Body
Norm,
Usable energy is always a differential so when you say which has more
energy this can be a counter intuitive question. If energy is the
capacity to perform work then I will go the cold route because it can
warm much faster than the warm can cool.
On 7/20/2018 7:37 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat? Which
> has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes due to
> missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons until all
> holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, absolute zero
> conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there are no holes for
> electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>
> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>
> Kone,
>
> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy not
> just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the neutral
> spike Norm is on to. It is elusive because it requires a solid
> negative pulse for that huge power return strike just like lighting.
> With positive lightening there is no return strike. The return mucks
> up everything silicon so no wonder it has been completely engineered
> around. It's difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the
> oscillations provide as you know the counter field so the proper neg
> polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a good start. This
> is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling
> wave which is what he referred to as radiant. I am sure certain
> materials also contribute to a more pure charge one way or the other
> just like with static charges. We just have to learn to use the
> proper materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>
> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>
> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will understand
> the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating the huge amounts
> of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm. Moray is interested in the
> positive lighting producing the sprite events over the storms as
> photographed by the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot
> positive charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.)
>
>
>
>
>
> *What is Heat ?*
>
> * *
>
>
> By
>
> * *
>
> *Norman L. Wootan*
>
> *Battle Creek Farms*
>
> *22825 FM709N*
>
> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>
> *(214)907-0010
> *
>
> *[email protected]*
>
> What is Heat #2
>
>
>
> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>
> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>
> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>
> electrical power around the phenomenon. The reason for this
>
> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>
> from the ambient background via thermal differentials. My
>
> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>
> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>
> electronic cooling devices. Would you believe that most
>
> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>
> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>
> junction. Historically we find that German physicist,
>
> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>
> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>
> electrical energy resulted. Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>
> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>
> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold. It was not
>
> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>
> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>
> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>
> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>
> reversed. These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>
> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>
> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>
> differentials. In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>
> available which revived the electric cooling principles. In
>
> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>
> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>
> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>
> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>
> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>
> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>
> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship. The first
>
> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>
> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas. With a
>
> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>
> current with an attendant voltage was developed. Increasing
>
> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>
> and voltage. About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>
> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>
> the KeelyNet BBS. My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>
> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>
> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>
> thermal energy across the junction. This is a directly
>
> reversible situation based on polarity.
>
> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>
> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>
> change material such as water and refrigerants. We have
>
> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>
> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>
> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>
> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change. Would
>
> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>
> provides an attendant electrical effect. Back in 1840
>
> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>
> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>
> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>
> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>
> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>
> passing through the nozzles. After reading an old (1920 s)
>
> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>
> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>
> not purely mechanical. The atoms of the material lose or
>
> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>
> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>
> transitions between phases. More energy is present after
>
> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>
> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>
> explained. When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>
> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>
> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>
> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>
> totally not understood by modern science. Now my suspicions
>
> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>
> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>
> question of, What is heat? We were told in the school
>
> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>
> of energy. What is the form of this energy? Let us look at
>
> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>
> process. When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>
> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>
> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>
> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot. The
>
> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes. Now
>
> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>
> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>
> net negative state or cold. Heat or cold is based on the
>
> ion relationship in the material. When we apply a flame
>
> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>
> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>
> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>
> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>
> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>
> (ions). Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>
> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>
> how the process works. All phase change processes work the
>
> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>
> processes which we were taught. Everything in chemistry is
>
> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>
> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>
> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>
> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>
> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>
> cooling effects. Now we see Patents issued based on
>
> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>
> cool because it becomes net negative charged. This is a
>
> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>
> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>
> current involved. It is possible to develop this ion
>
> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>
> output from very subtle temperature differentials. Remember
>
> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>
> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>
> as in the Peltier device. I hope that this dialog will
>
> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>
> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>
> of experimentation. Norm
>
>
> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity"
> they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde,
> liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil primary.
> Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of
> a very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
>
>
>
>
> **
>