Re: AW: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight
Database ID: 108968
2018-07-29T09:27:08-05:00
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID
In-Reply-To:
<[email protected]>
Body
Sven , Warren slowly getting back around to the Transverter and how to extract that energy! Hector described it correctly in that you have to make the pig squeal. My favorite subject, Ferroresonance! I started putting together a file on the EVGARYTWO site Norm's Research regarding the Ferroresonance Phenomenon and titled it Ferroresonance Capture. Have see this phenomenon many times and actually was able to replicate it on the bench top convinced me that there is a lot of anomalous power when you see voltages and currents multiplied by 10X over line supply. Ferroresonance and Stochastic resonance (rapid shifts in and out of resonance) have a different sound to them. Just like the hydraulic analog called the Water Hammer effect. When totally isolated event, the ground response is called the Neutral Spike cause this energy comes from the Earth Ground neutral. Read some of the articles on this, especially the comments from the common linemen that work day to day with it! https://powerlineman.com/lforum/archive/index.php/t-5798.html <https://powerlineman.com/lforum/archive/index.php/t-5798.html> I had both 3 phase and single phase transformers in the 5KVA size to play with and it was very easy to set up the Hector squealing pig. The Rotor Verter was easiest to put into this condition when switching in capacitance which caused the motor to growl at you like an angry dog or go into instant rotor lock while running at full speed. Not good for instant torque would sen motor flying. That is the reason I sold my 40HP Marathon RV to Luther down in Houston. Instantly locking a 40 # rotor at 1725 RPM is a No! No! All you have to do is accidentally switch in a huge capacitive value while running and if a match occurs you get the stochastic resonance or the rotor lock up. Play around with this but be cautious! On 7/29/2018 4:59 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: > > Sven > > Enjoy being with your family on these holidays. > This little disturbance in the AC signal is interesting. > Could it be harmonics of the main signal? > I have usually taken the lazy man's solution to this problem and > changed the signals to DC, whenever it is possible, using the DC . > Cheers Warren > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> > > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 at 3:09 AM, 'S.friedrich' [email protected] > [EVGRAY] > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Warren, I'm still working on the transverter, the diode plug > circuit works, if the diodes, thyristors are sized large, there > are no thermal issues. My research is now focused on tickling the > Transformer to his sweetspot. laughing. I have the Pushpull > control not yet finished because I always get under load > disturbances in the alternating signal. At the moment there are > holidays with us for the children and I have little time for such > things. Best regards Sven > > > Von Samsung Mobile gesendet > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: "Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY]" > Datum:29.07.2018 05:17 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight > > Sven > > What was the final result with your three phase transformer? > My computer died and I have had to rely on my phone > Cheers Warren > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 11:28 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Norm, > > Talk about plain sight how about this. Professional recording > tape was made with a barium ferrite oxide layer. The record > heads run a high frequency ac frequency to help the domains > flip without interference called bias, different freqs > depending on tape speed. > > Want to flip domains fast enough to record sound accurately > must have some bias to make it smooth and slippery. Talk about > low Lenz, what is Bias supposed to do, remove hysteresis! > > http://richardhess.com/notes/2008/02/02/tape-recorder-bias-frequencies/ > > > On 7/26/2018 2:49 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> Having been in Military Research & Development and moving to >> Dallas in 1981, I found the Tesla Book Store over in >> Greenville,TX where I bought all of Tom Bearden's works and a >> ton of information on the Master himself, Tesla. Through the >> years I have kept up on the Black Budget Programs and have >> always correlated what I was reading with the real world >> developments. If you folks would so kindly spend a little >> time reading the KeelyNet, Guy Resh presentation of the Sweet >> Bearden paper from the Boston Conference and put the pieces >> of the puzzle together, you will see what has been going on >> in plain sight. When you read the Sweet/Bearden paper you >> will stop and say to yourself, Did he just say what I think >> he said? All of the puzzle is forming a brilliant picture. >> Bearden put me onto the Book, Physics of the Primary State of >> Matter, Davson, 1955 in which the energetic Aether was >> described as Glowing Magnetism, Cold Plasma in a hard vacuum. >> Read and enjoy! Norm >> >> >> ----- Forwarded Message ----- >> *From:* "Energy Times Newsletter" <[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> *To:* "Norman Wootan" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >> *Cc:* >> *Sent:* Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM >> *Subject:* * DISCLOSED * Gravity Control Method Demonstrates >> 80% weight reduction! >> >> */* RELEASED * GRAVITY CONTROL - WITH PRESENT TECHNOLOGY/* >> >> Hi Norman, >> >> We held off on announcing which presentation was going to be >> released today until we actually launched it due to the >> critical nature of the content. >> >> Oppenheimer, Bohm and other fathers of the atomic age >> personally taught one very brilliant man named Dr. Frederick >> Alzofon who went on to develop a method to control gravity, >> which was experimentally proven in 1994. I had the honor and >> privilege to spend time with him in a private meeting around >> 2004 in Corvallis, Oregon and he shared many insights with me >> were simply mind-blowing. He was always in the back of my >> mind and I lost touch with him and unfortunately, he passed >> away in 2012. Thankfully, I was able to get in contact with >> his son David Alzofon who agreed to present at the conference >> and it has been an interesting journey ever since. >> >> Read this now and get your hands on a copy while you can: >> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >> >> Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: *GRAVITY25* >> >> In 1994, Dr. Alzofon experimentally proved that his >> predictions based on his Unified Field Theory were correct >> and *he was able to reduce the weight of aluminum by 80%!!!* >> We're talking about someone who was a physicist at Lockheed >> and Boeing so the quality of the material is not some >> home-brewed method with a bunch of hype - you're getting the >> first ever disclosure that is meant for the general public. >> The presentation is subtitled "with present technology" >> because it can be done with equipment that is readily >> available and is not some far off future fantasy. >> >> If you want to know of a path on controlling gravity, which >> cancels inertia and opens the door possibly to some unspoken >> of free energy possibilities, /embrace this * RARE * and >> priceless gift/! >> >> Read this now and get your hands on a copy while you can: >> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >> >> Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: *GRAVITY25* >> >> Sincerely, >> Emediapress.com >> >> *2018 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS >> RELEASED* >> >> *IMPORTANT*: After completing payment in the shopping cart, >> click the OK button and scroll down and click the *GREEN* >> button to access the download. Details are here: >> http://emediapress.com/download-help/ >> This is INSTANT ACCESS - you do not need to wait for an email >> to come with download instructions - you're already there. >> >> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *EPD25* - ERIC DOLLARD - /HISTORY, >> THEORY & PRACTICE OF THE ELECTRICAL UTILITY SYSTEM/: >> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115 >> >> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *WATER25* - DR. GERALD POLLACK - >> /FOURTH PHASE OF WATER, BEYOND LIQUID, SOLID & VAPOR/: >> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=116 >> >> *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *GRAVITY25* - DAVID ALZOFON - GRAVITY >> CONTROL WITH PRESENT TECHNOLOGY: >> http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 >> >> POB 10029 >> Spokane WA 99209 >> USA >> >> When you read the above document, you will see a spacecraft >> OTC which stands for Otis T. Carr. >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t67876ch95M >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haurcUcDiiA >> >> http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm >> >> Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed). When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder! >> >> Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame. >> >> See: Super light! >> >> >> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?* >> >> *By:Dr. John Mileweski*** >> >> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric >> radiation**.. * >> >> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic >> radiation**.. There is parity or symmetry the Universe, >> everything has an equal and opposite mirror–image >> counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and left, matter >> and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not light? * >> >> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in >> all things except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity >> in light as well ! * >> >> *I will now explain and give you more detail. * >> >> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been >> ignored by science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians >> for thousands of years. It has been given different names by >> different cultures for thousands of years. * >> >> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone >> Energy, Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space >> Energy, Vacuum Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who >> have subtle perception know it is real. * >> >> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago >> when James Clerk Maxwell >> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his >> famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was >> invented by Nikola Tesla >> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and >> theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to >> explain radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's >> Equations this explains radio waves and also all forms of >> electro–magnetic radiation such as light, radio, TV, >> microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 100 >> years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that >> comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second >> solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you >> were taught algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers >> (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no meaning in >> this world. Well, times have changed and now we have a very >> valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and it is >> SuperLight. * >> >> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford >> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; >> "What does this second solution explain when interpreted in >> our world."_{1} * >> >> *To understand this second solution, we must first review >> what the first or positive solution explains. The first >> solution is as follows: Radio waves leave the antenna and >> radiate out into space from a point source (the antenna) >> equally in all directions into space toward infinity >> traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a >> large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 >> degrees to the electrical component. Thus named, >> electro–magnetic radiation.. * >> >> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the >> opposite structure. It explains that **from infinity >> traveling toward the point source from all directions >> radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation is composed of a >> large magnetic component and a small electrical component, >> thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations >> are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" >> travels at the speed of light squared !** 10^20 meters per >> second, or 10 billion times faster than light >> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. * >> >> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a >> corresponding, shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher >> energy density. * >> >> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, >> how come we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected >> scientifically?" Well, the frequency is so high, its wave >> length so short, (4 x 10^–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 >> meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes through >> everything as though the substance was nearly completely >> transparent (like glass). * >> >> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating >> like x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding >> the relative size, will be given later. * >> >> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?*** >> >> *It comes out of black holes !