like the Australia Act 1986 no one has challenged either pieces of invalid
>> Legislation.)
>>
>> The New Queensland 2001 Constitution also stealthily replaced the Crown
>> with the “State” and changed the State into an Individual. In the 1999
>> Referendum 66% of Queenslanders voting to retain the Crown. The
>> Constitution 2001 was against the will of the people. It was all done
>> underhandedly using The Reprints Acts and this was just the beginning.
>>
>>
>> *The BRIGALOW CORPORATION and private land ownership*
>> 1. During the early 1990’s all important and relevant Acts were changed
>> and framed, but were adjourned *without a definite date of reprinting*.
>> 2. On 3 December 2001, the *Queensland Constitution 2001* came into
>> being.
>> 3. On this day, this ACT became the “Fundamental Law of QLD”.
>> 4. 7 June 2002, all the framed Acts *were reprinted* and became law.
>> 5. QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, *without the
>> assent of any of the laws* by the Crown or Her Representative,* an
>> independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation
>> of powers in that state.*
>> 6. 15 July 2002, *The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) **Reprint No 3* created
>> in QLD a Corporate Government.
>> The State of Queensland Australia (*the reason why the state was made an
>> individual*) is registered with the US Securities and Exchange
>> Commissions under No. 0001244818.
>> 7. The Queensland Treasury Corp (*the reason why the state was made an
>> individual*) is registered under No. 0000852555.
>> 8. The old crowns lands act (Qld) *was converted* to the *Land Act 1994
>> (Qld),* and at section 4(1) the Land Administration Commission was
>> renamed *Brigalow Corporation*.
>> 9. *The Land Act 1994 – **Reprint No 10**c, Part 7A, Section 506C* states
>> that the Corporation (Brigalow Corp) represents the Crown.
>> 10. Culminating in the Beattie Govt introduction of the QLD Constitution
>> 2001, QLD government administrations had *reworked backward* every piece
>> of Federal and state legislation, removing any connection to and mention of
>> Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, British law and the Royal Seal of England.
>> 11. These acts were then *reworked forward*, replacing the removed
>> elements with the Queen of Australia (as created by the Whitlam Govt in
>> 1973) and the Great Seal of both Australia and QLD.
>> 12. This means that the legislation contained in those acts are now
>> “governed” by the government of those Seals, not the government of the
>> Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900.
>>
>> *What Labor had effectively done was turn Queensland into a corporation
>> and stolen it away from “we the people” and from under the Australian
>> Constitution”. It is grand theft!*
>>
>> 13. The *Australia Waste Lands Act 1855* was *reprinted* in 1996 under
>> the Seal of QLD, and because the Queen of Australia was also now sealed
>> with the Seal of QLD, this effectively created a QLD “ownership” of all
>> Crown land in Australia.
>> 14. And as the introduction of the *Corporations (Q) Act 1900 (Q) **Reprint
>> No** 3* had created a Corporate Govt, this effectively meant all Crown
>> land “ownership” was now under the control of the Qld Corporation, known as
>> the Brigalow Corp.
>>
>> *The Premier is the Chief Officer of the Brigalow Corporation.*
>>
>> 15. All Crown land, assets and infrastructure in Australia including
>> schools, hospitals, roads, etc are subject to and responsible to the
>> Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at
>> *Chapter III of the QLD Constitution 2001.*16. All Sovereign People are
>> now persons under the Corporation, All persons are chattel ( a piece of
>> property that is moveable).
>> 17. Their land, bank accounts and all items of ownership are now assets
>> under the Brigalow Corporation.
>> 18. The *Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Magistrate’s Courts
>> are now inside the Parliament* of the State of QLD, and as such must
>> obey the *QLD Constitution 2001*.
>> 19. *The Australian Constitution,* the Common Law & Equity, the High
>> Court and the Federal Government *no longer have any superior governance
>> over the State of QLD.*
>>
>> *The Judiciary, the Constitution and the Governor are now under control
>> of the State. The people no longer have access to the High Court. The
>> federal Government and Australian Constitution no longer has any superior
>> Governance over Queensland. Queensland officially left the Commonwealth of
>> Australia….and without one Referendum on the matter. *
>>
>> 20. The State of QLD and the Sovereign People of QLD have only Civil and
>> Statute Law in this state.
>> 21. As private ownership can not exist under Civil and Statute Law, all
>> private equity and inheritance in the State is now the property of “the
>> State”*. (8)*
>>
>> Invalid legislation like the Australia Act and the Queensland
>> Constitution 2001 and subsequent reprints must be challenged. Indeed what
>> these pieces of legislation amount to is treason against the Australian
>> people and our Constitution. All those involved need to accountable to the
>> Crimes Act 1914 Section 24AA
>>
>> *24AA Treachery (1) A person shall not: (a) do any act or thing with
>> intent: (i) to overthrow the Constitution of the Commonwealth by revolution
>> or sabotage.*
>>
>> Prime Minsters *Whitlam, Hawke, Keating* for their involvement in the
>> Australia Act and subsequent illegal legislation. For passing the Australia
>> Act though their Parliaments: Premiers *Neville Wran, Barrie Unsworth,
>> John Bannon, John Cain, Brian Burke and Robin Gray.*
>>
>> *Peter Bettie* for Creating the 2001 Queensland Constitution and
>> subsequent Reprints.
