Body
Having bought and studied all of Walter Russell's work, I was really
fascinated with your work on the focusing dynamo! Thanks!
http://rexresearch.com/russellcoil/russellcoil.htm
On 7/27/2018 8:45 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
> Thanks Norm for the call out. Somewhere I have the CAD file of the
> the Optical Dynamo Generator that was transcribed from a copy of a
> drawing Russel did maybe at a Navy base in Florida and ended up in
> Colorado Springs with a NORAD connection. I wrote that all up once
> but it was so long ago I forget the details.
>
> What a long strange trip its been….
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pafY6sZt0FE
>
>
>
> Toby Grotz
> 608-606-5370
> In the future,
> We will sit on our front porches with family, friends and neighbors,
> Singing and playing acoustic music,
> until the stars shine down upon us, undimmed by the fires of fossil fuels.
>
>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 6:38 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry! I hit send and was not finished with my response. (cont)
>>
>> If you will take the time to read this book by Davson (The only
>> writing about the work of Karl Schappeller BTW) it will open your
>> thought process as to how the sun really works. The Schappeller
>> engine is rather fascinating. See:
>>
>> http://www.ebook3000.com/The-Physics-of-The-Primary-State-of-Matter--An-Application-Through-The-Primary-Technique_89229.html
>>
>> http://rexresearch.com/schapp/schapp.htm
>>
>> http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Stevens.pdf
>>
>> Smokey! Since you brought up the other possible elements before
>> hydrogen in the periodic table, best to review the work of Walter
>> Russell's Octave based table of the elements. I bought the entire
>> study course from the Institute and thoroughly studied the subject.
>> The old saying applies, We do not know all that we do not know!
>> Enough said. I have to kind of stick to conventional physics and
>> electronic theory on here for we have so many dyed in the wood
>> traditionalist , that we draw the ire of same when we venture into
>> our real beliefs. Toby is on here and can attest to the focusing
>> dynamo experiments as drawn by Walter Russell. See:
>>
>> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/567242515548916992/?lp=true
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/22/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks You!!!! Smokey for opening the door to my very favorite
>>> subject! The energetic vacuum, a seathing sea of aetheric energy.
>>> Way back in the 80s, Tom Bearden put me onto the book, The Physics
>>> of the Primary State of Matter, Davson 1955 which was in a book
>>> store in Boston. I purchased the very rare (autographed copy) for
>>> $450 and treasure the contents for it goes right to the heart of
>>> what you are saying. If you were able to pull down a perfect vacuum
>>> in a vessile you would have a concentration of energetic aether.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/21/2018 8:59 PM, David G [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Norman,
>>>> Quote:
>>>> "Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom,
>>>> where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic
>>>> Generator?? I have issued this challenge before with no comments."
>>>>
>>>> We have to begin to accept the total facts that there are no such
>>>> things as 'electrons' and they cannot exist as 'free electrons' in
>>>> space.
>>>> This theory comes from the likes of the darlings of the control and
>>>> fantasy World of people like Einstein.
>>>> The Electron Microscope is a joke and still today, nobody has seen
>>>> an 'electron'.
>>>>
>>>> https://ia802502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf
>>>>
>>>> See Page 20.
>>>>
>>>> https://ia800306.us.archive.org/31/items/dashedagainsttherock00colviala/dashedagainsttherock00colviala.pdf
>>>>
>>>> The attached extract pdf is from William J Colville and his Book
>>>> 'Dashed Against The Rocks' 1894 and this is Chapter 4 and talks of
>>>> the Ether or 'atomolic substance' and after a Gas he describes
>>>> 'Ultra-Gaseous' which we, today, call a Plasma.
>>>> Not a single mention of the fantasy word 'electron'.
>>>>
>>>> We need to begin to look at what is next to the Ether and after the
>>>> Gas and that is a Plasma.
>>>> What really is a Plasma?
>>>> Plasma is excited Ether and what overunity is all about.
>>>> You might have your fantasy 'electron' rotating inside the Atom but
>>>> once excited and is in free space, becomes a part of the Plasma.
>>>> Probably nothing to do with the Hydrogen as you are working inside
>>>> a gas filled vacuum and the Ether just loves a vacuum.
>>>> Nature abhors a vacuum and has to fill the space with something.
>>>> Excited Ether you could probably call 'motivated Ether' ready and
>>>> willing to do work.
>>>>
>>>> So then why do you build a Geometric Translator with Square Root 2
>>>> rotating Cones (Flanagan/Constable) for rainmaking and you include
>>>> Vacuum Tubes in the design? - to attract the Ether, that's why.
>>>> The design is such that the unseen Ether is attracted to the device
>>>> through excitation and in the generation of the Plasma you have and
>>>> put Ions to work.
>>>>
>>>> My 'Impulse Discharge' device shows all of this at work where you
>>>> have the Spark Gap but you have no arc/spark but an Ion induced
>>>> Plasma instead at the gap which is really an excited Ether and this
>>>> is all confirmed by Chernetsky/Galkin/Frolov in their 'Self
>>>> Generating Discharge'.
>>>> As I see it.
>>>>
>>>> Why is the USA re-opening their Colorado DUMB - because of the fear
>>>> of an EMP wiping out all of their solid state electronics which the
>>>> smart Russians have chosen not to do and still use Vacuum Tubes in
>>>> their military designs as was demonstrated in the Black Sea with
>>>> the USS Donald E Cook.
>>>> Go back into the 60s and see what 'Operation Fishbowl' was really
>>>> all about as a consequence.
>>>>
>>>> Hope I have made an attempt to answer your question suitably.
>>>> Respectfully.
>>>>
>>>> Smokey
>>>>
>>>> On 21/07/2018 1:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom,
>>>>> where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic
>>>>> Generator?? I have issued this challenge before with no comments.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat?
>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes
>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons
>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW,
>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there
>>>>>> are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy
>>>>>> not just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the
>>>>>> neutral spike Norm is on to. It is elusive because it requires a
>>>>>> solid negative pulse for that huge power return strike just like
>>>>>> lighting. With positive lightening there is no return strike.
>>>>>> The return mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it has been
>>>>>> completely engineered around. It's difficult to get solid
>>>>>> negative with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you
>>>>>> know the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a
>>>>>> coil doesn't cut it but is a good start. This is why Tesla was
>>>>>> using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave which
>>>>>> is what he referred to as radiant. I am sure certain materials
>>>>>> also contribute to a more pure charge one way or the other just
>>>>>> like with static charges. We just have to learn to use the
>>>>>> proper materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will
>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating
>>>>>> the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm.
>>>>>> Moray is interested in the positive lighting producing the sprite
>>>>>> events over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space Station.
>>>>>> (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold Negative
>>>>>> ionosphere.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super
>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of
>>>>>> using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super conductive
>>>>>> Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink"
>>>>>> with electron densities of a very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>