*** >> >> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then >> make the analogy for SuperLight. * >> >> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when >> electric monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit >> about our atoms is an electric monopole — as it changes its' >> orbit it either gives off or absorbs energy in the form of >> electro– magnetic radiation.. Sunlight is converted into >> electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the >> opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity >> into light. * >> >> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced >> when an electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and >> releases its energy in the form of light. * >> >> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense >> and hot matter found in black holes. It is theorized that >> black holes contain magnetic monopoles and when these >> extremely dense, extremely small, extremely energetic >> magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their orbit >> they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So >> black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings >> of SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong >> gravitation forces of the black holes because its velocity is >> the square of the velocity of light and it therefore, can >> easily escape._{7} * >> >> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of >> every galaxy in the universe is a black hole. There are >> billions and billions of galaxies all around us, and they all >> are producing SuperLight. We are literally bathed in a >> three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an "Ether" of >> SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. * >> >> *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE*** >> >> *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in >> the universe and accounts for the production of what we call >> life. I believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of >> matter in our bodies and produces what we call Vital Life >> Forces. These special forms of matter are found in bones, >> micro–crystals and also in the various fluids in the body, >> that contain cell salts. There are also, believed to be >> organic molecules in some body fluids, that are believed to >> be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state >> (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small >> change in energy (e.g. emotions). * >> >> *Another form of organized structure found in the body, are >> the multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, >> that form phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased >> array radio telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up >> extreme weak signals and amplify them, by being in phase. It >> is also suggested, that these proteins may have room >> temperature superconductivity. It is these organized >> structures in living things, that produce a coherence that >> has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of >> it passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, >> without even coming in contact with them. * >> >> *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of >> millions and billions of micro–electronic units that are >> formed in structures that have a phase array organization_{3} >> . I believe that the electronic resonance in these organized >> conductive molecules, have some resonance with very small >> amounts of SuperLight and that these energy fields and >> currents are responsible for the human aura and the energy >> vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the >> Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even >> a very, very small amount produces more than enough energy to >> sustain life. Thus, life is produced and sustained by >> specific forms and amounts of organized matter, and old age >> and eventual death occurs when too much disorder and disease >> comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered structure. >> At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital >> Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe >> that all forms of organized matter produce its own >> aura–finger–prints or energy signature when it reacts with >> SuperLight. * >> >> *There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the >> aura of living entities and substances. Our body can >> determine whether this energy is good or bad for itself. I >> believe that this accounts for Kineseology and also explains >> how herbs work on the body. For example, each herb has an >> energy field signature that has a special attunement to >> specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or >> reactivate that energy center which may be slow or stopped, >> because of some illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to >> the rescue, through the herb structure that is appropriate to >> that area of the body in need. * >> >> *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized >> structures and thus according to this thesis are also >> converters or transducers of SuperLight. This is where their >> energy comes from and explains how they seemingly can radiate >> a positive signal continuously without being recharged. As >> with herbs, crystals and minerals of different chemistries >> and structures, develop different types of energy fields. >> This explains why different crystals have different effects >> on different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is >> to match the required energy with the proper crystal that >> produces that specific energy need. * >> >> *As scientists and experimenters become more aware of >> SuperLight and start to understand it, experiments and >> instruments will be designed to attune to these energies. In >> the future, I conceive of manufacturing simulated body >> structures_{4} which will be micro–size phase array >> assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They >> will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for >> healing. Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune >> to, and resonate with, the exact energy needed, in the >> specific part of the body that needs an energy boost for >> healing and regeneration. * >> >> *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands >> of years, and that their secret was that they, at times, >> would sleep in crystal lined caves and that this would >> rejuvenate their bodies, bringing healing and new growth. * >> >> *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to >> test this idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my >> lab in Albuquerque. Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber >> crystals long enough, and in large enough quantities, that we >> will be able to spin these crystals into yarn. Once spun into >> yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be woven to make >> crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation >> shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal >> fiber, or cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth >> wallpaper. This should stimulate creativity, imagination, >> healing and regeneration. * >> >> *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it >> will be possible to make room temperature superconductors of >> crystal fiber. If this becomes possible, we are talking about >> levitation, and possibly even a magic carpet. * >> >> *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working >> with SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal >> fibers. I believe these need to be high purity crystal >> fibers, in order to have the coherence necessary to resonate >> with SuperLight. * >> >> *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY* >> >> *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter >> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is >> inertia <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. >> These secondary forces are both formed by the reaction of >> matter to the dynamic field of SuperLight. Gravity is not an >> attraction! It is the result of a universal pressure, exerted >> by **SuperLight as it rains in from infinity, from all >> directions, onto every object**. Materials are not 100% >> transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about >> 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material >> domains, all "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by >> SuperLight. Every "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or >> pressure differential, as SuperLight travels past and through >> them. * >> >> *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight >> joins in, or exits the activities of the particle domain. >> Field effects come into play, as the SuperLight Entity >> travels through the Atomic Atmosphere producing drag. Drag >> turbulence and particle pressures combine to produce the >> accelerational force we know as gravity. * >> >> *This acceleration is of little consequence when a single >> object is in space, at a very great distance from other >> objects, since the force vectors cancel out. However, when a >> second object comes close to the first object, then, the two >> objects shield each other from the full power of SuperLight >> pressure on the opposite sides of the objects facing each >> other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net >> accelerational force toward each other, which is directly >> proportional to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual >> shielding that each object experiences. Thus, falsely, each >> object is said to be attracted to each other ! In reality, >> they are being pushed together by the net differential force >> of SuperLight pressure which results from the slight >> absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. >> This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is >> a push exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each >> other, from a portion of the SuperLight radiation. * >> >> *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of >> porous matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void >> for each part of solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight >> is much smaller than the typical atomic dimension. Thus, most >> of SuperLight passes through the atomic structure unopposed. >> However, when SuperLight contacts the nucleus or electrons it >> produces the force that holds the electrons in orbit, and the >> nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives matter >> its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force >> since only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with >> matter on the atomic scale. An example that will give you >> some idea as to how porous solid matter is, as follows: Let >> us expand the nucleus of an atom to the size of a golf ball, >> then the electrons in orbit about this nucleus would be about >> the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its orbit about >> the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few yards >> in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter >> is mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of >> SuperLight, whose wavelength is many times smaller than the >> diameter of the electron, will to a large extent miss the >> particle regions, as it rains through the atomic region. Only >> a small amount of SuperLight interacts with the nucleus and >> electrons while the majority will pass right through the >> region. * >> >> *NUCLEAR FORCE*** >> >> *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when >> compared to that of the atom as a whole. The particles of >> matter in the nucleus are much closer to each other, than >> those in the electron. The nucleus is probably in the order >> of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that holds the nucleus >> together, must be very strong. * >> >> *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing >> and interacting, that holds the components of nucleus >> together. These stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a >> result of its increased relative density and ability to >> shield SuperLight. It is the density and geometry of matter >> that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One Source, comes >> the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so many >> interesting ways. * >> >> *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the >> nucleus and this accounts for the relative stability of >> various nuclei. A less symmetrical structure, results in >> radioactivity and an unstable nucleus. In this way, >> SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. * >> >> *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY*** >> >> *(The University Field or Energy Source) * >> >> *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a >> unifying field theory that would unite all forces into one. I >> believe that with SuperLight, a theory can be developed to >> explain this idea. SuperLight; one force, once source. The >> concept I've developed is new, and all aspects have not yet >> been considered, but what has been covered appears to fit >> quite well with our current understanding of reality. * >> >> *I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or >> universal energy force in all nature and that its interaction >> with various forms of matter and energy produce all other >> forces in the Universe. Specific atomic structures and >> sub-atomic structures are resonant to and interact with some >> aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them and our >> bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the >> electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces >> producing our vital life force. This can explain all the >> forces of nature and life energies. * >> >> *It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the >> different forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. * >> >> *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE*** >> >> *As greater understanding of what types of devices >> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td..htm> can attune to >> SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture >> this energy, collect it, and measure it. At first only small >> assemblies will be made for healing and regeneration, (only >> small amounts are needed) scientific analysis, proof of >> principle and localized experiments. In the future, I >> envision massive devices to be used as direct energy >> converters. This development will have a significant effect >> on reducing world pollution associated with most other energy >> producing systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. * >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *SUMMARY*** >> >> *There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two >> forms: * >> >> *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C. (10^10 >> meters per sec.) * >> >> *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. * >> >> *These lights are responsible for all created matter, all >> forces, and life itself. As a result of this theory , I make >> the following statements; * >> >> *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY*** >> >> *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting >> with coherent structures in the body. * >> >> *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the >> interaction with SuperLight. * >> >> *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. * >> >> *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to >> higher concentrations of