>>
>> Penalty for treachery: Imprisonment for life….(and removal of all
>> Pensions and benefits).
>> The further undermining of the Australian Sovereignty by the United
>> Nations
>>
>>
>> <http://concit.org/treachery-how-socialists-stole-australia-from-the-people/slider-welcome-to-the-unaa-3-1-1140x400/>The
>> United Nations represents an equal threat to the undermining of the
>> Constitution of the Commonwealth. Consider this entreaty from Peter Farris,
>> QC.
>>
>> “We are preparing to abdicate our Australian sovereignty to “law” made by
>> the United Nations… A greater attack on national sovereignty is hard to
>> imagine. A prime and current example is global warming. The propagation of
>> this fraud by the Left constitutes a major attack on capitalism. Rich
>> countries will be obliged to bankrupt their industries and economies, to
>> the great benefit of so-called poor countries like China and India. In the
>> end, the aim is to bring the US [and Australia] to its knees…….. The Left
>> do not want to have Australian laws for Australia. They want UN laws. This,
>> of course, removes Australian sovereignty.
>>
>> Instead of Australians making their own laws, the laws are imported (as
>> some sort of universal truths) from the UN. The ultimate aim, which will be
>> achieved, is that every UN covenant is legislated into law in Australia.
>>
>> The practical effect is that the UN becomes our supreme legislative body.
>> And these laws will be supervised by the unelected judges who can
>> effectively strike down any legislation of the duly elected Parliaments……
>>
>> From the point of view of sovereignty, the United Nations has no
>> legitimacy—in fact, it is in direct contradiction to the concept of
>> sovereignty. It is one thing for Australians to make their own laws, it is
>> quite another for the UN—an unelected body, a collection of states
>> including some of the worst in the world—to be deciding what laws are so
>> universal that they should be imposed upon the Australian people…And we can
>> be absolutely certain that our socialist federal Government, in the great
>> tradition of socialists and communists, will seek to destroy our Australian
>> sovereignty in favour of UN dogma……
>>
>> In summary, my complaint is this. We introduced into Australia, as
>> legislated domestic law, various UN Covenants. These replace parts of our
>> own law as we know it. The introduction of these laws acknowledges their
>> moral superiority—they are universal laws and must be obeyed. Our
>> sovereignty is diminished by the fact that these superior laws are the
>> product of an unelected body outside of Australia. Australia and
>> Australians have demonstrated that they are perfectly capable of creating a
>> just legal system arising from our national sovereignty. This is now
>> denied. The acceptance of UN Covenants is an acceptance of the correctness
>> of that denial.”—*Peter Farris QC*. (2)
>>
>> The United Nations undermines our Sovereignty by creating legislation
>> that appears in our statutes without assent from the people of Australia.
>>
>> Without a Referendum, every PM that has ever signed a UN Agreement is now
>> party to this undermining:
>> John Curtin – Signatory to the United Nations (aligned us to a foreign
>> power without a referendum);
>> Robert Menzies – UN Refugee Convention (Stopped Equality at
>> law—introducing “cultural considerations”)
>> Gough Whitlam – Lima Declaration (Sabotaged our manufacturing and
>> farming sectors)
>> Malcolm Fraser – UN Human Rights Charter (Allowed UNHCR and Muslim
>> migration)
>> Malcolm Turnbull – Climate Change Conference (Skyrocketing energy costs
>> to meet targets not set by us)
>>
>> We must start making our Parliamentarians and leaders accountable to we
>> the people and our Constitution.
>>
>> Time to Drain Our Swamp and take back our Parliaments don’t you think?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sources:
>>
>> 1.
>>
>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-12-07/australia27s_last_bric
>> k_of_nationhood/41892
>> 2.
>>
>> http://www.galileomovement.com.au/docs/gw/UNsolutions_or_OZs
>> olutions.pdf
>> 3.
>>
>> https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth17_
>> doc_1986.pdf
>> 4.
>>
>> https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item-sdid-94.html
>> 5.
>>
>> https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item-sdid-99.html
>> 6.
>>
>> http://www.ironbarkresources.com/articles/phillips20050300.htm
>> 7.
>>
>> http://www.australiandebtclock.com.au/
>> 8.
>>
>> http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2010/01/overv
>> iew-of-brigalow-corp-takeover-of.html
>> <http://peopleofthecommonwealth.blogspot.com.au/2010/01/overview-of-brigalow-corp-takeover-of.html>
>> 9.
>>
>> https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/release/transcript-6396
>>
>> AddThis Sharing Buttons
>>
>> Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to
>> More8.1K
>>
>>
>>
>>
>