Body
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonthermal_plasma Tesla made these UV
plasma lamps and were sold by of all stores ,Sears Roebuck back in the
20s & 30s as a medical treatment device. They pop up in antique stores
quite often. (Cold Plasma)
Aerospace
Main article: Magnetohydrodynamic converter
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamic_converter>
See also: Paschen's law <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen%27s_law>
Aerodynamic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodynamics> active flow
control <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_control_%28fluid%29>
solutions involving technological nonthermal weakly ionized plasmas
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29#Fully_vs._partially_%28weakly%29_ionized_gases>
for subsonic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodynamics#Subsonic_flow>,
supersonic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic_speed> and
hypersonic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic_speed> flight
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight> are being studied, as plasma
actuators <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_actuator> in the field
of electrohydrodynamics
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrohydrodynamics>, and as
magnetohydrodynamic converters
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamic_converter> when
magnetic fields are also involved.^[19]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonthermal_plasma#cite_note-Weier-Shatrov-Gerbeth-19>
Studies conducted in wind tunnels
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_tunnel> involve most of the time low
atmospheric pressure
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_pressure> similar to an
altitude <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude> of 20–50 km, typical
of hypersonic flight <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic_flight>,
where the electrical conductivity of air is higher, hence non-thermal
weakly ionized plasmas can be easily produced with a fewer energy
expense. Think of the implications here! Norm
On 7/22/2018 6:38 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Sorry! I hit send and was not finished with my response. (cont)
>
> If you will take the time to read this book by Davson (The only
> writing about the work of Karl Schappeller BTW) it will open your
> thought process as to how the sun really works. The Schappeller engine
> is rather fascinating. See:
>
> http://www.ebook3000.com/The-Physics-of-The-Primary-State-of-Matter--An-Application-Through-The-Primary-Technique_89229.html
>
> http://rexresearch.com/schapp/schapp.htm
>
> http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Stevens.pdf
>
> Smokey! Since you brought up the other possible elements before
> hydrogen in the periodic table, best to review the work of Walter
> Russell's Octave based table of the elements. I bought the entire
> study course from the Institute and thoroughly studied the subject.
> The old saying applies, We do not know all that we do not know!
> Enough said. I have to kind of stick to conventional physics and
> electronic theory on here for we have so many dyed in the wood
> traditionalist , that we draw the ire of same when we venture into our
> real beliefs. Toby is on here and can attest to the focusing dynamo
> experiments as drawn by Walter Russell. See:
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/567242515548916992/?lp=true
>
>
>
> On 7/22/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Thanks You!!!! Smokey for opening the door to my very favorite
>> subject! The energetic vacuum, a seathing sea of aetheric energy.
>> Way back in the 80s, Tom Bearden put me onto the book, The Physics
>> of the Primary State of Matter, Davson 1955 which was in a book store
>> in Boston. I purchased the very rare (autographed copy) for $450
>> and treasure the contents for it goes right to the heart of what you
>> are saying. If you were able to pull down a perfect vacuum in a
>> vessile you would have a concentration of energetic aether.
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2018 8:59 PM, David G Dawson [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Norman,
>>> Quote:
>>> "Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom,
>>> where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic
>>> Generator?? I have issued this challenge before with no comments."
>>>
>>> We have to begin to accept the total facts that there are no such
>>> things as 'electrons' and they cannot exist as 'free electrons' in
>>> space.
>>> This theory comes from the likes of the darlings of the control and
>>> fantasy World of people like Einstein.
>>> The Electron Microscope is a joke and still today, nobody has seen
>>> an 'electron'.
>>>
>>> https://ia802502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf
>>>
>>> See Page 20.
>>>
>>> https://ia800306.us.archive.org/31/items/dashedagainsttherock00colviala/dashedagainsttherock00colviala.pdf
>>>
>>> The attached extract pdf is from William J Colville and his Book
>>> 'Dashed Against The Rocks' 1894 and this is Chapter 4 and talks of
>>> the Ether or 'atomolic substance' and after a Gas he describes
>>> 'Ultra-Gaseous' which we, today, call a Plasma.
>>> Not a single mention of the fantasy word 'electron'.
>>>
>>> We need to begin to look at what is next to the Ether and after the
>>> Gas and that is a Plasma.
>>> What really is a Plasma?
>>> Plasma is excited Ether and what overunity is all about.
>>> You might have your fantasy 'electron' rotating inside the Atom but
>>> once excited and is in free space, becomes a part of the Plasma.
>>> Probably nothing to do with the Hydrogen as you are working inside a
>>> gas filled vacuum and the Ether just loves a vacuum.
>>> Nature abhors a vacuum and has to fill the space with something.
>>> Excited Ether you could probably call 'motivated Ether' ready and
>>> willing to do work.
>>>
>>> So then why do you build a Geometric Translator with Square Root 2
>>> rotating Cones (Flanagan/Constable) for rainmaking and you include
>>> Vacuum Tubes in the design? - to attract the Ether, that's why.
>>> The design is such that the unseen Ether is attracted to the device
>>> through excitation and in the generation of the Plasma you have and
>>> put Ions to work.
>>>
>>> My 'Impulse Discharge' device shows all of this at work where you
>>> have the Spark Gap but you have no arc/spark but an Ion induced
>>> Plasma instead at the gap which is really an excited Ether and this
>>> is all confirmed by Chernetsky/Galkin/Frolov in their 'Self
>>> Generating Discharge'.
>>> As I see it.
>>>
>>> Why is the USA re-opening their Colorado DUMB - because of the fear
>>> of an EMP wiping out all of their solid state electronics which the
>>> smart Russians have chosen not to do and still use Vacuum Tubes in
>>> their military designs as was demonstrated in the Black Sea with the
>>> USS Donald E Cook.
>>> Go back into the 60s and see what 'Operation Fishbowl' was really
>>> all about as a consequence.
>>>
>>> Hope I have made an attempt to answer your question suitably.
>>> Respectfully.
>>>
>>> Smokey
>>>
>>> On 21/07/2018 1:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom,
>>>> where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic
>>>> Generator?? I have issued this challenge before with no comments.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat?
>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes due
>>>>> to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons until
>>>>> all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, absolute zero
>>>>> conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there are no holes for
>>>>> electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>
>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy
>>>>> not just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the
>>>>> neutral spike Norm is on to. It is elusive because it requires a
>>>>> solid negative pulse for that huge power return strike just like
>>>>> lighting. With positive lightening there is no return strike.
>>>>> The return mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it has been
>>>>> completely engineered around. It's difficult to get solid
>>>>> negative with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you know
>>>>> the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a coil
>>>>> doesn't cut it but is a good start. This is why Tesla was using
>>>>> magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave which is what
>>>>> he referred to as radiant. I am sure certain materials also
>>>>> contribute to a more pure charge one way or the other just like
>>>>> with static charges. We just have to learn to use the proper
>>>>> materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will
>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating
>>>>> the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm. Moray
>>>>> is interested in the positive lighting producing the sprite events
>>>>> over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space Station.
>>>>> (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold Negative
>>>>> ionosphere.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>
>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>
>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>
>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>
>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>
>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>
>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>
>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>
>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>
>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>
>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>
>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>
>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>
>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>
>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>
>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>
>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>
>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>
>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>
>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>
>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>
>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>
>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>
>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>
>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>
>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>
>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>
>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>
>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>
>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>
>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>
>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>
>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>
>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>
>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>
>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>
>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>
>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>
>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>
>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>
>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>
>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>
>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>
>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>
>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>
>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>
>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>
>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>
>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>
>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>
>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>
>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>
>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>
>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>
>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>
>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>
>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>
>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>
>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>
>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>
>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>
>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>
>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>
>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>
>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>
>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>
>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>
>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>
>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>
>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>
>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>
>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>
>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>
>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>
>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>
>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>
>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>
>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>
>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>
>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>
>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>
>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>
>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>
>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>
>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>
>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>
>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>
>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>
>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>
>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>
>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>
>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>
>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>
>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>
>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>
>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>
>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>
>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>
>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>
>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>
>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>
>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>
>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>
>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>
>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>
>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>
>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>
>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>
>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>
>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>
>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>
>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>
>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>
>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>
>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>
>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super
>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of
>>>>> using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super conductive
>>>>> Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink"
>>>>> with electron densities of a very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>