SuperLight. * >> >> *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave >> bands. * >> >> *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy*** >> >> *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts >> with all matter and energy causing all forces. * >> >> *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only >> a reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) * >> >> *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only >> it's reaction to acceleration through the ether of >> SuperLight's dynamic field. * >> >> *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. * >> >> *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. >> Rubins problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too >> fast". (There is a slight drag causing the stars to fall >> slowly into the center of the galaxy.) * >> >> *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes >> less as one approaches black holes, due to the reduction >> effect of SuperLight radiating out of the black hole. * >> >> *7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes >> significantly less at the edge of the Universe. * >> >> *8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, >> — matter in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole >> from becoming massive and gobbling up the whole universe. * >> >> *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. * >> >> *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and >> creation <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. >> For example: Since gravity and inertia are the result of >> matter reacting with SuperLight, which did not exist prior to >> the big bang, or in early times, then, the Big Bang could >> have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because any force >> would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was >> nothing to hold matter back. * >> >> *SuperLight And Space Travel*** >> >> *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit >> extreme distant communication in space in much shorter times. >> (e.g. 100,000 light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) * >> >> *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in >> space, thus permitting real deep space travel. * >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ** >> >> *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An >> Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy *** >> >> >> >> Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting, You have to have >> a very high volume capacity HVDC (negative) ion generator >> like the Felici 3,000 watt electrostatic generator. When I >> was working with Leonard Dorsett and his Super Steam >> Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and water vapor, planned >> to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion genweration to enhance >> its proven fire fighting capability! (Super Steam >> Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube. >> >> >> On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> Norm, >> >> Great stuff on the VTA. Always found it suspicious that >> after the Scientific American released the time reversed >> light article that all slid into obscurity. We should be >> using these mirrors for satellite communications and all >> sorts of other applications but no. Seems that maybe >> wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been >> widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just >> for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the >> shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store... >> >> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire >> control. Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject >> matter. Do you think this application has potential for >> forest fires and if so what is required to build a >> prototype? From the brief description available it appeared >> to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source. >> Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you >> mentioned? Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified >> flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages >> employed/required? Interesting I have not found patent of >> Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are >> available in The inventions, researches and writings of >> Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin. There also seemed >> to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but >> have not found much more about these interesting claimed >> devices that the occasional mutterings. >> >> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce >> this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified >> primary? Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many >> chores and so much to build. >> On 7/25/2018 7:46 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>> >>> Just sending out info on Sweet VTA! >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: Sweets and space - Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in >>> Negative charge (What is Heat?) >>> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:40:47 -0500 >>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> To: Toby Grotz <[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> Toby! Between Jerry Decker and Gunderson at Sweet VTA Yahoo >>> site, I got a lot of Sweet info. >>> >>> Here I will send you the KeelyNet (Decker Files) About 8 >>> files. Windows ! Open in "Note Pad"! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> (word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, >>> TM=2, BM=2) >>> Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 >>> Sponsored by Vangard Sciences >>> PO BOX 1031 >>> Mesquite, TX 75150 >>> >>> There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS >>> on duplicating, publishing or distributing the >>> files on KeelyNet except where noted! >>> >>> February 22, 1992 >>> >>> SWEET1.ASC >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy Resh. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just received in ASCII form the two papers by Mr. >>> Tom E. Bearden >>> which appeared in the Proceedings of the 26th >>> Intersociety Energy >>> Conversion Engineering Conference, August 4-9, 1991, Boston, >>> Massachusetts. They can be found in volume 4 in the section >>> entitled 'Advanced Energy Concepts'. The titles are : >>> >>> "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy" >>> by Floyd Sweet and Tom E. Bearden (pp. >>> 370-375) >>> (listed as SWEET1.ASC on KeelyNet) >>> and >>> "On a Testable Unification of >>> Electromagnetics, >>> General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics" >>> by Tom E. Bearden and Walter Rosenthal (pp. 487-492) >>> (listed as SWEET2.ASC on KeelyNet) >>> >>> Except for the unsupported conjectures dealing with >>> mind, thought >>> and life, which bring his results almost into the >>> metaphysical >>> realm, I find these papers to be very intriguing >>> and compelling. >>> Thus, with the permission of Mr. Bearden, I am >>> posting them to >>> sci.physics and alt.sci.physics.new-theories. (I'll start >>> with the >>> paper "On a Testable Unification of Electromagnetics, >>> General >>> Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics".) >>> >>> As you can see in the "Followup-To:" line, I >>> would like to see >>> discussion appear in alt.sci.physics.new-theories, since >>> that is the >>> most appropriate place for discussion. If your >>> site does not >>> receive a.s.p.n., then let me know, and I can send >>> you summaries of >>> whatever discussion follows (hopefully a lot). Of course, >>> if your >>> site doesn't receive a.s.p.n, then ask your sysadmin >>> if it would be >>> possible to receive it. >>> >>> BTW, Mr. Bearden is not (yet) on the net, but he has >>> agreed to let >>> me be a go-between, and I'll try to post his >>> comments on whatever >>> discussion ensues. I encourage everybody to find >>> Whittaker's two >>> papers and Maxwell's original treatise on >>> electromagnetic theory >>> (see the papers for the exact citations) and to read >>> them carefully. >>> >>> I hope you find these papers as intriguing as I >>> have. If nothing >>> else, it will help you to firm up your foundation of >>> physics. >>> >>> >>> Page 1 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please, let's keep an open, yet critical mind, and >>> let's not allow >>> the discussion to develop into a flame war. >>> >>> >>> Jon Noring >>> >>> (As soon as I have time, I'll post Mr. Bearden's >>> other paper. They >>> came to me in Word 5..0 format, so I've had to do >>> some editing). >>> ==================================================================== >>> | Jon Noring | [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> |"The dogs bark, but| >>> | JKN International | IP : 192.100.81.100 | the >>> caravan moves | >>> | 1312 Carlton Place| Phone : (510) 294-8153 | >>> caravan moves on."| >>> | Livermore,CA 94550| V-Mail: (510) 862-1101 |"Pack >>> your lunch, | >>> | | sit in the bushes,| >>> | | and watch." | >>> ==================================================================== >>> "If you make $50,000 today, you have the same buying >>> power as the >>> average coal miner did in 1949, adjusted for taxes >>> and inflation," >>> John Sestina, nationally recognized Certified >>> Financial Planner; >>> quoted in 1987. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> [This paper appeared in the 26th IECEC Conference, >>> as past posts >>> have mentioned.. Posted with the permission of T.E. >>> Bearden. See >>> my prior post for more information. J.Noring] >>> >>> ON A TESTABLE UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETICS, >>> GENERAL RELATIVITY, AND QUANTUM MECHANICS >>> >>> T. E. Bearden >>> Association of Distinguished American >>> Scientists >>> 2311 Big Cove Road >>> Huntsville, Alabama 35801 >>> >>> Walter Rosenthal >>> 4876 Bethany Lane >>> Santa Maria, California 93455 >>> >>> Abstract >>> >>> Unrecognized for what it was, in 1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker (W) >>> published a fundamental, engineerable theory of >>> electrogravitation >>> (EG) in two profound papers. The first (W-1903) >>> demonstrated a >>> hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the >>> scalar potential of >>> vacuum, and showed how to produce a standing scalar >>> EM potential >>> wave -- the same wave discovered experimentally four >>> years earlier >>> by Nikola Tesla. >>> >>> W-1903 is a hidden variable theory that shows how to >>> deterministically curve the local and/or distant space-time >>> using >>> EM. >>> >>> W-1904 shows that all force field EM can be >>> replaced by >>> interferometry of two scalar potentials, anticipating the >>> Aharonov- >>> Bohm effect by 55 years and extending it to the >>> engineerable >>> macroscopic world. >>> >>> W-1903 shows how to turn EM into G-potential, curve >>> local and/or >>> distant space-time, and directly engineer the >>> virtual particle flux >>> of vacuum. >>> >>> >>> Page 2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> W-1904 shows how to turn G-potential and curvature >>> of space-time >>> back into force-field EM, even at a distance. The >>> papers implement >>> Sakharov's 1968 statement that gravitation is not a fundamental >>> field of nature, but a conglomerate of other fields. >>> Separately >>> applied to electromagnetics (EM), quantum mechanics >>> (QM), and >>> general relativity (GR), an extended superset of each >>> results. >>> >>> The three supersets are Whittaker-unified, so that >>> a testable, >>> engineerable, unified field theory is generated. EM, QM, and GR >>> each contained a fundamental error that blocked >>> unification, and >>> these three errors are explained. The Schroedinger >>> potential can >>> also be structured and altered, indicating the direct >>> engineering of >>> physical quantum change. >>> >>> Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this hidden >>> bidirectional EM >>> wave structure in the Schroedinger potential, without >>> referencing >>> Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. The >>> potential for >>> applying the new approach to explain the nature of mind and >>> thought, >>> and providing a laboratory-testable theory for >>> them, is briefly >>> noted and indicative major references cited. Some of >>> the possible >>> implications for physics and biology are pointed out. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Electromagnetics Has Foundations Difficulties >>> >>> There exists today a small but growing number of >>> scientists who have >>> become aware that the presently accepted >>> electromagnetic theory is >>> seriously flawed. Shortcomings in the theory are readily >>> cited. >>> (listed as THEORYBE.ASC on KeelyNet) >>> >>> For example, in railgun experiments the Lorentz force >>> law has been >>> falsified. It was always an approximation, and does not >>> adequately >>> approximate at high energies. [ref. 1] >>> >>> Also completely contrary to orthodox EM theory, the >>> EM force fields >>> are not primary agents at all, but are effects >>> produced in and on >>> the physical system by the potentials. As an >>> example, we cite the >>> Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, which proves that, even in the >>> total >>> absence of the force fields, the potentials remain >>> and can interfere >>> at a distance to produce real effects in charged >>> particle systems. >>> [ref. 2] The AB effect has been proven to the >>> satisfaction of all >>> but the most diehard skeptics. [ref. 3] However, >>> its fundamental >>> impact on the basic notions underlying classical EM >>> theory continues >>> to be ignored by all but a handful of scientists. >>> >>> These EM shortcomings were not present in the >>> original quaternion EM >>> theory by James Clerk Maxwell. [ref. 4] Indeed, the >>> original >>> Maxwell theory contains many things that were >>> mistakenly eliminated >>> from the abbreviated vector theory formulated >>> primarily by Heaviside >>> and Gibbs, and to a lesser extent by Hertz. [ref. 5] >>> Further, these >>> things that do not exist in conventional EM theory, >>> but that exist >>> in Maxwell's actual quaternion theory, can be used >>> in specially >>> designed equipment, and the operation of that equipment >>> will be >>> inexplicable by present-day electromagnetic theory. >>> AB-effect >>> laboratory apparatuses are in fact rigorous demonstrations >>> of such >>> a statement. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Scalar Electromagnetics >>> >>> This can be even further explained and developed >>> experimentally >>> >>> Page 3 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> according to Whittaker's fundamental approach. [ref. 6] >>> >>> In a modern sense, in 1903/1904 Whittaker >>> theoretically showed how >>> to engineer the scalar potential with a highly >>> dynamic, hidden, >>> bidirectional EM wave structure, to build hidden EM vacuum >>> engines >>> that are still unsuspected in modern physics today. >>> Much of the >>> content of the fundamental 1959 Aharonov/Bohm paper >>> was anticipated >>> in a different manner, and dramatically extended in >>> an engineerable, >>> testable fashion, by Whittaker's two papers. At the time, >>> however, >>> the vector >>> >>> | phi(x) >>> | >>> | >>> | >>> | potential >>> | >>> | + + >>> | + + <---- Organized Local Space-Time >>> | + + Curvature >>> | + EM + >>> | + Substructure + >>> | + + >>> | + + >>> |+_______________________________+_______________________________+ >>> >>> + + >>> X --> + EM + >>> + >>> Substructure + >>> >>> + + >>> >>> + + >>> + + >>> + + >>> >>> Figure 1. A Standing Scalar EM Potential Whittaker Wave. >>> >>> interpretation of Maxwell's EM theory was just slowly >>> beginning to >>> spread as the adopted model. Also, special and >>> general relativity >>> and quantum mechanics had not yet been born. >>> Accordingly, >>> considering the scientific understanding of the day, it >>> was not >>> possible for any scientist, even Whittaker himself, to >>> perceive the >>> potential future impact these fundamental papers could have on >>> sciences and technologies not yet even born. Unfortunately, in >>> later years Whittaker apparently never realized that >>> his two earlier >>> papers had such application to the modern unification >>> problem. >>> >>> Indeed, up to the time of Whittaker's death, very >>> few scientists >>> even concerned themselves with the notion of unified >>> fields. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Turning EM Energy Into G-Potential Energy >>> >>> In his 1903 paper Whittaker showed that a standing >>> scalar potential >>> wave can be decomposed into a special set of >>> bidirectional EM waves >>> that convolute into a standing scalar potential >>> wave, as shown in >>> Figure 1. As a corollary, a set of bidirectional EM >>> waves, stress >>> waves, can be constructed to form a standing scalar >>> potential wave >>> in space, as shown in Figure 2. Since all potentials >>> represent >>> trapped energy density of vacuum, they are gravitational >>> >>> [Note, Figure 2 is too complicated to reproduce here >>> in ASCII] >>> >>> Page 4 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Figure 2. Whittaker's Bidirectional EM Plane Wave Structure. >>> >>> in nature. [ref. 7] Because it represents a >>> "standing wave" whose >>> magnitude represents the variation in the local energy >>> density of >>> the vacuum, the Whittaker scalar potential wave >>> represents a >>> standing wave of variation in the local curvature of vacuum, >>> sharply >>> in contradiction to the assumptions of present >>> electromagnetics and >>> general relativity. [ref. 8] It also represents a >>> standing wave of >>> the variation of the local gauge. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Turning G-Potential Back to EM >>> >>> The very next year, Whittaker's second paper (cited >>> above) showed >>> how to turn such G-potential wave energy back into >>> EM energy, even >>> at a distance, by scalar potential interferometry, >>> anticipating and >>> greatly expanding the Aharonov-Bohm effect. >>> >>> Indeed, Whittaker's second paper shows that the >>> entire present >>> force-field electromagnetics can be directly replaced with >>> scalar >>> potential interferometry. In other words, scalar EM >>> includes and >>> extends the present restricted vector subset of >>> Maxwell's original >>> theory. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Engineering the Nucleus Directly >>> >>> Whittaker's work is even more striking when one realizes that >>> potentials are actually part of the vacuum itself. They pervade >>> through the electron shells of an atom, directly >>> reaching the >>> nucleus and centering on it. >>> >>> Gross external changes (gradients; force fields) of >>> the potentials >>> interact primarily with the electron shells of the atom. The >>> stabilized (persistent, gradient-free) potential's primary >>> interaction is with the atomic nucleus. >>> >>> Specifically, the primary interaction between the infolded, >>> internalized EM bidirectional wave structure of a Whittaker >>> potential is with the atomic nuclei, rather than with the >>> atom's >>> electron shells, because in the standing Whittaker >>> potential wave >>> the local magnitude of the external potential is not >>> changing. >>> >>> Whittaker has in fact shown that there exists an unsuspected, >>> hidden, internal EM energy exchange channel between >>> nuclei, a >>> channel where EM energy flows bidirectionally, >>> undetected by most >>> modern detectors. >>> >>> Unlimited types of Whittaker-structures can be produced in the >>> laboratory in the form of deterministically structured >>> potentials; >>> for the first time, the direct engineering, >>> structuring, and >>> manipulation of the nuclear potentials themselves, even with >>> miniscule EM power, is possible. This is a new capability of >>> exceptional importance and application. >>> >>> The Whittaker structuring in effect allows one to >>> produce a "virtual >>> grid" to place in the violent virtual particle flux >>> (VPF) exchange >>> of the local vacuum with the nucleus. By simply >>> holding the grid >>> signal constant, gradually the nuclear potential >>> itself will >>> substructure (activate) with the same structure. >>> >>> >>> Page 5 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> When the activating ("charging") potential is >>> removed, the >>> activation of the nucleus will gradually "decay" back to the >>> normal >>> structure. Just as one example, the binding energy of an >>> atomic >>> nucleus is accessible and, theoretically, engineerable. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Whittaker Structuring Confirmed >>> >>> Recently Ignatovich has pointed out the hidden bidirectional >>> EM wave >>> structure in the Schroedinger potential, without referencing >>> Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. [ref. 9] >>> >>> Also, recently modern researchers, working on >>> acoustic missiles and >>> with the scalar acoustic wave equation, have >>> "rediscovered" >>> Whittaker's 1903 infolded bidirectional planar waves >>> inside the >>> scalar wave. [ref. 10] They do not appear to have >>> yet recognized >>> its relevance to their work in electromagnetic >>> missiles. [ref. 11] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> STOCHASTIC ELECTRODYNAMICS >>> >>> Whittaker's paper takes on a significant new meaning, >>> however, in >>> light of Sakharov's 1968 hypothesis that gravitation >>> is not a >>> primary field, but is produced as a result of >>> interactions of other >>> fields. Together with Whittaker's structured potential, this >>> implies that the gravitational aspects of the >>> nucleus can also be >>> electromagnetically engineered. >>> >>> As a result of Sakharov's hypothesis, explosive >>> activity in >>> stochastic electrodynamics (SED) has shown that many >>> fundamental >>> parts of physics are "already unified" in terms of >>> electromagnetics >>> and gravitation. Evidence continues to accumulate >>> that the >>> gravitational field may not be a primary field of nature, but a >>> secondary or residual effect associated with other >>> non-gravitational >>> fields. >>> >>> [ref. 12] Actually, general relativity has always >>> focused on >>> energy as the thing which really has gravitation. >>> Trapped energy, >>> such as mass, is particularly important. But since >>> mass is >>> essentially trapped EM energy, relativity has essentially >>> assumed >>> Sakharov's hypothesis anyway, without stating it so explicitly. >>> >>> Further, GR considers "the" G-potential as a conglomerate of >>> other >>> things. [ref. 13] It follows that the gradient of >>> that conglomerate >>> yields a force field which is also a conglomerate. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> G-Potential is Electromagnetic >>> >>> Starting from Sakharov's postulate, to the first order >>> gravitation >>> should be due to some aspect of the EM field, >>> since EM is the >>> strongest and most universal force normally encountered in the >>> macroscopic world experimentally, and since mass is already >>> "trapped >>> EM energy." Thus Sakharov focused attention upon the >>> zero-point EM >>> energy fluctuations (ZPF) of vacuum. >>> >>> Sakharov conjectured that the Lagrange function of the >>> G-field is >>> generated by vacuum polarization, due to fermions. [ref. 14] >>> Akama >>> et al examined the potential generation of gravity >>> as a collective >>> excitation of fermion-antifermion pairs. [ref. 15] >>> >>> Haxlacher and Mottolo proved that space-time (ST) curvature can >>> >>> Page 6 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> arise from the quantum fluctuations of pure gauge >>> fields. [ref. 16] >>> Zee showed that gravity is generated as a >>> symmetry-breaking effect >>> in quantum field theory in which a dynamical >>> scale-invariance >>> breaking is postulated to take place at energies near the >>> Planck >>> mass. [ref. 17] >>> >>> Amati, Veneziano and Yoshimoto showed that in >>> pre-geometric models >>> the Einstein action and metric may be generated >>> from quantum >>> fluctuations of matter fields. [ref. 18] >>> >>> A review of the exploding field was given by Adler, >>> with particular >>> emphasis on the case of renormalizable field theories with >>> dynamical >>> scale-invariance breaking, in which the induced gravitational >>> effective action is finite and calculable. [ref. 19] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Puthoff's Important Contribution >>> >>> Recently Puthoff has applied the Sakharov viewpoint to >>> significantly >>> advance the stochastic electrodynamics field. He >>> has successfully >>> explained why the atom's orbital electrons do not decay >>> into the >>> nucleus, even though by conventional EM theory each >>> electron must >>> constantly radiate EM energy, since it is constantly >>> accelerated. >>> [ref. 20] >>> >>> He has also shown that gravitation can indeed be >>> regarded as an >>> induced effect associated with zero-point EM >>> fluctuations of the >>> vacuum. [ref. 21] He has also shown a >>> feedback-derivation of the >>> source of the vacuum EM zero-point energy >>> fluctuations from quantum >>> fluctuation motion of particles driven by the ZPE. [ref. 22] >>> Quantum fluctuation motion of particles and vacuum >>> ZPE fluctuations >>> are connected by a causal, self-regenerating >>> cosmological feedback >>> cycle. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Some Conclusions >>> >>> In light of Whittaker's EM structuring of the >>> potential, there are >>> several important conclusions to be taken from the >>> important SED >>> work since Sakharov's seminal suggestion, as follows: >>> >>> (1) In stochastic electrodynamics, very solid theoretical >>> foundation exists for electrogravitation. >>> (2) The vacuum EM ZPF may be regarded as causally connected to >>> quantum mechanical particle jitter >>> (Zitterbewegung motion) >>> and vice versa, though the feedback >>> mechanism into the >>> virtual particle flux of vacuum is normally >>> hidden by the >>> large-scale integration represented by >>> any macroscopic >>> object or process. >>> (3) The SED theoretical demonstration of this hidden mechanism >>> adds new emphasis on the rather neglected >>> hidden variable >>> theories. >>> (4) In some fashion, statistical quantum change is chaotic >>> rather than random, for it has already >>> been shown by >>> Puthoff that the vacuum ZPF fluctuations >>> driving everything >>> are totally deterministic. It follows that, >>> theoretically, >>> hidden Whittaker order already exists in >>> quantum change, >>> and quantum change must be already >>> chaotic and at least >>> partially deterministic. >>> (5) It follows that there may well exist engineerable >>> mechanisms that can affect or manipulate >>> quantum change. >>> >>> Page 7 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Whittaker Potentials Are Engineerable >>> >>> What Whittaker has described in his 1903 paper is >>> a standing >>> electrogravitational wave, a standing wave in the local >>> curvature of >>> space-time itself, that can readily be constructed >>> experimentally. >>> >>> This Whittaker standing potential wave is precisely >>> the new form of >>> standing EM wave that Nikola Tesla had experimentally >>> discovered >>> being radiated from a thunderstorm four years >>> earlier, on the night >>> of July 3-4, 1899, and which he recorded in his >>> Colorado Springs >>> Notebook on the morning of July 4, 1899. [ref. 23] >>> >>> Further, Whittaker's paper directly implies that the hidden >>> variable >>> determinism shown by Puthoff to be driving the zero-point EM >>> fluctuations can also be engineered, both locally and at a >>> distance. >>> >>> In short, Whittaker's 1903 paper shows how to turn >>> electromagnetics >>> into gravitational potential. Unknowingly, Whittaker >>> had already >>> shown the correct engineering way to unify EM and G >>> fields, and >>> already falsified one of Einstein's later primary GR >>> assumptions, >>> that the local space-time is never curved, in a >>> testable manner, a >>> decade before Einstein published his theory of >>> general relativity. >>> >>> In the very next year, 1904, Whittaker's second >>> paper (orally >>> presented in 1903) was published. [ref. 24] In this >>> little-noticed >>> paper Whittaker shows that all classical force field >>> electromagnetics can be replaced by scalar EM potentials >>> and their >>> interferometry. >>> >>> Specifically, any EM force field can be replaced by two >>> scalar >>> potential fields and scalar interferometry. The combination >>> of this >>> paper and the 1903 Mathematische Annalen paper not >>> only includes the >>> Aharonov-Bohm effect, but specifies a testable method for >>> producing >>> a macroscopic and controlled Aharanov-Bohm effect, >>> even at large >>> distances. [ref. 25] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PRESENT ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY IS INCOMPLETE >>> >>> As stated above, Maxwell's original EM theory was >>> written in >>> quaternions, which are an extension to the complex number >>> theory and >>> an independent system of mathematics. In >>> short, since the >>> quaternion is a hypernumber, Maxwell's theory was a >>> hyperspatial >>> theory, not just the limited three-dimensional >>> subset that was >>> extracted and expressed by Heaviside and Gibbs in terms >>> of an >>> abbreviated, incomplete vector mathematics. [ref. 26] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Heaviside and Gibbs Curtailed Maxwell's Theory >>> >>> Oliver Heaviside was a brilliant, self-taught >>> genius who never >>> formally attained a university degree, and whose papers were >>> printed >>> in technical magazines rather than scientific >>> journals. When >>> Maxwell published his Treatise in 1873, Heaviside was >>> just teaching >>> himself differential equations. >>> >>> Heaviside's imagination was completely seized by Maxwell's >>> book, and >>> Maxwell forever became his hero. However, he had >>> great difficulty >>> with quaternions and could not completely tolerate them. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Page 8 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Electrogravitation Was Discarded >>> >>> A puzzled Heaviside abhorred the quaternion, since >>> it linked >>> together a scalar component and a vector component, or >>> "apples and >>> oranges," in his view. He excised the scalar component of the >>> quaternion and excluded the hyperspatial characteristics >>> of its >>> directional components, producing his much more limited vectors. >>> >>> To unite magnetics and electromagnetics, the simplest >>> complex aspect >>> of the quaternion had to be restored by resorting >>> to ordinary >>> imaginary numbers. These machinations to the quaternion theory, >>> however, discarded its unified field theory aspects. >>> >>> In short, Heaviside produced a very practical, >>> highly restricted >>> subset that was far easier to engineer, but he >>> threw out >>> electrogravitation in the process. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Hatred of the Potential >>> >>> Heaviside hated the potential because he did not truly >>> understand >>> it. He stated that it was "...mystical and should >>> be murdered from >>> the theory." He conditioned generations of >>> physicists and engineers >>> to erroneously believe that the potential was just >>> a mathematical >>> convenience, and had no actual physical realization. >>> >>> Indeed, most electrical physicists and electrical >>> engineers are >>> still of that erroneous persuasion today, even though >>> the Aharonov- >>> Bohm work has long-since falsified such a position, >>> both >>> theoretically and experimentally. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> The Quaternion Theory Was Already a Unified EM/G Theory >>> >>> The present author has previously pointed out that >>> Maxwell's >>> quaternion theory was in fact a unified theory of >>> electromagnetics >>> and gravitation, and that the scalar component of the >>> quaternion was >>> the electrogravitational part. [ref. 27] >>> >>> That part was discarded by Heaviside and Gibbs, >>> and so >>> electrogravitation no longer appears in the >>> electromagnetics that >>> resulted from Heaviside's and Gibbs' surgery on Maxwell's >>> quaternion >>> theory. Strong experimental evidence for the EG nature of >>> Whittaker's scalar EM theory is planned for presentation >>> at this >>> conference. [ref. 28] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ELECTROGRAVITATION ALSO EXCLUDED FROM GENERAL RELATIVITY >>> >>> The electrogravitational effect was also erroneously >>> excluded from >>> Einsteinian general relativity (GR). Einstein unwittingly >>> narrowed >>> his general relativity to only a subset of an >>> unrestricted general >>> relativity of curved space-time, by excluding local >>> curvature. This >>> GR error was an indirect result of the fundamental >>> Heaviside/Gibbs >>> omission error in classical electromagnetics. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Einstein's Gedankenexperiment >>> >>> Unfortunately, Einstein's view of electromagnetics >>> approximated the >>> classical Heaviside/Gibbs view. In classical EM theory, the >>> electrical potentials, which actually were electrogravitational >>> potentials, were already ignored as having no physical >>> significance, >>> >>> Page 9 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> and EM was considered mutually exclusive to G. >>> Therefore, Einstein >>> only considered the weak gravitational force due to >>> the attraction >>> of mass, in developing his general relativity >>> theory of curved >>> space-time. >>> >>> The G-force is far weaker than the E-force; for two >>> electrons, for >>> example, the attractive G-force between them is on the order >>> of only >>> 10^-42 times as strong as their electrical E-force >>> repulsion. Thus >>> the G-force is incredibly smaller than the EM force. >>> >>> If only the weak G-force is considered for curving >>> space-time, then >>> there will never be an observable curvature except >>> in the immediate >>> vicinity of a very large mass, such as on the surface of the >>> sun or >>> near a star. >>> >>> Considering the weak G-force as the agent for curvature, >>> Einstein >>> reasoned that the laboratory and the >>> observer/scientist/instrument >>> would never be on the surface of the sun or near a >>> star. Therefore, >>> the local space-time, where the lab and the >>> scientist/observer and >>> his instruments are, would never be observably >>> curved. The local >>> space-time of the observer would always be flat. >>> >>> Unfortunately Einstein then overgeneralized his thought >>> examination, >>> and he stated one of his fundamental postulates >>> of general >>> relativity as "The local space-time is always flat." This >>> is an >>> erroneous overstatement. >>> >>> The postulate should be more correctly stated as >>> follows: "The local >>> space-time is always flat, whenever only the weak >>> gravitational >>> force is used for the agent of curvature, and the >>> observer is not >>> near a large collection of mass, such as a star." >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Corollary to the Corrected Postulate >>> >>> The two statements of the postulate differ >>> fundamentally. >>> Einstein's overstatement of the postulate does not allow >>> the far >>> stronger EM force to be used as an agent for local >>> curvature. In >>> effect, his own postulate excluded electromagnetics >>> from curvature >>> unity with gravitation, in his general relativity >>> theory. [ref. 29] >>> >>> On the other hand, the corrected statement of the >>> postulate admits >>> the following corollary: >>> >>> "When a very strong force such as the electromagnetic force is >>> used for the agent of curvature, the local space-time may be >>> curved, even though the observer is not near a large >>> collection of mass, such as a star." [ref. 30] >>> >>> Regrettably, many of Einstein's modern followers have raised >>> Einstein's theory to a dogma, and have vigorously enforced his >>> overstatement of the locally flat space-time. [ref. 31] >>> >>> In so doing, general relativity has been erroneously >>> reduced to a >>> theory that is basically not experimental: >>> >>> A priori, if the local space-time is flat, >>> then there is no >>> local experiment or local apparatus that involves or yields a >>> curved space-time where the laboratory, the instruments, and >>> the observer are located. >>> >>> Page 10 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> In this fashion the universities have continued to >>> perpetuate the >>> exclusion of electrogravitation and its direct space-time >>> curvature >>> engineering implications. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> THE CURTAILMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS >>> >>> Today, quantum mechanics is our most successful >>> physics theory. Its >>> predictions, even the eery prediction of action at a >>> distance, have >>> been proven time and time again. However, quantum >>> mechanics theory >>> is known to have a formidable foundations difficulty: >>> Try as they >>> will, quantum physicists cannot find chaos in the >>> theory. The >>> theory is known to be wrong unless it possesses >>> chaos (hidden order >>> inside its statistics), yet the best efforts of >>> quantum physicists >>> have failed to find it. [ref. 32] >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Chaos Excluded By Inherent Assumption >>> >>> Any well-founded mathematical discipline is totally >>> implied by its >>> foundations postulates, and that is true of quantum >>> mechanics. If >>> the best efforts of the ablest physicists of the >>> day cannot find >>> chaos in the present QM, then one may suspect that >>> the present QM >>> does not contain chaos (hidden order), but already >>> excludes it in >>> some fashion. If that is true, then some present >>> QM postulate, >>> either explicit or implicit, of QM must be the culprit. >>> >>> If so, the "real" QM needed is a superset that has >>> at least two >>> subsets: one (the missing) subset includes chaos, while the >>> present >>> subset excludes chaos. >>> >>> So we may suspect that one or more of the postulates >>> of the present >>> QM theory is in error or overly restrictive, and >>> must be changed to >>> allow the missing chaotic subset. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Gibbs Statistics Excludes Hidden Order >>> >>> Indeed, we may resolve this formidable QM problem >>> quite simply by >>> examining the statistics utilized by quantum mechanics. When >>> QM was >>> being formulated, scientists simply appropriated and >>> included the >>> thermodynamic statistics of Willard Gibbs (the same Gibbs who, >>> together with Heaviside, was responsible for the highly >>> restricted >>> vector subset of Maxwell's theory of electromagnetics.). >>> >>> Gibbs' thermodynamics statistics was totally based >>> on the notion of >>> the random variable. That is, the change (value >>> assumed by the >>> variable in a specific instance) is not only totally >>> statistical, it >>> is also totally random. >>> >>> Quantum physicists assumed a postulate of QM as >>> follows: "Quantum >>> change is totally statistical." However, because of >>> the Gibbs >>> statistics, in application they interpreted that postulate >>> in a much >>> stronger fashion, as if it had been stated thusly: "Quantum >>> change >>> is totally statistical and random." >>> >>> The actual postulate and the presently applied >>> interpretation of it >>> are in fact two quite different statements, and the >>> interpretation >>> is far more restrictive than actually implied by the >>> postulate >>> itself. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> Page 11 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The Random Interpretation Is False >>> >>> Further, the strong interpretation can readily be >>> falsified. As an >>> example, the macroscopic universe is simply a large >>> integration >>> (collection) of quantum changes. If these component quanta >>> occur >>> totally randomly, then no integration of them >>> would yield the >>> ordered, macroscopic world we all live in, because >>> integrated >>> randomness is still random. Therefore, since the ordered >>> macroworld >>> exists, the present QM strong interpretation of its >>> own statistical >>> quantum change postulate is invalid. >>> >>> In addition, if quantum change were totally random, >>> then there would >>> never be any possibility, a priori, of engineering it >>> deterministically. Presently, almost all quantum physicists >>> believe >>> that quantum change cannot be engineered, on first >>> principles. >>> >>> On the other hand, if hidden order is admitted, >>> there is at least >>> the possibility of directly engineering physical >>> quantum change >>> itself. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Hidden Variables >>> >>> Interestingly, the renowned physicist David Bohm has shown >>> that a >>> hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics can >>> actually be >>> constructed, whereby one could potentially engineer physical >>> change. >>> [ref. 33] >>> >>> It is well-known that experimental physics does not >>> in any manner >>> refute hidden variable theories. Because of the >>> historical >>> attachment of physics to the theory of the random >>> variable, such >>> contrary notions as chaos (hidden order) and hidden >>> variables have >>> simply been greeted with suspicion and shuffled >>> aside. The usual >>> objection is Occam's razor; a theory must predict something >>> different, or it is said to be unwarranted. [ref. 34] >>> >>> But based on this same form of Occam's overworked >>> razor, the >>> Whittaker hidden variable approach certainly predicts many >>> profoundly different engineerable effects and capabilities that >>> mandate its full examination. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Correction of the Statistical Postulate >>> >>> A much better, valid interpretation of the quantum >>> change postulate >>> is as follows: "Quantum change is statistical, and >>> may contain >>> hidden order." >>> >>> The two interpretations differ sharply. In the >>> new and less >>> restrictive reinterpretation, one has three cases or >>> subsets of QM >>> as follows: >>> >>> (1) the subset where quantum change contains partial order, >>> hence is already chaotic, >>> (2) the subset where the internal order has vanished, leaving >>> the statistics as Gibbs' random variable >>> statistics, and >>> exhibiting the present quantum mechanics >>> without chaos, and >>> (3) the subset where the statistics is totally deterministic, >>> but information on the variables is lost. >>> >>> >>> >>> Page 12 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Remarks On the New Interpretation >>> >>> The new interpretation is consistent with Bohm's >>> hidden variable >>> theory, and it is also consistent with the >>> Schroedinger equation, >>> which in the QM model already propagates the QM >>> states forward in >>> time with absolute determinism. >>> >>> It is even possible, for example, to >>> deterministically produce a >>> Bohm/de Broglie quantum potential, according to a >>> self-targeting >>> repetitive phase conjugation mechanism advanced by this >>> author. >>> [ref. 35] >>> >>> The new interpretation is not consistent with >>> the Copenhagen >>> interpretation, which only applies to the present QM >>> subset. This >>> can be seen as follows: If quantum change is >>> engineerable by >>> Whittaker hidden variables, then the inner contents of the >>> engineered quantum change are known. >>> >>> This knowledge applies to the subset where QM change >>> is engineered >>> (the new subset), but not to the subset where all >>> variables are >>> random variables and hence not subject to >>> engineering. Therefore >>> the Copenhagen interpretation applies to the random >>> quantum change >>> subset, but not to chaotic (partially ordered) >>> quantum change >>> subset. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> The New Interpretation Is Testable >>> >>> Happily, the reinterpretation of the postulate now allows a >>> sufficient collection of already-chaotic quantum changes to >>> produce >>> the well-ordered, macroscopic universe we all live >>> in. Also, the >>> new interpretation is testable, and it can be >>> falsified or verified >>> in the laboratory. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> THE END RESULT OF ABBREVIATING MAXWELL'S THEORY >>> >>> Effect On EM >>> >>> In discarding the scalar component of the >>> quaternion, Heaviside and >>> Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G >>> portion of Maxwell's >>> theory that arises when the translational/directional >>> components of >>> two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the >>> scalar resultant >>> remains and infolds a deterministic, dynamic >>> structure that is a >>> function of oppositive directional/translational components. >>> >>> In the infolding of EM energy inside a scalar >>> potential, a >>> structured scalar potential results, almost precisely as >>> later shown >>> by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific >>> community. The simple >>> vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs >>> captured only that >>> subset of Maxwell's theory where EM and gravitation >>> are mutually >>> exclusive. >>> >>> In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and >>> equipment will not >>> ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or >>> inertial effects in >>> materials and equipments. Not a single one of those >>> Heaviside/Gibbs >>> equations ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk >>> Maxwell, >>> even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs >>> interpretation >>> is universally and erroneously taught in all Western >>> universities as >>> Maxwell's theory. >>> >>> Page 13 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Effect On GR >>> >>> As a result of this artificial restriction of >>> Maxwell's theory, >>> Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general >>> relativity, forever preventing the unification of >>> electromagnetics >>> and relativity. He also essentially prevented the >>> present >>> restricted general relativity from ever becoming an >>> experimental, >>> engineerable science on the laboratory bench, since a hidden >>> internalized electromagnetics causing a deterministically >>> structured >>> local space-time curvature was excluded. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Effect On QM >>> >>> Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/Gibbs >>> externalized >>> electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell's >>> internalized and >>> ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a >>> structured scalar >>> potential. Accordingly, QM maintained its Gibbs statistics of >>> quantum change, which is non-chaotic a priori. >>> >>> Quantum physicists by and largely excluded Bohm's >>> hidden variable >>> theory, which conceivably could have offered the >>> potential of >>> engineering quantum change, engineering physical reality itself. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> In Summary >>> >>> Each of the three major scientific disciplines missed >>> and excluded a >>> subset of its disciplinary area, because it did not >>> have the scalar >>> component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further, all of >>> them >>> completely missed the significance of the Whittaker >>> approach, which >>> already shows how to apply and engineer the very >>> subsets they had >>> excluded. >>> >>> What now exist in these areas are three inconsistent >>> disciplines. >>> Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of its >>> discipline, >>> which was the unified field part. Ironically, then, >>> present >>> physicists continue to exert great effort to find the >>> missing key to >>> unification of the three disciplines, but find it hopeless, >>> because >>> these special subsets are already contradictory to >>> one another, as >>> is quite well-known to foundations physicists. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> CONCLUSIONS >>> >>> Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add >>> back the >>> unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each discipline. >>> >>> Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to be one >>> and the >>> same, as shown in Figure 3. So application of >>> Whittaker's work to >>> each one of the three disciplines produces the >>> necessary superset of >>> each, and these three supersets are unified in and >>> on the common >>> added Whittaker subset. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Page 14 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________ >>> | | >>> | GENERAL | >>> | RELATIVITY (GR) | >>> _____________________|_____________________|_____________________ >>> | | | | >>> | QM | APPLY | CLASSICAL | >>> | (MISSING | WHITTAKER | EM | >>> | CHAOS) | THEORY | THEORY | >>> |____________________|_____________________|____________________| >>> | | >>> | MIND AND SUBTLE | >>> | ENERGY | >>> |_____________________| >>> >>> Figure 3. Whittaker Unification of EM, GR, >>> and QM. >>> >>> Also, as shown in the figure, one gets an added and >>> unexpected bonus >>> of great value: Mind, thought, and life occupy time, >>> and if time is >>> treated as a real dimension, then these are real >>> also. Since >>> fundamental units in which physics is modeled are arbitrary, >>> one can >>> even model physics in terms of one unit, time. >>> >>> In that case, everything is a time structure. Since >>> even physical >>> reality can be viewed in this fashion, it is not >>> unreasonable to >>> view mind, thought, and life as real; they do after >>> all occupy time. >>> >>> However, since they do not emerge in the normal external >>> electromagnetics, they must lie within the hidden, internal >>> electromagnetics (since the photon carries both time and >>> energy, >>> being a piece of action). >>> >>> Without further development, we state that the >>> Whittaker hidden >>> variable EM approach, in allowing the complete engineering >>> of the >>> internal electromagnetics, allows the complete engineering >>> of mind, >>> thought, and life. Living systems have utilized the >>> internal EM >>> Whittaker channel (in and through atomic nuclear potentials >>> and area >>> quantum potentials) since the beginning. [ref. 36] >>> >>> Finally, the Whittaker unification linkage of the three >>> disciplines >>> is testable. It is engineerable. It works. >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> NOTES AND REFERENCES >>> >>> [1] P. Graneau, Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals, >>> Nonantum, Massachusetts, Hadronic Press, >>> 1985. See also P. >>> Graneau and P.N. Graneau, "Electrodynamic >>> Explosions in >>> Liquids," Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 46, >>> 1985, p. 468; R. >>> Azevedo, P. Graneau, P.N. Graneau, and C. >>> Millet, "Powerful >>> Water Plasma Explosions," Phys. Lett. >>> Vol. 117, 1986, p. >>> 101. >>> >>> [2] See Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Significance of >>> Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum >>> Theory," Phys. >>> Rev. Second Series, 115(3), Aug. 1, 1959, p. >>> 458-491. This >>> paper pointed out the primacy of the >>> potentials. Instead >>> of being causative agents, the force >>> fields are actually >>> effects generated in and of charged >>> particle systems from >>> the potentials. This is in complete >>> violation of both >>> classical electromagnetics and classical >>> dynamics, but it >>> >>> Page 15 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> is absolutely required by quantum >>> mechanics. For an >>> extensive discussion of the Aharonov-Bohm >>> effect and an >>> extensive list of references, see S. Olariu >>> and I. Iovitzu >>> Popescu, "The Quantum Effects of >>> Electromagnetic Fluxes," >>> Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(2), Apr. 1985. >>> >>> [3] See Bertram Schwarzschild, "Currents in normal-metal rings >>> exhibit Aharonov-Bohm Effect," Physics >>> Today, 39(1), Jan. >>> 1986, p. 17-20 for confirmation. >>> >>> [4] James Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and >>> Magnetism, Oxford University Press, >>> Oxford, 1873. The >>> third edition is published by Dover, 1954. >>> >>> [5] Maxwell's true theory of electromagnetics is contained in >>> some 200-odd quaternion equations, and is >>> far more complex >>> than the gross vector simplification >>> developed by Heaviside >>> and Gibbs after Maxwell's death. For a >>> cogent argument >>> about what might have been discovered >>> much earlier in >>> physics if quaternions had not been cast >>> aside, see James >>> D. Edmonds, Jr., "Quaternion Quantum Theory: >>> New Physics or >>> Number Mysticism?", Am. J. Phys., 42(3), >>> Mar. 1974, p. 220- >>> 223. Just how much more powerful >>> was Maxwell's >>> quaternionic expression of EM theory than >>> was Heaviside's >>> (i.e., the modern) vector interpretation, >>> was succinctly >>> expressed by Josephs as follows: >>> "Hamilton's algebra of >>> quaternions, unlike Heaviside's algebra of >>> vectors, is not >>> a mere abbreviated mode of expressing >>> Cartesian analysis, >>> but is an independent branch of >>> mathematics with its own >>> rules of operation and its own special >>> theorems. A >>> quaternion is, in fact, a generalized >>> or hypercomplex >>> number..." (H.J. Josephs, "The Heaviside >>> Papers Found at >>> Paignton in 1957," Electromagnetic >>> Theory by Oliver >>> Heaviside, Including an account of >>> Heaviside's unpublished >>> notes for a fourth volume, and with a >>> foreword by Sir >>> Edmund Whittaker, Vol. III, Third >>> Edition, Chelsea >>> Publishing Co., New York, 1971, p. 660.) >>> >>> [6] See E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential Equations >>> of Mathematical Physics," Math. Ann., >>> Vol. 57, 1903, p. >>> 333-355; "On an Expression of the >>> Electromagnetic Field Due >>> to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar >>> Potential Functions," >>> Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, >>> 1904, p. 367-372. >>> >>> [7] In the modern view, it is trapped energy that is >>> gravitational, mass being viewed as >>> simply such trapped >>> energy. We point out that Einstein's >>> formula E = mc^2 >>> actually is an expression for mass in terms >>> of its trapped >>> EM energy. Thus we extend the modern view >>> by stating that, >>> to first order, Newtonian gravitational >>> attraction is due >>> to the attraction of spatially entrapped >>> electromagnetic >>> energy. Since the electromagnetic >>> scalar potentials >>> represent just such spatially entrapped >>> EM energy, then >>> they hold a special significance >>> gravitationally. >>> >>> [8] This assertion can be tested. At the nodal points of the >>> standing potential wave, the rate of >>> flow of time is >>> normal. At nonzero points along the >>> wave, however, the >>> local rate of flow of local time varies from >>> normal. After >>> a proper-time interval for the observer at >>> the nodal point, >>> >>> Page 16 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> normal clocks and watches at different >>> non-nodal points >>> along the wave will appreciably vary in >>> their time reading. >>> Initially synchronized clocks will >>> thus be found to >>> disagree, if placed in different positions >>> in the Whittaker >>> wave and allowed to remain for a test >>> period. In the past, >>> various inventors have anecdotally >>> demonstrated this >>> effect. As an example, see David >>> Jones, Vancouver Sun >>> Times, Dec. 17, 1977, p. 17. >>> >>> [9] V.K. Ignatovich, "The Remarkable Capabilities of Recursive >>> Relations," Am. J. Phys., 57(10), Oct. 1989, >>> p. 873-878. >>> >>> [10] Richard W. Ziolkowski, "Localized >>> transmission of wave >>> energy," Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1061, Microwave and Particle Beam >>> Sources and Directed Energy Concepts, Jan. 1989, p. 396-397. >>> >>> [11] An acoustic missile is essentially a slug of >>> acoustic energy >>> that holds together as it travels, striking and damaging or >>> destroying a target. An electromagnetic missile is a slug >>> of EM energy that holds together as it travels to a target >>> and strikes it. >>> >>> [12] A.D. Sakharov, "Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in >>> Curved Space >>> and the Theory of Gravitation," Sov. Phys. Dokl., Vol. 12, >>> 1968, p. 1040. See also the related discussion in Misner, >>> Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, 1973, p. 426. >>> >>> [13] Note that this assigns an internal >>> structure to a >>> gravitational potential. >>> >>> [14] A.D. Sakharov, Theor. Math. Phys., Vol. 23, >>> 1975, p. 435. >>> >>> [15] K. Akama et al, Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. 60, >>> 1978, p. 868. >>> >>> [16] B. Hasslacher and E. Mottolo, Phys. Lett., >>> Vol. 95B, 1980, >>> p. 237. >>> >>> [17] A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 42, 1979, p. 417. >>> >>> [18] D. Amati and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett., Vol. >>> 105B, 1981, p. >>> 358; S. Yoshimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. 78, 1987, p. >>> 435. >>> >>> [19] S. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 54, 1982, p. 729. >>> >>> [20] H.E. Puthoff, "Ground State of Hydrogen as a >>> Zero-Point- >>> Fluctuation-Determined State," Phys. Rev. D, 35(10), May 15, >>> 1987, p. 3266-3269. >>> >>> [21] H.E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a >>> Zero-Point-Fluctuation Force," >>> Phys. Rev. A., 39(5), Mar. 1, 1989, p. 2333-2342. See also >>> H.E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum electromagnetic Zero-Point >>> Energy," Phys. Rev. A., 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989, p. 4857-4862. >>> Changing the vacuum potential constitutes a fluctuation >>> directly in and of the zero-point energy of vacuum, and >>> hence, by Puthoff's mechanism, it does indeed induce a >>> gravitational effect. At the level of the vacuum virtual >>> particle flux exchange with the charged nucleus, producing >>> >>> >>> Page 17 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> an electromagnetic change also produces a gravitational >>> change, and vice-versa. >>> >>> [22] Puthoff, Phys. Rev. D., 35(10), May 15, 1987, >>> p. 3266-3269. >>> >>> [23] Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs Notes >>> 1899-1900, Nolit, >>> Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1978, p. 61-62. >>> >>> [24] E.T. Whittaker, "On an Expression of the >>> Electromagnetic >>> Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar Potential >>> Functions," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, >>> 1904, p. 367-372. >>> >>> [25] The potential for weaponization of the >>> Whittaker work should >>> be obvious. >>> >>> [26] Toward the end of his life Heaviside lived as >>> a recluse in a >>> small garret apartment, and may have returned again to his >>> struggle with quaternions. In the 1950's handwritten notes >>> of a theory of gravitation, written in quaternion >>> mathematics, were found beneath the floor boards of his tiny >>> study. >>> >>> [27] T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Original Quaternion >>> Theory Was a >>> Unified Field Theory of Electromagnetics and >>> Electrogravitation," Proceedings, International Tesla >>> Society Symposium, Colorado Springs, Colorado, July 1988. >>> See also T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Lost Unified Field Theory >>> of Electromagnetics and Gravitation," Proceedings, PACE >>> Third International New Energy Technology Symposium, June >>> 25-28, 1988 at Maison du Citoyen, Hull (Ottawa), Canada, >>> 1988. >>> >>> [28] See Floyd Sweet and T.E. Bearden, "Utilizing >>> Scalar >>> Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy," Proceedings, this >>> conference. >>> >>> [29] Ironically, Einstein then spent the remainder >>> of his life, >>> desperately trying to unify electromagnetics and gravitation >>> in his theory of general relativity, never realizing that >>> his own overstatement of his "flat local space-time" >>> postulate precluded his success and foredoomed all his >>> efforts to failure. >>> >>> [30] To appreciate just what can actually be >>> done with local >>> space-time curvature, see E.B. Smetanin, "Electromagnetic >>> Field in a Space With Curvature - New Solutions," Sov. Phys. >>> J., 25(2), Feb. 1982, p. 107-111. >>> >>> [31] For a detailed exposition of the scientific >>> suppression used >>> to uphold the present GR, written by an inside scientist of >>> excellent ability, and one with over 100 published papers in >>> the literature, see Rugero Maria Santilli, Ethical Probe on >>> Einstein's Followers in the USA: An Insider's View, Alpha >>> Publishing, POB 82, Newtonville, MA 02160, 1984. >>> >>> [32] For a discussion of the missing chaos in >>> quantum mechanics, >>> see Robert Pool, "Quantum Chaos: Enigma Wrapped in a >>> Mystery," Science, 243(4893), Feb. 17, 1989, p. 893-895. >>> >>> Page 18 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> For a more technical discussion see P.V. Elyutin, "The >>> Quantum Chaos Problem," Sov. Phys. Usp. 31(7), July 1988, >>> p. 597-622. >>> >>> [33] For an entry point into the literature of >>> hidden variable >>> theory, see Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David >>> Bohm, B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat, Eds., Routledge & >>> Kegan Paul, London & New York, 1987. >>> >>> [34] However, even if it predicts something new and >>> is warranted, >>> it still may not be adopted. An example is the continuing >>> reluctance of physicists to reformulate EM theory, stressing >>> the primacy of the potential and the fact that not the force >>> field but only the potential for the force field exists in >>> the vacuum. Even more so, it is well-known that detection >>> is actually binary, and we throw away precisely half of >>> almost every detection our instruments make. C.f. Richard >>> Kidd et al, "Evolution of the Modern Photon," Am. J. Phys., >>> 57(1), Jan. 1989, p. 27-35. Generally in every >>> electromagnetic interaction of our instruments, two photons >>> are produced: one a time-forward photon, and the other a >>> time-reversed photon. Our detectors essentially measure the >>> time-forward photon half, not the time-reversed photon >>> (antiphoton) half. The antiphoton half produces a slight >>> recoil force (Newton's third law reaction force) in the mass >>> (nuclei) of the instrument, which we ignore. Also, we >>> continue to ignore the evidence that the photon and >>> antiphoton are not identical. In a pumped phase conjugate >>> mirror, for example, the emission of a normal photon from >>> the mirror material results in a recoil of the mirror; the >>> emission of an antiphoton by the mirror material, however, >>> does not result in recoil of the mirror. Physics is still >>> not consistent, as is well-known to foundations researchers, >>> but this fact is generally not accented to university >>> students. >>> >>> [35] Bearden, Gravitobiology, Tesla Book Co., >>> 1991, p. 33-36. >>> The mechanism was previously advanced in several >>> miscellaneous papers and in private correspondence. >>> >>> [36] See Bearden, Gravitobiology, Tesla Book Co., >>> for additional >>> development of biological effects and mechanisms of scalar >>> EM. >>> ******************* >>> End of paper >>> ******************* >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> If you have comments or other information relating >>> to such topics >>> as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet >>> or send to the >>> Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. >>> Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. >>> >>> Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson >>> Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> If we can be of service, you may contact >>> Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) >>> 242-9346 >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Page 19 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/25/2018 6:48 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>> Norm, >>>> >>>> That looks familiar. Where is it from? Was that an early >>>> Bearden paper? I have two file cabinets and book cases >>>> full of stuff like that that are between the garage and the >>>> basement. At the current rate it will be another year until >>>> I’m organized again. >>>> >>>> Sparky gave me an equation about the permittivity of space >>>> and told me “don’t tell anyone about that”. Its in one of >>>> my notebooks from the ’90’s. Might find it during a winter >>>> time review of paperwork. Too much to so now in the summer >>>> in this house and a rental house we picked up earlier this >>>> year after our son lost his mind and disappeared. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Toby >>>> >>>> >>>> Toby Grotz >>>> 608-606-5370 >>>> In the future, >>>> We will sit on our front porches with family, friends and >>>> neighbors, >>>> Singing and playing acoustic music, >>>> until the stars shine down upon us, undimmed by the fires >>>> of fossil fuels. >>>> >>>>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Norman Wootan >>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <nppckhgeghphmkjo.png> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Toby ! Here is next page. I sent the attachment with the >>>>> whole Sparky Sweet paper! >>>>> >>>>> On 7/24/2018 9:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>>>> Norm, >>>>>> >>>>>> On that Nature od space, It cuts off at the end. Seems >>>>>> there should be a page 2 after the ….. “only real space, >>>>>> the"….???" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Toby Grotz >>>>>> 608-606-5370 >>>>>> In the future, >>>>>> We will sit on our front porches with family, friends and >>>>>> neighbors, >>>>>> Singing and playing acoustic music, >>>>>> until the stars shine down upon us, undimmed by the fires >>>>>> of fossil fuels. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jul 23, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Norman Wootan >>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <habdfmegacnlohpb.png> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/23/2018 11:08 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM >>>>>>>> motors and became friends with the Production Manager >>>>>>>> at General Magnetics (Southland Corp) in Dallas for >>>>>>>> they manufactured speaker magnets of all size and >>>>>>>> shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, >>>>>>>> molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium >>>>>>>> Ferite magnets. EPA mandated the end of the use of >>>>>>>> barium in the manufacturing process with a strontium >>>>>>>> substitute. The barium magnets became available from >>>>>>>> Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin >>>>>>>> and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets I found >>>>>>>> them at Edmund Scientific so bought the exact same >>>>>>>> Sweet magnets. I was scrapping sown all the main frame >>>>>>>> (IBM) computers in the DFW area and found that the >>>>>>>> early versions of the big hard drives had the barium >>>>>>>> magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <pommgidpifdmpbjn.jpg> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <abjopbhbpapmilnb.jpg> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <ciecjnijpplnkoln.jpg> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these >>>>>>>> linear servos in the read write heads. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of >>>>>>>> cold electrical output making a self runner (Sweet said >>>>>>>> not possible) I realized that much more had to be >>>>>>>> learned about this aspect of research. I know you were >>>>>>>> involved to some extent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Before I got all bogged down with my Hydrogen >>>>>>>> Production Process and building Proof of concept >>>>>>>> prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had formulated a real >>>>>>>> neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to be >>>>>>>> made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype >>>>>>>> magnets built. >>>>>>>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA >>>>>>>> Yahoo site, I accumulated practically all there is to >>>>>>>> know about the Sweet Project. I guess Bearden's Final, >>>>>>>> Final, Final Secret is still yet to be realized! Lol >>>>>>>> Norm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots of stuff here. I have been busy so need to back >>>>>>>>> and review all. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite. Sparky sweet >>>>>>>>> said the magnets he used had to be barium ferrite. >>>>>>>>> Most ceramic magnets of the size he was using are >>>>>>>>> strontium ferrite. To tell the difference I used, per >>>>>>>>> his instructions, an ohm meter. One conducts, the >>>>>>>>> other doesn’t.. I forget which way it is. Somewhere >>>>>>>>> in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his >>>>>>>>> magnets. I’m still unpackingand organizing after >>>>>>>>> many, many moves so it will be awhile before I find it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet >>>>>>>>> he had used. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Toby >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge >>>>>>>>>> (What is Heat?) >>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700 >>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY]<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Interesting theory Norm, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen >>>>>>>>>> than most other people, I read your patent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron >>>>>>>>>> difference is but there seems to be the potential of >>>>>>>>>> a hole difference or at least a neutron missing. >>>>>>>>>> Very interesting what happens with a Coleman battery >>>>>>>>>> in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems to >>>>>>>>>> know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I >>>>>>>>>> think proton electricity is a different animal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than >>>>>>>>>> Hydrogen so maybe the mono form is one of the light >>>>>>>>>> Aether gasses since it has no neutron and would only >>>>>>>>>> need a proton to gather an electron. If it shows up >>>>>>>>>> from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth >>>>>>>>>> well so we do agree on the origin. Also have a theory >>>>>>>>>> about rain forming in a similar way. When we have >>>>>>>>>> these weather systems starting on the west cost and >>>>>>>>>> dumping billions of gallons all across the country >>>>>>>>>> more than the clouds could ever hold. As the high >>>>>>>>>> and lower clouds commingle I thing they convert >>>>>>>>>> nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work >>>>>>>>>> properly without a ground connection so they are in >>>>>>>>>> fact pumps. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of >>>>>>>>>> rectifying and then fractioning the HV to a coil vs >>>>>>>>>> straight up static charge from a serious influence >>>>>>>>>> machine for the neutral spike. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build >>>>>>>>>> someday. Also interesting what NASA is doing with >>>>>>>>>> the helium to hold H in the Protium state. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great >>>>>>>>>> idea too. I think there are some deep truths in >>>>>>>>>> William Lynes writings even if some of the whys and >>>>>>>>>> wherefores may be misinterpreted. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I >>>>>>>>>> intend to pursue as far as attempting electrets and >>>>>>>>>> anisotropic alignments and restructuring. I think >>>>>>>>>> Barrium Ferrite might be piezoelectric, don't recall >>>>>>>>>> right now, but either way it seems to be a very good >>>>>>>>>> insulator and something that can fraction electrons >>>>>>>>>> from the B field. I imagine you played with this >>>>>>>>>> stuff quite a bit during your MRA design and likely >>>>>>>>>> noticed some interesting aspects of the material. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and >>>>>>>>>> tape heads for a OU lenz free generator. He had a >>>>>>>>>> single sine wave freq and claimed he could loop >>>>>>>>>> generating electricity in this way as the tape >>>>>>>>>> passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts >>>>>>>>>> did not seem to get loaded down. Probably just >>>>>>>>>> another tuned high impedance system. Find it >>>>>>>>>> interesting as mag tape is mostly barium ferrite >>>>>>>>>> particles. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential? >>>>>>>>>>> Well, here is what is happening which agrees with >>>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff paper on the spontaneous formation of >>>>>>>>>>> hydrogen from space background from free protons. >>>>>>>>>>> Please reviewIrving Langmuir >>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir> >>>>>>>>>>> Atomic Hydrogen. Here is my theory as to how the >>>>>>>>>>> 3000watts of HVDC is created in a 30 atm. atmosphere >>>>>>>>>>> of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In the Lanfmuir torch a >>>>>>>>>>> high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond creating >>>>>>>>>>> monatomic hydrogen (atoms). Same with the Felici >>>>>>>>>>> Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. >>>>>>>>>>> According to Hal Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses >>>>>>>>>>> an electron it is immediately replenished by the >>>>>>>>>>> Zero Point space background. The Felici Generator is >>>>>>>>>>> a zero Point Energy Generator or PUMP. I had an >>>>>>>>>>> interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a >>>>>>>>>>> New Energy Symposium in Denver. I asked him what >>>>>>>>>>> type of power supply he used in charging his HVDC >>>>>>>>>>> capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster experiments. >>>>>>>>>>> His reply was an Electrostatic Influence Machine >>>>>>>>>>> (Holtz Machine). He said that if you apply a >>>>>>>>>>> potential of lets say 100,000 Volts across a >>>>>>>>>>> capacitor it will charge because you have stressed >>>>>>>>>>> the dielectric (dielectric displacement). >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting answer to say the least. The charged >>>>>>>>>>> capacitors will do work. Same with the Felici >>>>>>>>>>> Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do work >>>>>>>>>>> drawing the energy from the space background. See! >>>>>>>>>>> Mick, I had to answer my own question for nobody >>>>>>>>>>> thinks about the perplexing problems. Ha! Ha! Norm >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the >>>>>>>>>>>> device! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one >>>>>>>>>>>>> electron / atom, where does the electrons come >>>>>>>>>>>>> from in the Felici HV Electrostatic Generator?? I >>>>>>>>>>>>> have issued this challenge before with no comments. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is Heat? Which has more energy, Holes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Electrons? Hot surface = holes due to missing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons >>>>>>>>>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions) BTW, absolute zero conditions, there >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no Browning Motion for there are no holes for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the extra energy not just from the additional in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coil collapse but from the neutral spike Norm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is on to. It is elusive because it requires a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> solid negative pulse for that huge power return >>>>>>>>>>>>>> strike just like lighting. With positive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightening there is no return strike. The return >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been completely engineered around. It's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficult to get solid negative with high voltage >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the oscillations provide as you know the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter field so the proper neg polarity to input >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a coil doesn't cut it but is a good start. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out the negative traveling wave which is what he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> referred to as radiant. I am sure certain >>>>>>>>>>>>>> materials also contribute to a more pure charge >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one way or the other just like with static >>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges. We just have to learn to use the proper >>>>>>>>>>>>>> materials in our coils for the expected outcomes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive- lightning-why-its-so- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dangerous/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you will understand the concentration of negative >>>>>>>>>>>>>> charge (cold) creating the huge amounts of ice & >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hail in the negative thunderstorm. Moray is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested in the positive lighting producing the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sprite events over the storms as photographed by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> positive charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> By >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effects of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generator of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be extracted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> differentials.My >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimented >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction >>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices found in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heat was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to two >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> importance of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a drop of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> froze then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> over 100 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature >>>>>>>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> materials became >>>>>>>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling >>>>>>>>>>>>>> principles.In >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling >>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects >>>>>>>>>>>>>> using a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride.. Today >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more advanced >>>>>>>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> being a pore >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a high >>>>>>>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature >>>>>>>>>>>>>> relationship.The first >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about 10 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dallas.With a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a weak >>>>>>>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed.Increasing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in current >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chips on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> puzzle of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by moving >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> process used in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices >>>>>>>>>>>>>> employing phase >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effects by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change.Would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phase change >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator >>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional >>>>>>>>>>>>>> process with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam >>>>>>>>>>>>>> friction >>>>>>>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1920 s) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lose or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material >>>>>>>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phase change >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspicions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the absence >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us >>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> converted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> light >>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hot.The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> becomes.Now >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some water >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> flame >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> photons >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the atomic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to occur. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric current >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation as to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanical >>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chemistry is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic level >>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>> several years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fighting in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapidly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an ion >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> very little >>>>>>>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion >>>>>>>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical >>>>>>>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature >>>>>>>>>>>>>> differentials.Remember >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and voltage >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> KeelyNet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting line >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Super Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work with the idea of using the Linde, liquid air >>>>>>>>>>>>>> process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil >>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary. Tesla understood the power of a "Cold >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sink" with electron densities of a very high >>>>>>>>>>>>>> order! "Hmmmmn"! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SPARKY--Nothing.pdf><SPARKY--19872.pdf> >>>> >>> >> > >
Headers
| Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Sender | [email protected] |
| X-Apparently-To | [email protected] |
| X-Received | (qmail 15105 invoked by uid 102); 29 Jul 2018 14:27:15 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mtaq5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.198.29.78) by m5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2018 14:27:15 -0000 |
| X-Received | (qmail 10183 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2018 14:27:14 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.221.10.59) by mtaq5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2018 14:27:14 -0000 |
| X-Original-Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Received-SPF | none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) |
| X-YMailISG | aV2W6DkWLDtCs.re3LD.gPySXxfj_tLlAxEK91Y5KlDKvNXl 9Y.7frGcHHHuExY3DdfuyEVnqDeL0eHp6sav5cnPT90bMlbxrScYMeNlvCn0 _P4N0y8vQsNK87WOgvhEWMgPt5uz8xJqZIWark.CxlV4Ro4ybWlyrLAsabC_ 80kd1aXFonRKWCGn0C76YeY15AXX3RDCJu.JA_JziPy0RHbCay_MwH2Kgryd H0eKlatbR1HTMMMuxbZijG_caus8.xmD2SYtRhRJ_uNLf5qDwsy4x3vp_DXh Hl3IGD6OsUb_VBjBAif2CBLY3GaSfoqKEu4b3NK0.uWSiDL7mm0NuinQdsS4 oUY.9lTOkOkDwnDdkAZCnuWRYp1rZHcg5we9jRSiLIIWt90PpSNvrjoCyjyw XWUV7CsvCBTcgoFbnvbn8TA3QbQdpZG037teu8jZENwwJ6vohkiU0TPEvCxE VWTH0BpwcYJDzuWcDt8gtRBDc0wJRsafU1QYGXhbKMdfVT17ESlWRt7Ge0Y_ Y7ou7n3qfZ894Y5ba3fDDfYQCCip21o9NOPPyMpXU84zg0_MlEg524hMTGyd d4P2onOO8mL6ClxgMdTIAwU2AMkDpXPQltqbAxf69SXWzg1mDrP4eTtHivzH BNbj51DWv1DAWgWbNGE99Sd2cWZ6Tk3u26jWCB99c.j72sWLkQmh5CVv.857 KfOihi.vrOU62Q5YVYNgfEwsYqH7uF7BpLzcwFG1zewv_OoscDnb.IJz4p6Y 5ljDI6Oy_7ivTOnA.2jdi3vRsDBH.vimXV5bPa_IBXBnq2eviI7TUG9pwzWQ p745w4Uj_8rCVyZUG9T4qcSu70v8dNZp_nGuO3xCh74nLeR5Jc8GrLtTsbNX iVxPdCBBtpT425KrC.2zimHr6yiSOXGNZCc3KLss8rcvxUMZcPtr9_tGfTXu WPAckQEb6XBmU1ogxmn43DDr80DhzTBaQgvCnEVzT4DRJuE2pc4c783xRpox xuOGt8SuvVfUh6mj158v4ugWsnEXr2UJTtI5.p8ELpcCLGUoSw0Yadvl6hMI vJDCrYOlSBq7eb08dhmVmEgVutBpipckTV5U87vp0bjpHIOEjM98QXbBULyD Lq.M1T4zQJv0MWNbBON8Q8Kzgo_C3nW6ZFo8Q7ExPy4a1lXavEi2nZs_QfOi XLxQm.FGyD5Uv8BoRQxB6Ujdev90WY6RCDJ_VHgJ0n8qWTzx0FdALEgm7B2l GXYOKlfCc6lCCF2Ho.ne39ManGdq0PQrJmzkOlWhn9CuNH6G0qaX5CuERcdq TctQxhPBXyzxHmKkfy5pjzSp3a8s3hXFr98zsX6BMHWwD2wg9iy1MijmdKtD kaVUo9hAoey8KvBOk0tG55p6c6KmpgeHUKb3M2BwkEojFQ4jTL8wBQsmhJgm eXEHvhHWE2IO_TwOVwfXvcFCK0haafbfWqp5MyL8d3VDWY8rip0YRDsrwM5Y ORHNfMMFVhda8Hci3xVY_cvwtoFbqDxxNtNQh9KOiYKv3CPOwFqyYR7DRyVf VT2t5..VBb1VIRur.JxPw8OjKgO5gT6aI82LiNrMog2Dnj9wRiGLxdeMnJ2Q _gxWkGyM |
| Authentication-Results | mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=att.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=att.net; dkim=pass (ok) |
| X-Received | from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic309-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.65.149) by mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:27:13 +0000 |
| X-YMail-OSG | ayJJAxUVM1lsZNwJt02p5My8GYFSpAd5177o5cTebaLa5BM.vq5tuPwSkTb4HXL hfM1m_KPjz56i1tJQCV7jus6QQukyNVbC_ZkZiXcTpPBw7TU2nzvWHN.Fl41lpi6DPb6JDv8SuBw CuwdeyVjHmfKxVf3Z9m8kZUP0OC6F6J709FoZF1m1baXDKNuUBK2d6zOeaxbJLPCYSP1PE1cc0kB Qv1wix6iX6tk_etEa6f49QQjNxyl34a7t6FVZZjSq0igqhriadKVFRP47Xm_MaxB2i.UrBqGnb5D w3hzLZHJnbl_gteJy7IV1EPSN.Hdu8KnX2zZ.rdYHutcsGTKyf2XZ7Z4NK8rjQCluAFG8ceU_pXl RBrT7cNHvL3EW7myNJ7k3HJnoG.ayg7q1Cb73IE11QkWhT3se.NQmKIEGgk0wsGmUFz3rv9Vxci7 UaTG_2kjVLk.ImA_rGqVXW8SHQxbyraI64tDWjghkyQoy_JbZROAUE0fqCZqNRpU01FLyvqTAz_m zQ.EvO0_o5rCVfSIspyvXnSxsag8ySnjGG8aLgRENpTdjUQyvVHrTHHk_IxdCSQ19rmoTJzXLK26 HGjoH_F1AjQW5Zf6a8Tu9rszpIDj3AnB.FVxoDQZ5LxUrnJAbTLF3AicIflbsK_MM8BXIMGkN3_P Cn3Q6V8NZLVniovOWgoiwUrIfNKER9rYkvpqv_57LrCzkHzGjfdc01zobqiT2ph53_S5AbDfQdRY B37s6Vl0es1K0uJ_.8cuav7UNAQTywWiwY0RXngsfsaRiMIaqrsjaos0zTapF38xtRyQMFbI8zIf KvEs3OrCvWM8Ad5_8z0rPE_TJtSI0lL4zTwMhdl1ARh8D_zmmmLsrdWjZoF1GeihaKXQBhtGje7M sRPD6onvTE.ift4ruoHE8_F08j7o_XvNkRYhI6.D3ug8RkdesEBBsag2vgfAZiAUeUmEmPtPlRZ. spClyy_s94MYQNjYEukSxZnKt2nJcwqkWtHDw_OdpU.QU2LLCZvtJF7Ne.D5_lGislQuKTCB9fA4 L3zrswSc- |
| X-Received | from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:27:11 +0000 |
| X-Received | from ip70-189-9-73.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.4]) ([70.189.9.73]) by smtp425.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID e35507a419e3af51937c6944cbb2b5a5; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:27:09 +0000 (UTC) |
| To | [email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Pre mbold <[email protected]> |
| References | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
| Date | Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:27:08 -0500 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <[email protected]> |
| Content-Type | multipart/mixed; boundary="------------538CE5850559FA432C6365A9" |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Originating-IP | 10.221.10.59 |
| Subject | Re: AW: Re: [EVGRAY] Low Lenz in plain sight |
| X-Yahoo-Group-Post | member; u=554418533; y=ANBVfVVF0-d0DijoVYBPyjs505-qfPW3Ea-T_HgYnHu_DEFnr3fR_m2a |
| X-Yahoo-Profile | [email protected] |
| From | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |