Re: Fwd: Re: Sweets and space - Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
Database ID: 108956
2018-07-26T16:49:37-05:00
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID
In-Reply-To:
<[email protected]>
Body
Having been in Military Research & Development and moving to Dallas in 1981, I found the Tesla Book Store over in Greenville,TX where I bought all of Tom Bearden's works and a ton of information on the Master himself, Tesla. Through the years I have kept up on the Black Budget Programs and have always correlated what I was reading with the real world developments. If you folks would so kindly spend a little time reading the KeelyNet, Guy Resh presentation of the Sweet Bearden paper from the Boston Conference and put the pieces of the puzzle together, you will see what has been going on in plain sight. When you read the Sweet/Bearden paper you will stop and say to yourself, Did he just say what I think he said? All of the puzzle is forming a brilliant picture. Bearden put me onto the Book, Physics of the Primary State of Matter, Davson, 1955 in which the energetic Aether was described as Glowing Magnetism, Cold Plasma in a hard vacuum. Read and enjoy! Norm ----- Forwarded Message ----- *From:* "Energy Times Newsletter" <[email protected]> *To:* "Norman Wootan" <[email protected]> *Cc:* *Sent:* Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM *Subject:* * DISCLOSED * Gravity Control Method Demonstrates 80% weight reduction! */* RELEASED * GRAVITY CONTROL - WITH PRESENT TECHNOLOGY/* Hi Norman, We held off on announcing which presentation was going to be released today until we actually launched it due to the critical nature of the content. Oppenheimer, Bohm and other fathers of the atomic age personally taught one very brilliant man named Dr. Frederick Alzofon who went on to develop a method to control gravity, which was experimentally proven in 1994. I had the honor and privilege to spend time with him in a private meeting around 2004 in Corvallis, Oregon and he shared many insights with me were simply mind-blowing. He was always in the back of my mind and I lost touch with him and unfortunately, he passed away in 2012. Thankfully, I was able to get in contact with his son David Alzofon who agreed to present at the conference and it has been an interesting journey ever since. Read this now and get your hands on a copy while you can: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: *GRAVITY25* In 1994, Dr. Alzofon experimentally proved that his predictions based on his Unified Field Theory were correct and *he was able to reduce the weight of aluminum by 80%!!!* We're talking about someone who was a physicist at Lockheed and Boeing so the quality of the material is not some home-brewed method with a bunch of hype - you're getting the first ever disclosure that is meant for the general public. The presentation is subtitled "with present technology" because it can be done with equipment that is readily available and is not some far off future fantasy. If you want to know of a path on controlling gravity, which cancels inertia and opens the door possibly to some unspoken of free energy possibilities, /embrace this * RARE * and priceless gift/! Read this now and get your hands on a copy while you can: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 Coupon for 25% off - use this in the shopping cart: *GRAVITY25* Sincerely, Emediapress.com *2018 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS RELEASED* *IMPORTANT*: After completing payment in the shopping cart, click the OK button and scroll down and click the *GREEN* button to access the download. Details are here: http://emediapress.com/download-help/ This is INSTANT ACCESS - you do not need to wait for an email to come with download instructions - you're already there. *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *EPD25* - ERIC DOLLARD - /HISTORY, THEORY & PRACTICE OF THE ELECTRICAL UTILITY SYSTEM/: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115 *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *WATER25* - DR. GERALD POLLACK - /FOURTH PHASE OF WATER, BEYOND LIQUID, SOLID & VAPOR/: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=116 *25% DISCOUNT COUPON*: *GRAVITY25* - DAVID ALZOFON - GRAVITY CONTROL WITH PRESENT TECHNOLOGY: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=117 POB 10029 Spokane WA 99209 USA When you read the above document, you will see a spacecraft OTC which stands for Otis T. Carr. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t67876ch95M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haurcUcDiiA http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed). When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder! Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame. See: Super light! *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?* *By:Dr. John Mileweski*** *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. * *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**. There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not light? * *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity in light as well ! * *I will now explain and give you more detail. * *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of years. It has been given different names by different cultures for thousands of years. * *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception know it is real. * *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by Nikola Tesla <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and it is SuperLight. * *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} * *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. * *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of light squared !** 10^20 meters per second, or 10 billion times faster than light <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. * *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher energy density. * *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?" Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes through everything as though the substance was nearly completely transparent (like glass). * *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be given later. * *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?*** *It comes out of black holes !*** *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the analogy for SuperLight. * *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. * *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its energy in the form of light. * *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it therefore, can easily escape._{7} * *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. * *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE*** *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our bodies and produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special forms of matter are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the various fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There are also, believed to be organic molecules in some body fluids, that are believed to be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small change in energy (e.g. emotions). * *Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals and amplify them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these proteins may have room temperature superconductivity. It is these organized structures in living things, that produce a coherence that has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even coming in contact with them. * *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of millions and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures that have a phase array organization_{3} . I believe that the electronic resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have some resonance with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these energy fields and currents are responsible for the human aura and the energy vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very, very small amount produces more than enough energy to sustain life. Thus, life is produced and sustained by specific forms and amounts of organized matter, and old age and eventual death occurs when too much disorder and disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered structure. At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that all forms of organized matter produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy signature when it reacts with SuperLight. * *There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example, each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement to specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate that energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the herb structure that is appropriate to that area of the body in need. * *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers of SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how they seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without being recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different chemistries and structures, develop different types of energy fields. This explains why different crystals have different effects on different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is to match the required energy with the proper crystal that produces that specific energy need. * *As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed to attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of manufacturing simulated body structures_{4} which will be micro–size phase array assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing. Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate with, the exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that needs an energy boost for healing and regeneration. * *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of years, and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in crystal lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, bringing healing and new growth. * *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This should stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration. * *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly even a magic carpet. * *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I believe these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. * *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY* *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary forces are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field of SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a universal pressure, exerted by **SuperLight as it rains in from infinity, from all directions, onto every object**. Materials are not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as SuperLight travels past and through them. * *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in, or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come into play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures combine to produce the accelerational force we know as gravity. * *This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects facing each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each object experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted to each other ! In reality, they are being pushed together by the net differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion of the SuperLight radiation. * *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void for each part of solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to the size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its orbit about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few yards in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight, whose wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the electron, will to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it rains through the atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight interacts with the nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass right through the region. * *NUCLEAR FORCE*** *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to that of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus are much closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus is probably in the order of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that holds the nucleus together, must be very strong. * *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density and geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so many interesting ways. * *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and this accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. * *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY*** *(The University Field or Energy Source) * *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying field theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea. SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new, and all aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been covered appears to fit quite well with our current understanding of reality. * *I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal energy force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms of matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe. Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to and interact with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them and our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our vital life force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life energies. * *It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. * *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE*** *As greater understanding of what types of devices <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy, collect it, and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be made for healing and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed) scientific analysis, proof of principle and localized experiments. In the future, I envision massive devices to be used as direct energy converters. This development will have a significant effect on reducing world pollution associated with most other energy producing systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *SUMMARY*** *There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms: * *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C. (10^10 meters per sec.) * *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. * *These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following statements; * *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY*** *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with coherent structures in the body. * *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction with SuperLight. * *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. * *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher concentrations of SuperLight. * *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands. * *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy*** *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all matter and energy causing all forces. * *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) * *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic field. * *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. * *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is a slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the galaxy.) * *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as one approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight radiating out of the black hole. * *7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly less at the edge of the Universe. * *8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming massive and gobbling up the whole universe. * *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. * *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight, which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then, the Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because any force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was nothing to hold matter back. * *SuperLight And Space Travel*** *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) * *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus permitting real deep space travel. * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ** *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy *** Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting, You have to have a very high volume capacity HVDC (negative) ion generator like the Felici 3,000 watt electrostatic generator. When I was working with Leonard Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion genweration to enhance its proven fire fighting capability! (Super Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube. On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: Norm, Great stuff on the VTA. Always found it suspicious that after the Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all slid into obscurity. We should be using these mirrors for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications but no. Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store... I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control. Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter. Do you think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is required to build a prototype? From the brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source. Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned? Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required? Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin. There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings. I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary? Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build. On 7/25/2018 7:46 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > Just sending out info on Sweet VTA! > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Sweets and space - Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative > charge (What is Heat?) > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:40:47 -0500 > From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]> > To: Toby Grotz <[email protected]> > > > > Toby! Between Jerry Decker and Gunderson at Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I > got a lot of Sweet info. > > Here I will send you the KeelyNet (Decker Files) About 8 files. > Windows ! Open in "Note Pad"! > > > > > > (word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) > Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 > Sponsored by Vangard Sciences > PO BOX 1031 > Mesquite, TX 75150 > > There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS > on duplicating, publishing or distributing the > files on KeelyNet except where noted! > > February 22, 1992 > > SWEET1.ASC > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy Resh. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hello, > > I just received in ASCII form the two papers by Mr. Tom E. > Bearden > which appeared in the Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety > Energy > Conversion Engineering Conference, August 4-9, 1991, Boston, > Massachusetts. They can be found in volume 4 in the section > entitled 'Advanced Energy Concepts'. The titles are : > > "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy" > by Floyd Sweet and Tom E. Bearden (pp. 370-375) > (listed as SWEET1.ASC on KeelyNet) > and > "On a Testable Unification of Electromagnetics, > General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics" > by Tom E. Bearden and Walter Rosenthal (pp. 487-492) > (listed as SWEET2.ASC on KeelyNet) > > Except for the unsupported conjectures dealing with mind, thought > and life, which bring his results almost into the metaphysical > realm, I find these papers to be very intriguing and > compelling. > Thus, with the permission of Mr. Bearden, I am posting them to > sci.physics and alt.sci.physics.new-theories. (I'll start with the > paper "On a Testable Unification of Electromagnetics, General > Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics".) > > As you can see in the "Followup-To:" line, I would like to see > discussion appear in alt.sci.physics.new-theories, since that > is the > most appropriate place for discussion. If your site does not > receive a.s.p.n., then let me know, and I can send you > summaries of > whatever discussion follows (hopefully a lot). Of course, if > your > site doesn't receive a.s.p.n, then ask your sysadmin if it would be > possible to receive it. > > BTW, Mr. Bearden is not (yet) on the net, but he has agreed > to let > me be a go-between, and I'll try to post his comments on > whatever > discussion ensues. I encourage everybody to find Whittaker's two > papers and Maxwell's original treatise on electromagnetic theory > (see the papers for the exact citations) and to read them > carefully. > > I hope you find these papers as intriguing as I have. If nothing > else, it will help you to firm up your foundation of physics. > > > Page 1 > > > > > > Please, let's keep an open, yet critical mind, and let's not > allow > the discussion to develop into a flame war. > > Jon Noring > > (As soon as I have time, I'll post Mr. Bearden's other paper. > They > came to me in Word 5.0 format, so I've had to do some editing). > ==================================================================== > | Jon Noring | [email protected] |"The dogs bark, > but| > | JKN International | IP : 192.100.81.100 | the caravan > moves | > | 1312 Carlton Place| Phone : (510) 294-8153 | caravan moves > on."| > | Livermore,CA 94550| V-Mail: (510) 862-1101 |"Pack your > lunch, | > | | sit in the > bushes,| > | | and > watch." | > ==================================================================== > "If you make $50,000 today, you have the same buying power as the > average coal miner did in 1949, adjusted for taxes and > inflation," > John Sestina, nationally recognized Certified Financial Planner; > quoted in 1987. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > [This paper appeared in the 26th IECEC Conference, as past posts > have mentioned. Posted with the permission of T.E. > Bearden. See > my prior post for more information. J.Noring] > > ON A TESTABLE UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETICS, > GENERAL RELATIVITY, AND QUANTUM MECHANICS > > T. E. Bearden > Association of Distinguished American Scientists > 2311 Big Cove Road > Huntsville, Alabama 35801 > > Walter Rosenthal > 4876 Bethany Lane > Santa Maria, California 93455 > > Abstract > > Unrecognized for what it was, in 1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker (W) > published a fundamental, engineerable theory of > electrogravitation > (EG) in two profound papers. The first (W-1903) > demonstrated a > hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the scalar > potential of > vacuum, and showed how to produce a standing scalar EM potential > wave -- the same wave discovered experimentally four years > earlier > by Nikola Tesla. > > W-1903 is a hidden variable theory that shows how to > deterministically curve the local and/or distant space-time using > EM. > > W-1904 shows that all force field EM can be replaced by > interferometry of two scalar potentials, anticipating the > Aharonov- > Bohm effect by 55 years and extending it to the engineerable > macroscopic world. > > W-1903 shows how to turn EM into G-potential, curve local and/or > distant space-time, and directly engineer the virtual particle > flux > of vacuum. > > > Page 2 > > > > > > W-1904 shows how to turn G-potential and curvature of > space-time > back into force-field EM, even at a distance. The papers > implement > Sakharov's 1968 statement that gravitation is not a fundamental > field of nature, but a conglomerate of other fields. > Separately > applied to electromagnetics (EM), quantum mechanics (QM), and > general relativity (GR), an extended superset of each results. > > The three supersets are Whittaker-unified, so that a testable, > engineerable, unified field theory is generated. EM, QM, and GR > each contained a fundamental error that blocked unification, and > these three errors are explained. The Schroedinger potential can > also be structured and altered, indicating the direct > engineering of > physical quantum change. > > Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this hidden > bidirectional EM > wave structure in the Schroedinger potential, without referencing > Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. The potential for > applying the new approach to explain the nature of mind and > thought, > and providing a laboratory-testable theory for them, is briefly > noted and indicative major references cited. Some of the possible > implications for physics and biology are pointed out. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Electromagnetics Has Foundations Difficulties > > There exists today a small but growing number of scientists who > have > become aware that the presently accepted electromagnetic theory is > seriously flawed. Shortcomings in the theory are readily cited. > (listed as THEORYBE.ASC on KeelyNet) > > For example, in railgun experiments the Lorentz force law has > been > falsified. It was always an approximation, and does not > adequately > approximate at high energies. [ref. 1] > > Also completely contrary to orthodox EM theory, the EM force > fields > are not primary agents at all, but are effects produced in > and on > the physical system by the potentials. As an example, we > cite the > Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, which proves that, even in the total > absence of the force fields, the potentials remain and can > interfere > at a distance to produce real effects in charged particle > systems. > [ref. 2] The AB effect has been proven to the satisfaction > of all > but the most diehard skeptics. [ref. 3] However, its fundamental > impact on the basic notions underlying classical EM theory > continues > to be ignored by all but a handful of scientists. > > These EM shortcomings were not present in the original > quaternion EM > theory by James Clerk Maxwell. [ref. 4] Indeed, the original > Maxwell theory contains many things that were mistakenly > eliminated > from the abbreviated vector theory formulated primarily by > Heaviside > and Gibbs, and to a lesser extent by Hertz. [ref. 5] Further, these > things that do not exist in conventional EM theory, but that exist > in Maxwell's actual quaternion theory, can be used in > specially > designed equipment, and the operation of that equipment will be > inexplicable by present-day electromagnetic theory. AB-effect > laboratory apparatuses are in fact rigorous demonstrations of such > a statement. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Scalar Electromagnetics > > This can be even further explained and developed experimentally > > Page 3 > > > > > > according to Whittaker's fundamental approach. [ref. 6] > > In a modern sense, in 1903/1904 Whittaker theoretically > showed how > to engineer the scalar potential with a highly dynamic, hidden, > bidirectional EM wave structure, to build hidden EM vacuum engines > that are still unsuspected in modern physics today. Much > of the > content of the fundamental 1959 Aharonov/Bohm paper was > anticipated > in a different manner, and dramatically extended in an > engineerable, > testable fashion, by Whittaker's two papers. At the time, however, > the vector > > | phi(x) > | > | > | > | potential > | > | + + > | + + <---- Organized Local Space-Time > | + + Curvature > | + EM + > | + Substructure + > | + + > | + + > |+_______________________________+_______________________________+ > + + > X --> + EM + > + Substructure + > + + > + + > + + > + + > > Figure 1. A Standing Scalar EM Potential Whittaker Wave. > > interpretation of Maxwell's EM theory was just slowly > beginning to > spread as the adopted model. Also, special and general > relativity > and quantum mechanics had not yet been born. Accordingly, > considering the scientific understanding of the day, it was not > possible for any scientist, even Whittaker himself, to > perceive the > potential future impact these fundamental papers could have on > sciences and technologies not yet even born. Unfortunately, in > later years Whittaker apparently never realized that his two > earlier > papers had such application to the modern unification problem. > > Indeed, up to the time of Whittaker's death, very few scientists > even concerned themselves with the notion of unified fields. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Turning EM Energy Into G-Potential Energy > > In his 1903 paper Whittaker showed that a standing scalar potential > wave can be decomposed into a special set of bidirectional EM > waves > that convolute into a standing scalar potential wave, as shown in > Figure 1. As a corollary, a set of bidirectional EM waves, stress > waves, can be constructed to form a standing scalar potential > wave > in space, as shown in Figure 2. Since all potentials represent > trapped energy density of vacuum, they are gravitational > > [Note, Figure 2 is too complicated to reproduce here in ASCII] > > Page 4 > > > > > > Figure 2. Whittaker's Bidirectional EM Plane Wave Structure. > > in nature. [ref. 7] Because it represents a "standing wave" > whose > magnitude represents the variation in the local energy > density of > the vacuum, the Whittaker scalar potential wave represents a > standing wave of variation in the local curvature of vacuum, > sharply > in contradiction to the assumptions of present > electromagnetics and > general relativity. [ref. 8] It also represents a standing > wave of > the variation of the local gauge. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Turning G-Potential Back to EM > > The very next year, Whittaker's second paper (cited above) showed > how to turn such G-potential wave energy back into EM energy, > even > at a distance, by scalar potential interferometry, > anticipating and > greatly expanding the Aharonov-Bohm effect. > > Indeed, Whittaker's second paper shows that the entire present > force-field electromagnetics can be directly replaced with scalar > potential interferometry. In other words, scalar EM > includes and > extends the present restricted vector subset of Maxwell's > original > theory. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Engineering the Nucleus Directly > > Whittaker's work is even more striking when one realizes that > potentials are actually part of the vacuum itself. They pervade > through the electron shells of an atom, directly reaching the > nucleus and centering on it. > > Gross external changes (gradients; force fields) of the > potentials > interact primarily with the electron shells of the atom. The > stabilized (persistent, gradient-free) potential's primary > interaction is with the atomic nucleus. > > Specifically, the primary interaction between the infolded, > internalized EM bidirectional wave structure of a Whittaker > potential is with the atomic nuclei, rather than with the atom's > electron shells, because in the standing Whittaker potential > wave > the local magnitude of the external potential is not changing. > > Whittaker has in fact shown that there exists an unsuspected, > hidden, internal EM energy exchange channel between nuclei, a > channel where EM energy flows bidirectionally, undetected by > most > modern detectors. > > Unlimited types of Whittaker-structures can be produced in the > laboratory in the form of deterministically structured > potentials; > for the first time, the direct engineering, structuring, and > manipulation of the nuclear potentials themselves, even with > miniscule EM power, is possible. This is a new capability of > exceptional importance and application. > > The Whittaker structuring in effect allows one to produce a > "virtual > grid" to place in the violent virtual particle flux (VPF) > exchange > of the local vacuum with the nucleus. By simply holding the grid > signal constant, gradually the nuclear potential itself will > substructure (activate) with the same structure. > > > Page 5 > > > > > > When the activating ("charging") potential is removed, the > activation of the nucleus will gradually "decay" back to the > normal > structure. Just as one example, the binding energy of an atomic > nucleus is accessible and, theoretically, engineerable. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Whittaker Structuring Confirmed > > Recently Ignatovich has pointed out the hidden bidirectional EM > wave > structure in the Schroedinger potential, without referencing > Whittaker's 1903 discovery of the basic effect. [ref. 9] > > Also, recently modern researchers, working on acoustic > missiles and > with the scalar acoustic wave equation, have "rediscovered" > Whittaker's 1903 infolded bidirectional planar waves inside the > scalar wave. [ref. 10] They do not appear to have yet > recognized > its relevance to their work in electromagnetic missiles. [ref. 11] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > STOCHASTIC ELECTRODYNAMICS > > Whittaker's paper takes on a significant new meaning, however, in > light of Sakharov's 1968 hypothesis that gravitation is not a > primary field, but is produced as a result of interactions of > other > fields. Together with Whittaker's structured potential, this > implies that the gravitational aspects of the nucleus can > also be > electromagnetically engineered. > > As a result of Sakharov's hypothesis, explosive activity in > stochastic electrodynamics (SED) has shown that many > fundamental > parts of physics are "already unified" in terms of > electromagnetics > and gravitation. Evidence continues to accumulate that the > gravitational field may not be a primary field of nature, but a > secondary or residual effect associated with other > non-gravitational > fields. > > [ref. 12] Actually, general relativity has always focused on > energy as the thing which really has gravitation. Trapped energy, > such as mass, is particularly important. But since mass is > essentially trapped EM energy, relativity has essentially > assumed > Sakharov's hypothesis anyway, without stating it so explicitly. > > Further, GR considers "the" G-potential as a conglomerate of > other > things. [ref. 13] It follows that the gradient of that > conglomerate > yields a force field which is also a conglomerate. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > G-Potential is Electromagnetic > > Starting from Sakharov's postulate, to the first order > gravitation > should be due to some aspect of the EM field, since EM is the > strongest and most universal force normally encountered in the > macroscopic world experimentally, and since mass is already > "trapped > EM energy." Thus Sakharov focused attention upon the > zero-point EM > energy fluctuations (ZPF) of vacuum. > > Sakharov conjectured that the Lagrange function of the G-field is > generated by vacuum polarization, due to fermions. [ref. 14] > Akama > et al examined the potential generation of gravity as a > collective > excitation of fermion-antifermion pairs. [ref. 15] > > Haxlacher and Mottolo proved that space-time (ST) curvature can > > Page 6 > > > > > > arise from the quantum fluctuations of pure gauge fields. > [ref. 16] > Zee showed that gravity is generated as a symmetry-breaking > effect > in quantum field theory in which a dynamical scale-invariance > breaking is postulated to take place at energies near the Planck > mass. [ref. 17] > > Amati, Veneziano and Yoshimoto showed that in pre-geometric > models > the Einstein action and metric may be generated from quantum > fluctuations of matter fields. [ref. 18] > > A review of the exploding field was given by Adler, with particular > emphasis on the case of renormalizable field theories with > dynamical > scale-invariance breaking, in which the induced gravitational > effective action is finite and calculable. [ref. 19] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Puthoff's Important Contribution > > Recently Puthoff has applied the Sakharov viewpoint to > significantly > advance the stochastic electrodynamics field. He has > successfully > explained why the atom's orbital electrons do not decay into the > nucleus, even though by conventional EM theory each electron > must > constantly radiate EM energy, since it is constantly > accelerated. > [ref. 20] > > He has also shown that gravitation can indeed be regarded as an > induced effect associated with zero-point EM fluctuations of the > vacuum. [ref. 21] He has also shown a feedback-derivation of the > source of the vacuum EM zero-point energy fluctuations from quantum > fluctuation motion of particles driven by the ZPE. [ref. 22] > Quantum fluctuation motion of particles and vacuum ZPE > fluctuations > are connected by a causal, self-regenerating cosmological > feedback > cycle. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Some Conclusions > > In light of Whittaker's EM structuring of the potential, > there are > several important conclusions to be taken from the > important SED > work since Sakharov's seminal suggestion, as follows: > > (1) In stochastic electrodynamics, very solid theoretical > foundation exists for electrogravitation. > (2) The vacuum EM ZPF may be regarded as causally > connected to > quantum mechanical particle jitter (Zitterbewegung > motion) > and vice versa, though the feedback mechanism > into the > virtual particle flux of vacuum is normally hidden by the > large-scale integration represented by any macroscopic > object or process. > (3) The SED theoretical demonstration of this hidden > mechanism > adds new emphasis on the rather neglected hidden variable > theories. > (4) In some fashion, statistical quantum change is chaotic > rather than random, for it has already been shown by > Puthoff that the vacuum ZPF fluctuations driving > everything > are totally deterministic. It follows that, > theoretically, > hidden Whittaker order already exists in quantum change, > and quantum change must be already chaotic and at > least > partially deterministic. > (5) It follows that there may well exist engineerable > mechanisms that can affect or manipulate quantum change. > > Page 7 > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Whittaker Potentials Are Engineerable > > What Whittaker has described in his 1903 paper is a standing > electrogravitational wave, a standing wave in the local > curvature of > space-time itself, that can readily be constructed experimentally. > > This Whittaker standing potential wave is precisely the new > form of > standing EM wave that Nikola Tesla had experimentally > discovered > being radiated from a thunderstorm four years earlier, on the > night > of July 3-4, 1899, and which he recorded in his Colorado Springs > Notebook on the morning of July 4, 1899. [ref. 23] > > Further, Whittaker's paper directly implies that the hidden > variable > determinism shown by Puthoff to be driving the zero-point EM > fluctuations can also be engineered, both locally and at a > distance. > > In short, Whittaker's 1903 paper shows how to turn > electromagnetics > into gravitational potential. Unknowingly, Whittaker had already > shown the correct engineering way to unify EM and G fields, and > already falsified one of Einstein's later primary GR > assumptions, > that the local space-time is never curved, in a testable > manner, a > decade before Einstein published his theory of general relativity. > > In the very next year, 1904, Whittaker's second paper (orally > presented in 1903) was published. [ref. 24] In this > little-noticed > paper Whittaker shows that all classical force field > electromagnetics can be replaced by scalar EM potentials and > their > interferometry. > > Specifically, any EM force field can be replaced by two scalar > potential fields and scalar interferometry. The combination of > this > paper and the 1903 Mathematische Annalen paper not only > includes the > Aharonov-Bohm effect, but specifies a testable method for > producing > a macroscopic and controlled Aharanov-Bohm effect, even at large > distances. [ref. 25] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > PRESENT ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY IS INCOMPLETE > > As stated above, Maxwell's original EM theory was written in > quaternions, which are an extension to the complex number > theory and > an independent system of mathematics. In short, since the > quaternion is a hypernumber, Maxwell's theory was a hyperspatial > theory, not just the limited three-dimensional subset that was > extracted and expressed by Heaviside and Gibbs in terms of an > abbreviated, incomplete vector mathematics. [ref. 26] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Heaviside and Gibbs Curtailed Maxwell's Theory > > Oliver Heaviside was a brilliant, self-taught genius who never > formally attained a university degree, and whose papers were > printed > in technical magazines rather than scientific journals. When > Maxwell published his Treatise in 1873, Heaviside was just > teaching > himself differential equations. > > Heaviside's imagination was completely seized by Maxwell's > book, and > Maxwell forever became his hero. However, he had great > difficulty > with quaternions and could not completely tolerate them. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Page 8 > > > > > > Electrogravitation Was Discarded > > A puzzled Heaviside abhorred the quaternion, since it linked > together a scalar component and a vector component, or > "apples and > oranges," in his view. He excised the scalar component > of the > quaternion and excluded the hyperspatial characteristics of its > directional components, producing his much more limited vectors. > > To unite magnetics and electromagnetics, the simplest complex > aspect > of the quaternion had to be restored by resorting to ordinary > imaginary numbers. These machinations to the quaternion > theory, > however, discarded its unified field theory aspects. > > In short, Heaviside produced a very practical, highly > restricted > subset that was far easier to engineer, but he threw out > electrogravitation in the process. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hatred of the Potential > > Heaviside hated the potential because he did not truly understand > it. He stated that it was "...mystical and should be murdered > from > the theory." He conditioned generations of physicists and > engineers > to erroneously believe that the potential was just a > mathematical > convenience, and had no actual physical realization. > > Indeed, most electrical physicists and electrical engineers are > still of that erroneous persuasion today, even though the > Aharonov- > Bohm work has long-since falsified such a position, both > theoretically and experimentally. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Quaternion Theory Was Already a Unified EM/G Theory > > The present author has previously pointed out that Maxwell's > quaternion theory was in fact a unified theory of > electromagnetics > and gravitation, and that the scalar component of the > quaternion was > the electrogravitational part. [ref. 27] > > That part was discarded by Heaviside and Gibbs, and so > electrogravitation no longer appears in the electromagnetics > that > resulted from Heaviside's and Gibbs' surgery on Maxwell's > quaternion > theory. Strong experimental evidence for the EG nature of > Whittaker's scalar EM theory is planned for presentation at this > conference. [ref. 28] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ELECTROGRAVITATION ALSO EXCLUDED FROM GENERAL RELATIVITY > > The electrogravitational effect was also erroneously excluded from > Einsteinian general relativity (GR). Einstein unwittingly > narrowed > his general relativity to only a subset of an unrestricted > general > relativity of curved space-time, by excluding local curvature. > This > GR error was an indirect result of the fundamental Heaviside/Gibbs > omission error in classical electromagnetics. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Einstein's Gedankenexperiment > > Unfortunately, Einstein's view of electromagnetics > approximated the > classical Heaviside/Gibbs view. In classical EM theory, the > electrical potentials, which actually were electrogravitational > potentials, were already ignored as having no physical > significance, > > Page 9 > > > > > > and EM was considered mutually exclusive to G. Therefore, Einstein > only considered the weak gravitational force due to the > attraction > of mass, in developing his general relativity theory of > curved > space-time. > > The G-force is far weaker than the E-force; for two > electrons, for > example, the attractive G-force between them is on the order of > only > 10^-42 times as strong as their electrical E-force repulsion. Thus > the G-force is incredibly smaller than the EM force. > > If only the weak G-force is considered for curving space-time, > then > there will never be an observable curvature except in the > immediate > vicinity of a very large mass, such as on the surface of the > sun or > near a star. > > Considering the weak G-force as the agent for curvature, Einstein > reasoned that the laboratory and the > observer/scientist/instrument > would never be on the surface of the sun or near a star. > Therefore, > the local space-time, where the lab and the > scientist/observer and > his instruments are, would never be observably curved. The local > space-time of the observer would always be flat. > > Unfortunately Einstein then overgeneralized his thought > examination, > and he stated one of his fundamental postulates of general > relativity as "The local space-time is always flat." This > is an > erroneous overstatement. > > The postulate should be more correctly stated as follows: "The > local > space-time is always flat, whenever only the weak gravitational > force is used for the agent of curvature, and the observer is not > near a large collection of mass, such as a star." > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Corollary to the Corrected Postulate > > The two statements of the postulate differ fundamentally. > Einstein's overstatement of the postulate does not allow the far > stronger EM force to be used as an agent for local curvature. In > effect, his own postulate excluded electromagnetics from > curvature > unity with gravitation, in his general relativity theory. [ref. 29] > > On the other hand, the corrected statement of the postulate > admits > the following corollary: > > "When a very strong force such as the electromagnetic > force is > used for the agent of curvature, the local space-time > may be > curved, even though the observer is not near a large > collection of mass, such as a star." [ref. 30] > > Regrettably, many of Einstein's modern followers have raised > Einstein's theory to a dogma, and have vigorously enforced his > overstatement of the locally flat space-time. [ref. 31] > > In so doing, general relativity has been erroneously reduced to a > theory that is basically not experimental: > > A priori, if the local space-time is flat, then there is no > local experiment or local apparatus that involves or > yields a > curved space-time where the laboratory, the > instruments, and > the observer are located. > > Page 10 > > > > > > In this fashion the universities have continued to > perpetuate the > exclusion of electrogravitation and its direct space-time > curvature > engineering implications. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > THE CURTAILMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS > > Today, quantum mechanics is our most successful physics > theory. Its > predictions, even the eery prediction of action at a distance, > have > been proven time and time again. However, quantum mechanics > theory > is known to have a formidable foundations difficulty: Try as they > will, quantum physicists cannot find chaos in the theory. The > theory is known to be wrong unless it possesses chaos (hidden > order > inside its statistics), yet the best efforts of quantum > physicists > have failed to find it. [ref. 32] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Chaos Excluded By Inherent Assumption > > Any well-founded mathematical discipline is totally implied by its > foundations postulates, and that is true of quantum > mechanics. If > the best efforts of the ablest physicists of the day cannot find > chaos in the present QM, then one may suspect that the present QM > does not contain chaos (hidden order), but already excludes > it in > some fashion. If that is true, then some present QM postulate, > either explicit or implicit, of QM must be the culprit. > > If so, the "real" QM needed is a superset that has at least two > subsets: one (the missing) subset includes chaos, while the > present > subset excludes chaos. > > So we may suspect that one or more of the postulates of the > present > QM theory is in error or overly restrictive, and must be changed to > allow the missing chaotic subset. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gibbs Statistics Excludes Hidden Order > > Indeed, we may resolve this formidable QM problem quite > simply by > examining the statistics utilized by quantum mechanics. When > QM was > being formulated, scientists simply appropriated and included the > thermodynamic statistics of Willard Gibbs (the same Gibbs who, > together with Heaviside, was responsible for the highly > restricted > vector subset of Maxwell's theory of electromagnetics.). > > Gibbs' thermodynamics statistics was totally based on the > notion of > the random variable. That is, the change (value assumed by the > variable in a specific instance) is not only totally > statistical, it > is also totally random. > > Quantum physicists assumed a postulate of QM as follows: > "Quantum > change is totally statistical." However, because of the Gibbs > statistics, in application they interpreted that postulate in a > much > stronger fashion, as if it had been stated thusly: "Quantum > change > is totally statistical and random." > > The actual postulate and the presently applied interpretation > of it > are in fact two quite different statements, and the > interpretation > is far more restrictive than actually implied by the postulate > itself. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Page 11 > > > > > > The Random Interpretation Is False > > Further, the strong interpretation can readily be falsified. > As an > example, the macroscopic universe is simply a large integration > (collection) of quantum changes. If these component quanta occur > totally randomly, then no integration of them would yield the > ordered, macroscopic world we all live in, because integrated > randomness is still random. Therefore, since the ordered > macroworld > exists, the present QM strong interpretation of its own statistical > quantum change postulate is invalid. > > In addition, if quantum change were totally random, then there > would > never be any possibility, a priori, of engineering it > deterministically. Presently, almost all quantum physicists > believe > that quantum change cannot be engineered, on first principles. > > On the other hand, if hidden order is admitted, there is at least > the possibility of directly engineering physical quantum change > itself. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hidden Variables > > Interestingly, the renowned physicist David Bohm has shown > that a > hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics can actually be > constructed, whereby one could potentially engineer physical > change. > [ref. 33] > > It is well-known that experimental physics does not in any manner > refute hidden variable theories. Because of the historical > attachment of physics to the theory of the random variable, such > contrary notions as chaos (hidden order) and hidden variables have > simply been greeted with suspicion and shuffled aside. The > usual > objection is Occam's razor; a theory must predict something > different, or it is said to be unwarranted. [ref. 34] > > But based on this same form of Occam's overworked razor, the > Whittaker hidden variable approach certainly predicts many > profoundly different engineerable effects and capabilities that > mandate its full examination. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Correction of the Statistical Postulate > > A much better, valid interpretation of the quantum change postulate > is as follows: "Quantum change is statistical, and may contain > hidden order." > > The two interpretations differ sharply. In the new and less > restrictive reinterpretation, one has three cases or subsets of QM > as follows: > > (1) the subset where quantum change contains partial > order, > hence is already chaotic, > (2) the subset where the internal order has vanished, > leaving > the statistics as Gibbs' random variable statistics, and > exhibiting the present quantum mechanics without > chaos, and > (3) the subset where the statistics is totally > deterministic, > but information on the variables is lost. > > > > Page 12 > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Remarks On the New Interpretation > > The new interpretation is consistent with Bohm's hidden > variable > theory, and it is also consistent with the Schroedinger equation, > which in the QM model already propagates the QM states > forward in > time with absolute determinism. > > It is even possible, for example, to deterministically > produce a > Bohm/de Broglie quantum potential, according to a self-targeting > repetitive phase conjugation mechanism advanced by this author. > [ref. 35] > > The new interpretation is not consistent with the Copenhagen > interpretation, which only applies to the present QM subset. > This > can be seen as follows: If quantum change is engineerable by > Whittaker hidden variables, then the inner contents of the > engineered quantum change are known. > > This knowledge applies to the subset where QM change is > engineered > (the new subset), but not to the subset where all variables are > random variables and hence not subject to engineering. > Therefore > the Copenhagen interpretation applies to the random quantum > change > subset, but not to chaotic (partially ordered) quantum change > subset. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > The New Interpretation Is Testable > > Happily, the reinterpretation of the postulate now allows a > sufficient collection of already-chaotic quantum changes to > produce > the well-ordered, macroscopic universe we all live in. > Also, the > new interpretation is testable, and it can be falsified or > verified > in the laboratory. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > THE END RESULT OF ABBREVIATING MAXWELL'S THEORY > > Effect On EM > > In discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, > Heaviside and > Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G portion of Maxwell's > theory that arises when the translational/directional components of > two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar > resultant > remains and infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a > function of oppositive directional/translational components. > > In the infolding of EM energy inside a scalar potential, a > structured scalar potential results, almost precisely as later > shown > by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific community. The > simple > vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured only that > subset of Maxwell's theory where EM and gravitation are > mutually > exclusive. > > In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and equipment will not > ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or inertial > effects in > materials and equipments. Not a single one of those > Heaviside/Gibbs > equations ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk > Maxwell, > even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation > is universally and erroneously taught in all Western > universities as > Maxwell's theory. > > Page 13 > > > > > > Effect On GR > > As a result of this artificial restriction of Maxwell's > theory, > Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general > relativity, forever preventing the unification of > electromagnetics > and relativity. He also essentially prevented the present > restricted general relativity from ever becoming an > experimental, > engineerable science on the laboratory bench, since a hidden > internalized electromagnetics causing a deterministically > structured > local space-time curvature was excluded. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Effect On QM > > Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/Gibbs externalized > electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell's internalized and > ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a structured scalar > potential. Accordingly, QM maintained its Gibbs statistics of > quantum change, which is non-chaotic a priori. > > Quantum physicists by and largely excluded Bohm's hidden variable > theory, which conceivably could have offered the potential of > engineering quantum change, engineering physical reality itself. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > In Summary > > Each of the three major scientific disciplines missed and > excluded a > subset of its disciplinary area, because it did not have the > scalar > component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further, all of them > completely missed the significance of the Whittaker approach, which > already shows how to apply and engineer the very subsets > they had > excluded. > > What now exist in these areas are three inconsistent disciplines. > Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of its discipline, > which was the unified field part. Ironically, then, present > physicists continue to exert great effort to find the missing > key to > unification of the three disciplines, but find it hopeless, > because > these special subsets are already contradictory to one another, as > is quite well-known to foundations physicists. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > CONCLUSIONS > > Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add > back the > unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each discipline. > > Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to be one > and the > same, as shown in Figure 3. So application of Whittaker's > work to > each one of the three disciplines produces the necessary > superset of > each, and these three supersets are unified in and on the > common > added Whittaker subset. > > > > > > > > > > > Page 14 > > > > > _______________________ > | | > | GENERAL | > | RELATIVITY (GR) | > _____________________|_____________________|_____________________ > | | | | > | QM | APPLY | CLASSICAL | > | (MISSING | WHITTAKER | EM | > | CHAOS) | THEORY | THEORY | > |____________________|_____________________|____________________| > | | > | MIND AND SUBTLE | > | ENERGY | > |_____________________| > > Figure 3. Whittaker Unification of EM, GR, and QM. > > Also, as shown in the figure, one gets an added and unexpected > bonus > of great value: Mind, thought, and life occupy time, and if > time is > treated as a real dimension, then these are real also. Since > fundamental units in which physics is modeled are arbitrary, > one can > even model physics in terms of one unit, time. > > In that case, everything is a time structure. Since even physical > reality can be viewed in this fashion, it is not > unreasonable to > view mind, thought, and life as real; they do after all occupy > time. > > However, since they do not emerge in the normal external > electromagnetics, they must lie within the hidden, internal > electromagnetics (since the photon carries both time and energy, > being a piece of action). > > Without further development, we state that the Whittaker hidden > variable EM approach, in allowing the complete engineering > of the > internal electromagnetics, allows the complete engineering of > mind, > thought, and life. Living systems have utilized the internal EM > Whittaker channel (in and through atomic nuclear potentials and > area > quantum potentials) since the beginning. [ref. 36] > > Finally, the Whittaker unification linkage of the three > disciplines > is testable. It is engineerable. It works. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTES AND REFERENCES > > [1] P. Graneau, Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals, > Nonantum, Massachusetts, Hadronic Press, 1985. See > also P. > Graneau and P.N. Graneau, "Electrodynamic Explosions in > Liquids," Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 46, 1985, p. 468; R. > Azevedo, P. Graneau, P.N. Graneau, and C. Millet, > "Powerful > Water Plasma Explosions," Phys. Lett. Vol. 117, > 1986, p. > 101. > > [2] See Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Significance of > Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory," Phys. > Rev. Second Series, 115(3), Aug. 1, 1959, p. 458-491. > This > paper pointed out the primacy of the potentials. > Instead > of being causative agents, the force fields are > actually > effects generated in and of charged particle systems from > the potentials. This is in complete violation of both > classical electromagnetics and classical dynamics, but it > > Page 15 > > > > > is absolutely required by quantum mechanics. For an > extensive discussion of the Aharonov-Bohm effect and an > extensive list of references, see S. Olariu and I. Iovitzu > Popescu, "The Quantum Effects of Electromagnetic > Fluxes," > Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(2), Apr. 1985. > > [3] See Bertram Schwarzschild, "Currents in normal-metal > rings > exhibit Aharonov-Bohm Effect," Physics Today, 39(1), Jan. > 1986, p. 17-20 for confirmation. > > [4] James Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and > Magnetism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1873. The > third edition is published by Dover, 1954. > > [5] Maxwell's true theory of electromagnetics is contained in > some 200-odd quaternion equations, and is far more > complex > than the gross vector simplification developed by > Heaviside > and Gibbs after Maxwell's death. For a cogent argument > about what might have been discovered much > earlier in > physics if quaternions had not been cast aside, see > James > D. Edmonds, Jr., "Quaternion Quantum Theory: New > Physics or > Number Mysticism?", Am. J. Phys., 42(3), Mar. 1974, p. > 220- > 223. Just how much more powerful was Maxwell's > quaternionic expression of EM theory than was Heaviside's > (i.e., the modern) vector interpretation, was > succinctly > expressed by Josephs as follows: "Hamilton's algebra of > quaternions, unlike Heaviside's algebra of vectors, is not > a mere abbreviated mode of expressing Cartesian > analysis, > but is an independent branch of mathematics with its own > rules of operation and its own special theorems. A > quaternion is, in fact, a generalized or hypercomplex > number..." (H.J. Josephs, "The Heaviside Papers Found at > Paignton in 1957," Electromagnetic Theory by Oliver > Heaviside, Including an account of Heaviside's > unpublished > notes for a fourth volume, and with a foreword by Sir > Edmund Whittaker, Vol. III, Third Edition, Chelsea > Publishing Co., New York, 1971, p. 660.) > > [6] See E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential > Equations > of Mathematical Physics," Math. Ann., Vol. 57, 1903, p. > 333-355; "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic > Field Due > to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar Potential > Functions," > Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. > 367-372. > > [7] In the modern view, it is trapped energy that is > gravitational, mass being viewed as simply such trapped > energy. We point out that Einstein's formula E = > mc^2 > actually is an expression for mass in terms of its > trapped > EM energy. Thus we extend the modern view by stating > that, > to first order, Newtonian gravitational attraction is due > to the attraction of spatially entrapped electromagnetic > energy. Since the electromagnetic scalar potentials > represent just such spatially entrapped EM energy, then > they hold a special significance gravitationally. > > [8] This assertion can be tested. At the nodal points of the > standing potential wave, the rate of flow of time is > normal. At nonzero points along the wave, however, the > local rate of flow of local time varies from normal. > After > a proper-time interval for the observer at the nodal > point, > > Page 16 > > > > > > normal clocks and watches at different non-nodal > points > along the wave will appreciably vary in their time > reading. > Initially synchronized clocks will thus be found to > disagree, if placed in different positions in the > Whittaker > wave and allowed to remain for a test period. In the past, > various inventors have anecdotally demonstrated this > effect. As an example, see David Jones, > Vancouver Sun > Times, Dec. 17, 1977, p. 17. > > [9] V.K. Ignatovich, "The Remarkable Capabilities of > Recursive > Relations," Am. J. Phys., 57(10), Oct. 1989, p. 873-878. > > [10] Richard W. Ziolkowski, "Localized transmission of wave > energy," Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1061, Microwave and Particle > Beam > Sources and Directed Energy Concepts, Jan. 1989, p. > 396-397. > > [11] An acoustic missile is essentially a slug of acoustic > energy > that holds together as it travels, striking and > damaging or > destroying a target. An electromagnetic missile is a slug > of EM energy that holds together as it travels to a target > and strikes it. > > [12] A.D. Sakharov, "Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved > Space > and the Theory of Gravitation," Sov. Phys. Dokl., > Vol. 12, > 1968, p. 1040. See also the related discussion in > Misner, > Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation, 1973, p. 426. > > [13] Note that this assigns an internal structure to a > gravitational potential. > > [14] A.D. Sakharov, Theor. Math. Phys., Vol. 23, 1975, p. 435. > > [15] K. Akama et al, Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. 60, 1978, p. 868. > > [16] B. Hasslacher and E. Mottolo, Phys. Lett., Vol. 95B, > 1980, > p. 237. > > [17] A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 42, 1979, p. 417. > > [18] D. Amati and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett., Vol. 105B, 1981, p. > 358; S. Yoshimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. 78, > 1987, p. > 435. > > [19] S. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 54, 1982, p. 729. > > [20] H.E. Puthoff, "Ground State of Hydrogen as a Zero-Point- > Fluctuation-Determined State," Phys. Rev. D, 35(10), > May 15, > 1987, p. 3266-3269. > > [21] H.E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a Zero-Point-Fluctuation > Force," > Phys. Rev. A., 39(5), Mar. 1, 1989, p. 2333-2342. See > also > H.E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum electromagnetic > Zero-Point > Energy," Phys. Rev. A., 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989, p. > 4857-4862. > Changing the vacuum potential constitutes a fluctuation > directly in and of the zero-point energy of > vacuum, and > hence, by Puthoff's mechanism, it does indeed induce a > gravitational effect. At the level of the vacuum virtual > particle flux exchange with the charged nucleus, producing > > > Page 17 > > > > > > an electromagnetic change also produces a gravitational > change, and vice-versa. > > [22] Puthoff, Phys. Rev. D., 35(10), May 15, 1987, p. 3266-3269. > > [23] Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900, Nolit, > Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1978, p. 61-62. > > [24] E.T. Whittaker, "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic > Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar > Potential > Functions," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, > 1904, p. 367-372. > > [25] The potential for weaponization of the Whittaker work > should > be obvious. > > [26] Toward the end of his life Heaviside lived as a recluse > in a > small garret apartment, and may have returned again to his > struggle with quaternions. In the 1950's handwritten > notes > of a theory of gravitation, written in quaternion > mathematics, were found beneath the floor boards of his > tiny > study. > > [27] T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Original Quaternion Theory Was a > Unified Field Theory of Electromagnetics and > Electrogravitation," Proceedings, International Tesla > Society Symposium, Colorado Springs, Colorado, July > 1988. > See also T.E. Bearden, "Maxwell's Lost Unified Field > Theory > of Electromagnetics and Gravitation," Proceedings, PACE > Third International New Energy Technology Symposium, June > 25-28, 1988 at Maison du Citoyen, Hull (Ottawa), > Canada, > 1988. > > [28] See Floyd Sweet and T.E. Bearden, "Utilizing Scalar > Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy," Proceedings, > this > conference. > > [29] Ironically, Einstein then spent the remainder of his > life, > desperately trying to unify electromagnetics and > gravitation > in his theory of general relativity, never realizing that > his own overstatement of his "flat local space-time" > postulate precluded his success and foredoomed all his > efforts to failure. > > [30] To appreciate just what can actually be done with local > space-time curvature, see E.B. Smetanin, "Electromagnetic > Field in a Space With Curvature - New Solutions," Sov. > Phys. > J., 25(2), Feb. 1982, p. 107-111. > > [31] For a detailed exposition of the scientific suppression > used > to uphold the present GR, written by an inside > scientist of > excellent ability, and one with over 100 published > papers in > the literature, see Rugero Maria Santilli, Ethical > Probe on > Einstein's Followers in the USA: An Insider's View, Alpha > Publishing, POB 82, Newtonville, MA 02160, 1984. > > [32] For a discussion of the missing chaos in quantum > mechanics, > see Robert Pool, "Quantum Chaos: Enigma Wrapped in a > Mystery," Science, 243(4893), Feb. 17, 1989, p. 893-895. > > Page 18 > > > > > > For a more technical discussion see P.V. Elyutin, "The > Quantum Chaos Problem," Sov. Phys. Usp. 31(7), July 1988, > p. 597-622. > > [33] For an entry point into the literature of hidden variable > theory, see Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David > Bohm, B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat, Eds., > Routledge & > Kegan Paul, London & New York, 1987. > > [34] However, even if it predicts something new and is > warranted, > it still may not be adopted. An example is the > continuing > reluctance of physicists to reformulate EM theory, > stressing > the primacy of the potential and the fact that not the > force > field but only the potential for the force field exists in > the vacuum. Even more so, it is well-known that > detection > is actually binary, and we throw away precisely half of > almost every detection our instruments make. C.f. Richard > Kidd et al, "Evolution of the Modern Photon," Am. J. Phys., > 57(1), Jan. 1989, p. 27-35. Generally in every > electromagnetic interaction of our instruments, two > photons > are produced: one a time-forward photon, and the other a > time-reversed photon. Our detectors essentially > measure the > time-forward photon half, not the time-reversed photon > (antiphoton) half. The antiphoton half produces a slight > recoil force (Newton's third law reaction force) in the > mass > (nuclei) of the instrument, which we ignore. > Also, we > continue to ignore the evidence that the photon and > antiphoton are not identical. In a pumped phase > conjugate > mirror, for example, the emission of a normal photon from > the mirror material results in a recoil of the > mirror; the > emission of an antiphoton by the mirror material, > however, > does not result in recoil of the mirror. Physics is still > not consistent, as is well-known to foundations > researchers, > but this fact is generally not accented to university > students. > > [35] Bearden, Gravitobiology, Tesla Book Co., 1991, p. 33-36. > The mechanism was previously advanced in several > miscellaneous papers and in private correspondence. > > [36] See Bearden, Gravitobiology, Tesla Book Co., for > additional > development of biological effects and mechanisms of > scalar > EM. > ******************* > End of paper > ******************* > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > If you have comments or other information relating to such topics > as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send > to the > Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. > Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. > > Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson > Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > If we can be of service, you may contact > Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Page 19 > > > > > > On 7/25/2018 6:48 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >> Norm, >> >> That looks familiar. Where is it from? Was that an early Bearden >> paper? I have two file cabinets and book cases full of stuff like >> that that are between the garage and the basement. At the current >> rate it will be another year until I’m organized again. >> >> Sparky gave me an equation about the permittivity of space and told >> me “don’t tell anyone about that”. Its in one of my notebooks from >> the ’90’s. Might find it during a winter time review of paperwork. >> Too much to so now in the summer in this house and a rental house we >> picked up earlier this year after our son lost his mind and disappeared. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Toby >> >> >> Toby Grotz >> 608-606-5370 >> In the future, >> We will sit on our front porches with family, friends and neighbors, >> Singing and playing acoustic music, >> until the stars shine down upon us, undimmed by the fires of fossil >> fuels. >> >>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> <nppckhgeghphmkjo.png> >>> >>> >>> >>> Toby ! Here is next page. I sent the attachment with the whole >>> Sparky Sweet paper! >>> >>> On 7/24/2018 9:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>> Norm, >>>> >>>> On that Nature od space, It cuts off at the end. Seems there >>>> should be a page 2 after the ….. “only real space, the"….???" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Toby Grotz >>>> 608-606-5370 >>>> In the future, >>>> We will sit on our front porches with family, friends and neighbors, >>>> Singing and playing acoustic music, >>>> until the stars shine down upon us, undimmed by the fires of fossil >>>> fuels. >>>> >>>>> On Jul 23, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <habdfmegacnlohpb.png> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/23/2018 11:08 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and >>>>>> became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics >>>>>> (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets >>>>>> of all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the >>>>>> mixing, molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite >>>>>> magnets. EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the >>>>>> manufacturing process with a strontium substitute. The barium >>>>>> magnets became available from Brazil and China. Back when I >>>>>> visited with Don Martin and got the dimensions of Sparky's >>>>>> magnets I found them at Edmund Scientific so bought the exact >>>>>> same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping sown all the main frame (IBM) >>>>>> computers in the DFW area and found that the early versions of >>>>>> the big hard drives had the barium magnets which Joel and I used >>>>>> in the MRA (Mini Sweet). >>>>>> >>>>>> <pommgidpifdmpbjn.jpg> >>>>>> >>>>>> <abjopbhbpapmilnb.jpg> >>>>>> >>>>>> <ciecjnijpplnkoln.jpg> >>>>>> >>>>>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear >>>>>> servos in the read write heads. >>>>>> >>>>>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold >>>>>> electrical output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) >>>>>> I realized that much more had to be learned about this aspect of >>>>>> research. I know you were involved to some extent. >>>>>> >>>>>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words! >>>>>> >>>>>> Before I got all bogged down with my Hydrogen Production Process >>>>>> and building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I >>>>>> had formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite >>>>>> magnet to be made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype >>>>>> magnets built. >>>>>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, >>>>>> I accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet >>>>>> Project. I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still >>>>>> yet to be realized! Lol >>>>>> Norm >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote: >>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lots of stuff here. I have been busy so need to back and review >>>>>>> all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite. Sparky sweet said the >>>>>>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite. Most ceramic magnets >>>>>>> of the size he was using are strontium ferrite. To tell the >>>>>>> difference I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter. One >>>>>>> conducts, the other doesn’t. I forget which way it is. >>>>>>> Somewhere in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his >>>>>>> magnets. I’m still unpackingand organizing after many, many >>>>>>> moves so it will be awhile before I find it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Toby >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is >>>>>>>> Heat?) >>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700 >>>>>>>> From: [email protected][EVGRAY]<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting theory Norm, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most >>>>>>>> other people, I read your patent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference >>>>>>>> is but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or >>>>>>>> at least a neutron missing. Very interesting what happens with >>>>>>>> a Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really >>>>>>>> seems to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think >>>>>>>> proton electricity is a different animal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so >>>>>>>> maybe the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it >>>>>>>> has no neutron and would only need a proton to gather an >>>>>>>> electron. If it shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to >>>>>>>> dimensional tuning. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so >>>>>>>> we do agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain >>>>>>>> forming in a similar way. When we have these weather systems >>>>>>>> starting on the west cost and dumping billions of gallons all >>>>>>>> across the country more than the clouds could ever hold. As >>>>>>>> the high and lower clouds commingle I thing they convert >>>>>>>> nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly >>>>>>>> without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and >>>>>>>> then fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge >>>>>>>> from a serious influence machine for the neutral spike. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday. Also >>>>>>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the >>>>>>>> Protium state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea >>>>>>>> too. I think there are some deep truths in William Lynes >>>>>>>> writings even if some of the whys and wherefores may be >>>>>>>> misinterpreted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to >>>>>>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic >>>>>>>> alignments and restructuring. I think Barrium Ferrite might be >>>>>>>> piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems >>>>>>>> to be a very good insulator and something that can fraction >>>>>>>> electrons from the B field. I imagine you played with this >>>>>>>> stuff quite a bit during your MRA design and likely noticed >>>>>>>> some interesting aspects of the material. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape >>>>>>>> heads for a OU lenz free generator. He had a single sine wave >>>>>>>> freq and claimed he could loop generating electricity in this >>>>>>>> way as the tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 >>>>>>>> volts did not seem to get loaded down. Probably just another >>>>>>>> tuned high impedance system. Find it interesting as mag tape >>>>>>>> is mostly barium ferrite particles. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential? Well, here >>>>>>>>> is what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on >>>>>>>>> the spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background >>>>>>>>> from free protons. Please reviewIrving Langmuir >>>>>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir> Atomic >>>>>>>>> Hydrogen. Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is >>>>>>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In >>>>>>>>> the Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond >>>>>>>>> creating monatomic hydrogen (atoms). Same with the Felici >>>>>>>>> Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to >>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses an electron it is >>>>>>>>> immediately replenished by the Zero Point space background. >>>>>>>>> The Felici Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator or >>>>>>>>> PUMP. I had an interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) >>>>>>>>> Shoulders at a New Energy Symposium in Denver. I asked him >>>>>>>>> what type of power supply he used in charging his HVDC >>>>>>>>> capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster experiments. His reply >>>>>>>>> was an Electrostatic Influence Machine (Holtz Machine). He >>>>>>>>> said that if you apply a potential of lets say 100,000 Volts >>>>>>>>> across a capacitor it will charge because you have stressed >>>>>>>>> the dielectric (dielectric displacement). Interesting answer >>>>>>>>> to say the least. The charged capacitors will do work. Same >>>>>>>>> with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do >>>>>>>>> work drawing the energy from the space background. See! >>>>>>>>> Mick, I had to answer my own question for nobody thinks about >>>>>>>>> the perplexing problems. Ha! Ha! Norm >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / >>>>>>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV >>>>>>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator?? I have issued this challenge >>>>>>>>>>> before with no comments. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is >>>>>>>>>>>> Heat? Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot >>>>>>>>>>>> surface = holes due to missing electrons vs cold surface= >>>>>>>>>>>> packing of electrons until all holes are filled (absolute >>>>>>>>>>>> zero conditions) BTW, absolute zero conditions, there is no >>>>>>>>>>>> Browning Motion for there are no holes for electrons to >>>>>>>>>>>> move in the atomic lattice. See: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Kone, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra >>>>>>>>>>>> energy not just from the additional in the coil collapse >>>>>>>>>>>> but from the neutral spike Norm is on to. It is elusive >>>>>>>>>>>> because it requires a solid negative pulse for that huge >>>>>>>>>>>> power return strike just like lighting. With positive >>>>>>>>>>>> lightening there is no return strike. The return mucks up >>>>>>>>>>>> everything silicon so no wonder it has been completely >>>>>>>>>>>> engineered around. It's difficult to get solid negative >>>>>>>>>>>> with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you know >>>>>>>>>>>> the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a >>>>>>>>>>>> coil doesn't cut it but is a good start. This is why Tesla >>>>>>>>>>>> was using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling >>>>>>>>>>>> wave which is what he referred to as radiant. I am sure >>>>>>>>>>>> certain materials also contribute to a more pure charge one >>>>>>>>>>>> way or the other just like with static charges. We just >>>>>>>>>>>> have to learn to use the proper materials in our coils for >>>>>>>>>>>> the expected outcomes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/ >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will >>>>>>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) >>>>>>>>>>>> creating the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative >>>>>>>>>>>> thunderstorm. Moray is interested in the positive lighting >>>>>>>>>>>> producing the sprite events over the storms as photographed >>>>>>>>>>>> by the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot positive >>>>>>>>>>>> charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> By >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010 >>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *[email protected]* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of >>>>>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of >>>>>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of >>>>>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this >>>>>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted >>>>>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My >>>>>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented >>>>>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in >>>>>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most >>>>>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal >>>>>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor >>>>>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist, >>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was >>>>>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that >>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier >>>>>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two >>>>>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not >>>>>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of >>>>>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of >>>>>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then >>>>>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was >>>>>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 >>>>>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor >>>>>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature >>>>>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became >>>>>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In >>>>>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling >>>>>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a >>>>>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced >>>>>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore >>>>>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical >>>>>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high >>>>>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first >>>>>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years >>>>>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a >>>>>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak >>>>>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing >>>>>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current >>>>>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the >>>>>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on >>>>>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of >>>>>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the >>>>>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving >>>>>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly >>>>>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity. >>>>>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in >>>>>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase >>>>>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have >>>>>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided >>>>>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same >>>>>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the >>>>>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would >>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change >>>>>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 >>>>>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on >>>>>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one >>>>>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. >>>>>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with >>>>>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction >>>>>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) >>>>>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the >>>>>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and >>>>>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or >>>>>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the >>>>>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material >>>>>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after >>>>>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The >>>>>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be >>>>>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by >>>>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a >>>>>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change >>>>>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is >>>>>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions >>>>>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an >>>>>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool >>>>>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence >>>>>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at >>>>>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this >>>>>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is >>>>>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to >>>>>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light >>>>>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The >>>>>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now >>>>>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water >>>>>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a >>>>>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the >>>>>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame >>>>>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons >>>>>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic >>>>>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. >>>>>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current >>>>>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy >>>>>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or >>>>>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to >>>>>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the >>>>>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical >>>>>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is >>>>>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level >>>>>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. >>>>>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago >>>>>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in >>>>>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the >>>>>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on >>>>>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly >>>>>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a >>>>>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion >>>>>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little >>>>>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion >>>>>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical >>>>>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember >>>>>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal >>>>>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage >>>>>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will >>>>>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet. >>>>>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line >>>>>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super >>>>>>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the >>>>>>>>>>>> idea of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a >>>>>>>>>>>> super conductive Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the >>>>>>>>>>>> power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very >>>>>>>>>>>> high order! "Hmmmmn"! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> <SPARKY--Nothing.pdf><SPARKY--19872.pdf> >> >
Headers
| Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Sender | [email protected] |
| X-Apparently-To | [email protected] |
| X-Received | (qmail 10635 invoked by uid 102); 26 Jul 2018 21:49:40 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.224.239) by m14.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2018 21:49:40 -0000 |
| X-Received | (qmail 10702 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2018 21:49:40 -0000 |
| X-Received | from unknown (HELO mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.195.149) by mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2018 21:49:40 -0000 |
| X-Original-Return-Path | <[email protected]> |
| X-Received-SPF | none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) |
| X-YMailISG | BpHKz7IWLDt0CgLoOwJl4If__BrLv8dnm96REZydgYiw3RCI tqqFwexjH8HanjCavqN4lnipJiw5fl2yvfS5Jf0foqniLpPAzKL8os0KXhOl 3uXDTEkYCR_yI0JtDQ9pqEk_.RXFoxB3O2ybieBGUAUr0p39_Qatyz9zOFvt dcZ2xMx8.in2Yhko7iEjMa7YRSArJe9JwYl8NdDzogz_UzDEsMNwaxWAF_V9 UkAlTYZHlHkEDnqYknIuc.G2Z6ScSYDnnddmUI73VdJyLi_Q4RLY2D.M_BuW 1cRWGo.1eGuzR0xHdf_wJX8LftenEjtzw9z.AlWpPiXWzunSw3LBxEOqjaaM _6bRp1RTP_UHj9CJ0ZnCfQHUmO6Z_fwDv0TuIXGPnvy6jrnTLOC0exRpzDNH xdc1ohZ8Ss9KNVpAuV2nyXF56SpszTir5wmuLD06t3SwKgSWqGLKEeTgPLxg AQonH79EDa5O9n_JDydEou4TCxIu8Vwze8cJEQQL2rsi3AprP0d4g2JUmOjT OMVuI.y97y9z9c_rpeCOCWBuU5SwoGaPVmDgEFttN0LPJkwPgd1zXmM5Ktsj tmelaYkSpKMhl8swNfBwfIoojqi5ogIAcRH4RVqkhjbv2jUNPgSRu9eIXDyG ZXCze61uw2aidhaAomdcwrv2UJMn2li4R9IjZ9vjxBeHWJrVR94jGcZHEpDO kseizDoJxH649RrWAIA9TR_W.1or3pN7Rsk.Sq51KwefoRmjjAUc1V2gu85W vfsyG3Rk64O34ACzVXNdZXkHW1JQ3FYlNI4lmvrgrNNAhv3c2zic9sloWnIf 7Ph1gEqtwfUa5Fq.OHAy3dVBYaCMHcvA_vnVHTDl9xjupnFQITXm5l2TcV0g pkdKfDnxKpnDvaE2E55yZfBMJf3byQOoTwdhbq7yMMwpzUTHVIFU5VFvRxlg Y2rbEjt.YXi1wRlxMPy4Mq_WtX7ZH_H9k60EZ_AWhEJYUOYxmdl1hTXOTDsS MCz64ygvjKs2vMOjPfAzBzK40tFmCmXlj3kX.PpzcsEXwi82Q2zLHMbBPIj6 azZa3XCdzO0mGbKHrwJFRMwR_yqEt_XBKJNXkXuCh3jmLu.4aiLA6u83VsC_ 0obgmm9wbMRdhNzIZKf2Esolt3rA3RUr07bAoQns.H.RaM3tjyGdqf9cWPcz vFbVOFrZuiDqs0ZxYD4xqIpWn3URnA0odw7KNgEwUtyT0GRGXqI0FI4uw8s7 5n006IvC3ZI67xB.bxCI6Ul2A9fpOEsQMfIhKZx4lR3r36WwnBGy1DbZsELX ogdEmRn45Qy9GRwSqrM555eFgVzn5Jayd8NG6OczId6FPfsilbT6OjyzX9nB ZIQ44WntE1lpM9UffD29oEa8klpIV5STavRG0onvCdJ6ESck2pUPGy2AJ36C 42gJU3G5bL5JPv8s7sH6U6yzQEpfGpakxJZqh_yqnGlmCJ_.z3sfA7nNWG8_ jpWD8CNySGQhAwlkosvlkosW7x9pcEvI9s8M_hWlyGWVQDlSpTACqdgrYlYv hOij6w-- |
| Authentication-Results | mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=att.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=att.net; dkim=pass (ok) |
| X-Received | from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic306-7.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com) (74.6.132.46) by mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:49:39 +0000 |
| X-YMail-OSG | 1o5ncGkVM1lp4o1O68GWollI2xn67kGkiEOezUvM1TW0WHkiAsH5tfQkDyOYEHH 1Ic6Zhb99ojtS3Kn2ke3OSmIgd3Qe8eeP4TMhVt96LJTqnpQTe7Uk9usEy495mJeD0aKzboSjQ1J l8odMwW5Gd4jI8r_f_PbCO3EEho4_kMKjDVjv9AvAWHsFC9fYMtAeaJewK_QQ1MBDwFW_SntLvbz 3gucYC0cS.uJ9PplxU2n6C4uBcFBXgTiGj386XaY5ElbZJAbtMkCg9Xgw_kvlY4H1nTbwk5SEvsz 33.OHvtYkoaF5KNBfbQlh23U_zdnd_f13QmzWC_Z9EsdwzGVLZwZqwOeLBSfRm8aoI9x6M_5KKUX GF3OH0pOTOQnRNq7FQ74D6LWAUdGoQyALWxcMN0jjJSM0RJPEKkI1ywsHh0aXgQBlvK7dkPuyRyJ msiYo3jOWztO22Rr1BqSskSTVB2NFuQr3yJF_3V4cE1N2CJTRIqdGLYudg4kUsvrZum3EBu4KrP3 zTNH9tlRHH1GrNvnzgJmPJrXATad65iYPQslGsu794FpO.fTD3AcThO7MmUTQptB9GvP7opM3Q5k 2SQEz0iXLo30b8PkbeInS9s6vStjvN6In30tS3rY4VZNs0Wn2SMT8.QEZqU1_K1i6TG8qsgUxsdy nO2ktoEB1eQBmbrsqAHLukIOutIS3iHnm82cxiggVzJ2YJiXiQzD00vMalNyfxz5EgOXbFFQx9S_ uvHeo8lVolmbZaHBv8isrqbTffc9h69k2uSxxdrPr3Ks2HutqmSvqHyKA9Q4i7jDDmFwSvwIUHDF zgNWVqiM.qamYBPTVG1ZypBe44XB47VH.738MTtjqhtpEoEHKfWj.cCcl7sFbScyTg0wyc8GBFxO f6LhsCUKRQOMmmeJUYdTa0k_6yXt2Zl4P.C5ivjlJEFBFjHHqyrNSDUA8TrMRYj_XUcgu5171h.5 oGJREriEirq2RRc8V2ZRRmBmA0evhe079zWnlbbSzTsixT56UCeFDtuXF6wFatBmN7jl5f._xXPl ZmB8jtu7d3Q-- |
| X-Received | from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:49:39 +0000 |
| X-Received | from ip70-189-9-73.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.4]) ([70.189.9.73]) by smtp410.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 74436fc119456263de075a497f1446f8; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:49:35 +0000 (UTC) |
| To | Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Pre mbold <[email protected]>, Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, [email protected], joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]> |
| References | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
| Date | Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:49:37 -0500 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <[email protected]> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="------------72D4F8CF45A009A48FD18B4C" |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Originating-IP | 10.201.195.149 |
| Subject | Re: Fwd: Re: Sweets and space - Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?) |
| X-Yahoo-Group-Post | member; u=554418533; y=Sshp2fz2Eom8SIQmYKjDpRQbpjAp42dhj6yo3F0hVgjDOQvuefePMxUo |
| X-Yahoo-Profile | [email protected] |
| From | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |