Re: Aw: Re: AW: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight
Database ID: 108984
2018-07-30T07:57:57-05:00
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID
In-Reply-To:
<[email protected]>
Body
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/electromagnetism/magnetic-hysteresis.html On 7/30/2018 7:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: > > A typical magnetization curve of an iron core > coil is shown in Figure 2. As the current > increases, the magnetic flux density increases. > A point is reached, however, where further > increases in current yield smaller and smaller > increases in flux density. This is called the > saturation point, and is characterized by a > dramatic change in the slope of the current - > flux density curve. The slope of this curve is > proportional to the inductance of the coil, which > indicates that the inductance value itself is > different for current magnitudes above the > saturation point. This is key to understanding > ferroresonance. As the current in a > ferromagnetic coil increases beyond the > saturation point, the inductance of the coil > changes rather suddenly. > As Ole has explained, the inductive value of an iron core coil can go > down to that of an air core inductor at super saturation (radical > inductive value shift) that Tesla himself described when he stated > that a fine grade of iron would enable us to tap this form of energy. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pentacarbonyl and electrolytic iron > are the purest forms of iron that Tesla eluded to. Interesting topic > in itself to say the least! I have wanted to buy this form of PURE > iron and sinter (heat bonding) > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sintering) to make a pure iron core > that would yield a perfect super saturable core as Tesla described. > If you will go back and read Tesla comments on the perfect iron you > will see that dead soft (pure) iron would yield the the worst case > hysteresis magnetic curve. This is highly desirable when you look for > the super saturation (current hog). Transformer lams are made of > silicon steel to mitigate the harsh BH magnitication curve that easily > saturates. (comments please) Norm > > > On 7/30/2018 7:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >> >> Sorry Sven, I missed commenting on the last portion of your message >> regarding the occurrence of ferroresonance in a pure sine wave input >> supply! If you read carefully the Cadick Report (attached) you will >> be able to set up a three phase transformer and intentionally apply >> all the No! Nos! and put your circuit into a ferroresonant effect. >> An unloaded leg with the proper capacitance value will set up a self >> targeting (wild card) ferroresonant situation. >> >> >> On 7/30/2018 6:59 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>> >>> Sven! My production of the Neutral Spike phenomenon with the 5 HP >>> A/C compressor (capacitors, start & run 45mfd) had the iron frame >>> earth bonded. The motor winding and capacitors were isolated from >>> ground when the single phase two pole contactor was opened at iron >>> saturation. (locked rotor amps). I believe our friend Ole explained >>> what happens to an iron core inductor when it goes into saturation, >>> there is a shift in inductive value to that of and air core instead >>> of iron core. Its in this shift region that the capacitive value = >>> the inductive value X-L= X-C and you get the ferroresonant effect. >>> There are two different ferroresonant sounds. When you get the >>> familiar marbles in a tin can sound, the circuit is in stochastic >>> resonance, where there is a rapid shifting in and out of resonance >>> (water hammer sound).. The Hector described squeal is heard when >>> there is a solid sustained ferroresonance and sound emitted depends >>> on self targeted ferroresonant frequency. The target frequency is a >>> wild card, and solely dependent on the Xl=Xc match up in circuit >>> parameters. My replication gave an audible sound like a loud growl >>> then a whoooomp! as circuit targeted and gave the EMP shot from the >>> earth ground side of circuit. The aerial non nuclear EMP weapon >>> (ishttps://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb3.htm) (Flux compression >>> generator) an interesting animal for it is totally isolated from >>> earth ground since it is at high altitude when EMP burst is emitted. >>> Isolated charged capacitors and inductor at super saturation and >>> inductor instantaneously shorted to drop inductive value to zero! >>> Boom, EMP shot! Now this is where the Super Light, Magneto-Electric >>> effect comes into play! (see: Dr. John Mileweski, Super Light) Norm >>> >>> >>> On 7/30/2018 5:50 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> Hello Norman, >>>> >>>> somehow I'm not quite there now. The soil or earth reaction as a >>>> neutral spike can only be transmitted if the iron laminate of the >>>> transformer is earthed?!?. >>>> For fun, I've held the earth cable to the laminate at resonance and >>>> there was a brief sparks of blue sparks, but I have to re-touch the >>>> laminate over and over again, and there was a short change on the >>>> oscilloscope with high voltage spikes. >>>> >>>> With max. Im impedance I go to 1500 volts in resonance. When the >>>> transformer is in resonance, the sound of the transformer changes, >>>> that's right. But he does not squeak like a pig. >>>> >>>> That's why I wanted to control the transformer so that I can tickle >>>> him adjustable frequency and with sharp energy peaks to produce the >>>> resonance with little energy expenditure or a more extreme effect. >>>> Would be nice if someone has recorded this noise in the >>>> Ferroresonanz times. I can just make a video of my transverter as >>>> the sound changes. >>>> I also own a real Magnetic voltage constant holder, so a >>>> Ferroresonanztrafo and that sounds just the same for me. >>>> >>>> Now I run the transformer with mains-sine AC 50Hz. >>>> And I have a sine wave inverter that uses a toroidal transformer to >>>> generate a 50 Hz AC voltage in the 4 quadrant system, ie with 4 >>>> IGBTs or Mosfet. The device is very simple to build, no boost >>>> converter is needed as the toroidal transformer transforms the >>>> voltage from 24V to 230V. >>>> >>>> When I see the Pdfs that you have posted, I see network equipment >>>> and network systems are operated with pure sinewave. >>>> >>>> Does not it make any difference what I take as an energy source? >>>> >>>> I thought with pure sine wave voltage one can not produce the >>>> effects so easily! >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 um 16:27 Uhr >>>> *Von:* "Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> *An:* [email protected], "Bert Pool" <[email protected]>, >>>> "Bob Paddock" <[email protected]>, "joel mcclain" >>>> <[email protected]>, "Jon Gentry" <[email protected]>, >>>> Mbking42 <[email protected]>, "Toby Grotz" >>>> <[email protected]>, "Jeane Manning" <[email protected]>, >>>> "Pre mbold" <[email protected]> >>>> *Betreff:* Re: AW: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight [2 Attachments] >>>> >>>> Sven , Warren slowly getting back around to the Transverter and how >>>> to extract that energy! Hector described it correctly in that you >>>> have to make the pig squeal. My favorite subject, >>>> Ferroresonance! I started putting together a file on the EVGARYTWO >>>> site Norm's Research regarding the Ferroresonance Phenomenon and >>>> titled it Ferroresonance Capture. Have see this phenomenon many >>>> times and actually was able to replicate it on the bench top >>>> convinced me that there is a lot of anomalous power when you see >>>> voltages and currents multiplied by 10X over line supply. >>>> Ferroresonance and Stochastic resonance (rapid shifts in and out of >>>> resonance) have a different sound to them. Just like the hydraulic >>>> analog called the Water Hammer effect. When totally isolated >>>> event, the ground response is called the Neutral Spike cause this >>>> energy comes from the Earth Ground neutral. Read some of the >>>> articles on this, especially the comments from the common linemen >>>> that work day to day with it! >>>> >>>> https://powerlineman.com/lforum/archive/index.php/t-5798.html >>>> <https://powerlineman.com/lforum/archive/index.php/t-5798.html> >>>> >>>> I had both 3 phase and single phase transformers in the 5KVA size to play with and it was very easy to set up the Hector squealing pig. The Rotor Verter was easiest to put into this condition when switching in capacitance which caused the motor to growl at you like an angry dog or go into instant rotor lock while running at full speed. Not good for instant torque would sen motor flying. That is the reason I sold my 40HP Marathon RV to Luther down in Houston. Instantly locking a 40 # rotor at 1725 RPM is a No! No! All you have to do is accidentally switch in a huge capacitive value while running and if a match occurs you get the stochastic resonance or the rotor lock up. Play around with this but be cautious! >>>> On 7/29/2018 4:59 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] >>>> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>> Enjoy being with your family on these holidays. >>>> This little disturbance in the AC signal is interesting. >>>> Could it be harmonics of the main signal? >>>> I have usually taken the lazy man's solution to this problem >>>> and changed the signals to DC, whenever it is possible, using >>>> the DC . >>>> Cheers Warren >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> >>>> >>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 at 3:09 AM, 'S.friedrich' >>>> [email protected] [EVGRAY] >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello Warren, I'm still working on the transverter, the >>>> diode plug circuit works, if the diodes, thyristors are >>>> sized large, there are no thermal issues. My research is >>>> now focused on tickling the Transformer to his sweetspot. >>>> laughing. I have the Pushpull control not yet finished >>>> because I always get under load disturbances in the >>>> alternating signal. At the moment there are holidays with >>>> us for the children and I have little time for such things. >>>> Best regards Sven >>>> Von Samsung Mobile gesendet >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>>> Von: "Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY]" >>>> Datum:29.07.2018 05:17 (GMT+01:00) >>>> An: [email protected] >>>> Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>> What was the final result with your three phase transformer? >>>> My computer died and I have had to rely on my phone >>>> Cheers Warren >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 11:28 AM, Mick >>>> [email protected] [EVGRAY] >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Norm, >>>> >>>> Talk about plain sight how about this. Professional >>>> recording tape was made with a barium ferrite oxide >>>> layer. The record heads run a high frequency ac >>>> frequency to help the domains flip without interference >>>> called bias, different freqs depending on tape speed. >>>> >>>> Want to flip domains fast enough to record sound >>>> accurately must have some bias to make it smooth and >>>> slippery. Talk about low Lenz, what is Bias supposed to >>>> do, remove hysteresis! >>>> >>>> http://richardhess.com/notes/2008/02/02/tape-recorder-bias-frequencies/ >>>> >>>> On 7/26/2018 2:49 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> >>>> Having been in Military Research & Development and >>>> moving to Dallas in 1981, I found the Tesla Book >>>> Store over in Greenville,TX where I bought all of >>>> Tom Bearden's works and a ton of information on the >>>> Master himself, Tesla. Through the years I have >>>> kept up on the Black Budget Programs and have >>>> always correlated what I was reading with the real >>>> world developments. If you folks would so kindly >>>> spend a little time reading the KeelyNet, Guy Resh >>>> presentation of the Sweet Bearden paper from the >>>> Boston Conference and put the pieces of the puzzle >>>> together, you will see what has been going on in >>>> plain sight. When you read the Sweet/Bearden paper >>>> you will stop and say to yourself, Did he just say >>>> what I think he said? All of the puzzle is >>>> forming a brilliant picture. Bearden put me onto >>>> the Book, Physics of the Primary State of Matter, >>>> Davson, 1955 in which the energetic Aether was >>>> described as Glowing Magnetism, Cold Plasma in a >>>> hard vacuum. >>>> Read and enjoy! Norm >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Forwarded Message ----- >>>> *From:* "Energy Times Newsletter" >>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> *To:* "Norman Wootan" <[email protected]> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* >>>> *Sent:* Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM >>>> *Subject:* * DISCLOSED * Gravity Control Method >>>> Demonstrates 80% weight reduction! >>>> >>>> */* RELEASED * GRAVITY CONTROL - WITH PRESENT >>>> TECHNOLOGY/* >>>> >>>> Hi Norman, >>>> >>>> We held off on announcing which presentation was >>>> going to be released today until we actually >>>> launched it due to the critical nature of the content. >>>> >>>> Oppenheimer, Bohm and other fathers of the atomic >>>> age personally taught one very brilliant man named >>>> Dr. Frederick Alzofon who went on to develop a >>>> method to control gravity, which was experimentally >>>> proven in 1994. I had the honor and privilege to >>>> spend time with him in a private meeting around >>>> 2004 in Corvallis, Oregon and he shared many >>>> insights with me were simply mind-blowing. He was >>>> always in the back of my mind and I lost touch with >>>> him and unfortunately, he passed away in 2012. >>>> Thankfully, I was able to get in contact with his >>>> son David Alzofon who agreed to present at the >>>> conference and it has been an interesting journey >>>> ever since. >>>> >>>> Read this now and get your hands on a copy while >>>> you can: >>>> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >>>> >>>> Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: >>>> *GRAVITY25* >>>> >>>> In 1994, Dr. Alzofon experimentally proved that his >>>> predictions based on his Unified Field Theory were >>>> correct and *he was able to reduce the weight of >>>> aluminum by 80%!!!* We're talking about someone who >>>> was a physicist at Lockheed and Boeing so the >>>> quality of the material is not some home-brewed >>>> method with a bunch of hype - you're getting the >>>> first ever disclosure that is meant for the general >>>> public. The presentation is subtitled "with present >>>> technology" because it can be done with equipment >>>> that is readily available and is not some far off >>>> future fantasy. >>>> >>>> If you want to know of a path on controlling >>>> gravity, which cancels inertia and opens the door >>>> possibly to some unspoken of free energy >>>> possibilities, /embrace this * RARE * and priceless >>>> gift/! >>>> >>>> Read this now and get your hands on a copy while >>>> you can: >>>> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >>>> >>>> Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: >>>> *GRAVITY25* >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> Emediapress.com >>>> >>>> *2018 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE >>>> PRESENTATIONS RELEASED* >>>> >>>> *IMPORTANT*: After completing payment in the >>>> shopping cart, click the OK button and scroll down >>>> and click the *GREEN* button to access the >>>> download. Details are here: >>>> http://emediapress.com/download-help/ >>>> This is INSTANT ACCESS - you do not need to wait >>>> for an email to come with download instructions - >>>> you're already there. >>>> >>>> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *EPD25* - ERIC DOLLARD - >>>> /HISTORY, THEORY & PRACTICE OF THE ELECTRICAL >>>> UTILITY SYSTEM/: >>>> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115 >>>> >>>> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *WATER25* - DR. GERALD >>>> POLLACK - /FOURTH PHASE OF WATER, BEYOND LIQUID, >>>> SOLID & VAPOR/: >>>> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=116 >>>> >>>> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *GRAVITY25* - DAVID ALZOFON >>>> - GRAVITY CONTROL WITH PRESENT TECHNOLOGY: >>>> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >>>> >>>> POB 10029 >>>> Spokane WA 99209 >>>> USA >>>> >>>> When you read the above document, you will see a >>>> spacecraft OTC which stands for Otis T. Carr. >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t67876ch95M >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haurcUcDiiA >>>> >>>> http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm >>>> >>>> Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed). When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder! >>>> >>>> Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame. >>>> >>>> See: Super light! >>>> >>>> >>>> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?