Body
Mick! Glad to see someone is paying attention! Your quote! BTW. I was
a friend of Smith and can verify that his goal was to capture and
utilize the earth magnetic fields as his source of power. He had all
the maps of magnetic flux anomalies around the earth. His favorite was
at Little Rock AR. You are correct in your assumption! You mentioned
the Neutral Spike phenomenon. It all goes back to the John Miliske
Super Light which you should re-read and appreciate its implications.
See: Super Light.
*WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
*By:Dr. John Mileweski***
*SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
*Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**.
There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and
opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and
left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not
light? *
*Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things
except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity in light as well ! *
*I will now explain and give you more detail. *
*SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by
science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of
years. It has been given different names by different cultures for
thousands of years. *
*A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy,
Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum
Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception
know it is real. *
*SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James
Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his
famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by
Nikola Tesla <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and
theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain
radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this
explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation
such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation
also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the
solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second
solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught
algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root
of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have
changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's
equation and it is SuperLight. *
*In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University
took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this
second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
*To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first
or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio
waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source
(the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity
traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large
electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the
electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
*The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite
structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point
source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation is
composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component,
thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked
at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of
light squared !** 10^20 meters per second, or 10 billion times faster
than light <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
*It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding,
shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher energy density. *
*The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come
we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"
Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8
nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes
through everything as though the substance was nearly completely
transparent (like glass). *
*We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays,
but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be
given later. *
*WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
*It comes out of black holes !***
*First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the
analogy for SuperLight. *
*Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric
monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an
electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or
absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is
converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the
opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
*So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an
electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its energy
in the form of light. *
*Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot
matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain
magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small,
extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their
orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So black
holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of
course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of the black
holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it
therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
*The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy
in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of
galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are
literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an
"Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
When you get into IONS, one should remember the negative ion fields that
are created around a running Tesla coil that causes chilling effects.
Se my paper on What is Heat that I wrote back in the 90s.
What is Heat #2
For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
people do not understand how these devices move thermal
energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
melted when the polarity of the direct current was
reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
materials which could provide the wide temperature
differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
small temperature differential across the device a weak
current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
the differential provided a proportional increase in current
and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
reversible situation based on polarity.
Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
transitions between phases.More energy is present after
the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
a very simple example of heating which may explain this
process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
heated because electrons in the material are converted to
photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
(ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
(ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
how the process works.All phase change processes work the
same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
generator operates at very high voltages with very little
current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
differential will cause a development of current and voltage
as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
of experimentation.Norm
BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity"
they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde,
liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil primary.
Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a
very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
More here on "Evanescent wave"! and "critical angle"!
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection_
On 1/16/2016 10:31 AM, Norman wrote:
_https://physics.ucf.edu/~rep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf
<https://physics.ucf.edu/%7Erep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf>_
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_field_ This article shows how
to approach "Zero Loss"! BTW, Moray, read this little note
regarding your "micro sphere implosion" phenomenon! ("Evanescent wave
coupling is used to excite, for example, _dielectric microsphere
resonators
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dielectric_microsphere_resonators&action=edit&redlink=1>_.").
On 1/16/2016 10:06 AM, Norman wrote:
PS:
Natural infrared
Sunlight, at an effective temperature of 5,780 kelvins, is composed of
nearly thermal-spectrum radiation that is slightly more than half
infrared. At zenith, sunlight provides an _irradiance
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irradiance>_ of just over 1 _kilowatt
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt>_ per square meter at sea level.
Of this energy, 527 watts is infrared radiation, 445 watts is _visible
light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light>_, and 32 watts is
_ultraviolet <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet>_
radiation._^[10] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#cite_note-10> _
On the surface of Earth, at far lower temperatures than the surface of
the Sun, almost all thermal radiation consists of infrared in various
wavelengths. Of these natural thermal radiation processes only lightning
and natural fires are hot enough to produce much visible energy, and
fires produce far more infrared than visible-light energy.
If you are going to collect it you have to know what you are dealing with!
On 9/15/2018 1:18 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Warren,
>
> Glad to see someone is paying attention, I was waiting for someone to
> pick up on that. People think of the Smith device as an transformer
> but it is actually an antenna. This is also what Hector talks about
> with his RV, RF energy modulating the phases to usable electricity
> through transformation.
>
> Most of the Smith schematics are wrong, including Zilano's which is
> probably a good thing or there would be many dead experimenters.
>
> Smith:
>
> HV Dc + modulated antenna = energy pump
>
> Don't forget to remember to remove the ions or nature creates another
> equilibrium, in other words the more one loads it the better the
> device works up to it's own engineering limitations. Also design
> based on which ions one desires to work with the earth ones or air.
> Of course the real extreme multiplication factor comes from utilizing
> the return strike or neutral spike.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_field
>
> "Electromagnetic evanescent waves have been used to exert
> opticalradiation pressure
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure>on small particles
> to trap them for experimentation, or tocool
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrigeration>them to very low
> temperatures,"
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency
>
> "The quantum interference in EIT can be exploited tolaser cool
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_cooling>atomic particles, even
> down to the quantum mechanical ground state of motion.^[2]
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency#cite_note-2>
> This has recently been used to directly image individual atoms trapped
> in anoptical lattice
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_lattice>.^[3]"
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency#cite_note-3>
>
>
>
> Warren,
>
> Did you procure the buzzer that Norm gave the link for?
>
>
> On 9/14/2018 8:20 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> .Mick
>>
>> That is most impressive for a SSB antenna.
>> I sure could have used such a nice tool on my schooner while cruising.
>> Do you notice how similar it is to some Don Smith, and Tesla coils?
>> Zilano gives detailed building instructions, as well, for a very
>> similar coil.
>> There seems to be a whole school of study regarding this type of
>> magnetic field transducer, or antenna, that we are not so familiar with.
>> I am feeling like a chimpanzee contemplating a diode.
>> We have a lot of work to do.
>> Another wide band device/(antenna) might be Tesla's spiral pancake coil.
>> I had good luck with my little experiments, using the induction stove
>> top and a 3 hp treadmill motor, with a lamp cord pancake coil. The
>> induction stove software sucked, but the basic concept was good of
>> driving with induction/pancake.
>> The current amplification seemed substantial, if the motor speed, and
>> performance, was any indication.
>> This other coil looks interesting,now, too.
>> Cheers Warren
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 5:27 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> Yes the Black Hole looks super cool for energy harvesting.
>>
>> What is kind of interesting is that this antenna has been around
>> since at least 03 and there is very little information on how to
>> build it. Then of course all the engineers poo pooing it
>> claiming it's just a dummy load and the coax is doing all the
>> work because they cannot possibly relate to the additional vector
>> claim. The reviews of people using it claim it works very well
>> in practice, lots of contacts but not all that well with
>> theoretical testing ie with radiated output power etc. To me it
>> looks like a 90 degree phase modulated diskone where one disk
>> would be in counterphase to the other creating the longitudinal
>> field aspect same as my wireless charging of HVAC caps. Would be
>> interesting to see the current/voltage phase plot.
>>
>> Lights a florescent pretty well at 4 watts
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWR5d7t0WAw
>> http://www.ehant.qrz.ru/eh_phase.pdf
>>
>>
>> On 9/13/2018 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks! Mick, reminds me of the Sutton Black Hole Antennae that
>>> was presented at the Tesla Symposium.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/12/2018 4:49 PM, Mick [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is a magnetic antenna that functions similar to Tesla's
>>>> wireless
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eh-antenna.com/EH_HZ.pdf
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>