* >>>> >>>> *By:Dr. John Mileweski* >>>> >>>> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is >>>> **magneto–electric radiation**.. * >>>> >>>> *Regular light is electric light or >>>> **electro–magnetic radiation**.. There is parity or >>>> symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and >>>> opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the >>>> Yang, right and left, matter and anti matter, the >>>> electron and the positron. Why not light? * >>>> >>>> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this >>>> parity law in all things except light. They are >>>> wrong. ** There is parity in light as well ! * >>>> >>>> *I will now explain and give you more detail. * >>>> >>>> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has >>>> been ignored by science but real to the mystics and >>>> metaphysicians for thousands of years. It has been >>>> given different names by different cultures for >>>> thousands of years. * >>>> >>>> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's >>>> Orgone Energy, Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal >>>> Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum Energy, and Zero >>>> Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception >>>> know it is real. * >>>> >>>> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 >>>> years ago when James Clerk Maxwell >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> >>>> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred >>>> shortly after radio was invented by Nikola Tesla >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and >>>> theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical >>>> model to explain radio waves. When using positive >>>> numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio >>>> waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic >>>> radiation such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, >>>> x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 100 >>>> years ago was SuperLight but because it was the >>>> solution that comes from the use of negative >>>> numbers, **"this second solution"**was ignored for >>>> over 100 years. Remember when you were taught >>>> algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers >>>> (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no >>>> meaning in this world. Well, times have changed and >>>> now we have a very valid second solution to >>>> Maxwell's equation and it is SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, >>>> at Stanford University took another look at >>>> Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this >>>> second solution explain when interpreted in our >>>> world."_{1} * >>>> >>>> *To understand this second solution, we must first >>>> review what the first or positive solution >>>> explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio >>>> waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space >>>> from a point source (the antenna) equally in all >>>> directions into space toward infinity traveling at >>>> the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large >>>> electrical component and a small magnetic component >>>> 90 degrees to the electrical component. Thus named, >>>> electro–magnetic radiation.. * >>>> >>>> *The second solution describes a particle wave of >>>> just the opposite structure. It explains that >>>> **from infinity traveling toward the point source >>>> from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new >>>> radiation is composed of a large magnetic component >>>> and a small electrical component, thus the name, >>>> magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are >>>> looked at more closely, one finds that >>>> **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of light >>>> squared !** 10^20 meters per second, or 10 >>>> billion times faster than light >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. * >>>> >>>> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and >>>> has a corresponding, shorter wavelength. It >>>> therefore has a higher energy density. * >>>> >>>> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so >>>> powerful, how come we do not feel it, or how come >>>> it is not detected scientifically?" Well, the >>>> frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 >>>> x 10^–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its >>>> velocity so fast, that it goes through everything >>>> as though the substance was nearly completely >>>> transparent (like glass). * >>>> >>>> *We can say the higher frequency is completely >>>> penetrating like x–rays, but even more so. More >>>> information, regarding the relative size, will be >>>> given later. * >>>> >>>> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?* >>>> >>>> *It comes out of black holes !* >>>> >>>> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed >>>> and then make the analogy for SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is >>>> formed when electric monopoles give off energy. The >>>> electron in orbit about our atoms is an electric >>>> monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives >>>> off or absorbs energy in the form of electro– >>>> magnetic radiation.. Sunlight is converted into >>>> electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just >>>> the opposite occurs in optical diodes, which >>>> convert electricity into light. * >>>> >>>> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is >>>> produced when an electron (an electric monopole) >>>> lowers its orbit and releases its energy in the >>>> form of light. * >>>> >>>> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the >>>> extremely dense and hot matter found in black >>>> holes. It is theorized that black holes contain >>>> magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, >>>> extremely small, extremely energetic magnetic >>>> monopoles release energy by lowering their orbit >>>> they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our >>>> SuperLight. So black holes really are not so black. >>>> They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of course >>>> SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of >>>> the black holes because its velocity is the square >>>> of the velocity of light and it therefore, can >>>> easily escape._{7} * >>>> >>>> *The current scientific thinking is that in the >>>> center of every galaxy in the universe is a black >>>> hole. There are billions and billions of galaxies >>>> all around us, and they all are producing >>>> SuperLight. We are literally bathed in a >>>> three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an >>>> "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. * >>>> >>>> *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE* >>>> >>>> *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating >>>> energy in the universe and accounts for the >>>> production of what we call life. I believe >>>> SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter >>>> in our bodies and produces what we call Vital Life >>>> Forces. These special forms of matter are found in >>>> bones, micro–crystals and also in the various >>>> fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There >>>> are also, believed to be organic molecules in some >>>> body fluids, that are believed to be liquid >>>> crystalline in structure. These change state >>>> (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely >>>> small change in energy (e.g. emotions). * >>>> >>>> *Another form of organized structure found in the >>>> body, are the multitude of long parallel conductive >>>> protein structures, that form phase arrays like >>>> structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio >>>> telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up >>>> extreme weak signals and amplify them, by being in >>>> phase. It is also suggested, that these proteins >>>> may have room temperature superconductivity. It is >>>> these organized structures in living things, that >>>> produce a coherence that has resonance with very >>>> minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it passes >>>> through matter, between the nucleus and electron, >>>> without even coming in contact with them. * >>>> >>>> *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is >>>> composed of millions and billions of >>>> micro–electronic units that are formed in >>>> structures that have a phase array organization_{3} >>>> . I believe that the electronic resonance in these >>>> organized conductive molecules, have some resonance >>>> with very small amounts of SuperLight and that >>>> these energy fields and currents are responsible >>>> for the human aura and the energy vortexes found in >>>> the body chakra area. They also produce the Vital >>>> Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, >>>> even a very, very small amount produces more than >>>> enough energy to sustain life. Thus, life is >>>> produced and sustained by specific forms and >>>> amounts of organized matter, and old age and >>>> eventual death occurs when too much disorder and >>>> disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this >>>> ordered structure. At that point, the body can no >>>> longer produce enough Vital Life Force from >>>> SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that >>>> all forms of organized matter produce its own >>>> aura–finger–prints or energy signature when it >>>> reacts with SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *There are many sensitive people, who can detect >>>> and read the aura of living entities and >>>> substances. Our body can determine whether this >>>> energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that >>>> this accounts for Kineseology and also explains how >>>> herbs work on the body. For example, each herb has >>>> an energy field signature that has a special >>>> attunement to specific body parts and its presence >>>> helps "kick off" or reactivate that energy center >>>> which may be slow or stopped, because of some >>>> illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the >>>> rescue, through the herb structure that is >>>> appropriate to that area of the body in need. * >>>> >>>> *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very >>>> organized structures and thus according to this >>>> thesis are also converters or transducers of >>>> SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from >>>> and explains how they seemingly can radiate a >>>> positive signal continuously without being >>>> recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of >>>> different chemistries and structures, develop >>>> different types of energy fields. This explains why >>>> different crystals have different effects on >>>> different parts of the body. The key to crystal >>>> healing is to match the required energy with the >>>> proper crystal that produces that specific energy >>>> need. * >>>> >>>> *As scientists and experimenters become more aware >>>> of SuperLight and start to understand it, >>>> experiments and instruments will be designed to >>>> attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive >>>> of manufacturing simulated body structures_{4} >>>> which will be micro–size phase array assemblies >>>> made of room temperature superconductors. They will >>>> be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for >>>> healing. Specific micro–structures will be designed >>>> to attune to, and resonate with, the exact energy >>>> needed, in the specific part of the body that needs >>>> an energy boost for healing and regeneration. * >>>> >>>> *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for >>>> thousands of years, and that their secret was that >>>> they, at times, would sleep in crystal lined caves >>>> and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, >>>> bringing healing and new growth. * >>>> >>>> *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be >>>> able to test this idea with the fiber crystal that >>>> I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. Soon, I hope >>>> to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, >>>> and in large enough quantities, that we will be >>>> able to spin these crystals into yarn. Once spun >>>> into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be >>>> woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, >>>> hats, and meditation shawls. You could even stuff >>>> your mattress with crystal fiber, or cover your >>>> bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. >>>> This should stimulate creativity, imagination, >>>> healing and regeneration. * >>>> >>>> *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I >>>> believe that it will be possible to make room >>>> temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If >>>> this becomes possible, we are talking about >>>> levitation, and possibly even a magic carpet. * >>>> >>>> *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities >>>> of working with SuperLight energies, through the >>>> use of single crystal fibers. I believe these need >>>> to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have >>>> the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY* >>>> >>>> *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, >>>> neither is inertia >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. >>>> These secondary forces are both formed by the >>>> reaction of matter to the dynamic field of >>>> SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the >>>> result of a universal pressure, exerted by >>>> **SuperLight as it rains in from infinity, from all >>>> directions, onto every object**. Materials are >>>> not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, >>>> perhaps about 99.99999999% transparent. As a >>>> consequence, all material domains, all "matter", >>>> experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. >>>> Every "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or >>>> pressure differential, as SuperLight travels past >>>> and through them. * >>>> >>>> *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as >>>> SuperLight joins in, or exits the activities of the >>>> particle domain. Field effects come into play, as >>>> the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic >>>> Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and >>>> particle pressures combine to produce the >>>> accelerational force we know as gravity. * >>>> >>>> *This acceleration is of little consequence when a >>>> single object is in space, at a very great distance >>>> from other objects, since the force vectors cancel >>>> out. However, when a second object comes close to >>>> the first object, then, the two objects shield each >>>> other from the full power of SuperLight pressure on >>>> the opposite sides of the objects facing each >>>> other. As a result of this, the objects experience >>>> a net accelerational force toward each other, which >>>> is directly proportional to their mass. Mass that >>>> produces the mutual shielding that each object >>>> experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to >>>> be attracted to each other ! In reality, they are >>>> being pushed together by the net differential force >>>> of SuperLight pressure which results from the >>>> slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes >>>> through these objects. This, according to my >>>> theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push >>>> exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each >>>> other, from a portion of the SuperLight radiation. * >>>> >>>> *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the >>>> effects of porous matter. An atom of matter is >>>> about 10^18 parts void for each part of solid >>>> matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much >>>> smaller than the typical atomic dimension. Thus, >>>> most of SuperLight passes through the atomic >>>> structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight >>>> contacts the nucleus or electrons it produces the >>>> force that holds the electrons in orbit, and the >>>> nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This >>>> gives matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity >>>> is the weak force since only a very small amount of >>>> SuperLight interacts with matter on the atomic >>>> scale. An example that will give you some idea as >>>> to how porous solid matter is, as follows: Let us >>>> expand the nucleus of an atom to the size of a golf >>>> ball, then the electrons in orbit about this >>>> nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when >>>> this pea makes its orbit about the golf ball its >>>> orbit is not a few feet or even a few yards in >>>> diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. >>>> Matter is mostly composed of void or space and the >>>> energy rays of SuperLight, whose wavelength is many >>>> times smaller than the diameter of the electron, >>>> will to a large extent miss the particle regions, >>>> as it rains through the atomic region. Only a small >>>> amount of SuperLight interacts with the nucleus and >>>> electrons while the majority will pass right >>>> through the region. * >>>> >>>> *NUCLEAR FORCE* >>>> >>>> *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, >>>> when compared to that of the atom as a whole. The >>>> particles of matter in the nucleus are much closer >>>> to each other, than those in the electron. The >>>> nucleus is probably in the order of 10^28 more >>>> dense. Thus, the force that holds the nucleus >>>> together, must be very strong. * >>>> >>>> *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight >>>> pushing and interacting, that holds the components >>>> of nucleus together. These stronger interactions on >>>> the nucleus, are a result of its increased relative >>>> density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the >>>> density and geometry of matter that changes the >>>> forces we see. Thus, from One Source, comes the One >>>> Force, that divides and manifests itself in so many >>>> interesting ways. * >>>> >>>> *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in >>>> the nucleus and this accounts for the relative >>>> stability of various nuclei. A less symmetrical >>>> structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable >>>> nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain >>>> radioactivity. * >>>> >>>> *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY* >>>> >>>> *(The University Field or Energy Source) * >>>> >>>> *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search >>>> of a unifying field theory that would unite all >>>> forces into one. I believe that with SuperLight, a >>>> theory can be developed to explain this idea. >>>> SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept >>>> I've developed is new, and all aspects have not yet >>>> been considered, but what has been covered appears >>>> to fit quite well with our current understanding of >>>> reality. * >>>> >>>> *I propose that SuperLight energy is the >>>> singularity or universal energy force in all nature >>>> and that its interaction with various forms of >>>> matter and energy produce all other forces in the >>>> Universe. Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic >>>> structures are resonant to and interact with some >>>> aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them and >>>> our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is >>>> converted into the electrical, magnetic, nuclear >>>> and gravitational forces producing our vital life >>>> force. This can explain all the forces of nature >>>> and life energies. * >>>> >>>> *It is the geometry and density of matter that >>>> explains the different forms and intensity of the >>>> forces that are produced. * >>>> >>>> *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE* >>>> >>>> *As greater understanding of what types of devices >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td..htm> can >>>> attune to SuperLight, I believe that it will be >>>> possible to capture this energy, collect it, and >>>> measure it. At first only small assemblies will be >>>> made for healing and regeneration, (only small >>>> amounts are needed) scientific analysis, proof of >>>> principle and localized experiments. In the future, >>>> I envision massive devices to be used as direct >>>> energy converters. This development will have a >>>> significant effect on reducing world pollution >>>> associated with most other energy producing systems >>>> such as nuclear and fossil fuels. * >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> *SUMMARY* >>>> >>>> *There is parity in the universe, therefore light >>>> has two forms: * >>>> >>>> *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C. >>>> (10^10 meters per sec.) * >>>> >>>> *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C >>>> squared. * >>>> >>>> *These lights are responsible for all created >>>> matter, all forces, and life itself. As a result of >>>> this theory , I make the following statements; * >>>> >>>> *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY* >>>> >>>> *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight >>>> reacting with coherent structures in the body. * >>>> >>>> *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from >>>> the interaction with SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. * >>>> >>>> *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by >>>> exposure to higher concentrations of SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the >>>> SuperLight wave bands. * >>>> >>>> *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy* >>>> >>>> *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether >>>> that reacts with all matter and energy causing all >>>> forces. * >>>> >>>> *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of >>>> matter, but only a reaction to an external force. >>>> (e.g. SuperLight) * >>>> >>>> *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, >>>> but only it's reaction to acceleration through the >>>> ether of SuperLight's dynamic field. * >>>> >>>> *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a >>>> distance. * >>>> >>>> *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and >>>> solves Dr. Rubins problem of the outer stars in >>>> galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is a slight >>>> drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the >>>> center of the galaxy.) * >>>> >>>> *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but >>>> becomes less as one approaches black holes, due to >>>> the reduction effect of SuperLight radiating out of >>>> the black hole. * >>>> >>>> *7. This also means that the gravity constant >>>> becomes significantly less at the edge of the >>>> Universe. * >>>> >>>> *8. It also allows black holes to reach an >>>> equilibrium state, — matter in SuperLight out — >>>> thus preventing one black hole from becoming >>>> massive and gobbling up the whole universe. * >>>> >>>> *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are >>>> SuperLight. * >>>> >>>> *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang >>>> and creation >>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. >>>> For example: Since gravity and inertia are the >>>> result of matter reacting with SuperLight, which >>>> did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early >>>> times, then, the Big Bang could have been a Little >>>> Bang (or a big breath)because any force would cause >>>> and infinite acceleration, since there was nothing >>>> to hold matter back. * >>>> >>>> *SuperLight And Space Travel* >>>> >>>> *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will >>>> permit extreme distant communication in space in >>>> much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 light years in 3 >>>> to 4 minutes.) * >>>> >>>> *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you >>>> travel in space, thus permitting real deep space >>>> travel. * >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An >>>> Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy * >>>> >>>> >>>> Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting, You >>>> have to have a very high volume capacity HVDC >>>> (negative) ion generator like the Felici 3,000 watt >>>> electrostatic generator. When I was working with >>>> Leonard Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that >>>> put out CO2, Nitrogen and water vapor, planned to >>>> incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion genweration to >>>> enhance its proven fire fighting capability! (Super >>>> Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference >>>> 1995) see YouTube. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> >>>> Norm, >>>> >>>> Great stuff on the VTA. Always found it suspicious >>>> that after the Scientific American released the >>>> time reversed light article that all slid into >>>> obscurity. We should be using these mirrors for >>>> satellite communications and all sorts of other >>>> applications but no. Seems that maybe wireless >>>> power is in the same boat as it should have been >>>> widely applied by now with all the carbide fets >>>> designed just for this purpose, could it be that >>>> loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power >>>> device might give away the candy store... >>>> >>>> I am very interested in the device you posted about >>>> for fire control. Unfortunately your posts are not >>>> parsable by subject matter. Do you think this >>>> application has potential for forest fires and if >>>> so what is required to build a prototype? From the >>>> brief description available it appeared to be some >>>> sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source. Do >>>> you know the size of the generator used for fuel >>>> fires you mentioned? Is just a series of 15 kv >>>> diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more >>>> relativistic voltages employed/required? >>>> Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas >>>> magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing >>>> are available in The inventions, researches and >>>> writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford >>>> Martin. There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum >>>> rectifiers build for a short spell but have not >>>> found much more about these interesting claimed >>>> devices that the occasional mutterings. >>>> >>>> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can >>>> produce this effect so is this a matter of timing >>>> of a rectified primary? Need to get my thyratron >>>> up and online, so many chores and so much to build. >>>> On 7/25/2018 7:46 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>> >>>> Just sending out info on Sweet VTA! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: Sweets and space - Re: [EVGRAY] >>>> The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?) >>>> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:40:47 -0500 >>>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> To: Toby Grotz <[email protected]> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Toby! Between Jerry Decker and Gunderson at >>>> Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I got a lot of Sweet info. >>>> >>>> Here I will send you the KeelyNet (Decker >>>> Files) About 8 files. Windows ! Open in "Note >>>> Pad"! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> (word processor parameters >>>> LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) >>>> Taken from KeelyNet BBS >>>> (214) 324-3501 >>>> Sponsored by Vangard >>>> Sciences >>>> PO BOX 1031 >>>> Mesquite, TX 75150 >>>> >>>> There are ABSOLUTELY NO >>>> RESTRICTIONS >>>> on duplicating, publishing or >>>> distributing the >>>> files on KeelyNet except >>>> where noted! >>>> >>>> February 22, 1992 >>>> >>>> SWEET1.ASC >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy >>>> Resh. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I just received in ASCII form the two >>>> papers by Mr. Tom E. Bearden >>>> which appeared in the Proceedings of >>>> the 26th Intersociety Energy >>>> Conversion Engineering Conference, August >>>> 4-9, 1991, Boston, >>>> Massachusetts. They can be found in volume >>>> 4 in the section >>>> entitled 'Advanced Energy Concepts'. The titles >>>> are : >>>> >>>> "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap >>>> Vacuum Energy" >>>> by Floyd Sweet and Tom E. >>>> Bearden (pp. 370-375) >>>> (listed as SWEET1.ASC >>>> on KeelyNet) >>>> and >>>> "On a Testable Unification of >>>> Electromagnetics, >>>> General Relativity, and >>>> Quantum Mechanics" >>>> by Tom E. Bearden and Walter Rosenthal (pp. >>>> 487-492) >>>> (listed as SWEET2.ASC >>>> on KeelyNet) >>>> >>>> Except for the unsupported conjectures >>>> dealing with mind, thought >>>> and life, which bring his results >>>> almost into the metaphysical >>>> realm, I find these papers to be very >>>> intriguing and compelling. >>>> Thus, with the permission of Mr. >>>> Bearden, I am posting them to >>>> sci.physics and alt.sci.physics.new-theories. >>>> (I'll start with the >>>> paper "On a Testable Unification of >>>> Electromagnetics, General >>>> Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics".) >>>> >>>> As you can see in the "Followup-To:" >>>> line, I would like to see >>>> discussion appear in >>>> alt.sci.physics.new-theories, since that is the >>>> most appropriate place for discussion. >>>> If your site does not >>>> receive a.s.p.n., then let me know, and >>>> I can send you summaries of >>>> whatever discussion follows (hopefully a >>>> lot). Of course, if your >>>> site doesn't receive a.s.p.n, then ask >>>> your sysadmin if it would be >>>> possible to receive it. >>>> >>>> BTW, Mr. Bearden is not (yet) on the >>>> net, but he has agreed to let >>>> me be a go-between, and I'll try to >>>> post his comments on whatever >>>> discussion ensues. I encourage everybody to >>>> find Whittaker's two >>>> papers and Maxwell's original treatise >>>> on electromagnetic theory >>>> (see the papers for the exact citations) >>>> and to read them carefully. >>>> >>>> I hope you find these papers as >>>> intriguing as I have. If nothing >>>> else, it will help you to firm up your >>>> foundation of physics. >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please, let's keep an open, yet >>>> critical mind, and let's not allow >>>> the discussion to develop into a flame war. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jon Noring >>>> >>>> (As soon as I have time, I'll post Mr. >>>> Bearden's other paper. They >>>> came to me in Word 5..0 format, so I've >>>> had to do some editing). >>>> ==================================================================== >>>> | Jon Noring | [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> |"The dogs >>>> bark, but| >>>> | JKN International | IP : >>>> 192.100.81.100 | the caravan moves | >>>> | 1312 Carlton Place| Phone : (510) >>>> 294-8153 | caravan moves on."| >>>> | Livermore,CA 94550| V-Mail: (510) >>>> 862-1101 |"Pack your lunch, | >>>> | | sit in the bushes,| >>>> | | and watch." | >>>> ==================================================================== >>>> "If you make $50,000 today, you have the >>>> same buying power as the >>>> average coal miner did in 1949, >>>> adjusted for taxes and inflation," >>>> John Sestina, nationally recognized >>>> Certified Financial Planner; >>>> quoted in 1987. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> [This paper appeared in the 26th IECEC >>>> Conference, as past posts >>>> have mentioned.. Posted with the >>>> permission of T.E. Bearden. See >>>> my prior post for more information. >>>> J.Noring] >>>> >>>> ON A TESTABLE UNIFICATION OF >>>> ELECTROMAGNETICS, >>>> GENERAL RELATIVITY, AND >>>> QUANTUM MECHANICS >>>> >>>> T. E. Bearden >>>> Association of Distinguished >>>> American Scientists >>>> 2311 Big Cove Road >>>> Huntsville, >>>> Alabama 35801 >>>> >>>> Walter Rosenthal >>>> 4876 Bethany Lane >>>> Santa Maria, >>>> California 93455 >>>> >>>> Abstract >>>> >>>> Unrecognized for what it was, in 1903-1904 >>>> E.T. Whittaker (W) >>>> published a fundamental, engineerable theory of >>>> electrogravitation >>>> (EG) in two profound papers. The >>>> first (W-1903) demonstrated a >>>> hidden bidirectional EM wave structure >>>> in the scalar potential of >>>> vacuum, and showed how to produce a >>>> standing scalar EM potential >>>> wave -- the same wave discovered >>>> experimentally four years earlier >>>> by Nikola Tesla. >>>> >>>> W-1903 is a hidden variable theory >>>> that shows how to >>>> deterministically curve the local and/or >>>> distant space-time using >>>> EM. >>>> >>>> W-1904 shows that all force field EM >>>> can be replaced by >>>> interferometry of two scalar potentials, >>>> anticipating the Aharonov- >>>> Bohm effect by 55 years and extending >>>> it to the engineerable >>>> macroscopic world. >>>> >>>> W-1903 shows how to turn EM into >>>> G-potential, curve local and/or >>>> distant space-time, and directly >>>> engineer the virtual particle flux >>>> of vacuum. >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> W-1904 shows how to turn G-potential >>>> and curvature of space-time >>>> back into force-field EM, even at a >>>> distance. The papers implement >>>> Sakharov's 1968 statement that gravitation is >>>> not a fundamental >>>> field of nature, but a conglomerate of >>>> other fields. Separately >>>> applied to electromagnetics (EM), >>>> quantum mechanics (QM), and >>>> general relativity (GR), an extended >>>> superset of each results. >>>> >>>> The three supersets are >>>> Whittaker-unified, so that a testable, >>>> engineerable, unified field theory is >>>> generated. EM, QM, and GR >>>> each contained a fundamental error that >>>> blocked unification, and >>>> these three errors are explained. The >>>> Schroedinger potential can >>>> also be structured and altered, >>>> indicating the direct engineering of >>>> physical quantum change. >>>> >>>> Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this >>>> hidden bidirectional EM >>>> wave structure in the Schroedinger >>>> potential, without referencing >>>> Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic >>>> effect. The potential for >>>> applying the new approach to explain the nature >>>> of mind and thought, >>>> and providing a laboratory-testable >>>> theory for them, is briefly >>>> noted and indicative major references >>>> cited. Some of the possible >>>> implications for physics and biology are >>>> pointed out. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Electromagnetics Has Foundations Difficulties >>>> >>>> There exists today a small but growing >>>> number of scientists who have >>>> become aware that the presently accepted >>>> electromagnetic theory is >>>> seriously flawed. Shortcomings in the theory >>>> are readily cited. >>>> (listed as THEORYBE.ASC >>>> on KeelyNet) >>>> >>>> For example, in railgun experiments the >>>> Lorentz force law has been >>>> falsified. It was always an approximation, >>>> and does not adequately >>>> approximate at high energies. [ref. 1] >>>> >>>> Also completely contrary to orthodox EM >>>> theory, the EM force fields >>>> are not primary agents at all, but are >>>> effects produced in and on >>>> the physical system by the potentials. >>>> As an example, we cite the >>>> Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, which proves that, >>>> even in the total >>>> absence of the force fields, the >>>> potentials remain and can interfere >>>> at a distance to produce real effects >>>> in charged particle systems. >>>> [ref. 2] The AB effect has been proven >>>> to the satisfaction of all >>>> but the most diehard skeptics. [ref. 3] >>>> However, its fundamental >>>> impact on the basic notions underlying >>>> classical EM theory continues >>>> to be ignored by all but a handful of >>>> scientists. >>>> >>>> These EM shortcomings were not present >>>> in the original quaternion EM >>>> theory by James Clerk Maxwell. [ref. 4] >>>> Indeed, the original >>>> Maxwell theory contains many things >>>> that were mistakenly eliminated >>>> from the abbreviated vector theory >>>> formulated primarily by Heaviside >>>> and Gibbs, and to a lesser extent by >>>> Hertz. [ref. 5] Further, these >>>> things that do not exist in conventional >>>> EM theory, but that exist >>>> in Maxwell's actual quaternion theory, >>>> can be used in specially >>>> designed equipment, and the operation of that >>>> equipment will be >>>> inexplicable by present-day electromagnetic >>>> theory. AB-effect >>>> laboratory apparatuses are in fact rigorous >>>> demonstrations of such >>>> a statement. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Scalar Electromagnetics >>>> >>>> This can be even further explained and >>>> developed experimentally >>>> >>>> Page 3 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> according to Whittaker's fundamental approach. >>>> [ref. 6] >>>> >>>> In a modern sense, in 1903/1904 >>>> Whittaker theoretically showed how >>>> to engineer the scalar potential with a >>>> highly dynamic, hidden, >>>> bidirectional EM wave structure, to build >>>> hidden EM vacuum engines >>>> that are still unsuspected in modern >>>> physics today. Much of the >>>> content of the fundamental 1959 >>>> Aharonov/Bohm paper was anticipated >>>> in a different manner, and dramatically >>>> extended in an engineerable, >>>> testable fashion, by Whittaker's two papers. At >>>> the time, however, >>>> the vector >>>> >>>> | phi(x) >>>> | >>>> | >>>> | >>>> | potential >>>> | >>>> | + + >>>> | + + <---- Organized Local Space-Time >>>> | + + Curvature >>>> | + EM + >>>> | + Substructure + >>>> | + + >>>> | + + >>>> |+_______________________________+_______________________________+ >>>> >>>> + + >>>> X --> >>>> + EM + >>>> >>>> + Substructure + >>>> >>>> + + >>>> >>>> + + >>>> >>>> + + >>>> >>>> + + >>>> >>>> Figure 1. A Standing Scalar EM Potential >>>> Whittaker Wave. >>>> >>>> interpretation of Maxwell's EM theory was just >>>> slowly beginning to >>>> spread as the adopted model. Also, >>>> special and general relativity >>>> and quantum mechanics had not yet >>>> been born. Accordingly, >>>> considering the scientific understanding of >>>> the day, it was not >>>> possible for any scientist, even Whittaker >>>> himself, to perceive the >>>> potential future impact these fundamental >>>> papers could have on >>>> sciences and technologies not yet even born. >>>> Unfortunately, in >>>> later years Whittaker apparently never >>>> realized that his two earlier >>>> papers had such application to the >>>> modern unification problem. >>>> >>>> Indeed, up to the time of Whittaker's >>>> death, very few scientists >>>> even concerned themselves with the >>>> notion of unified fields. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Turning EM Energy Into G-Potential Energy >>>> >>>> In his 1903 paper Whittaker showed that >>>> a standing scalar potential >>>> wave can be decomposed into a special >>>> set of bidirectional EM waves >>>> that convolute into a standing scalar >>>> potential wave, as shown in >>>> Figure 1. As a corollary, a set of >>>> bidirectional EM waves, stress >>>> waves, can be constructed to form a >>>> standing scalar potential wave >>>> in space, as shown in Figure 2. Since >>>> all potentials represent >>>> trapped energy density of vacuum, they >>>> are gravitational >>>> >>>> [Note, Figure 2 is too complicated to >>>> reproduce here in ASCII] >>>> >>>> Page 4 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Figure 2. Whittaker's Bidirectional EM Plane >>>> Wave Structure. >>>> >>>> in nature. [ref. 7] Because it >>>> represents a "standing wave" whose >>>> magnitude represents the variation in the >>>> local energy density of >>>> the vacuum, the Whittaker scalar >>>> potential wave represents a >>>> standing wave of variation in the local >>>> curvature of vacuum, sharply >>>> in contradiction to the assumptions of >>>> present electromagnetics and >>>> general relativity. [ref. 8] It also >>>> represents a standing wave of >>>> the variation of the local gauge. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Turning G-Potential Back to EM >>>> >>>> The very next year, Whittaker's second >>>> paper (cited above) showed >>>> how to turn such G-potential wave >>>> energy back into EM energy, even >>>> at a distance, by scalar potential >>>> interferometry, anticipating and >>>> greatly expanding the Aharonov-Bohm effect. >>>> >>>> Indeed, Whittaker's second paper shows >>>> that the entire present >>>> force-field electromagnetics can be directly >>>> replaced with scalar >>>> potential interferometry. In other words, >>>> scalar EM includes and >>>> extends the present restricted vector >>>> subset of Maxwell's original >>>> theory. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Engineering the Nucleus Directly >>>> >>>> Whittaker's work is even more striking when >>>> one realizes that >>>> potentials are actually part of the vacuum >>>> itself. They pervade >>>> through the electron shells of an >>>> atom, directly reaching the >>>> nucleus and centering on it. >>>> >>>> Gross external changes (gradients; force >>>> fields) of the potentials >>>> interact primarily with the electron shells >>>> of the atom. The >>>> stabilized (persistent, gradient-free) >>>> potential's primary >>>> interaction is with the atomic nucleus. >>>> >>>> Specifically, the primary interaction between >>>> the infolded, >>>> internalized EM bidirectional wave structure >>>> of a Whittaker >>>> potential is with the atomic nuclei, rather >>>> than with the atom's >>>> electron shells, because in the standing >>>> Whittaker potential wave >>>> the local magnitude of the external >>>> potential is not changing. >>>> >>>> Whittaker has in fact shown that there >>>> exists an unsuspected, >>>> hidden, internal EM energy exchange >>>> channel between nuclei, a >>>> channel where EM energy flows >>>> bidirectionally, undetected by most >>>> modern detectors. >>>> >>>> Unlimited types of Whittaker-structures can be >>>> produced in the >>>> laboratory in the form of deterministically >>>> structured potentials; >>>> for the first time, the direct >>>> engineering, structuring, and >>>> manipulation of the nuclear potentials >>>> themselves, even with >>>> miniscule EM power, is possible. This is a >>>> new capability of >>>> exceptional importance and application. >>>> >>>> The Whittaker structuring in effect >>>> allows one to produce a "virtual >>>> grid" to place in the violent virtual >>>> particle flux (VPF) exchange >>>> of the local vacuum with the nucleus. >>>> By simply holding the grid >>>> signal constant, gradually the nuclear >>>> potential itself will >>>> substructure (activate) with the same structure. >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 5 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When the activating ("charging") >>>> potential is removed, the >>>> activation of the nucleus will gradually >>>> "decay" back to the normal >>>> structure. Just as one example, the binding >>>> energy of an atomic >>>> nucleus is accessible and, >>>> theoretically, engineerable. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Whittaker Structuring Confirmed >>>> >>>> Recently Ignatovich has pointed out the hidden >>>> bidirectional EM wave >>>> structure in the Schroedinger potential, >>>> without referencing >>>> Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. >>>> [ref. 9] >>>> >>>> Also, recently modern researchers, >>>> working on acoustic missiles and >>>> with the scalar acoustic wave equation, >>>> have "rediscovered" >>>> Whittaker's 1903 infolded bidirectional planar >>>> waves inside the >>>> scalar wave. [ref. 10] They do not >>>> appear to have yet recognized >>>> its relevance to their work in >>>> electromagnetic missiles. [ref. 11] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> STOCHASTIC ELECTRODYNAMICS >>>> >>>> Whittaker's paper takes on a significant new >>>> meaning, however, in >>>> light of Sakharov's 1968 hypothesis that >>>> gravitation is not a >>>> primary field, but is produced as a >>>> result of interactions of other >>>> fields. Together with Whittaker's structured >>>> potential, this >>>> implies that the gravitational aspects >>>> of the nucleus can also be >>>> electromagnetically engineered. >>>> >>>> As a result of Sakharov's hypothesis, >>>> explosive activity in >>>> stochastic electrodynamics (SED) has shown >>>> that many fundamental >>>> parts of physics are "already unified" >>>> in terms of electromagnetics >>>> and gravitation. Evidence continues to >>>> accumulate that the >>>> gravitational field may not be a primary field >>>> of nature, but a >>>> secondary or residual effect associated with >>>> other non-gravitational >>>> fields. >>>> >>>> [ref. 12] Actually, general relativity >>>> has always focused on >>>> energy as the thing which really has >>>> gravitation. Trapped energy, >>>> such as mass, is particularly >>>> important. But since mass is >>>> essentially trapped EM energy, relativity has >>>> essentially assumed >>>> Sakharov's hypothesis anyway, without stating >>>> it so explicitly. >>>> >>>> Further, GR considers "the" G-potential as a >>>> conglomerate of other >>>> things. [ref. 13] It follows that the >>>> gradient of that conglomerate >>>> yields a force field which is also a >>>> conglomerate. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> G-Potential is Electromagnetic >>>> >>>> Starting from Sakharov's postulate, to the >>>> first order gravitation >>>> should be due to some aspect of the EM >>>> field, since EM is the >>>> strongest and most universal force normally >>>> encountered in the >>>> macroscopic world experimentally, and since >>>> mass is already "trapped >>>> EM energy." Thus Sakharov focused >>>> attention upon the zero-point EM >>>> energy fluctuations (ZPF) of vacuum. >>>> >>>> Sakharov conjectured that the Lagrange function >>>> of the G-field is >>>> generated by vacuum polarization, due to >>>> fermions. [ref. 14] Akama >>>> et al examined the potential generation >>>> of gravity as a collective >>>> excitation of fermion-antifermion pairs. [ref. 15] >>>> >>>> Haxlacher and Mottolo proved that space-time >>>> (ST) curvature can >>>> >>>> Page 6 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> arise from the quantum fluctuations of >>>> pure gauge fields. [ref. 16] >>>> Zee showed that gravity is generated as >>>> a symmetry-breaking effect >>>> in quantum field theory in which a >>>> dynamical scale-invariance >>>> breaking is postulated to take place at >>>> energies near the Planck >>>> mass. [ref. 17] >>>> >>>> Amati, Veneziano and Yoshimoto showed >>>> that in pre-geometric models >>>> the Einstein action and metric may >>>> be generated from quantum >>>> fluctuations of matter fields. [ref. 18] >>>> >>>> A review of the exploding field was >>>> given by Adler, with particular >>>> emphasis on the case of renormalizable field >>>> theories with dynamical >>>> scale-invariance breaking, in which the >>>> induced gravitational >>>> effective action is finite and calculable. >>>> [ref. 19] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Puthoff's Important Contribution >>>> >>>> Recently Puthoff has applied the Sakharov >>>> viewpoint to significantly >>>> advance the stochastic electrodynamics >>>> field. He has successfully >>>> explained why the atom's orbital electrons do >>>> not decay into the >>>> nucleus, even though by conventional EM theory >>>> each electron must >>>> constantly radiate EM energy, since it is >>>> constantly accelerated. >>>> [ref. 20] >>>> >>>> He has also shown that gravitation can >>>> indeed be regarded as an >>>> induced effect associated with >>>> zero-point EM fluctuations of the >>>> vacuum. [ref. 21] He has also shown a >>>> feedback-derivation of the >>>> source of the vacuum EM zero-point >>>> energy fluctuations from quantum >>>> fluctuation motion of particles driven by the >>>> ZPE. [ref. 22] >>>> Quantum fluctuation motion of particles >>>> and vacuum ZPE fluctuations >>>> are connected by a causal, >>>> self-regenerating cosmological feedback >>>> cycle. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Some Conclusions >>>> >>>> In light of Whittaker's EM structuring >>>> of the potential, there are >>>> several important conclusions to be >>>> taken from the important SED >>>> work since Sakharov's seminal >>>> suggestion, as follows: >>>> >>>> (1) In stochastic electrodynamics, very solid >>>> theoretical >>>> foundation exists for >>>> electrogravitation. >>>> (2) The vacuum EM ZPF may be regarded as >>>> causally connected to >>>> quantum mechanical particle >>>> jitter (Zitterbewegung motion) >>>> and vice versa, though the >>>> feedback mechanism into the >>>> virtual particle flux of vacuum >>>> is normally hidden by the >>>> large-scale integration >>>> represented by any macroscopic >>>> object or process. >>>> (3) The SED theoretical demonstration of this >>>> hidden mechanism >>>> adds new emphasis on the rather >>>> neglected hidden variable >>>> theories. >>>> (4) In some fashion, statistical quantum >>>> change is chaotic >>>> rather than random, for it >>>> has already been shown by >>>> Puthoff that the vacuum ZPF >>>> fluctuations driving everything >>>> are totally deterministic. It >>>> follows that, theoretically, >>>> hidden Whittaker order already >>>> exists in quantum change, >>>> and quantum change must be >>>> already chaotic and at least >>>> partially deterministic. >>>> (5) It follows that there may well exist >>>> engineerable >>>> mechanisms that can affect or >>>> manipulate quantum change. >>>> >>>> Page 7 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Whittaker Potentials Are Engineerable >>>> >>>> What Whittaker has described in his >>>> 1903 paper is a standing >>>> electrogravitational wave, a standing wave in >>>> the local curvature of >>>> space-time itself, that can readily be >>>> constructed experimentally. >>>> >>>> This Whittaker standing potential wave >>>> is precisely the new form of >>>> standing EM wave that Nikola Tesla had >>>> experimentally discovered >>>> being radiated from a thunderstorm four >>>> years earlier, on the night >>>> of July 3-4, 1899, and which he >>>> recorded in his Colorado Springs >>>> Notebook on the morning of July 4, 1899. [ref. 23] >>>> >>>> Further, Whittaker's paper directly implies >>>> that the hidden variable >>>> determinism shown by Puthoff to be driving >>>> the zero-point EM >>>> fluctuations can also be engineered, both >>>> locally and at a distance. >>>> >>>> In short, Whittaker's 1903 paper shows >>>> how to turn electromagnetics >>>> into gravitational potential. >>>> Unknowingly, Whittaker had already >>>> shown the correct engineering way to >>>> unify EM and G fields, and >>>> already falsified one of Einstein's >>>> later primary GR assumptions, >>>> that the local space-time is never >>>> curved, in a testable manner, a >>>> decade before Einstein published his >>>> theory of general relativity. >>>> >>>> In the very next year, 1904, >>>> Whittaker's second paper (orally >>>> presented in 1903) was published. [ref. 24] >>>> In this little-noticed >>>> paper Whittaker shows that all classical >>>> force field >>>> electromagnetics can be replaced by scalar EM >>>> potentials and their >>>> interferometry. >>>> >>>> Specifically, any EM force field can be >>>> replaced by two scalar >>>> potential fields and scalar interferometry. The >>>> combination of this >>>> paper and the 1903 Mathematische Annalen >>>> paper not only includes the >>>> Aharonov-Bohm effect, but specifies a testable >>>> method for producing >>>> a macroscopic and controlled >>>> Aharanov-Bohm effect, even at large >>>> distances. [ref. 25] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> PRESENT ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY IS INCOMPLETE >>>> >>>> As stated above, Maxwell's original EM >>>> theory was written in >>>> quaternions, which are an extension to the >>>> complex number theory and >>>> an independent system of >>>> mathematics. In short, since the >>>> quaternion is a hypernumber, Maxwell's theory >>>> was a hyperspatial >>>> theory, not just the limited >>>> three-dimensional subset that was >>>> extracted and expressed by Heaviside and >>>> Gibbs in terms of an >>>> abbreviated, incomplete vector mathematics. >>>> [ref. 26] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Heaviside and Gibbs Curtailed Maxwell's Theory >>>> >>>> Oliver Heaviside was a brilliant, >>>> self-taught genius who never >>>> formally attained a university degree, and >>>> whose papers were printed >>>> in technical magazines rather than >>>> scientific journals. When >>>> Maxwell published his Treatise in 1873, >>>> Heaviside was just teaching >>>> himself differential equations. >>>> >>>> Heaviside's imagination was completely seized >>>> by Maxwell's book, and >>>> Maxwell forever became his hero. >>>> However, he had great difficulty >>>> with quaternions and could not >>>> completely tolerate them. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Page 8 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Electrogravitation Was Discarded >>>> >>>> A puzzled Heaviside abhorred the >>>> quaternion, since it linked >>>> together a scalar component and a vector >>>> component, or "apples and >>>> oranges," in his view. He excised the scalar >>>> component of the >>>> quaternion and excluded the hyperspatial >>>> characteristics of its >>>> directional components, producing his much more >>>> limited vectors. >>>> >>>> To unite magnetics and electromagnetics, >>>> the simplest complex aspect >>>> of the quaternion had to be restored >>>> by resorting to ordinary >>>> imaginary numbers. These machinations to the >>>> quaternion theory, >>>> however, discarded its unified field theory >>>> aspects. >>>> >>>> In short, Heaviside produced a very >>>> practical, highly restricted >>>> subset that was far easier to >>>> engineer, but he threw out >>>> electrogravitation in the process. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Hatred of the Potential >>>> >>>> Heaviside hated the potential because he did >>>> not truly understand >>>> it. He stated that it was "...mystical >>>> and should be murdered from >>>> the theory." He conditioned generations >>>> of physicists and engineers >>>> to erroneously believe that the >>>> potential was just a mathematical >>>> convenience, and had no actual physical >>>> realization. >>>> >>>> Indeed, most electrical physicists and >>>> electrical engineers are >>>> still of that erroneous persuasion >>>> today, even though the Aharonov- >>>> Bohm work has long-since falsified >>>> such a position, both >>>> theoretically and experimentally. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> The Quaternion Theory Was Already a >>>> Unified EM/G Theory >>>> >>>> The present author has previously >>>> pointed out that Maxwell's >>>> quaternion theory was in fact a unified theory >>>> of electromagnetics >>>> and gravitation, and that the scalar >>>> component of the quaternion was >>>> the electrogravitational part. [ref. 27] >>>> >>>> That part was discarded by Heaviside >>>> and Gibbs, and so >>>> electrogravitation no longer appears in the >>>> electromagnetics that >>>> resulted from Heaviside's and Gibbs' surgery on >>>> Maxwell's quaternion >>>> theory. Strong experimental evidence for the >>>> EG nature of >>>> Whittaker's scalar EM theory is planned for >>>> presentation at this >>>> conference. [ref. 28] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ELECTROGRAVITATION ALSO EXCLUDED FROM GENERAL >>>> RELATIVITY >>>> >>>> The electrogravitational effect was also >>>> erroneously excluded from >>>> Einsteinian general relativity (GR). Einstein >>>> unwittingly narrowed >>>> his general relativity to only a subset >>>> of an unrestricted general >>>> relativity of curved space-time, by excluding >>>> local curvature. This >>>> GR error was an indirect result of the >>>> fundamental Heaviside/Gibbs >>>> omission error in classical electromagnetics. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Einstein's Gedankenexperiment >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, Einstein's view of >>>> electromagnetics approximated the >>>> classical Heaviside/Gibbs view. In classical >>>> EM theory, the >>>> electrical potentials, which actually were >>>> electrogravitational >>>> potentials, were already ignored as having no >>>> physical significance, >>>> >>>> Page 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> and EM was considered mutually exclusive >>>> to G. Therefore, Einstein >>>> only considered the weak gravitational >>>> force due to the attraction >>>> of mass, in developing his general >>>> relativity theory of curved >>>> space-time. >>>> >>>> The G-force is far weaker than the >>>> E-force; for two electrons, for >>>> example, the attractive G-force between them is >>>> on the order of only >>>> 10^-42 times as strong as their >>>> electrical E-force repulsion. Thus >>>> the G-force is incredibly smaller than >>>> the EM force. >>>> >>>> If only the weak G-force is considered >>>> for curving space-time, then >>>> there will never be an observable >>>> curvature except in the immediate >>>> vicinity of a very large mass, such as on the >>>> surface of the sun or >>>> near a star. >>>> >>>> Considering the weak G-force as the agent for >>>> curvature, Einstein >>>> reasoned that the laboratory and the >>>> observer/scientist/instrument >>>> would never be on the surface of the sun >>>> or near a star. Therefore, >>>> the local space-time, where the lab and >>>> the scientist/observer and >>>> his instruments are, would never be >>>> observably curved. The local >>>> space-time of the observer would always be flat. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately Einstein then overgeneralized his >>>> thought examination, >>>> and he stated one of his fundamental >>>> postulates of general >>>> relativity as "The local space-time is always >>>> flat." This is an >>>> erroneous overstatement. >>>> >>>> The postulate should be more correctly >>>> stated as follows: "The local >>>> space-time is always flat, whenever only the >>>> weak gravitational >>>> force is used for the agent of >>>> curvature, and the observer is not >>>> near a large collection of mass, such as >>>> a star." >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Corollary to the Corrected Postulate >>>> >>>> The two statements of the postulate >>>> differ fundamentally. >>>> Einstein's overstatement of the postulate does >>>> not allow the far >>>> stronger EM force to be used as an agent for >>>> local curvature. In >>>> effect, his own postulate excluded >>>> electromagnetics from curvature >>>> unity with gravitation, in his general >>>> relativity theory. [ref. 29] >>>> >>>> On the other hand, the corrected >>>> statement of the postulate admits >>>> the following corollary: >>>> >>>> "When a very strong force such as the >>>> electromagnetic force is >>>> used for the agent of curvature, the local >>>> space-time may be >>>> curved, even though the observer is not >>>> near a large >>>> collection of mass, such as a star." [ref. 30] >>>> >>>> Regrettably, many of Einstein's modern >>>> followers have raised >>>> Einstein's theory to a dogma, and have >>>> vigorously enforced his >>>> overstatement of the locally flat space-time. >>>> [ref. 31] >>>> >>>> In so doing, general relativity has >>>> been erroneously reduced to a >>>> theory that is basically not experimental: >>>> >>>> A priori, if the local space-time >>>> is flat, then there is no >>>> local experiment or local apparatus that >>>> involves or yields a >>>> curved space-time where the laboratory, the >>>> instruments, and >>>> the observer are located. >>>> >>>> Page 10 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In this fashion the universities have >>>> continued to perpetuate the >>>> exclusion of electrogravitation and its direct >>>> space-time curvature >>>> engineering implications. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> THE CURTAILMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS >>>> >>>> Today, quantum mechanics is our most >>>> successful physics theory. Its >>>> predictions, even the eery prediction of action >>>> at a distance, have >>>> been proven time and time again. >>>> However, quantum mechanics theory >>>> is known to have a formidable >>>> foundations difficulty: Try as they >>>> will, quantum physicists cannot find >>>> chaos in the theory. The >>>> theory is known to be wrong unless it >>>> possesses chaos (hidden order >>>> inside its statistics), yet the best >>>> efforts of quantum physicists >>>> have failed to find it. [ref. 32] >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Chaos Excluded By Inherent Assumption >>>> >>>> Any well-founded mathematical discipline >>>> is totally implied by its >>>> foundations postulates, and that is true of >>>> quantum mechanics. If >>>> the best efforts of the ablest >>>> physicists of the day cannot find >>>> chaos in the present QM, then one may >>>> suspect that the present QM >>>> does not contain chaos (hidden order), >>>> but already excludes it in >>>> some fashion. If that is true, then >>>> some present QM postulate, >>>> either explicit or implicit, of QM must >>>> be the culprit. >>>> >>>> If so, the "real" QM needed is a >>>> superset that has at least two >>>> subsets: one (the missing) subset includes >>>> chaos, while the present >>>> subset excludes chaos. >>>> >>>> So we may suspect that one or more of >>>> the postulates of the present >>>> QM theory is in error or overly >>>> restrictive, and must be changed to >>>> allow the missing chaotic subset. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Gibbs Statistics Excludes Hidden Order >>>> >>>> Indeed, we may resolve this formidable >>>> QM problem quite simply by >>>> examining the statistics utilized by quantum >>>> mechanics. When QM was >>>> being formulated, scientists simply >>>> appropriated and included the >>>> thermodynamic statistics of Willard Gibbs (the >>>> same Gibbs who, >>>> together with Heaviside, was responsible for >>>> the highly restricted >>>> vector subset of Maxwell's theory of >>>> electromagnetics.). >>>> >>>> Gibbs' thermodynamics statistics was >>>> totally based on the notion of >>>> the random variable. That is, the >>>> change (value assumed by the >>>> variable in a specific instance) is not only >>>> totally statistical, it >>>> is also totally random. >>>> >>>> Quantum physicists assumed a postulate >>>> of QM as follows: "Quantum >>>> change is totally statistical." However, >>>> because of the Gibbs >>>> statistics, in application they interpreted >>>> that postulate in a much >>>> stronger fashion, as if it had been stated >>>> thusly: "Quantum change >>>> is totally statistical and random." >>>> >>>> The actual postulate and the presently >>>> applied interpretation of it >>>> are in fact two quite different >>>> statements, and the interpretation >>>> is far more restrictive than actually >>>> implied by the postulate >>>> itself. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 11 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The Random Interpretation Is False >>>> >>>> Further, the strong interpretation can readily >>>> be falsified. As an >>>> example, the macroscopic universe is simply a >>>> large integration >>>> (collection) of quantum changes. If these >>>> component quanta occur >>>> totally randomly, then no integration >>>> of them would yield the >>>> ordered, macroscopic world we all live in, >>>> because integrated >>>> randomness is still random. Therefore, since >>>> the ordered macroworld >>>> exists, the present QM strong >>>> interpretation of its own statistical >>>> quantum change postulate is invalid. >>>> >>>> In addition, if quantum change were >>>> totally random, then there would >>>> never be any possibility, a priori, >>>> of engineering it >>>> deterministically. Presently, almost all >>>> quantum physicists believe >>>> that quantum change cannot be >>>> engineered, on first principles. >>>> >>>> On the other hand, if hidden order is >>>> admitted, there is at least >>>> the possibility of directly engineering >>>> physical quantum change >>>> itself. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Hidden Variables >>>> >>>> Interestingly, the renowned physicist David >>>> Bohm has shown that a >>>> hidden variable theory of quantum >>>> mechanics can actually be >>>> constructed, whereby one could potentially >>>> engineer physical change. >>>> [ref. 33] >>>> >>>> It is well-known that experimental >>>> physics does not in any manner >>>> refute hidden variable theories. >>>> Because of the historical >>>> attachment of physics to the theory of the >>>> random variable, such >>>> contrary notions as chaos (hidden order) and >>>> hidden variables have >>>> simply been greeted with suspicion and >>>> shuffled aside. The usual >>>> objection is Occam's razor; a theory must >>>> predict something >>>> different, or it is said to be unwarranted. >>>> [ref. 34] >>>> >>>> But based on this same form of Occam's >>>> overworked razor, the >>>> Whittaker hidden variable approach certainly >>>> predicts many >>>> profoundly different engineerable effects and >>>> capabilities that >>>> mandate its full examination. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Correction of the Statistical Postulate >>>> >>>> A much better, valid interpretation of >>>> the quantum change postulate >>>> is as follows: "Quantum change is >>>> statistical, and may contain >>>> hidden order." >>>> >>>> The two interpretations differ >>>> sharply. In the new and less >>>> restrictive reinterpretation, one has three >>>> cases or subsets of QM >>>> as follows: >>>> >>>> (1) the subset where quantum change contains >>>> partial order, >>>> hence is already chaotic, >>>> (2) the subset where the internal order has >>>> vanished, leaving >>>> the statistics as Gibbs' >>>> random variable statistics, and >>>> exhibiting the present quantum >>>> mechanics without chaos, and >>>> (3) the subset where the statistics is totally >>>> deterministic, >>>> but information on the >>>> variables is lost. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 12 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Remarks On the New Interpretation >>>> >>>> The new interpretation is consistent >>>> with Bohm's hidden variable >>>> theory, and it is also consistent with >>>> the Schroedinger equation, >>>> which in the QM model already >>>> propagates the QM states forward in >>>> time with absolute determinism. >>>> >>>> It is even possible, for example, to >>>> deterministically produce a >>>> Bohm/de Broglie quantum potential, >>>> according to a self-targeting >>>> repetitive phase conjugation mechanism >>>> advanced by this author. >>>> [ref. 35] >>>> >>>> The new interpretation is not >>>> consistent with the Copenhagen >>>> interpretation, which only applies to the >>>> present QM subset. This >>>> can be seen as follows: If quantum >>>> change is engineerable by >>>> Whittaker hidden variables, then the inner >>>> contents of the >>>> engineered quantum change are known. >>>> >>>> This knowledge applies to the subset >>>> where QM change is engineered >>>> (the new subset), but not to the >>>> subset where all variables are >>>> random variables and hence not subject >>>> to engineering. Therefore >>>> the Copenhagen interpretation applies >>>> to the random quantum change >>>> subset, but not to chaotic (partially >>>> ordered) quantum change >>>> subset. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> The New Interpretation Is Testable >>>> >>>> Happily, the reinterpretation of the postulate >>>> now allows a >>>> sufficient collection of already-chaotic >>>> quantum changes to produce >>>> the well-ordered, macroscopic universe >>>> we all live in. Also, the >>>> new interpretation is testable, and it >>>> can be falsified or verified >>>> in the laboratory. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> THE END RESULT OF ABBREVIATING MAXWELL'S >>>> THEORY >>>> >>>> Effect On EM >>>> >>>> In discarding the scalar component of >>>> the quaternion, Heaviside and >>>> Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified >>>> EM/G portion of Maxwell's >>>> theory that arises when the >>>> translational/directional components of >>>> two interacting quaternions reduce to >>>> zero, but the scalar resultant >>>> remains and infolds a deterministic, >>>> dynamic structure that is a >>>> function of oppositive >>>> directional/translational components. >>>> >>>> In the infolding of EM energy inside >>>> a scalar potential, a >>>> structured scalar potential results, almost >>>> precisely as later shown >>>> by Whittaker but unnoticed by the >>>> scientific community. The simple >>>> vector equations produced by Heaviside >>>> and Gibbs captured only that >>>> subset of Maxwell's theory where EM >>>> and gravitation are mutually >>>> exclusive. >>>> >>>> In that subset, electromagnetic >>>> circuits and equipment will not >>>> ever, and cannot ever, produce >>>> gravitational or inertial effects in >>>> materials and equipments. Not a single one of >>>> those Heaviside/Gibbs >>>> equations ever appeared in a paper or book by >>>> James Clerk Maxwell, >>>> even though the severely restricted >>>> Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation >>>> is universally and erroneously taught in >>>> all Western universities as >>>> Maxwell's theory. >>>> >>>> Page 13 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Effect On GR >>>> >>>> As a result of this artificial >>>> restriction of Maxwell's theory, >>>> Einstein also inadvertently restricted his >>>> theory of general >>>> relativity, forever preventing the unification >>>> of electromagnetics >>>> and relativity. He also essentially >>>> prevented the present >>>> restricted general relativity from ever >>>> becoming an experimental, >>>> engineerable science on the laboratory bench, >>>> since a hidden >>>> internalized electromagnetics causing a >>>> deterministically structured >>>> local space-time curvature was excluded. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Effect On QM >>>> >>>> Quantum mechanics used only the >>>> Heaviside/Gibbs externalized >>>> electromagnetics and completely missed >>>> Maxwell's internalized and >>>> ordered electromagnetics enfolded >>>> inside a structured scalar >>>> potential. Accordingly, QM maintained its >>>> Gibbs statistics of >>>> quantum change, which is non-chaotic a >>>> priori. >>>> >>>> Quantum physicists by and largely >>>> excluded Bohm's hidden variable >>>> theory, which conceivably could have >>>> offered the potential of >>>> engineering quantum change, engineering >>>> physical reality itself. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> In Summary >>>> >>>> Each of the three major scientific >>>> disciplines missed and excluded a >>>> subset of its disciplinary area, because >>>> it did not have the scalar >>>> component of the quaternion to incorporate. >>>> Further, all of them >>>> completely missed the significance of the >>>> Whittaker approach, which >>>> already shows how to apply and >>>> engineer the very subsets they had >>>> excluded. >>>> >>>> What now exist in these areas are three >>>> inconsistent disciplines. >>>> Each of them unwittingly excluded a >>>> vital part of its discipline, >>>> which was the unified field part. >>>> Ironically, then, present >>>> physicists continue to exert great effort to >>>> find the missing key to >>>> unification of the three disciplines, but find >>>> it hopeless, because >>>> these special subsets are already >>>> contradictory to one another, as >>>> is quite well-known to foundations >>>> physicists. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> CONCLUSIONS >>>> >>>> Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, >>>> one must add back the >>>> unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to >>>> each discipline. >>>> >>>> Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn >>>> out to be one and the >>>> same, as shown in Figure 3. So >>>> application of Whittaker's work to >>>> each one of the three disciplines >>>> produces the necessary superset of >>>> each, and these three supersets are >>>> unified in and on the common >>>> added Whittaker subset. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 14 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________ >>>> >>>> | | >>>> | >>>> GENERAL | >>>> | RELATIVITY >>>> (GR) | >>>> _____________________|_____________________|_____________________ >>>> | | | | >>>> | QM | APPLY | CLASSICAL | >>>> | (MISSING | WHITTAKER | EM | >>>> | CHAOS) | THEORY | THEORY | >>>> |____________________|_____________________|____________________| >>>> >>>> | | >>>> | MIND AND >>>> SUBTLE | >>>> | >>>> ENERGY | >>>> >>>> |_____________________| >>>> >>>> Figure 3. Whittaker >>>> Unification of EM, GR, and QM. >>>> >>>> Also, as shown in the figure, one gets >>>> an added and unexpected bonus >>>> of great value: Mind, thought, and life >>>> occupy time, and if time is >>>> treated as a real dimension, then >>>> these are real also. Since >>>> fundamental units in which physics is modeled >>>> are arbitrary, one can >>>> even model physics in terms of one unit, >>>> time. >>>> >>>> In that case, everything is a time >>>> structure. Since even physical >>>> reality can be viewed in this fashion, >>>> it is not unreasonable to >>>> view mind, thought, and life as real; >>>> they do after all occupy time. >>>> >>>> However, since they do not emerge in the >>>> normal external >>>> electromagnetics, they must lie within the >>>> hidden, internal >>>> electromagnetics (since the photon carries >>>> both time and energy, >>>> being a piece of action). >>>> >>>> Without further development, we state >>>> that the Whittaker hidden >>>> variable EM approach, in allowing the complete >>>> engineering of the >>>> internal electromagnetics, allows the complete >>>> engineering of mind, >>>> thought, and life. Living systems have >>>> utilized the internal EM >>>> Whittaker channel (in and through atomic >>>> nuclear potentials and area >>>> quantum potentials) since the beginning. >>>> [ref. 36] >>>> >>>> Finally, the Whittaker unification linkage of >>>> the three disciplines >>>> is testable. It is engineerable. It works. >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> NOTES AND REFERENCES >>>> >>>> [1] P. Graneau, Ampere-Neumann >>>> Electrodynamics of Metals, >>>> Nonantum, Massachusetts, >>>> Hadronic Press, 1985. See also P. >>>> Graneau and P.N. Graneau, >>>> "Electrodynamic Explosions in >>>> Liquids," Appl. Phys. Lett., >>>> Vol. 46, 1985, p. 468; R. >>>> Azevedo, P. Graneau, P.N. >>>> Graneau, and C. Millet, "Powerful >>>> Water Plasma Explosions," >>>> Phys. Lett. Vol. 117, 1986, p. >>>> 101. >>>> >>>> [2] See Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, >>>> "Significance of >>>> Electromagnetic Potentials in >>>> the Quantum Theory," Phys. >>>> Rev. Second Series, 115(3), >>>> Aug. 1, 1959, p. 458-491. This >>>> paper pointed out the primacy >>>> of the potentials. Instead >>>> of being causative agents, >>>> the force fields are actually >>>> effects generated in and of >>>> charged particle systems from >>>> the potentials. This is in >>>> complete violation of both >>>> classical electromagnetics and >>>> classical dynamics, but it >>>> >>>> Page 15 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> is absolutely required by >>>> quantum mechanics. For an >>>> extensive discussion of the >>>> Aharonov-Bohm effect and an >>>> extensive list of references, >>>> see S. Olariu and I. Iovitzu >>>> Popescu, "The Quantum Effects >>>> of Electromagnetic Fluxes," >>>> Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(2), Apr. 1985. >>>> >>>> [3] See Bertram Schwarzschild, "Currents in >>>> normal-metal rings >>>> exhibit Aharonov-Bohm Effect," >>>> Physics Today, 39(1), Jan. >>>> 1986, p. 17-20 for confirmation. >>>> >>>> [4] James Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on >>>> Electricity and >>>> Magnetism, Oxford University >>>> Press, Oxford, 1873. The >>>> third edition is published by >>>> Dover, 1954. >>>> >>>> [5] Maxwell's true theory of electromagnetics >>>> is contained in >>>> some 200-odd quaternion >>>> equations, and is far more complex >>>> than the gross vector >>>> simplification developed by Heaviside >>>> and Gibbs after Maxwell's >>>> death. For a cogent argument >>>> about what might have been >>>> discovered much earlier in >>>> physics if quaternions had >>>> not been cast aside, see James >>>> D. Edmonds, Jr., "Quaternion >>>> Quantum Theory: New Physics or >>>> Number Mysticism?", Am. J. >>>> Phys., 42(3), Mar. 1974, p. 220- >>>> 223. Just how much >>>> more powerful was Maxwell's >>>> quaternionic expression of EM >>>> theory than was Heaviside's >>>> (i.e., the modern) vector >>>> interpretation, was succinctly >>>> expressed by Josephs as >>>> follows: "Hamilton's algebra of >>>> quaternions, unlike Heaviside's >>>> algebra of vectors, is not >>>> a mere abbreviated mode of >>>> expressing Cartesian analysis, >>>> but is an independent branch >>>> of mathematics with its own >>>> rules of operation and its >>>> own special theorems. A >>>> quaternion is, in fact, a >>>> generalized or hypercomplex >>>> number..." (H.J. Josephs, >>>> "The Heaviside Papers Found at >>>> Paignton in 1957," >>>> Electromagnetic Theory by Oliver >>>> Heaviside, Including an >>>> account of Heaviside's unpublished >>>> notes for a fourth volume, >>>> and with a foreword by Sir >>>> Edmund Whittaker, Vol. >>>> III, Third Edition, Chelsea >>>> Publishing Co., New York, 1971, >>>> p. 660.) >>>> >>>> [6] See E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial >>>> Differential Equations >>>> of Mathematical Physics," >>>> Math. Ann., Vol. 57, 1903, p. >>>> 333-355; "On an Expression of >>>> the Electromagnetic Field Due >>>> to Electrons by Means of Two >>>> Scalar Potential Functions," >>>> Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series >>>> 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372. >>>> >>>> [7] In the modern view, it is trapped >>>> energy that is >>>> gravitational, mass being >>>> viewed as simply such trapped >>>> energy. We point out that >>>> Einstein's formula E = mc^2 >>>> actually is an expression for >>>> mass in terms of its trapped >>>> EM energy. Thus we extend the >>>> modern view by stating that, >>>> to first order, Newtonian >>>> gravitational attraction is due >>>> to the attraction of >>>> spatially entrapped electromagnetic >>>> energy. Since the >>>> electromagnetic scalar potentials >>>> represent just such spatially >>>> entrapped EM energy, then >>>> they hold a special >>>> significance gravitationally. >>>> >>>> [8] This assertion can be tested. At the >>>> nodal points of the >>>> standing potential wave, the >>>> rate of flow of time is >>>> normal. At nonzero points >>>> along the wave, however, the >>>> local rate of flow of local >>>> time varies from normal. After >>>> a proper-time interval for the >>>> observer at the nodal point, >>>> >>>> Page 16 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> normal clocks and watches >>>> at different non-nodal points >>>> along the wave will appreciably >>>> vary in their time reading. >>>> Initially synchronized >>>> clocks will thus be found to >>>> disagree, if placed in >>>> different positions in the Whittaker >>>> wave and allowed to remain for >>>> a test period. In the past, >>>> various inventors have >>>> anecdotally demonstrated this >>>> effect. As an example, see >>>> David Jones, Vancouver Sun >>>> Times, Dec. 17, 1977, p. 17. >>>> >>>> [9] V.K. Ignatovich, "The Remarkable >>>> Capabilities of Recursive >>>> Relations," Am. J. Phys., >>>> 57(10), Oct. 1989, p. 873-878. >>>> >>>> [10] Richard W. Ziolkowski, >>>> "Localized transmission of wave >>>> energy," Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1061, Microwave and >>>> Particle Beam >>>> Sources and Directed Energy Concepts, Jan. >>>> 1989, p. 396-397. >>>> >>>> [11] An acoustic missile is >>>> essentially a slug of acoustic energy >>>> that holds together as it travels, striking and >>>> damaging or >>>> destroying a target. An electromagnetic >>>> missile is a slug >>>> of EM energy that holds together as it travels >>>> to a target >>>> and strikes it. >>>> >>>> [12] A.D. Sakharov, "Vacuum Quantum >>>> Fluctuations in Curved Space >>>> and the Theory of Gravitation," Sov. Phys. >>>> Dokl., Vol. 12, >>>> 1968, p. 1040. See also the related >>>> discussion in Misner, >>>> Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, 1973, p. 426. >>>> >>>> [13] Note that this assigns an >>>> internal structure to a >>>> gravitational potential. >>>> >>>> [14] A.D. Sakharov, Theor. Math. >>>> Phys., Vol. 23, 1975, p. 435. >>>> >>>> [15] K. Akama et al, Prog. Theor. >>>> Phys., Vol. 60, 1978, p. 868. >>>> >>>> [16] B. Hasslacher and E. Mottolo, >>>> Phys. Lett., Vol. 95B, 1980, >>>> p. 237. >>>> >>>> [17] A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. >>>> 42, 1979, p. 417. >>>> >>>> [18] D. Amati and G. Veneziano, Phys. >>>> Lett., Vol. 105B, 1981, p. >>>> 358; S. Yoshimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. >>>> 78, 1987, p. >>>> 435. >>>> >>>> [19] S. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. >>>> 54, 1982, p. 729. >>>> >>>> [20] H.E. Puthoff, "Ground State of >>>> Hydrogen as a Zero-Point- >>>> Fluctuation-Determined State," Phys. Rev. D, >>>> 35(10), May 15, >>>> 1987, p. 3266-3269. >>>> >>>> [21] H.E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a >>>> Zero-Point-Fluctuation Force," >>>> Phys. Rev. A., 39(5), Mar. 1, 1989, p. >>>> 2333-2342. See also >>>> H.E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum >>>> electromagnetic Zero-Point >>>> Energy," Phys. Rev. A., 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989, >>>> p. 4857-4862. >>>> Changing the vacuum potential constitutes a >>>> fluctuation >>>> directly in and of the zero-point energy of >>>> vacuum, and >>>> hence, by Puthoff's mechanism, it does indeed >>>> induce a >>>> gravitational effect. At the level of the >>>> vacuum virtual >>>> particle flux exchange with the charged >>>> nucleus, producing >>>> >>>> >>>> Page 17 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> an electromagnetic change also produces a >>>> gravitational >>>> change, and vice-versa. >>>> >>>> [22] Puthoff, Phys. Rev. D., 35(10), >>>> May 15, 1987, p. 3266-3269. >>>> >>>> [23] Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs >>>> Notes 1899-1900, Nolit, >>>> Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1978, p. 61-62. >>>> >>>> [24] E.T. Whittaker, "On an >>>> Expression of the Electromagnetic >>>> Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two >>>> Scalar Potential >>>> Functions," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series >>>> 2, Vol. 1, >>>> 1904, p. 367-372. >>>> >>>> [25] The potential for weaponization >>>> of the Whittaker work should >>>> be obvious. >>>> >>>> [26] Toward the end of his life >>>> Heaviside lived as a recluse in a >>>> small garret apartment, and may have returned >>>> again to his >>>> struggle with quaternions. In the 1950's >>>> handwritten notes >>>> of a theory of gravitation, written in >>>> quaternion >>>> mathematics, were found beneath the floor >>>> boards of his tiny >>>> study. >>>> >>>> [27] T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Original >>>> Quaternion Theory Was a >>>> Unified Field Theory of Electromagnetics and >>>> Electrogravitation," Proceedings, >>>> International Tesla >>>> Society Symposium, Colorado Springs, Colorado, >>>> July 1988. >>>> See also T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Lost Unified >>>> Field Theory >>>> of Electromagnetics and Gravitation," >>>> Proceedings, PACE >>>> Third International New Energy Technology >>>> Symposium, June >>>> 25-28, 1988 at Maison du Citoyen, Hull >>>> (Ottawa), Canada, >>>> 1988. >>>> >>>> [28] See Floyd Sweet and T.E. >>>> Bearden, "Utilizing Scalar >>>> Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy," >>>> Proceedings, this >>>> conference. >>>> >>>> [29] Ironically, Einstein then spent >>>> the remainder of his life, >>>> desperately trying to unify electromagnetics >>>> and gravitation >>>> in his theory of general relativity, never >>>> realizing that >>>> his own overstatement of his "flat local >>>> space-time" >>>> postulate precluded his success and foredoomed >>>> all his >>>> efforts to failure. >>>> >>>> [30] To appreciate just what can >>>> actually be done with local >>>> space-time curvature, see E.B. Smetanin, >>>> "Electromagnetic >>>> Field in a Space With Curvature - New >>>> Solutions," Sov. Phys. >>>> J., 25(2), Feb. 1982, p. 107-111. >>>> >>>> [31] For a detailed exposition of the >>>> scientific suppression used >>>> to uphold the present GR, written by an inside >>>> scientist of >>>> excellent ability, and one with over 100 >>>> published papers in >>>> the literature, see Rugero Maria Santilli, >>>> Ethical Probe on >>>> Einstein's Followers in the USA: An Insider's >>>> View, Alpha >>>> Publishing, POB 82, Newtonville, MA 02160, 1984. >>>> >>>> [32] For a discussion of the missing >>>> chaos in quantum mechanics, >>>> see Robert Pool, "Quantum Chaos: Enigma >>>> Wrapped in a >>>> Mystery," Science, 243(4893), Feb. 17, 1989, p. >>>> 893-895. >>>> >>>> Page 18 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For a more technical discussion see P.V. >>>> Elyutin, "The >>>> Quantum Chaos Problem," Sov. Phys. Usp. 31(7), >>>> July 1988, >>>> p. 597-622. >>>> >>>> [33] For an entry point into the >>>> literature of hidden variable >>>> theory, see Quantum Implications: Essays in >>>> Honour of David >>>> Bohm, B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat, Eds., >>>> Routledge & >>>> Kegan Paul, London & New York, 1987. >>>> >>>> [34] However, even if it predicts >>>> something new and is warranted, >>>> it still may not be adopted. An example is >>>> the continuing >>>> reluctance of physicists to reformulate EM >>>> theory, stressing >>>> the primacy of the potential and the fact that >>>> not the force >>>> field but only the potential for the force >>>> field exists in >>>> the vacuum. Even more so, it is well-known >>>> that detection >>>> is actually binary, and we throw away >>>> precisely half of >>>> almost every detection our instruments make. >>>> C.f. Richard >>>> Kidd et al, "Evolution of the Modern Photon," >>>> Am. J. Phys., >>>> 57(1), Jan. 1989, p. 27-35. Generally in every >>>> electromagnetic interaction of our >>>> instruments, two photons >>>> are produced: one a time-forward photon, and >>>> the other a >>>> time-reversed photon. Our detectors >>>> essentially measure the >>>> time-forward photon half, not the >>>> time-reversed photon >>>> (antiphoton) half. The antiphoton half >>>> produces a slight >>>> recoil force (Newton's third law reaction >>>> force) in the mass >>>> (nuclei) of the instrument, which we ignore. >>>> Also, we >>>> continue to ignore the evidence that the >>>> photon and >>>> antiphoton are not identical. In a pumped >>>> phase conjugate >>>> mirror, for example, the emission of a normal >>>> photon from >>>> the mirror material results in a recoil of the >>>> mirror; the >>>> emission of an antiphoton by the mirror >>>> material, however, >>>> does not result in recoil of the mirror. >>>> Physics is still >>>> not consistent, as is well-known to foundations >>>> researchers, >>>> but this fact is generally not accented to >>>> university >>>> students. >>>> >>>> [35] Bearden, Gravitobiology, Tesla >>>> Book Co., 1991, p. 33-36. >>>> The mechanism was previously advanced in several >>>> miscellaneous papers and in private correspondence. >>>> >>>> [36] See Bearden, Gravitobiology, >>>> Tesla Book Co., for additional >>>> development of biological effects and >>>> mechanisms of scalar >>>> EM. >>>> ******************* >>>> End of paper >>>> ******************* >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> If you have comments or other >>>> information relating to such topics >>>> as this paper covers, please upload >>>> to KeelyNet or send to the >>>> Vangard Sciences address as listed on the >>>> first page. >>>> Thank you for your consideration, interest and >>>> support. >>>> >>>> Jerry W. Decker.........Ron >>>> Barker...........Chuck Henderson >>>> Vangard >>>> Sciences/KeelyNet >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> If we can be of service, >>>> you may contact >>>> Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron >>>> at (214) 242-9346 >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Page 19 >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/25/2018 6:48 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>> >>>> Norm, >>>> That looks familiar. Where is it from? >>>> Was that an early Bearden paper? I have >>>> two file cabinets and book cases full of >>>> stuff like that that are between the garage >>>> and the basement. At the current rate it >>>> will be another year until I’m organized again. >>>> Sparky gave me an equation about the >>>> permittivity of space and told me “don’t >>>> tell anyone about that”. Its in one of my >>>> notebooks from the ’90’s. Might find it >>>> during a winter time review of paperwork. >>>> Too much to so now in the summer in this >>>> house and a rental house we picked up >>>> earlier this year after our son lost his >>>> mind and disappeared. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Toby >>>> Toby Grotz >>>> 608-606-5370 >>>> In the future, >>>> We will sit on our front porches >>>> with family, friends and neighbors, >>>> Singing and playing acoustic music, >>>> until the stars shine down upon >>>> us, undimmed by the fires of fossil fuels. >>>> >>>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Norman >>>> Wootan <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> <nppckhgeghphmkjo.png> >>>> >>>> >>>> Toby ! Here is next page. I sent the >>>> attachment with the whole Sparky Sweet >>>> paper! >>>> >>>> On 7/24/2018 9:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>> >>>> Norm, >>>> On that Nature od space, It cuts >>>> off at the end. Seems there should >>>> be a page 2 after the ….. “only >>>> real space, the"….???" >>>> Toby Grotz >>>> 608-606-5370 >>>> In the future, >>>> We will sit on our front porches >>>> with family, friends and neighbors, >>>> Singing and playing acoustic music, >>>> until the stars shine down upon >>>> us, undimmed by the fires of fossil >>>> fuels. >>>> >>>> On Jul 23, 2018, at 11:18 AM, >>>> Norman Wootan <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> <habdfmegacnlohpb.png> >>>> >>>> On 7/23/2018 11:08 AM, Norman >>>> Wootan wrote: >>>> >>>> Toby! Back in the early >>>> 80s, I was designing some >>>> PM motors and became >>>> friends with the Production >>>> Manager at General >>>> Magnetics (Southland Corp) >>>> in Dallas for they >>>> manufactured speaker >>>> magnets of all size and >>>> shapes. My frequent visits >>>> with him, I saw the mixing, >>>> molding, firing and >>>> magnetizing of the then >>>> Barium Ferite magnets. EPA >>>> mandated the end of the use >>>> of barium in the >>>> manufacturing process with >>>> a strontium substitute. The >>>> barium magnets became >>>> available from Brazil and >>>> China. Back when I visited >>>> with Don Martin and got the >>>> dimensions of Sparky's >>>> magnets I found them at >>>> Edmund Scientific so bought >>>> the exact same Sweet >>>> magnets. I was scrapping >>>> sown all the main frame >>>> (IBM) computers in the DFW >>>> area and found that the >>>> early versions of the big >>>> hard drives had the barium >>>> magnets which Joel and I >>>> used in the MRA (Mini Sweet). >>>> >>>> <pommgidpifdmpbjn.jpg> >>>> >>>> <abjopbhbpapmilnb.jpg> >>>> >>>> <ciecjnijpplnkoln.jpg> >>>> >>>> The MRA magnets were barium >>>> ferrite taken from these >>>> linear servos in the read >>>> write heads. >>>> >>>> After talking to Bearden >>>> regarding the conversion of >>>> cold electrical output >>>> making a self runner (Sweet >>>> said not possible) I >>>> realized that much more had >>>> to be learned about this >>>> aspect of research. I know >>>> you were involved to some >>>> extent. >>>> >>>> See: Sweet attachments in >>>> his own words! >>>> >>>> Before I got all bogged >>>> down with my Hydrogen >>>> Production Process and >>>> building Proof of concept >>>> prototypes for GAZPROM, >>>> Russia, I had formulated a >>>> real neat Barium, Titanium >>>> dioxide, Ferrite magnet to >>>> be made by a Chinese >>>> vendor. I never got the >>>> prototype magnets built. >>>> Over the years with contact >>>> with Gunderson, Sweet VTA >>>> Yahoo site, I accumulated >>>> practically all there is to >>>> know about the Sweet >>>> Project. I guess Bearden's >>>> Final, Final, Final Secret >>>> is still yet to be >>>> realized! Lol >>>> Norm >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby >>>> Grotz wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> Lots of stuff here. I >>>> have been busy so need >>>> to back and review all. >>>> I did see a reference >>>> to barium ferrite. >>>> Sparky sweet said the >>>> magnets he used had to >>>> be barium ferrite. >>>> Most ceramic magnets >>>> of the size he was >>>> using are strontium >>>> ferrite. To tell the >>>> difference I used, per >>>> his instructions, an >>>> ohm meter. One >>>> conducts, the other >>>> doesn’t.. I forget >>>> which way it is. >>>> Somewhere in my >>>> collection of boxes I >>>> think I have one of his >>>> magnets. I’m still >>>> unpackingand organizing >>>> after many, many moves >>>> so it will be awhile >>>> before I find it. >>>> BTW, attached is Sweet >>>> circuit and plot from a >>>> magnet he had used. >>>> >>>> Toby >>>> >>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at >>>> 7:20 AM, Norman >>>> Wootan >>>> <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Forwarded >>>> Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: >>>> [EVGRAY] The Energy >>>> in Negative charge >>>> (What is Heat?) >>>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul >>>> 2018 22:39:51 -0700 >>>> From: >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY]<[email protected]> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Reply-To: >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >>>> To: >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> Interesting theory >>>> Norm, >>>> >>>> I am sure you have >>>> thought far more >>>> about Hydrogen than >>>> most other people, >>>> I read your patent. >>>> >>>> Protium and >>>> molecular, not sure >>>> where the electron >>>> difference is but >>>> there seems to be >>>> the potential of a >>>> hole difference or >>>> at least a neutron >>>> missing. Very >>>> interesting what >>>> happens with a >>>> Coleman battery in >>>> that it emits >>>> neutrons. As no one >>>> really seems to >>>> know what a hole >>>> is, some say it's >>>> protons but I think >>>> proton electricity >>>> is a different animal. >>>> >>>> Tesla always said >>>> it was a gas and >>>> lighter than >>>> Hydrogen so maybe >>>> the mono form is >>>> one of the light >>>> Aether gasses since >>>> it has no neutron >>>> and would only need >>>> a proton to gather >>>> an electron. If it >>>> shows up from out >>>> of nowhere that is >>>> a key to >>>> dimensional tuning. >>>> >>>> It's either coming >>>> from the (ZP) >>>> aether well or >>>> earth well so we do >>>> agree on the >>>> origin. Also have a >>>> theory about rain >>>> forming in a >>>> similar way. When >>>> we have these >>>> weather systems >>>> starting on the >>>> west cost and >>>> dumping billions of >>>> gallons all across >>>> the country more >>>> than the clouds >>>> could ever hold. >>>> As the high and >>>> lower clouds >>>> commingle I thing >>>> they convert >>>> nitrogen to >>>> hydrogen and oxygen. >>>> >>>> I don't think I >>>> have seen an >>>> influence machine >>>> work properly >>>> without a ground >>>> connection so they >>>> are in fact pumps. >>>> >>>> OK I have been >>>> wondering about all >>>> the todo of >>>> rectifying and then >>>> fractioning the HV >>>> to a coil vs >>>> straight up static >>>> charge from a >>>> serious influence >>>> machine for the >>>> neutral spike. >>>> >>>> The Felici device >>>> sounds like >>>> something to build >>>> someday. Also >>>> interesting what >>>> NASA is doing with >>>> the helium to hold >>>> H in the Protium state. >>>> >>>> Bill Lyne had the >>>> monoatomic furnace >>>> which is a great >>>> idea too. I think >>>> there are some deep >>>> truths in William >>>> Lynes writings even >>>> if some of the whys >>>> and wherefores may >>>> be misinterpreted. >>>> >>>> Dielectric stress >>>> in piezo crytals is >>>> another field I >>>> intend to pursue as >>>> far as attempting >>>> electrets and >>>> anisotropic >>>> alignments and >>>> restructuring. I >>>> think Barrium >>>> Ferrite might be >>>> piezoelectric, >>>> don't recall right >>>> now, but either way >>>> it seems to be a >>>> very good insulator >>>> and something that >>>> can fraction >>>> electrons from the >>>> B field. I imagine >>>> you played with >>>> this stuff quite a >>>> bit during your MRA >>>> design and likely >>>> noticed some >>>> interesting aspects >>>> of the material. >>>> >>>> There was a guy who >>>> was using magnetic >>>> tape rings and tape >>>> heads for a OU lenz >>>> free generator. He >>>> had a single sine >>>> wave freq and >>>> claimed he could >>>> loop generating >>>> electricity in this >>>> way as the tape >>>> passing by the >>>> heads each putting >>>> out about 9 volts >>>> did not seem to get >>>> loaded down. >>>> Probably just >>>> another tuned high >>>> impedance system. >>>> Find it interesting >>>> as mag tape is >>>> mostly barium >>>> ferrite particles. >>>> >>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 >>>> AM, Norman >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Remember Mick, >>>> You have been >>>> saying >>>> Differential? >>>> Well, here is >>>> what is >>>> happening which >>>> agrees with Hal >>>> Puthoff paper >>>> on the >>>> spontaneous >>>> formation of >>>> hydrogen from >>>> space >>>> background from >>>> free protons. >>>> Please >>>> reviewIrving >>>> Langmuir >>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir> >>>> Atomic >>>> Hydrogen. Here >>>> is my theory as >>>> to how the >>>> 3000watts of >>>> HVDC is created >>>> in a 30 atm. >>>> atmosphere of >>>> .9999 pure >>>> hydrogen gas. >>>> In the Lanfmuir >>>> torch a high >>>> voltage charge >>>> breaks the H2 >>>> bond creating >>>> monatomic >>>> hydrogen >>>> (atoms). Same >>>> with the Felici >>>> Generator, the >>>> operating gas >>>> is Atomic >>>> Hydrogen. >>>> According to >>>> Hal Puthoff, if >>>> a hydrogen atom >>>> looses an >>>> electron it is >>>> immediately >>>> replenished by >>>> the Zero Point >>>> space >>>> background. The >>>> Felici >>>> Generator is a >>>> zero Point >>>> Energy >>>> Generator or >>>> PUMP. I had an >>>> interesting >>>> discussion with >>>> Ken (RIP) >>>> Shoulders at a >>>> New Energy >>>> Symposium in >>>> Denver. I asked >>>> him what type >>>> of power supply >>>> he used in >>>> charging his >>>> HVDC capacitor >>>> banks for the >>>> Charged Cluster >>>> experiments. >>>> His reply was >>>> an >>>> Electrostatic >>>> Influence >>>> Machine (Holtz >>>> Machine). He >>>> said that if >>>> you apply a >>>> potential of >>>> lets say >>>> 100,000 Volts >>>> across a >>>> capacitor it >>>> will charge >>>> because you >>>> have stressed >>>> the dielectric >>>> (dielectric >>>> displacement). >>>> Interesting >>>> answer to say >>>> the least. The >>>> charged >>>> capacitors will >>>> do work. Same >>>> with the Felici >>>> Generator for >>>> the 3,000 watt >>>> output will do >>>> work drawing >>>> the energy from >>>> the space >>>> background. >>>> See! Mick, I >>>> had to answer >>>> my own question >>>> for nobody >>>> thinks about >>>> the perplexing >>>> problems. Ha! >>>> Ha! Norm >>>> >>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003 >>>> >>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding >>>> >>>> On 7/20/2018 >>>> 11:13 AM, >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, well, >>>> well... >>>> certainly >>>> not from >>>> inside the >>>> device! >>>> >>>> On >>>> 7/20/2018 >>>> 8:12 AM, >>>> Norman >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm >>>> >>>> Speaking >>>> of >>>> Hydrogen, >>>> gas >>>> with >>>> one >>>> proton >>>> and one >>>> electron >>>> / atom, >>>> where >>>> does >>>> the >>>> electrons >>>> come >>>> from in >>>> the >>>> Felici >>>> HV >>>> Electrostatic >>>> Generator?? >>>> I have >>>> issued >>>> this >>>> challenge >>>> before >>>> with no >>>> comments. >>>> >>>> On >>>> 7/20/2018 >>>> 9:37 >>>> AM, >>>> Norman >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Going >>>> back >>>> to >>>> a >>>> subject >>>> not >>>> fully >>>> understood. >>>> What >>>> is >>>> Heat? >>>> Which >>>> has >>>> more >>>> energy, >>>> Holes >>>> or >>>> Electrons? >>>> Hot >>>> surface >>>> = >>>> holes >>>> due >>>> to >>>> missing >>>> electrons >>>> vs >>>> cold >>>> surface= >>>> packing >>>> of >>>> electrons >>>> until >>>> all >>>> holes >>>> are >>>> filled >>>> (absolute >>>> zero >>>> conditions) >>>> BTW, >>>> absolute >>>> zero >>>> conditions, >>>> there >>>> is >>>> no >>>> Browning >>>> Motion >>>> for >>>> there >>>> are >>>> no >>>> holes >>>> for >>>> electrons >>>> to >>>> move >>>> in >>>> the >>>> atomic >>>> lattice. >>>> See: >>>> >>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm >>>> >>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen >>>> >>>> Kone, >>>> >>>> I >>>> am >>>> working >>>> with >>>> the >>>> ground >>>> return >>>> so >>>> there >>>> is >>>> the >>>> extra >>>> energy >>>> not >>>> just >>>> from >>>> the >>>> additional >>>> in >>>> the >>>> coil >>>> collapse >>>> but >>>> from >>>> the >>>> neutral >>>> spike >>>> Norm >>>> is >>>> on >>>> to. >>>> It >>>> is >>>> elusive >>>> because >>>> it >>>> requires >>>> a >>>> solid >>>> negative >>>> pulse >>>> for >>>> that >>>> huge >>>> power >>>> return >>>> strike >>>> just >>>> like >>>> lighting. >>>> With >>>> positive >>>> lightening >>>> there >>>> is >>>> no >>>> return >>>> strike. >>>> The >>>> return >>>> mucks >>>> up >>>> everything >>>> silicon >>>> so >>>> no >>>> wonder >>>> it >>>> has >>>> been >>>> completely >>>> engineered >>>> around. >>>> It's >>>> difficult >>>> to >>>> get >>>> solid >>>> negative >>>> with >>>> high >>>> voltage >>>> as >>>> the >>>> oscillations >>>> provide >>>> as >>>> you >>>> know >>>> the >>>> counter >>>> field >>>> so >>>> the >>>> proper >>>> neg >>>> polarity >>>> to >>>> input >>>> of >>>> a >>>> coil >>>> doesn't >>>> cut >>>> it >>>> but >>>> is >>>> a >>>> good >>>> start. >>>> This >>>> is >>>> why >>>> Tesla >>>> was >>>> using >>>> magnetic >>>> to >>>> fraction >>>> out >>>> the >>>> negative >>>> traveling >>>> wave >>>> which >>>> is >>>> what >>>> he >>>> referred >>>> to >>>> as >>>> radiant. >>>> I >>>> am >>>> sure >>>> certain >>>> materials >>>> also >>>> contribute >>>> to >>>> a >>>> more >>>> pure >>>> charge >>>> one >>>> way >>>> or >>>> the >>>> other >>>> just >>>> like >>>> with >>>> static >>>> charges. >>>> We >>>> just >>>> have >>>> to >>>> learn >>>> to >>>> use >>>> the >>>> proper >>>> materials >>>> in >>>> our >>>> coils >>>> for >>>> the >>>> expected >>>> outcomes. >>>> >>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive- >>>> lightning-why-its-so- >>>> dangerous/ >>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/> >>>> >>>> If >>>> you >>>> think >>>> about >>>> this >>>> for >>>> a >>>> moment, >>>> I >>>> believe >>>> you >>>> will >>>> understand >>>> the >>>> concentration >>>> of >>>> negative >>>> charge >>>> (cold) >>>> creating >>>> the >>>> huge >>>> amounts >>>> of >>>> ice >>>> & >>>> hail >>>> in >>>> the >>>> negative >>>> thunderstorm. >>>> Moray >>>> is >>>> interested >>>> in >>>> the >>>> positive >>>> lighting >>>> producing >>>> the >>>> sprite >>>> events >>>> over >>>> the >>>> storms >>>> as >>>> photographed >>>> by >>>> the >>>> ISIS >>>> Space >>>> Station. >>>> (interaction >>>> of >>>> the >>>> Hot >>>> positive >>>> charge >>>> with >>>> the >>>> Cold >>>> Negative >>>> ionosphere.) >>>> >>>> *What >>>> is >>>> Heat ?* >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> >>>> By >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> *Norman >>>> L. >>>> Wootan* >>>> >>>> *Battle >>>> Creek >>>> Farms* >>>> >>>> *22825 >>>> FM709N* >>>> >>>> *Hubbard, >>>> TX >>>> 76648* >>>> >>>> *(214)907-0010* >>>> >>>> *[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>* >>>> >>>> What >>>> is >>>> Heat #2 >>>> >>>> For >>>> about >>>> 10 >>>> years >>>> I >>>> have >>>> been >>>> studying >>>> the >>>> effects >>>> of >>>> heating >>>> and >>>> cooling >>>> associated >>>> with >>>> the >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> of >>>> liquids >>>> with >>>> the >>>> hope >>>> of >>>> building >>>> a >>>> simple >>>> generator >>>> of >>>> electrical >>>> power >>>> around >>>> the >>>> phenomenon.The >>>> reason >>>> for >>>> this >>>> interest >>>> is >>>> based >>>> on >>>> the >>>> theory >>>> that >>>> energy >>>> can >>>> be >>>> extracted >>>> from >>>> the >>>> ambient >>>> background >>>> via >>>> thermal >>>> differentials.My >>>> line >>>> of >>>> thinking >>>> really >>>> took >>>> off >>>> back >>>> when >>>> I >>>> experimented >>>> with >>>> the >>>> all >>>> too >>>> familiar >>>> Peltier >>>> junction >>>> devices >>>> found >>>> in >>>> electronic >>>> cooling >>>> devices.Would >>>> you >>>> believe >>>> that >>>> most >>>> people >>>> do >>>> not >>>> understand >>>> how >>>> these >>>> devices >>>> move >>>> thermal >>>> energy >>>> through >>>> a >>>> current >>>> flow >>>> across >>>> a >>>> semiconductor >>>> junction.Historically >>>> we >>>> find >>>> thatGerman >>>> physicist, >>>> Thomas >>>> Seebeck >>>> back >>>> in >>>> 1820 >>>> observed >>>> that >>>> when >>>> heat >>>> was >>>> applied >>>> to >>>> a >>>> junction >>>> of >>>> copper >>>> and >>>> steel >>>> wire >>>> that >>>> electrical >>>> energy >>>> resulted.Later >>>> in >>>> 1834 >>>> Jean >>>> Peltier >>>> discovered >>>> that >>>> when >>>> a >>>> direct >>>> current >>>> was >>>> applied >>>> to two >>>> dissimilar >>>> metals >>>> the >>>> junction >>>> got >>>> hot >>>> or >>>> cold.It >>>> was not >>>> until >>>> 1838 >>>> that >>>> Emil >>>> Lenz >>>> clearly >>>> showed >>>> the >>>> importance >>>> of >>>> both >>>> Seebeck >>>> and >>>> Peltier >>>> s >>>> discoveries >>>> by >>>> placing >>>> a >>>> drop of >>>> water >>>> on >>>> the >>>> junction >>>> of >>>> dissimilar >>>> metals >>>> which >>>> froze >>>> then >>>> melted >>>> when >>>> the >>>> polarity >>>> of >>>> the >>>> direct >>>> current >>>> was >>>> reversed.These >>>> discoveries >>>> remained >>>> dormant >>>> for >>>> over >>>> 100 >>>> years >>>> because >>>> of >>>> the >>>> unavailability >>>> of >>>> semiconductor >>>> materials >>>> which >>>> could >>>> provide >>>> the >>>> wide >>>> temperature >>>> differentials.In >>>> the >>>> 1930 >>>> s >>>> semiconductor >>>> materials >>>> became >>>> available >>>> which >>>> revived >>>> the >>>> electric >>>> cooling >>>> principles.In >>>> the >>>> 1960 >>>> s >>>> many >>>> companies >>>> began >>>> building >>>> spot >>>> cooling >>>> devices >>>> and >>>> refrigerators >>>> based >>>> on >>>> these >>>> effects >>>> using a >>>> junction >>>> material >>>> of >>>> bismuth-telluride.. >>>> Today >>>> more >>>> advanced >>>> materials >>>> are >>>> used >>>> with >>>> the >>>> basic >>>> parameters >>>> of >>>> being >>>> a pore >>>> thermal >>>> conductor >>>> but >>>> being >>>> an >>>> excellent >>>> electrical >>>> conductor. >>>> The >>>> dissimilar >>>> materials >>>> must >>>> provide >>>> a high >>>> coefficient >>>> of >>>> voltage >>>> temperature >>>> relationship.The >>>> first >>>> Peltier >>>> devices >>>> that >>>> I >>>> experimented >>>> with >>>> back >>>> about >>>> 10 >>>> years >>>> ago >>>> were >>>> built >>>> by >>>> Marlow >>>> Industries >>>> here >>>> in >>>> Dallas.With >>>> a >>>> small >>>> temperature >>>> differential >>>> across >>>> the >>>> device >>>> a weak >>>> current >>>> with >>>> an >>>> attendant >>>> voltage >>>> was >>>> developed.Increasing >>>> the >>>> differential >>>> provided >>>> a >>>> proportional >>>> increase >>>> in >>>> current >>>> and >>>> voltage.About >>>> 6 >>>> years >>>> ago >>>> I >>>> posted >>>> a >>>> chart >>>> of the >>>> wattage >>>> generated >>>> from >>>> two >>>> different >>>> size >>>> Peltier >>>> chips >>>> on >>>> the >>>> KeelyNet >>>> BBS.My >>>> curiosity >>>> was >>>> based >>>> on >>>> the >>>> puzzle >>>> of >>>> how >>>> electron >>>> flow >>>> could >>>> move >>>> thermal >>>> energy >>>> across >>>> the >>>> junctions >>>> and >>>> how >>>> electrical >>>> energy >>>> was >>>> produced >>>> by >>>> moving >>>> thermal >>>> energy >>>> across >>>> the >>>> junction.This >>>> is >>>> a >>>> directly >>>> reversible >>>> situation >>>> based >>>> on >>>> polarity. >>>> Now >>>> let >>>> us >>>> look >>>> at >>>> a >>>> very >>>> familiar >>>> parallel >>>> process >>>> used in >>>> refrigeration, >>>> cooling >>>> and >>>> heating >>>> devices >>>> employing >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> material >>>> such >>>> as >>>> water >>>> and >>>> refrigerants.We >>>> have >>>> always >>>> been >>>> led >>>> to >>>> believe >>>> that >>>> evaporating >>>> water >>>> provided >>>> cooling >>>> effects >>>> which >>>> is >>>> a >>>> mechanical >>>> process. >>>> By >>>> the >>>> same >>>> mechanical >>>> process >>>> we >>>> are >>>> provided >>>> heating >>>> effects >>>> by the >>>> condensation >>>> of >>>> a >>>> gas >>>> back >>>> to >>>> a >>>> liquid >>>> phase >>>> change.Would >>>> you >>>> believe >>>> that >>>> any >>>> material >>>> that >>>> undergoes >>>> a >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> provides >>>> an >>>> attendant >>>> electrical >>>> effect.Back >>>> in 1840 >>>> Armstrong >>>> invented >>>> an >>>> electrostatic >>>> generator >>>> based >>>> on >>>> escaping >>>> steam >>>> through >>>> insulated >>>> nozzles >>>> which >>>> provided >>>> one >>>> of >>>> the >>>> most >>>> powerful >>>> devices >>>> of >>>> this >>>> type >>>> ever >>>> built. >>>> Popular >>>> belief >>>> was >>>> that >>>> this >>>> was >>>> a >>>> frictional >>>> process >>>> with >>>> the >>>> electrical >>>> output >>>> resulting >>>> from >>>> the >>>> steam >>>> friction >>>> passing >>>> through >>>> the >>>> nozzles.After >>>> reading >>>> an >>>> old >>>> (1920 >>>> s) >>>> Thermodynamics >>>> in >>>> Chemistry >>>> text >>>> book >>>> I >>>> realized >>>> that >>>> the >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> of >>>> materials >>>> was >>>> an >>>> electrical >>>> phenomenon >>>> and >>>> not >>>> purely >>>> mechanical.The >>>> atoms >>>> of >>>> the >>>> material >>>> lose or >>>> gain >>>> electrons >>>> in >>>> the >>>> process >>>> which >>>> accounts >>>> for the >>>> discrepancy >>>> in >>>> the >>>> energy >>>> equation >>>> when >>>> a >>>> material >>>> transitions >>>> between >>>> phases.More >>>> energy >>>> is >>>> present >>>> after >>>> the >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> back >>>> to >>>> the >>>> lower >>>> form >>>> or >>>> atomic >>>> state. >>>> The >>>> text >>>> book >>>> stated >>>> that >>>> this >>>> phenomenon >>>> could >>>> not be >>>> explained.When >>>> Jerry >>>> and >>>> I >>>> attended >>>> a >>>> Conference >>>> hosted >>>> by >>>> Hal >>>> Puthoff >>>> down >>>> in >>>> Austin >>>> back >>>> about >>>> 6 >>>> years >>>> ago a >>>> physicist >>>> from >>>> Austria >>>> presented >>>> a >>>> paper >>>> on >>>> the >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> of >>>> water >>>> and >>>> the >>>> attendant >>>> electrical >>>> phenomenon >>>> which >>>> is >>>> totally >>>> not >>>> understood >>>> by >>>> modern >>>> science.Now >>>> my >>>> suspicions >>>> were >>>> confirmed >>>> that >>>> phase >>>> changes >>>> of >>>> materials >>>> are an >>>> electrostatic >>>> phenomenon, >>>> which >>>> leads >>>> us >>>> to >>>> the >>>> fundamental >>>> question >>>> of,What >>>> is >>>> heat?We >>>> were >>>> told >>>> in >>>> theschool >>>> that >>>> heat >>>> is >>>> the >>>> presence >>>> of >>>> energy >>>> and >>>> cool >>>> is >>>> the >>>> absence >>>> of >>>> energy.What >>>> is >>>> the >>>> form >>>> of >>>> this >>>> energy?Let >>>> us >>>> look at >>>> a >>>> very >>>> simple >>>> example >>>> of >>>> heating >>>> which >>>> may >>>> explain >>>> this >>>> process.When >>>> sunlight >>>> strikes >>>> an >>>> absorbing >>>> surface >>>> it is >>>> heated >>>> because >>>> electrons >>>> in >>>> the >>>> material >>>> are >>>> converted >>>> to >>>> photons >>>> which >>>> are >>>> emitted >>>> in >>>> the >>>> infrared >>>> band >>>> of >>>> light >>>> leaving >>>> the >>>> material >>>> in >>>> a >>>> net >>>> positive >>>> state >>>> or >>>> hot.The >>>> more >>>> electrons >>>> a >>>> material >>>> looses >>>> the >>>> hotter >>>> it >>>> becomes.Now >>>> the >>>> inverse >>>> situation >>>> is >>>> explored >>>> by >>>> evaporating >>>> some >>>> water >>>> from >>>> the >>>> surface >>>> of >>>> a >>>> material >>>> which >>>> leaves >>>> the >>>> surface >>>> in a >>>> net >>>> negative >>>> state >>>> or >>>> cold.Heat >>>> or >>>> cold >>>> is >>>> based >>>> on the >>>> ion >>>> relationship >>>> in >>>> the >>>> material.When >>>> we >>>> apply >>>> a flame >>>> (ionizing) >>>> to >>>> a >>>> material >>>> we >>>> cause >>>> the >>>> emission >>>> of >>>> photons >>>> which >>>> is >>>> basically >>>> stripping >>>> away >>>> electrons >>>> from >>>> the >>>> atomic >>>> structure >>>> causing >>>> a >>>> gross >>>> net >>>> positive >>>> situation >>>> to >>>> occur. >>>> Now >>>> we >>>> are >>>> getting >>>> a >>>> picture >>>> as >>>> to >>>> how >>>> an >>>> electric >>>> current >>>> across >>>> the >>>> Peltier >>>> junction >>>> can >>>> transport >>>> thermal >>>> energy >>>> (ions).Since >>>> the >>>> energy >>>> is >>>> in >>>> the >>>> form >>>> of >>>> presence >>>> or >>>> absence >>>> of >>>> electrons >>>> then >>>> it >>>> is >>>> a >>>> simple >>>> explanation >>>> as to >>>> how >>>> the >>>> process >>>> works.All >>>> phase >>>> change >>>> processes >>>> work >>>> the >>>> same >>>> way >>>> basically >>>> via >>>> ion >>>> transport >>>> and >>>> are >>>> not >>>> mechanical >>>> processes >>>> which >>>> we >>>> were >>>> taught.Everythingin >>>> chemistry >>>> is >>>> an >>>> electrical >>>> or >>>> electrostatic >>>> process >>>> at >>>> the >>>> atomic >>>> level >>>> based >>>> on >>>> the >>>> ionized >>>> state >>>> of >>>> the >>>> atoms >>>> involved. >>>> At >>>> a >>>> Vanguard >>>> Science >>>> Roundtable >>>> discussion >>>> several >>>> years >>>> ago >>>> we >>>> talked >>>> about >>>> the >>>> ion >>>> wind >>>> method >>>> of >>>> fire >>>> fighting >>>> in >>>> which >>>> ionized >>>> air >>>> will >>>> extinguish >>>> a >>>> flame >>>> because >>>> of the >>>> cooling >>>> effects.Now >>>> we >>>> see >>>> Patents >>>> issued >>>> based >>>> on >>>> negative >>>> ion >>>> spraying >>>> of >>>> a >>>> surface >>>> causing >>>> it >>>> to >>>> rapidly >>>> cool >>>> because >>>> it >>>> becomes >>>> net >>>> negative >>>> charged.This >>>> is a >>>> very >>>> efficient >>>> method >>>> of >>>> air >>>> conditioning >>>> because >>>> an ion >>>> generator >>>> operates >>>> at >>>> very >>>> high >>>> voltages >>>> with >>>> very >>>> little >>>> current >>>> involved.It >>>> is >>>> possible >>>> to >>>> develop >>>> this >>>> ion >>>> transport >>>> (thermal >>>> energy) >>>> to >>>> provide >>>> direct >>>> electrical >>>> output >>>> from >>>> very >>>> subtle >>>> temperature >>>> differentials.Remember >>>> that >>>> this >>>> is >>>> a >>>> direct >>>> reversible >>>> process >>>> where >>>> a >>>> thermal >>>> differential >>>> will >>>> cause >>>> a >>>> development >>>> of >>>> current >>>> and >>>> voltage >>>> as >>>> in >>>> the >>>> Peltier >>>> device.I >>>> hope >>>> that >>>> this >>>> dialog >>>> will >>>> provide >>>> some >>>> food >>>> for >>>> thought >>>> out >>>> there >>>> on >>>> the >>>> KeelyNet. >>>> Please >>>> provide >>>> some >>>> feedback >>>> on >>>> this >>>> very >>>> interesting >>>> line >>>> of >>>> experimentation.Norm >>>> >>>> BTW, >>>> when >>>> the >>>> Patent >>>> Office >>>> started >>>> researching >>>> "Super >>>> Conductivity" >>>> they >>>> ran >>>> right >>>> into >>>> Tesla's >>>> work >>>> with >>>> the >>>> idea >>>> of >>>> using >>>> the >>>> Linde, >>>> liquid >>>> air >>>> process >>>> to >>>> provide >>>> a >>>> super >>>> conductive >>>> Tesla >>>> Coil >>>> primary. >>>> Tesla >>>> understood >>>> the >>>> power >>>> of >>>> a >>>> "Cold >>>> Sink" >>>> with >>>> electron >>>> densities >>>> of >>>> a >>>> very >>>> high >>>> order! >>>> "Hmmmmn"! >>>> >>>> <SPARKY--Nothing.pdf><SPARKY--19872.pdf> >>>> >>> >> > >
References
<trinity-a2ab2c4d-4bea-40f2-a7c6-0d308c871aba-1532947811591@3c-app-gmx-bs15>
Headers
| Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Sender | [email protected] |
| X-Apparently-To | [email protected] |
| X-Received | (qmail 8997 invoked by uid 102); 30 Jul 2018 12:58:00 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.224.240) by m6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2018 12:58:00 -0000 |
| X-Received | (qmail 30432 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2018 12:58:00 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.221.10.59) by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2018 12:58:00 -0000 |
| X-Original-Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Received-SPF | none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) |
| X-YMailISG | 3X5U5ggWLDug1e0LN._MkysuWlKd3zpsBjE1MMKmdxCBo9Jp LCUDz602xAvHod1UWJR9tJRHuOa_sNYw2GDfWTc2wc.AsD6473fJqWSVmygM EbPm7yzoZSNKh0SQ0ixL0GtFVQSGGYWhndbECB0nqSLbiARt_gNJzmucx5W0 q8gogfjQfd3hgAogOi8mgA1ENaL6_Y2PF9kPzV60qh.18ZU68PW4fL7yNXvB wo35uqN3qAw0lN.9A1gnWa9nNGvYT0WExkn0G6gR_fZrbdLCGMBDOrWMgtiz wJAReRjxmcAY_uzUmzeYXd9tNAExjpxv90bwwYBk2blxS2D731.f098AxEs9 Ho.x6v509C2iZduQ_DQ10RBeVESIOGRsuDAzOLA0l.HC1Eu9u_pQEyDI0tUp QKMTCu_Ko0l2OMK8lDo0ba54gpNyi_uXK_i33vL1L_XLZG_BVB0fPZ7kX1xO nzINRasexSD4bo3BmkV0__7kiZUTgb6Np1xMgnYxHM.9VFl7UjOM48MJowYk fDQWPE4GqGf4QJsz.7eNVr8iR1zzaV4Z71eZ2MW8duNZ0cv6QjSxUvTEecGs EWMog_aT3VIeWoyTM5h4ry.TouSZKf6RPcdZGFhmWit4ms1m3qDvQgNYJnNe kBqWUfTDdIWy3MyGJ0XNf4wr43UAFZTkjm3TIMJOYrbaJ2hECBf.P1J_mePE B9tDefHPoAqDq26nGIPH7jrwG.rDKqiW3eQs_ni97qOtqda1KNjfUCQM_.t3 1XiEU9rdlGA9nc26P6xi5On38xvl_tDH7pE4Hpa8nZLAmiLh0LfWVx.Ca3Bm BmyRruQJJW0YcDbgwxXSt50W3lRFyLerLINwDSR4S_eiA7.H1Wu7NO4z2zMT j1CdZQBdWwTwoE.JJ51nBOdeTz.3sdtco2PBFN64R0cVqV4IvPoXexP8jwbt ehI23FBRcrzzAj5MtvKRrh73yVyy3ghlKms98Nl38gewJf8iF2xRSWsD3Svs qEsSEGHmIvYwroY67ok9t5ywTcKNFQTcoAI.gk6w5WGoal.Y6dEnOG6rN.Qc gwZI5aGbJ8LH7gcpCtFAevCpBgEJUElwhavxHEGhA7OWTjl.ITS1hNpRsAFE cet_Kv.ieUWZU0ttCOWer_S8eDrnHGIufO7gGz24p__Cb1cWuFQJVkl7fDa_ JqermwVclJvPowIi7.365TJh8.NhzSTWpHhGx0FysNXRwnlpSbsCTLQjX_SI XNNR52dCIsgVbgYWfEqkZmpDtbP98lp8AJmVdpMr_AOXio9Zy4.TS.pYhQaL pTOKPd21fUfEmmRMCjmHOdYN3kV_1A9FycHJMzFTF2OvJTFFshfsVaXxBrht yiJjjdzaL2eHLjjEP5POQYK45KTereQsQaaCYF4tXhVT5ndcJrLxH.qePFLy YftbOxXT8uLz5Fz.vyjdUjGFouN3LIOFOhQfDtEwmEI9TSZnJ1OnyFse.UpO cJXKHR0.VHutYBwmqGdhuYnWwG52eiuqAqoQs8KBBUAZWVjDa96knu.JVvZS uEUxLhwKoUOZAE5eE38.3ULVux5VMzBj7zAasH6Bgy8qTF6.K5kN1Gv6eoa0 czIYy1xqj.3dVg-- |
| Authentication-Results | mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=att.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=att.net; dkim=pass (ok) |
| X-Received | from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic305-24.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.185.150) by mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:57:59 +0000 |
| X-YMail-OSG | 0sot_KcVM1l57A8rmAw5NkqB_QzaO1ObZrEY6eq2.gn_vkYXQxrWL5HpwhDn3ES DmnELeXXI4B3C1ywcnLgqf.WBlc8.8PS7A8QY5k5CstdPybUntt801VG10XLYAr4xDETiwYHDtnb oashYpUYdiBPWnUugn9qVd0GeqXW.JXOhEvO2D1si05uB9DrurB4Vt06UpyGmBcImGNLNZclRIQ7 95HBDIGHoqgzdji3p3SHtzaHHiCR94qyK6fdD6Ehat.xLg.JnXjo3XxltJXMLEt_Ci7vTSUeqHXA xav3MQHiFLysSrUd4imMpxT2tjWKJ3DvQPLvrnnBFMZN92gZYHrOjyRTLiqHBGNjuzIfm7v8PREr 0xDnT2cYHmcljEC3pNnjpYc063c_20_mHAp1BXjWi5oplt9uzu6BCDZyc8QBjoHRs0Q_yYR3UhPv ctTFObBKuCGAEgTdSfRfEyoEAScosmVdoLrzlgu2Tq2kltn4epapx.38lhqgzUNvtGrrq.bsuXec J3nRrzIhn_QCJ7mvEv6rlnDM1gJutkAUMiXp3vg39Jmy5ghfTdkMz54q0vh2RtZpKQs74fZdA04v JteeLH5h2yeQmH2xLsm_yYKhaJw7meJEVCWENPAwuxbMStqsoTR.9.RL8r2qQ5WTN6.Iifx4HHaK kBVtiozuSOHPYRsqNnJojMs0EUMKkaR8GZSpxO2QO2.1d_fztMqZ1cwLYVtj2SWvGd9ZfoebCVuA 4GB9Qg52_3mYHaDA9bw81UhOrLok.nGjSum9wxWcqK4ddbqNQrQQZHxscr51H5Qhlwo9XrA4_tk0 NkslhF.eMQYZAkEIaLmQGw2M7lwSvxP7R6RbofmYONu3BD47wl_WMA_a3kEP1vvIxY69I_x4fS1m eXP7XABObDIcSHnQsCkVR.wM.StKiweWpirNC8.U6lntgLShkyd1rex30oywhkXPEBTSy4DUlonb ii1mSijE_mJ8p4EVxfnzW8vtu6XxNGy3QLTAZgzaS3ll_bWyRk6m0NuORdqpe0leM3UX1FYdxpEu BWk0ymWCR0q3oZBLwjXOY |
| X-Received | from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:57:59 +0000 |
| X-Received | from ip70-189-9-73.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.4]) ([70.189.9.73]) by smtp413.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 308adef2dd26dffe469f2f410203b12d; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:57:58 +0000 (UTC) |
| To | [email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Pre mbold <[email protected]> |
| References | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <trinity-a2ab2c4d-4bea-40f2-a7c6-0d308c871aba-1532947811591@3c-app-gmx-bs15> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
| Date | Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:57:57 -0500 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <[email protected]> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="------------75236B99938C7AC3E9BD9E11" |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Originating-IP | 10.221.10.59 |
| Subject | Re: Aw: Re: AW: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight |
| X-Yahoo-Group-Post | member; u=554418533; y=3l-TiLEYe34O1N4qNKko8C7AMHKtf0HGuRzeaBNbqb-PkYPKm1lpZg4M |
| X-Yahoo-Profile | [email protected] |
| From | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |